# data[].attributes.body
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2008/07-542

https://legaldictionary.net/arizona-v-gant/

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/08pdf/07-542.pdf

# data[].attributes.body
Who: Rodney Joseph Gant & Arizona
Where: Tuscan, Arizona
When:

Granted: Feb. 25th, 2008

Argued: Oct 7, 2008

Decided: April 21, 2009

# data[].attributes.body
Rodney Gant was pulled over by an Arizona state police officer for an warrant for driving with a suspended license. After the officers handcuffed Gant and placed him in their squad car, they went on to search his vehicle, finding a handgun and a plastic bag of cocaine.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Gant asked the judge to suppress the evidence found in his vehicle but was denied

2. Charged with possession of a narcotic drug and drug paraphernalia

3. The Supreme Court of Arizona reversed the upheld of Gants motion to suppress and held the search violated the 4th  amendment

4. The Charges on possession of drugs were suppressed

# data[].attributes.headline
Did the case violate 4th Amendment Right

# data[].attributes.subject
Did the case violate 4th Amendment Right

# data[].attributes.body
According to the Supreme Court,  police may search a vehicle only if the arrested person is within the reaching distance of the passenger compartment at the time of the search or reasonable belief is established that crime-related evidence is present in the vehicle. The 4th amendment  allows a person who is being arrested close enough to the car to grab or destroy evidence or weapon inside the care.

# data[].attributes.headline
Did the case violate 4th Amendment Right

# data[].attributes.subject
Did the case violate 4th Amendment Right

# data[].attributes.body
Opinion: Yes, The police officers did violate the 4th Amendment Right because the passenger wasn’t within reaching distance of the compartment. Gant was arrested 12 feet from his car, and was handcuffed and secured in the back of the police car. This gave him or chance to destroy evidence or grab the weapon. Gant was also arrested for a suspended license with gives no evidence or reasonable cause for the Police Officer to search his car. The police officers safety was not violated and gave no reason for them to search the car.

# data[].attributes.headline
Did the case violate 4th Amendment Right

# data[].attributes.subject
Did the case violate 4th Amendment Right

# data[].attributes.body
According to the judge, the search was a direct result of Gant's lawful arrest and therefore an exception to the general Fourth Amendment warrant requirement

# data[].attributes.body
The picture of the supreme court goes along with the case because after Gant was charged, the Supreme Court reversed the upheld of Gants motion to suppress the evidence, and agreed that that 4th amendment was violated

# data[].attributes.body
The picture of the man with handcuffs goes along with this case because Gant was handcuffed and secured in the back of the police car when the police officers searched his car and found the drugs and weapon.

# data[].attributes.body
The picture of the police officer searching the car goes with this case because the Police officers searched his car without a warrant and illegally.