# data[].attributes.body
1. I think that if some of it was taken they would find who was involved and punish them.

2. I agree with the colonists because if they did not do that they would of not shown the British that they were not happy with what the British are doing they showed them that they hated what the British were doing and I like the way they showed them that they were not happy.
3. I think that there were other options such as doing nothing or leaving some or they could argue in court. or more like that.

# data[].attributes.body
i think that if they took the tea instead of destroying it would make the British mad but not as mad bec they would be using the tea without being taxed  instead of not even using it but if they took the tea the british would be able to find the tea more easily. i think that destroying the tea was a good thing to do bec it would show the british that they don't want tea and they dont want to pay the tax.

# data[].attributes.body
 the only other option keep paying taxes.

# data[].attributes.body
If some tea was taken and someone found out later on there would be punishments on the person who took the tea.
I agree dumping the tea was a smart idea because a tax on something most people had an average of 2 cups a day that's crazy.
Really the only other option keep paying taxes and be mad.

# data[].attributes.body
1. If some of the tea was not destroyed they would probably not get punished the ones who kept the tea and the ones who dumped away most of the tea would get punished. Also, if they kept the tea it would probably make more tea instead of making a letter to send it to the people who make the tea. It was also a big sacruelfise because they loved tea and they had it every single day.
2. I agree with the colonist because the tea used to have no taxed, until King George the lll made it a taxed on the tea so you would have to pay the taxed before getting your tea. I would not be the one to dumped all the tea out I would just be in the crowd cheering them on when they were dumping out all of the tea.
3. They were other options, the options were: To not dump out all the tea because that is just wasting so much tea, They could have just sent it back to Britan, they could have just payed the tax instead of dumping it out, the history would have changed if they did not dump out all of that tea, they could have not have payed the taxed just not pay them, they could have not payed for the tea and just have stolen it, and they probably regreted because they all have loved tea.

# data[].attributes.body
1.if they accepted the tea they would have ended up getting taxed
2. I dont agree with them destroying the tea because it was a big waste of tea that someone could have enjoyed drinking the tea and it was a big waste of time for them sailing over if they are just gonna destroy it.
3. i do think they had other options I not sure which options but im sure they could figure something out eventually.

# data[].attributes.body
1. If some people had taken the tea  then there would have still been the tax because the people who took it still would have had to pay because if the redcoats some how found out they lied then they would be in trouble.
`2.Yes, i agree with the colonists because it was wrong for the king to tax the colonists, they are still his people so why do you have to tax them to get money back when you were help your own people.
3. Yes, there was other opinions. One of them was Thomas Hutchinson who knew people were anger about the tax because he still wanted to be loyal to the king and he didn't want the boy cot to happen so he told the people "to unload the ship as usual and even if they refuse to buy the tea that they will tax them".

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think that the difference would have been that they would have gotten in trouble and that the family’s would have gotten a lot of tea to last for a while.
2. I do not agree with the colonists even though it was wrong for the king to tax them. I believe that they could have changed they way they acted because even if they were upset they were kind of wasting a good amount of tea for something they hated.
3. I do believe that there were other options than dumping the tea in the water because they wasted all of it. they could have taken it and not have to get rid of it. Since the colonists were very angry at the time it makes sense that they would have moved so quickly and destroyed it but after that I think that maybe they would have regretted their decision. they could have also maybe tried  to make their own tea and maybe then removed all of it to make sure that when they did it they would have a backup option. The colonists could have done many other things but I think that if they changed what they did then the whole story of what happened could have changed.

# data[].attributes.body
1.It would have made  a difference if some of the tea was taken instead of being destroyed because you have to pay taxes for the tea and if anyone took some of the tea it would be free tea instead  of paying the tax the owners of the tea had to pay.
2. I do agree with the colonist because they were showing the king that taxing  will not stop there rights and that was a good protest if it was not it wouldn't be in history and we would not be learning about it now.
3.There were probably other options, but that's history and we can't change the past so for now I like what they did I think it proved there rights.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Britain would retreat the tea.
2.Yes, I do agree because then the British will be mad and notice they will never make money because they will keep on doing this and they will surrender.
3. the only other option keep paying taxes.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I the tea was taken instead of destroyed they would have been taxed
2.The colonists could of used it for fuel and other resorcis
3.if they kept the tea they would of got taxed by also the revolutionary war woulnt have started

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think that not destroying the tea would make a difference by... If there is a family that can afford it then they could have it and enjoy it.
Also the company that made the tea probably work hard to make it, and that is a lot of tea that they wasted.
2. I do not agree with the colonist to destroy the tea. The thing that I would do is just leave it on the boat and let someone else get it. Also I would be pretty angry because they had just found out that they had to pay for it and they got so much to use but turns out they can't use it until they pay, ( maybe they did not have the money to pay for it.)
3. Where there other option than to throw it overboard into the sea? I think maybe there was. They could have  left it on the ship, shipped it back, if they were sneaky enough they could have gave it to someone else who did not know that the tea was taxed and let them do something about it to get rid of it or use it.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that they could have taken some tea for the people. If they had given it to the people, the tea would not be taxed. I also agree with the colonists because they needed to make an impression on Britain so they would stop taxing them. If they had took the tea they would be smuggling. Also they want to stop being taxed so the need to show Britain that they will not pay the taxes that they impose on the colonies.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The difference it would have made if people took the tea instead of destroying it would be that the king would see how desperate people are for tea.
2. I don't agree with the colonists they shouldn't have destroyed all that tea I get why they destroyed all of it but people could have had some nice tea that day.
3. There were other options that they could have done like steal it and hide it somewhere so they can enjoy it but that would still be breaking the law also they could have just not buy tea instead of dumping it all.

# data[].attributes.body
1. It would have made a difference if they took some of the tea instead of being destroyed.  They could have taken the tea and used it for something else like fuel or other stuff.
2. I don't really agree with the colonists destroying the tea because it was a lot of money for the tea and it was a waste, they could have used it for something else.
3. There were other options. They could have sold the tea to people or drank the tea. They could even store it up and save it for a time where there is not much food and water.

# data[].attributes.body
2. I agree with the colonists because Gorge kept controlling them and it was there time to do the same. Also i think them poring the tea was a way to save money from tea. 1. taking tea instead of destroying they could of put it in a fire to make the fire bigger or took it and hide of it and told gorge they would not give it back unless he stopped making they pay for it.

# data[].attributes.body
1 If the tea was taken instead of throwing in the ocean I think they would of been taxed anyways because if you buy it they won't, let you leave without paying the tax when youre in the store.
2  I do not agree with the colinists destroying the tea.
My first reason why is because there wasting thouasands of pounds or millions of tea when there destroying it.
3 I think that there was 1 option they could of done which was paying the tax instead of wasting all that tea.

# data[].attributes.body
1. If some of the tea was taken, instead of being destroyed, then they would of had to been taxed for taking the tea,  but since they did not take the tea, and just destroyed it instead, they did not have to pay the tax. And if some of the tea was taken then to this day we could have been living without freedom because the Revolutionary War might have never happened.  And the rule called Intolerable Acts may have never happened.
2. I do agree with the colonists destroying the tea because it is not a very fair tax having something you enjoy in your daily life being taxed when before you could get the tea with no tax. And if they ended up trying to steal the tea or something else, then they could have ended up getting punished badly.
3. I don't really believe that there were other options for the colonists, because if there were other options, then I believe they should have tried them too. Who   knows what could of happened with more options?

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think that people would still have to pay tax for the tea because there is some left the buy!!!
2. I agree with them because if the British found it then they will tax it again but they can't tax something that doesn't exist!!!
3. I think there was ONE other option they could give it away!!!

# data[].attributes.body
1. If they did not dump the tea in there harbor then maby the revolutionary war might not of happend.
2. I do agree with the colonists because if they have keeped it then if Great Britain would of found it and they all would be in dager.

3.They could of keeped it but if they did the british would found out and punesh the people how wore in voved and they could die, they could of keeped it and make a fire or they could of done nothing and justed keep paying the taxes.

# data[].attributes.body
1.I think the difference that it would have made if they took the tea was that they would have gotten taxed. Then the revolutionary war might not have happened, and then America would have not gotten their freedom from King George and Great Britain. Then America would not be a free country.
2.I do agree with the colonists destroying the tea.If they had not they would have not gotten their freedom and we would still be controlled by Great Britain. I do think that if their was another option they could have done that but they had no choice unless they were to pay the tax.
3.I think that their were not other options. I think that that was their only option unless they were to pay the unjust tax on the tea and buy it.

# data[].attributes.body
1. If the tea was taken instead of being destroyed, I think they would still be taxed no matter what. I also think lots of people will get angry and have a battle or a war. I dont think it would be great and happy.
2. I do not agree with the colonists destroying the tea. I did not like there reasons and choices why they did. The reasons were not powerful reasons for them destroying the tea. Iget they were mad, but they could've not wasted the tea and use it for something else.
3. Yes I think they had other options instead of destroying the tea. THey could of drank it, or even like hid it somewhere else than destroying it. I did not think the colonists should of destroyed the tea for no powerful reason why they did.

# data[].attributes.body
1. If the tea was taken instead of them destroying it, the revolutionary war would not have began, and America would not be here today.
2.  I do agree with the colonists that  destroyed the tea, because they did it to have independence from Great Britain.
3. I don't think that they had a lot of other options, if they did not destroy the tea, the King would keep taxing their tea.

# data[].attributes.body
1 if some of the people took the tea, the colonists wouldn't be happy because they are probably going to get caught and pay the tea tax so britan will think "oh someone payed that means we should keep the tax"
2 I think trowing the tea into the harbor was a great idea so none could be docked and have to be paid for.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The difference that it would've made is that the colonists would have still been taxed on the tea. Which the revolutionary war might've not happened. Then America wouldn't be a free country.
2. I don't agree with the colonists destroying the tea. But I also don't disagree with their reasons of destroying the tea. It was ridiculous that King George III was making the colonist pay taxes on such things as tea. So in reality the colonists had a right to be mad, and a reason to dup all of the tea in the Boston harbor. What I don't like that they did is dup all the tea in the harbor. It was just a waste of perfectly good tea. They could've used it for better uses than wasting it all.
3. If the colonists were trying to avoid the tax I don't think there was any other way they could've gotten rid of it. Because the second the tea got on the land, the colonists would've gotten taxed.

# data[].attributes.body
(1) If some of the tea was taken, then I would guess that the people who stole it would be arrested if King George 111 found them, or the stolen tea would make King George 111 mad and he would tax the tea to a higher price. (2) I think the colonists made the right choice. They were standing up for not just their rights, but for everyone else's too. (3) I do not think there were other options. If they did not do anything about it, King George 111 would keep taxing their tea. And they could not fight about it, because the only thing that would come out of it would be something bad. For example, getting sent to court for arguing with the king.

# data[].attributes.body
1. If they took the tea they would either drink it,or use it to start a fire.
2. I think that they did the wrong thing and they could have had free tea and not have to pay for it.
3. They could have used the tea for drinking or for starting fires as their other options instead of throwing the tea overboard.

# data[].attributes.body
If some people took the tea they either could drink it.
I think that they did it wrong and they could have had free tea .
If I was a colonist have would take some of the tea to drink.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The difference of taking some of the tea off may have upset the colonists from the protest and maybe even have some side with the British 2. the colonist had great ides with throwing the tea in the water it really supported the cause of the revolution. 3. if I were the colonist on the boat I only would have thrown some in the ocean but with the rest I would have smuggle home to drink and to give to soldiers fighting on the front line.

# data[].attributes.body
I do think the colonists could have destroyed the tea in a more productive way like using it as fire fuel. Also if the colonists took the tea they would still pay the tax and if some were found out they might face jail time.

# data[].attributes.body
1. If the tea was taken instead of being destroyed either america wouldn't exist or the revolution would of happen a lot latter.

2. I agree with the colonists because they didn't do it because they hate tea they did it to came independence from Great Britain.

3. There were two options one was to dump the tea one the other was to pay a unjust tax.

# data[].attributes.body
Think about the following: 1.) What differ

# data[].attributes.body
1 If some people took the tea they either could us it for drinking it or fires.
2 I agree with the colonist throwing the tea even though it was a big waset it was not fair for them.
3 If I was a colonist I would take some of the tea fro fire and to drink.

# data[].attributes.body
1. if the tea was taken then there is a higher chances that the people in the boston tea party would have been caught and punished
2. eh i mean i think that what they did was a little big  but the tea was giving them big taxes so there's that
3. i mean they should have done something less crazy but then again the governor was not listening to them and refused to get rid of the tea so i guess they had to do it themselves

# data[].attributes.body
I mean they could of drink it or sell for money. Also make a fire. No I don't agree with this. They were selling tea for less I would take it not waste it. They could have got good use out of tea and got a good price. Well doing this many got hurt by getting beat by the British Army.

# data[].attributes.body
1 The tea  would have been good for starting fires or just drinking it.
2 I do not agree with the Colonist because they could have used it for either drinking or starting fires to keep warm.
3 I think that they could have sold it for money or could have drank it or.... they could have just brought it to different colonie>

# data[].attributes.body
They would problably use it as weapons, or drink it. I do not agree because it was a waste, and it could have been used as a drink, or a weapon to protect them. And yes there were other options for the tea to be useful.