# data[].attributes.headline
In your opinion is The Great Gatsby a story about lost love or is it more about delusion and failure?

# data[].attributes.subject
In your opinion is The Great Gatsby a story about lost love or is it more about delusion and failure?

# data[].attributes.headline
The ‘lack’ of emotion between Gatsby and Daisy that Fitzgerald admits to in his letters is interesting. Do you think the novel provides enough of a connection between the pair for this to be a truly tragic love story, especially one fit for Hollywood?

# data[].attributes.subject
The ‘lack’ of emotion between Gatsby and Daisy that Fitzgerald admits to in his letters is interesting. Do you think the novel provides enough of a connection between the pair for this to be a truly tragic love story, especially one fit for Hollywood?

# data[].attributes.headline
‘Gatsby has fallen for the wrong girl…that is the "tragedy".’ To what extent do you agree with this statement?

# data[].attributes.subject
‘Gatsby has fallen for the wrong girl…that is the "tragedy".’ To what extent do you agree with this statement?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby

In this course, Professor John McRae (University of Nottingham) explores F. Scott Fitzgerald's 1925 novel, The Great Gatsby. The course begins with a broader introduction to the novel, thinking about the context in which the novel was written and published, its alternative title ('Trimalchio in West Egg'), and introducing some of its key themes - love, loss, wealth, ambition. Each of the following nine sections is dedicated to one of the chapters of the novel, providing close reading and in-depth analysis of the novel's major characters, themes and motifs.

Introduction

This module provides a broad introduction to F. Scott Fitzgerald's Great Gatsby (1925), focusing in particular on the period in which the novel was written and published and the significance of the original title of the novel ('Trimalchio in West Egg') before thinking about some of its key themes - love, loss, wealth and ambition.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Prof. John McRae at Nottingham University discusses Introduction as part of a course on Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby | High-quality, curriculum-linked video lectures for GCSE, A Level and IB, produced by MASSOLIT.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby

In this course, Professor John McRae (University of Nottingham) explores F. Scott Fitzgerald's 1925 novel, The Great Gatsby. The course begins with a broader introduction to the novel, thinking about the context in which the novel was written and published, its alternative title ('Trimalchio in West Egg'), and introducing some of its key themes - love, loss, wealth, ambition. Each of the following nine sections is dedicated to one of the chapters of the novel, providing close reading and in-depth analysis of the novel's major characters, themes and motifs.

Introduction

This module provides a broad introduction to F. Scott Fitzgerald's Great Gatsby (1925), focusing in particular on the period in which the novel was written and published and the significance of the original title of the novel ('Trimalchio in West Egg') before thinking about some of its key themes - love, loss, wealth and ambition.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Prof. John McRae at Nottingham University discusses Introduction as part of a course on Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby | High-quality, curriculum-linked video lectures for GCSE, A Level and IB, produced by MASSOLIT.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby

In this course, Professor John McRae (University of Nottingham) explores F. Scott Fitzgerald's 1925 novel, The Great Gatsby. The course begins with a broader introduction to the novel, thinking about the context in which the novel was written and published, its alternative title ('Trimalchio in West Egg'), and introducing some of its key themes - love, loss, wealth, ambition. Each of the following nine sections is dedicated to one of the chapters of the novel, providing close reading and in-depth analysis of the novel's major characters, themes and motifs.

Introduction

This module provides a broad introduction to F. Scott Fitzgerald's Great Gatsby (1925), focusing in particular on the period in which the novel was written and published and the significance of the original title of the novel ('Trimalchio in West Egg') before thinking about some of its key themes - love, loss, wealth and ambition.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Prof. John McRae at Nottingham University discusses Introduction as part of a course on Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby | High-quality, curriculum-linked video lectures for GCSE, A Level and IB, produced by MASSOLIT.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby

In this course, Professor John McRae (University of Nottingham) explores F. Scott Fitzgerald's 1925 novel, The Great Gatsby. The course begins with a broader introduction to the novel, thinking about the context in which the novel was written and published, its alternative title ('Trimalchio in West Egg'), and introducing some of its key themes - love, loss, wealth, ambition. Each of the following nine sections is dedicated to one of the chapters of the novel, providing close reading and in-depth analysis of the novel's major characters, themes and motifs.

Introduction

This module provides a broad introduction to F. Scott Fitzgerald's Great Gatsby (1925), focusing in particular on the period in which the novel was written and published and the significance of the original title of the novel ('Trimalchio in West Egg') before thinking about some of its key themes - love, loss, wealth and ambition.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Prof. John McRae at Nottingham University discusses Introduction as part of a course on Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby | High-quality, curriculum-linked video lectures for GCSE, A Level and IB, produced by MASSOLIT.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
MASSOLIT - Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby: Introduction | Video lecture by Prof. John McRae, Nottingham University

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Prof. John McRae at Nottingham University discusses Introduction as part of a course on Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby | High-quality, curriculum-linked video lectures for GCSE, A Level and IB, produced by MASSOLIT.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
MASSOLIT - Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby: Introduction | Video lecture by Prof. John McRae, Nottingham University

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Prof. John McRae at Nottingham University discusses Introduction as part of a course on Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby | High-quality, curriculum-linked video lectures for GCSE, A Level and IB, produced by MASSOLIT.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
MASSOLIT - Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby: Introduction | Video lecture by Prof. John McRae, Nottingham University

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Prof. John McRae at Nottingham University discusses Introduction as part of a course on Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby | High-quality, curriculum-linked video lectures for GCSE, A Level and IB, produced by MASSOLIT.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
MASSOLIT - Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby: Introduction | Video lecture by Prof. John McRae, Nottingham University

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Prof. John McRae at Nottingham University discusses Introduction as part of a course on Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby | High-quality, curriculum-linked video lectures for GCSE, A Level and IB, produced by MASSOLIT.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
MASSOLIT - Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby: Introduction | Video lecture by Prof. John McRae, Nottingham University

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Prof. John McRae at Nottingham University discusses Introduction as part of a course on Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby | High-quality, curriculum-linked video lectures for GCSE, A Level and IB, produced by MASSOLIT.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
MASSOLIT - Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby: Introduction | Video lecture by Prof. John McRae, Nottingham University

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Prof. John McRae at Nottingham University discusses Introduction as part of a course on Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby | High-quality, curriculum-linked video lectures for GCSE, A Level and IB, produced by MASSOLIT.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
AQA (A) A-level English Literature Paper 1: The Great Gatsby - PMT

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Summary notes, past papers, character profiles, themes, glossary, flashcards, and exam and essay writing guides for AQA (A) A-level English Literature Paper 1: The Great Gatsby

# data[].attributes.body
Then wear the gold hat, if that will move her;
If you can bounce high, bounce for her too,
Till she cry, ‘Lover, gold-hatted, high-bouncing lover,
I must have you!’

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Great Gatsby and Sonnet 116 (Ivee and Abbie)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Compare how the authors of the two texts present true love

# data[].attributes.headline
Just put your email address in to sign up

# data[].attributes.subject
Just put your email address in to sign up

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Comparing The Great Gatsby with Pre 1900 Poetry: Fun Essays and Quizzes (English Literature) - Knowunity

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
English Literature: Topics ✓ Revision note ✓ 12, 13 Grades ✓ Overview ✓ Tips ✓ Presentations ✓ Exam Prep ✓ Flashcards ✓ Share Content.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Fitzgerald, Gatsby, Shakespeare, Lovelace, Daisy, Wilson, Tom, Contrastingly, Hemingway

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Paper 1 Love Through The Ages - ppt download

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Today’s feedback: It will focus just on Q1 ‘How do the authors of your texts present love as unconditional and permanent?’ – chosen by nearly everyone (DIT task is the other question or vice versa for the small number who chose it) If you did the ‘control’ essay, sorry. Use this feedback and example essay to rewrite and improve your control essay. Resources: Copy of example essay plan Your feedback sheet with your own key notes from the lesson

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
COMPARING THE GREAT GATSBY AND AQA PRE 1900 POETRY

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Share your videos with friends, family, and the world

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Poetry Anthology - poem summaries - Pre-19th-Century Poetry Anthology: Love Through the Ages BY - Studocu

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Share free summaries, lecture notes, exam prep and more!!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
'I married him because I thought he was a gentleman,' she said finally. 'I thought he knew something about breeding, but he wasn't fit to lick my shoe.'

Myrtle Wilson is talking about her husband, George, during a party in Myrtle's apartment in New York City. Myrtle claims that George tricked her into marrying him by pretending to be more wealthy than he was, but Myrtle's friends insist that she loved George. The scene, which reveals Tom's temper to us when he later hits Myrtle, indicates the entanglement of love and money. The particular quote is both satiric and sad, because the Wilsons are so much poorer than anyone else in the novel.

[H]e gave her a string of pearls . . . I was a bridesmaid. . . . She...pulled out the . . . pearls . . . "Take 'em down-stairs and give 'em back to whoever they belong to. Tell 'em all Daisy's change' her mine. Say: 'Daisy's change' her mind!'

Jordan recounts to Nick the story of Daisy's wedding day, when Daisy got drunk and told Jordan that she did not want to marry Tom. Her decision to return the pearls ends up being purely symbolic, however, because she finally does wed Tom for his wealth and high social standing. For the most part, Jordan Baker plays a rather unimportant role in the novel, but in this moment her character becomes important as a window into Daisy's thoughts and motivations. Like Nick, Jordan's role as a character is primarily to observe and narrate the actions of Gatsby, Daisy, and Tom.

He talked a lot about the past, and I gathered that he wanted to recover something, some idea of himself perhaps, that had gone into loving Daisy.

Here, Nick describes Gatsby's behavior after he confesses his desire to marry Daisy in Louisville, where they originally met. The confession takes place in the middle of the novel, when Gatsby and Daisy have embarked on their affair. Nick suggests that Gatsby's obsession with this plan does not come solely out of his love for Daisy in her current form but rather arises from Gatsby's nostalgic investment in how he remembers Daisy and his younger self. The younger Gatsby may have imagined a version of love that transcends money, whereas the older Gatsby recognizes the impossibility of a marriage insulated from the reality of the surrounding world. This idea of a perfect but inaccessible past is a major theme throughout the novel.

Neither of them can stand the person they're married to.... What I say is, why go on living with them if they can't stand them? If I was them I'd get a divorce and get married to each other right away.

During the party at Myrtle's apartment early in the novel, Myrtle's sister Catherine speaks to Nick about Myrtle and Tom's affair. Catherine's romanticizing the affair likely reflects Myrtle's own perspective on the relationship. Myrtle believes that the only reason Tom will not divorce Daisy is because Daisy is Catholic. But we learn that Tom's feelings for Myrtle are far less intense than he has led her to believe and that social pressure prevents him from ever leaving Daisy, who comes from a similar upper-class background.

For a while I lost sight of Jordan Baker, and then in midsummer I found her again . . . . I wasn't actually in love, but I felt a sort of tender curiosity.

As his first party at Gatsby's mansion winds down, Nick describes his growing romantic interest in Jordan Baker. The courtship between Nick and Jordan never takes center stage, but Nick mentions his shifting feelings toward her throughout the novel. Here, his distinction between love and curiosity offers a counterpoint to Daisy and Gatsby's intense relationship, which is more dramatic and romantic than Nick's and Jordan's but also has less connection to reality.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
'I married him because I thought he was a gentleman,' she said finally. 'I thought he knew something about breeding, but he wasn't fit to lick my shoe.' Myrtle Wilson is talking about her husband, George, during a party in Myrtle's apartment in New York City.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
In the middle of a class discussion of F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby some years ago, a student raised his hand and asked, in essence: What are we supposed to make of the scene where Nick Carraway goes off with the gay guy?

And I said, in essence: Wait, what gay guy?

He pointed me to the scene that closes Chapter II. This is the chapter in which Nick accompanies Tom Buchanan and his mistress, Myrtle, to an apartment Tom keeps in Manhattan. Myrtle invites her sister and some neighbors, Mr. and Mrs. McKee, to join them, and they throw a raucous party that ends with Tom breaking Myrtle's nose. Amid the blood and the screaming, Mr. McKee awakens from an alcoholic slumber:

Then Mr. McKee turned and continued on out the door. Taking my hat from the chandelier, I followed.

"Come to lunch some day," he suggested, as we groaned down in the elevator.

"Where?"

"Anywhere?"

"Keep your hands off the lever," snapped the elevator boy.

"I beg your pardon," said Mr. McKee with dignity, "I didn't know I was touching it."

"All right," I agreed. "I'll be glad to."

...I was standing beside his bed and he was sitting up between the sheets, clad in his underwear, with a great portfolio in his hands.

"Beauty and the Beast...Loneliness...Old Grocery Horse...Brook'n Bridge..."

Then I was lying half asleep in the cold lower level of the Pennsylvania Station, staring at the morning Tribune, and waiting for the four o'clock train.

I had, I'm embarrassed to say, never seen that passage before. Except that's not true. I'd read the book half a dozen times since college, and taught it once, but I had somehow missed the fact that the narrator wanders off in a drunken stupor with a stranger and ends up in his bedroom.

Whether my student knew it or not, he was tapping into a strain of scholarly inquiry into the sexual orientation of Nick Carraway that dates back at least to Keath Fraser's 1979 essay "Another Reading of The Great Gatsby." Fraser ultimately equivocated on the question of Nick's sexuality, but in 1992, Edward Wasiolek argued in "The Sexual Drama of Nick and Gatsby" that the gay subtext in Gatsby is crystal clear: "I do not know how one can read the scene in McKee's bedroom in any other way, especially when so many other facts about [Nick's] behavior support such a conclusion."

In the decades since, suggestions that maybe, possibly, there's more to Fitzgerald's narrator than he's letting on have given way to ever more self-assured, even faintly indignant, assertions of Nick's queerness, with titles like The Atlantic's 2013 article "The Great Gatsby Movie Needed to Be More Gay" or BookRiot's 2017 piece "Nick Carraway Is Queer and in Love with Jay Gatsby."

Most queer readings of Gatsby begin with that scene with Mr. McKee and branch out from there to note that Nick's love interest in the novel, Jordan Baker, is an athlete who carries herself "like a young cadet" and is most alluring to Nick when they play tennis and "a faint mustache of perspiration appear[s] on her upper lip." When she and Nick break up at the end of the book, Jordan tells him she had thought he was "an honest, straightforward person," to which he responds, "I'm thirty. I'm five years too old to lie to myself and call it honor"-a line that rings differently if you read Nick as a closeted gay man.

Of course, all of this shapes how we view the relationship between Nick and Gatsby. In a straight reading of the novel, Nick is merely an interested observer who helps facilitate Gatsby's mad dream to rekindle his love affair with Daisy, now unhappily married to Tom Buchanan. That Gatsby, the one taught for generations in high school and college classrooms, is a classic tale about the American Dream and doomed love and the impossibility of turning back time. In that novel, Nick loves Gatsby, the erstwhile James Gatz of North Dakota, for his capacity to dream Jay Gatsby into being and for his willingness to risk it all for the love of a beautiful woman.

In a queer reading of Gatsby, Nick doesn't just love Gatsby, he's in love with him. In some readings, the tragedy is that Gatsby doesn't love him back. In others, Gatsby is as repressed as Nick, each chasing an unavailable woman to avoid admitting what he truly desires. "Nick chooses Jordan for some of the same reasons Gatsby chose Daisy," writes Wasiolek in "The Sexual Drama of Nick and Gatsby." "Daisy is Gatsby's defense against women, and Jordan is Nick's against women."

That last one, I'll admit, is a touch too Freudian for me, but if Nick were gay and in love with Gatsby it sure would clear up some things-such as what exactly Nick sees in Gatsby, a social-climbing fabulist with gangster friends who moves heaven and earth for a woman Nick plainly sees as a ditz. It would also make sense of Nick's emotionally sterile affair with Jordan. And, of course, if Nick is queer, his trip to Mr. McKee's bedroom isn't merely a mysterious interlude in a canonical book, but a secret key that opens the door onto one of America's first great gay novels.

So then, is Nick gay? The short answer is we'll never know. The only person who could say for sure is F. Scott Fitzgerald, and he's been dead since 1940. But it's worth noting that when he wrote Gatsby, Fitzgerald was the golden boy of American letters at a time of near-universal homophobia. Had readers picked up even a whiff of gay subtext in Gatsby, he risked losing everything: his career, his marriage, his reputation, his friends. But no one did see it, and, in fact, as Wasiolek notes, among the thousands of essays and critical studies of one of America's most widely read novels no one noted the gay subtext in the McKee bedroom scene until Fraser wrote about it in 1979.

So, making Nick a closeted gay man makes little emotional or artistic sense unless Fitzgerald was using Nick's sexuality to explore in a deeply coded way his own guilt and shame over his unspoken desires-a theory that runs into the not inconsiderable hurdle that there is zero evidence that Fitzgerald was attracted to men. Yes, his wife Zelda did once accuse him of being in love with Ernest Hemingway, but at the time their marriage was unraveling and she was months from being hospitalized for schizophrenia. (Zelda also despised Hemingway, whom she reportedly saw as "a pansy with hair on his chest." Hemingway, for his part, hated Zelda right back, times approximately a million.)

But here's the thing: If Fitzgerald had wanted to scratch a sexual itch badly enough to make him write coded gay characters into his books, he suffered no shortage of opportunities. For the last decade of his life, he lived apart from Zelda in European resort towns and in Hollywood, where he was surrounded by men living more or less openly gay lives. Yet not one credible story of Fitzgerald having sex with another man has turned up, either in his journals or in the famously gossipy movie colony. Instead, he had a few minor flings with female starlets before settling into stable relationship with gossip columnist Sheilah Graham, who was with him when he died.

But okay, people are complicated. Maybe Fitzgerald had a secret life he was able keep under wraps his entire adult life despite the fact that he was falling-down drunk for much of that time, or perhaps he desired men, but was so disgusted by this need that he never acted upon it. There is, I think, a deeper reason to question a queer reading of The Great Gatsby: It doesn't sound much like a novel F. Scott Fitzgerald, gay or straight, would write.

Fitzgerald was a compulsively autobiographical writer who wrote his flaws into his work, unflinchingly and in plain English. When he drank, his characters drank along with him. When his marriage failed, his characters lost their wives, too. When he had a nervous breakdown, he wrote a searingly honest set of essays called " The Crack-Up" for Esquire. It strains credulity to suggest that if Fitzgerald were gay, he would expiate his guilt and shame by writing a veiled gay love plot nobody would notice for half a century. It's just not how his artistic apparatus worked. As a writer, Fitzgerald wore remarkably few veils. For 20 years, he opened a vein and beauty flowed onto the page.

None of this, of course, proves that Nick isn't gay-that can't be proven one way or the other-but I suspect the queer readings of Nick Carraway say more about the way we read now than they do about Nick or The Great Gatsby. We read with a perpetually queered eye, forever on the hunt for coded language or secret lives in characters. This is not in itself a bad thing. It layers our reading, opening our eyes to stories within stories that we missed before, but it can blind us, too, because once we know the code, we start to think all writers are in on it, when some of them might not be. Just because Fitzgerald wrote a scene that reads to us like a gay tryst doesn't mean that Fitzgerald was gay and trying to send us a message in a bottle. Similarly, the fact that Nick meets a gay man and doesn't run screaming doesn't make Nick gay. Maybe it just means he's tolerant and curious about people, whether they're closeted gay men or bootleggers who want to turn back time.

Let's go back to that scene with Mr. McKee. No writer as attuned to wordplay and symbols as F. Scott Fitzgerald could have written that line about touching the elevator lever before a scene in which two men end up in a bedroom and not meant for a reader to catch the double-entendre. Whatever his sexual persuasion, Fitzgerald wasn't an idiot.

To us, reading with our queered eye, the double-entendre must be a veiled hint that Nick is gay, but that's us now when the closeted gay man has become a stock character in film and literature. Fitzgerald's original readers wouldn't necessarily have come to the same conclusion. The savvier among them might have picked up that Mr. McKee is gay. It's McKee, after all, who invites Nick for lunch and gets accused of touching the lever. It's also McKee who's in bed in his skivvies while Nick stands, outside the bed, listening to McKee drone on about his photo album.

Of course, Nick does follow McKee from the party and accept his lunch invitation, but that's Nick's role in Gatsby: he follows people and agrees to things. Nick's tolerance, his curiosity about people, isn't just some minor character quirk. It's key to Nick's character and central to Fitzgerald's narrative strategy. Over and over, Nick meets bizarre, interesting people and reserves judgment until they reveal themselves to him-and us. It's right there on the first page of the novel, when Nick relates the advice his father gave him about keeping in mind that not everyone has had his advantages. "In consequence," Nick explains, "I'm inclined to reserve all judgments, a habit that has opened up many curious natures to me and also made me the victim of not a few veteran bores."

Thus, when Gatsby's friend, the gangster Meyer Wolfsheim, winds up a story about a mob hit by showing off his cufflinks fashioned from the "finest specimens of human molars," Nick doesn't back slowly out of the room and call the cops. He looks closer at the mobster's cufflinks and exclaims, "Well! That's a very interesting idea." Later, when Gatsby arranges for Nick to set up a date with Daisy, a married woman Gatsby hasn't seen since he was a poor boy about to be sent off to war, Nick doesn't tell Gatsby gently and firmly that he's out of his mind. No, he calls Daisy to set up the date.

This, to my mind, is what a queer reading of Gatsby misses: Nick's tolerance, his willingness to reserve judgment about things his world found frightening or wrong. Yes, it's possible Fitzgerald was using the scene with Mr. McKee to speak in code of his own hidden desires, but more likely it's a scene in which a straight man in 1920s America meets a closeted gay man-and listens to him. Likewise, maybe Nick's love for Gatsby is queer, but more likely it's queer in the nonsexual sense, meaning odd, uncanny. Maybe Nick really is who he says he is: a nice, decent, rather conventional bond salesman from the Midwest who knows he shouldn't admire Jay Gatsby, but does anyway. Maybe he loves Gatsby, not because he wants to have sex with him, but because he wants to understand him, make sense of his queer and improbable dreams.

Michael Bourne is a staff writer for The Millions and a contributing editor for Poets & Writers Magazine. His nonfiction has appeared in The New York Times, The Globe and Mail, The National Post, Salon, and The Economist. His fiction has appeared in Tin House, December, The Southampton Review, and The Cortland Review. His debut novel, Blithedale Canyon, is due out from Regal House in June, 2022

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
I suspect the queer readings of Nick Carraway say more about the way we read now than they do about Nick or The Great Gatsby.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Absent from Thee (a song) english presentation

# data[].attributes.body
Rocco's At An Inn is on the student shared area English/A level

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
BBC Radio 4 - In Our Time Archive: Culture

# data[].attributes.body
Each group/pair will feedback their ideas on their assigned characters/relationships. Note down key quotations and annotations in your copy of the text. We’ll then collate notes to consolidate on the summary sheet.