# data[].attributes.body
thewasnt a good enough warning label, she was not driving as she was in the passengers seat

# data[].attributes.body
after understanding the true facts on the case my views have changed. When the coffee was served it extremely hot without any warning. This injured her and puts Mcdonalds at fault. However coffee is always hot and Stella could've been prepaired for a hot cup of coffee. Therefor both parties are at fault.

# data[].attributes.body
in my opinion i still believe that there isn't a case because coffee is expected to be hot in order to stay fresh. stella shouldnt have put the coffee where she did and by her doing so the spilling of the coffee is her own fault. i still believe that mcdonalds isnt responsible for the burns and shouldnt have had to pay for her injuries.

# data[].attributes.body
my views have changed since lot of what was said was different from the facts.the coffee should not be hotter than 175-195.they didn't giver her a warning the coffee was hot

# data[].attributes.body
My thoughts have changed about the case because after reading the article, I belived that even if it wasn't McDonald's fault for causing Stella Liebeck to spill the coffee, they still have dangerously hot coffee. They should of at least had a warning for the coffee being hot or not make the tempature as hot as it was. McDonald's should at least pay for the damages the coffee has done to her, such as causing third deegree burns, which is the worst deegree of burns.

# data[].attributes.body
My initial feeling about this case was that Stella was in the right because not only was the coffee served at an extremely hot temperature, but McDonalds also did not provide any type of label or warning that the coffee can cause severe third degree burns in the matter of seconds.

# data[].attributes.body
After reading all the facts about the McDonalds VS Liebeck Hot Coffee Case my views have changed. I used to think that Stella had no valid points, given she had no right to sue Mcdonalds for her mistakes. However now with the stable facts, knowing that McDonalds made the coffee even more hotter than usual and when it was served to her their was no proper warning given to Stella.

# data[].attributes.headline
after reading the article i found additional arguments to the case however i still believe that both parties are at fault 

# data[].attributes.subject
after reading the article i found additional arguments to the case however i still believe that both parties are at fault 

# data[].attributes.body
initially i thought Liebeck was responsible for the injury she had gotten. i still believe that it is her own fault that the coffee burned her she decided to open the coffee cup.

# data[].attributes.body
After reviewing the facts my views have not changed. I still agree with Stellas side because it was not her fault that the coffee was over temperature and had no warning label. In addition to that the service was slow making her and other customers late to work.

# data[].attributes.body
after reading i now see that stella has some what of a case with the coffee being hotter than its supposed to be. i still feel that stella is still responsible for her actions tho

# data[].attributes.body
My views on this case remain the same. This is because McDonald's should warn their consumers about how hot the water is and that it can potentially cause burns. McDonald's also calls themselves a fast food restaurant, but the service was slow, which caused Liebeck to put cream and sugar into the coffee inside her car.

# data[].attributes.body
After reading the article, my opinion has changed on the case. I initially believed that Stella did not have a case, but after reviewing the article and the facts it contained I realized that it was not Stellas fault. Stella had not been driving when attempting to add cream and sugar into her coffee and the car had not been in motion.

# data[].attributes.body
stella should have known that coffee is served hot and she shouldnt have put  the coffee close to her body also she knows she was running late for work .

# data[].attributes.body
my views have changed since a lot of what was said is totally different from the facts. coffee should be hot but not hot enough to cause third degree burns in 3 seconds. mcdonalds shouldve been aware of what could happen even if they didnt make anyone spill it and make the coffee less hot since many others besides stella were injured from burns from their coffee

# data[].attributes.body
i still believe that they are both guilty because it is her fault for the coffee spilling but the coffee shouldn't have been that hot that's why i agree with the cases ruling

# data[].attributes.body
in my opinion i think that she still doesnt have a case. hot coffee is supposed to be hot so her putting the coffee where she did was her own fault.

# data[].attributes.body
I still think that Liebeck has a case because a fast food resturant needs to be fasr even if there is many people. Thats why there is many employees that work there. Her coffee being late caused her to put the coffee in between her legs and drive and put the cream and sugar at the same time. Thats why i believe that Liebeck has a case.

# data[].attributes.body
After reading all the true facts about the case my views have not changed because coffee is usually srved hot enough to burn skin if it touches it for 3 seconds. and she should put her coffee in the cup holder not her lap. Also shes is 80 so she shouldn't drink coffee or drive.

# data[].attributes.body
My views have changed since when taking into account the true age of the consumer, this can make the burns more harmful. Also, when given the specific details about the burns, we see more of the actual damage that was done. The mcdonalds is definitely liable.

# data[].attributes.body
my views have not changed. i still agree wit stella liebeck because the coffee was overheated by 30 to 40 degrees causing severe burns to her groin area. there was also no warning telling her how hot the coffee truly was

# data[].attributes.body
Initially i believed that Stella Liebeck was at fault but my views have changed. Mcdonalds was most definitely at fault. There was hundreds of other cases like this which they ignored. mcdonalds also knew for ten years that their coffee could cause severe burns but did not try to change that. They even refused to pay for Liebeck's hospital bills. mcdonalds also did not give any customers a warning that the coffee could cause burns.

# data[].attributes.body
After reading the article I side with Mcdonalds. The lady was not driving at all. She was in a stationary position. Furthermore the lady took off the lid herself and put matters into her own hands. Mcdonalds had a good reason for brewing their coffee very hot. Nevertheless the lady spilled the coffee onto herself. It is nobody but Stella's own fault she spilled the coffee and suffered third degree burns. In addition she did not have to put the coffee between her legs. As a matter of fact she could have used a cup holder. Mcdonalds should not be blamed for something an idiotic consumer did with their product. Therefore I have changed my views and side with Mcdonalds in this case.

# data[].attributes.body
when i first read this case yesterday i didnt think stella had a case but after reviewing more facts from the article i think she did have a right to sue mcdonalds. they served the coffee hotter than it shouldve been served and didnt give her a proper warning. also she wasnt driving when the coffee spilled her grandson was and had pulled over so she can put the cream and sugar

# data[].attributes.body
my views about the case of liebeck v. mcdonalds have changed because i now know more of the facts that i didn't know before. one of them being that she was not driving her car and was in fact parked and in the passenger seat. that changed the entire senario. the coffee though, was still served way too hot and which Mcdonalds should be liable for. the way the hot coffee was spilled it all on Stella's part. initially, i blamed most of it on Mcdonald's, but i now realize it is mostly Stella's fault.

# data[].attributes.body
after reading the case study i feel that mcdonalds is reliable since the coffee made was way over the reasonable amount for a fresh coffee and other customers have also suffered burns from the coffee that was served by the corporation

# data[].attributes.body
After reviewing all the facts within the court case article.

# data[].attributes.body
After reviewing the facts my views have changed, solely because the case exposed more faults of the company. There have been hundreds of other incidents like this one, and the company has not changed anything, holding them responsible for the case.

# data[].attributes.body
In case 1 it included a detailed explanation about the real story that happened to stella when she was in her car. After reading this case my views on the entire case has changed because if stella would have been more careful and actual put the coffee in the cup holder then her severe injuries would have never happened. Also, anther way she could've prevented the coffee spilling on her would have been her pulling over.

# data[].attributes.body
Initially i believed that Stella was in the right and i still believe this, but now provided with more information i can back my initial statement up more. Mcdonalds serve their coffee at an extremely hot temperature which cause third degree burns in the matter on three to seven seconds, now mcdonalds had nor label or warning stating the temperauture or consequences there were in ca

# data[].attributes.body
Before reading the second article I believed that McDonald's was liable for Liebeck's injuries. Now that I have been informed with all the facts this is still my stance. Liebeck was doing nothing out of the ordinary and simply spilled on herself. This caused several medical bills and days she missed out on work. The incident severely hurt Liebeck. Therefore they must pay for the damages. Furthermore McDonalds also admitted that their clients wewre not aware of how hot the coffee was and the results of an incident to one's body.

# data[].attributes.body
When first viewing the case I believed that both parties should've been held accountable but mainly McDonalds as they sold the hot coffee and their service was slow and I believed the injury was Stella's fault as she was driving and spilled it. After reading about the circumstances of the real case I believe McDonalds should've been fully liable as Stella was not the first person to recieve these coffee burns as there are many complaints, their warning label lacked detail, she was not driving and she was instead in the passengers seat, and the coffee was so hot that in a matter of 3 seconds she was burned.

# data[].attributes.body
My views on the case has changed because after reading my article, I feel like Stella LIebeck had a good case since she got servere burns. Even if it wasn't McDonald's fault for causing the spill, they still had coffee at dangerously high tempature, which meant that the coffee gave severe burns, since the article stated that it gave her third-deegree burns