# data[].attributes.body
Really interesting links to look at but the worksheet might have worked better as async material, then just a making the presentation for the groupwork.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that too little time was given to go through all of the exercises and then do the presentation. The session as a whole was great though and I enjoyed accessing the health data.

# data[].attributes.body
Really interesting content in first lecture, good overview, and introduction to the unit.

# data[].attributes.body
Very interesting and really enjoyed the first couple of lectures

# data[].attributes.body
Make sure the Padlet is working properly in advance.
Play videos to us as a group or ask us to watch in advance instead of all sitting there on different timings and not knowing when to move on.
Keep record of breakout group numbers.

# data[].attributes.body
Be more realistic about what can be achieved in the time given (the practical) as we barely got through any of the questions before rushing the presentation.
Not sure this format for the practical worked very well.
Ask us to do the reading in advance of a practical or base it on the previous weeks learning.
All felt a bit rushed and disjointed, think having time to do all the questions would have been more beneficial than the presentations. Not sure we got a lot from each others slides?

# data[].attributes.body
Enjoyed the first lectures, found it really interesting!

# data[].attributes.body
I agree about watching videos for groupwork. But quite liked watching the YouTube videos during the lecture, then discussing/ feeding back straight away.

# data[].attributes.body
The mini quiz was useful for checking understanding of some key terms and concepts from the lecture.

# data[].attributes.body
Still think it would be better if they played the videos to us as a group to avoid everyone being at different stages.
The afternoon group work session was much better organised and worked better as we had chance to prepare in advance. Think these session may benefit from being longer as there always seems to be lots to discuss. Certainly we didn't discuss everything in our breakout group.
Found the morning sessions and the asynchronous work really good and very interesting. Useful to hear of real world examples of PH in practice from Somerset LA.
Not sure how useful the breakout groups for the person-based approach work was, may have worked better as asynchronous and worked through those exercises instead?
Overall much improved this week

# data[].attributes.body
A weekly Padlet embedded in BB for each week might be useful, for any questions or comments. We had one for this in Stats unit last year.

# data[].attributes.body
I found the reflections document provided for "Living in Poverty" really useful. Sometimes we do exercises, but never spend time reflecting/ recapping/ linking the topic. This was a really useful summary.

# data[].attributes.body
First session was great this morning but this second session was just very rushed and didn't really take much in form the last half hour. I think more time was needed

# data[].attributes.body
AM lecture: allowing us to select our own breakout groups (after showing pre-specified list) seemed to work quite well, although we've never done that before.

# data[].attributes.body
It can be quite difficult managing breakout groups if IT is not playing, but then there is a knock on effect for the group activity. More time specified for group work, or having group work at a different designated time and pre-designated groups on BB (as we did for Research methods and HSPF) might help with this?

# data[].attributes.body
Good idea to record the rest of the Substance Use lecture as Async when time ran out.

# data[].attributes.body
Break out groups in the first section worked well. I enjoyed being in the same group in each discussion.

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe worth having smaller groups in the afternoon session. When there are larger groups less people contribute to the discussion.

# data[].attributes.body
All really interesting so far!

# data[].attributes.body
Really enjoyed the async lecture on ageing; was a good pace and got lots of info into 30 minutes which kept me engaged.

# data[].attributes.body
really enjoyed the lecture, potentially the use of polls etc throughout could have made the session more interactive!

# data[].attributes.body
I found the sub-division of marks allocation useful.

# data[].attributes.body
The screening lectures were really eye-opening.

# data[].attributes.body
The instructions for both assessments were helpful to me. They were explicit on what exactly was being asked.

# data[].attributes.body
It was a very good idea to use practical situations in explaining what global burden of disease is. I enjoyed that.

# data[].attributes.body
The assessments were in good detail and unambiguous. I still feel that personal feedback is somewhat vague and would be better acted on with specific examples.

# data[].attributes.body
By far the most interesting content this far with great facilitators and speakers. Also appreciated the structure of dovetailing asynchronous work the following weeks live stuff. Appreciate the course organiser's efforts to make this unit very engaging and varied as possible on a virtual platform.

# data[].attributes.body
There was a lack of consistency / at times it felt a bit odd that it wasn't the unit leads at the start of each session and then introducing the lecturer for that session. Also it would have been helpful for them to introduce each assignment in the lecture instead of just leave us to notice it and get on with it. Perhaps some Q&A / feedback sessions would be helpful?

# data[].attributes.body
The content was really interesting and I liked that we did a workshop based on each topic the week after the asynchronous work on it.

# data[].attributes.body
Sessions always ran over or there was a lack of time for questions so I think it would be better to allow extra time and build in a break and proper time for questions or have designated Q&A sessions each week as these are valuable learning opportunities missed

# data[].attributes.body
Marks were given in good time and feedback was helpful. The assignments were interesting although I found the word counts extremely low.

# data[].attributes.body
Very well organised and interesting unit.

# data[].attributes.body
I've really enjoyed this unit and its been a good balance I think of some of the principles of PH at the start, and going into specific topics later on. I liked that structure. By way of specific comments, I did find some of the later live sessions were either a bit repetitive of content in the asynch (e.g. screening), or had a tendency to put in a lot of statistics (cancer; sexual health), sometimes repetitively. I appreciate the stats are important, but I think I would have enjoyed more going into some details of specific studies (e.g. in the cancer lecture there was a brief mention of a cool study on lung cancer in Inuit populations - Those sorts of examples from research are really interesting in the live sessions, whereas to get a feel for lots of the stats on prevalence of particular conditions I think is better placed in asynch materials). The CVD content and live lecture was done very well though I thought.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked the way this unit was assessed. Having a large proportion of the mark attributed to the longer essay, but also knowing there was the smaller second assessment to follow, felt about right. The topics that we were able to look at in the assessments (and having a degree of choice) was also great - and I enjoyed having that ability to focus on an area that I was interested in. The feed in from formative to summative also felt useful, and the timing seemed to work pretty well.

# data[].attributes.body
Really appreciated getting a range of speakers from a rang