# data[].attributes.body
1a).I like the part of the video how there is affordable living in vienna.1b) Because everywhere in the world housing is often very pricey. 2a) social housing. 2b) The quality of the houses and the price. 3a. The video changed my view on housing. It showed how slums and overcrowding are reduced by better city planning in Vienna, making me see their approach as very effective.

3b. Vienna’s public housing system is better than the U.S. because of different laws and traditions. In the U.S., people must pay full rent, but Austria gives financial help to public housing, which makes a big difference in affordability.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked the part about creative solutions for affordable housing and how it could end the use of slums. I felt that the affordable and high-quality design interested me as it said that the costs were only half of what it would cost in America. As compared to Singapore, America is already seen as cheap for housing. The layouts of the affordable social houses showed balconies and some even pools. What surprised me was the different in prices for the same thing in different countries.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked the creative idea of social housing, this interested me because it could end slums. The idea of living in an affordable house in a city seemed cool because even the poor can experience living in a nice place. Social housing is built for elderly, couples and families.

# data[].attributes.body
1a. I liked the part of the video wherein they went in-depth as to why public housing projects like ones found in Vienna succeeded, whereas those in places like the USA failed.

1b. It was interesting to me because I was wondering the same thing. "Why would such a small, relatively minor nation like Austria be so successful in public housing projects whereas such an economic powerhouse like the USA would fail?"

2a. Personally, I felt that the affordable, high-quality design of Viennese housing struck me as awesome. It's not like Chinese public housing, wherein the quality is very low (tofu dreg), nor is it as a horrid failure as American housing projects. The fact that it's also high-quality struck me as very egalitarian, which is a quality I see as cool.

2b. I felt that the fact it was so high-quality made it stand out. Take the Aspen Seestadt, for example. It is a public housing project built on an old airstrip. It has various provisions, amenities and a SWIMMING POOL. That quality usually would only be found in high-end condominiums, so seeing it in a public housing project is certainly a surprise.

3a. One of the moments that made me change my views on cities and housing is at the end of the video, where they talk about slums and the effects of density of housing that affects the number of slums within a city's grounds. I now strongly feel that Vienna is taking the correct and efficient approach, even though beforehand I was generally lukewarm about public housing.

3b. If you take, lets say, American public housing projects, they pale in comparison to Vienna's. In the video, they chalk it up to differences in laws (notably zoning laws and land property ownership laws), as well as tradition. For example, in the USA you're expected to pay full rent, no questions asked. However, in Austria, they pay stipends and compensation toward public housing shareholders, which really affects things.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked the idea of providing housing to people in Vienna because it is interesting to see that despite the demand,people could get public housing with high qualities at a lower cost.

# data[].attributes.body
What I found interesting was a that there are competitions for architects when it comes to building these types of housing. I think that this is a great way to ensure that you are getting the best as having competitions forces architects to think outside the box.

# data[].attributes.body
1a. I like the part where they showed videos of the affordable housing in Vienna

1b. This part stood out to me as the housing looks very nice and well maintained which i wouldnt have expected

2a. I think the idea of social housing is effective

2b. it stood out to me as social housing is for the middle class and everyone not just people who are wealthy and come from good

3a. The layouts of some of these affordable social housing shows many facilities like communal areas, saunas,gyms,balconys, and pools. It is stated that they are a quarter of the price of what something like this would be in the US which surprised me

3b. it surprises me because i did not think there could be such a major difference in prices for the same types of housing in different countries

# data[].attributes.body
1a.I liked the part where they talked about how competition between housing developers increases the standard of the homes.

1b. I found how competition acted in a positive way intriguing. In Vienna, the competition between developers drives innovation, and affordability and makes the standard of the houses even greater. As I had not considered that, I found it interesting.

2a. I found the collaborative idea in particular especially interesting.

2b. This idea stood out to me as unlike regular housing, collaborative housing allows people to shape their home to the way they want it. I found that interesting as the idea of being able to design your own human is intriguing to me.

3a. The gentrification made me think differently about housing.

3b. I initially thought that old houses had to be demolished for new ones to be built, this idea of gentrification allows a cheaper and better way of creating upgraded houses.

Seeing the effectiveness of this idea, I think now think that more cities should start implementing this idea instead of demolishing buildings.

# data[].attributes.body
The part I liked the most was when they discussed the creative solutions for affordable housing. It was interesting to see how creativity could address such a big issue.

This section interested me because it gave real world examples of how urban areas could be improved to help people, especially those who are struggling financially. The way they turned unused spaces into livable areas was inspiring and it shows how cities can evolve when theres smart planning.

One solution that was effective to me was the idea of creating modular homes. It can not only reduce the cost of construction but also can change the housing as needed.

I was surprised by the discussion on how cities could make better use of rooftops and other unused spaces. I had never considered how much space is wasted in cities, and it made me rethink how cities are designed.

The idea that cities could become more efficient by simply rethinking their current layout was interesting. It made me realisethat the solution to housing shortages might already exist within cities and that it’s only a matter of redesigning the spaces

# data[].attributes.body
the idea of collaborative housing where people help design some of the buildings is interesting as you can play a part if you have an idea , you could help design a multi family housing. this will help give their building a form of lively community. The part that surprised me was that all the buildings were affordable but still well built and sustained with a lot of facilities like libraries, community spaces.

# data[].attributes.body
1a. I liked that the housing is high quality, affordable with a collaborative community design.

1b. The idea of community collaboration in housing design and the affordability

2a. Use of developer competitions

2b. Effectively balances quality, cost and creativity.

3a. The middle class support in Vienna was surprising

3b. Challenges the assumption that governments don’t only help low-income individuals but middle class too

# data[].attributes.body
The idea of designing your own space sounds really fun and creative to me. Having to work with your neighbour to create you living space can help to improve relationships between them. I like how the housing is affordable and and also high quality.

# data[].attributes.body
i liked the idea of affordable social housing. i think it could be effective in ending slums as it allows people who are poorer to be able to stay decent to high quality housing at a affordable rate. i found interesting how competition drove costs down

# data[].attributes.body
1a. I liked where they talked about Vienna’s social housing model, which does not displace residents as their incomes rise and presents a progressive approach to housing policy.

1b. I found the discussion on Vienna's social housing model particularly compelling because it embodies a progressive and inclusive approach to housing policy that addresses affordability and community stability.

2a. Collaborative Housing

2b. The collaborative housing model, where residents actively participate in designing and building their multi-family housing, is particularly compelling.

3a. One moment that surprised me in the discussion about cities and housing is the realisation of how Vienna's approach to social housing contrasts sharply with the U.S. model.

3b. The idea that social housing in Vienna is designed not merely for low-income individuals but as a middle-class subsidy is a paradigm shift. This perspective is often associated with public housing in the U.S., where it is frequently viewed as a last resort for the economically disadvantaged.

# data[].attributes.body
1a) What i like in the video was how people get together and design, and then build their own multi-family homes.

1b) The reason why it interests me is because it focuses on empowering the community. It's not only just affordable housing, but it creates that community feel, missing often in cities. It is an innovative concept for enabling the self to involve oneself directly in shaping one's living space.

2b) What stood out to me was how Vienna continuously focuses in a house-building program and the renovation of other cheap housing. This upgrading the older houses would help to keep it on the same quality with newer developments which differentiates completely the division often felt between older and newer neighborhoods.

3a) What had surprised me was finding out that over 60% of the population of Vienna is housed somehow or another in subsidized housing. It definitely changed my idea of how public or social housing could actually cover a lot of the solutions rather than being given to only very low-income individuals.

# data[].attributes.body
the part of the video i liked the most was when they were talking about the social housing as it would seem cool to live with other people and make new friends it can also reduce the amount of people on the streets. It interests me as you could make new friends and live in the city with an affordable housing. The amenities part seemed cool like the sauna etc , as it could serve as a way from people that live in these apartments to also have somewhat a way to relax especially if they have pools on the rooftop which is cool. I didn’t know that the capital of Austria would be doing this for poorer people which is what made me kinda surprised.

# data[].attributes.body
1a. The part I liked the most in the video was when they showed the affordable apartments in Vienna.

1b. I found this interesting because they mentioned how other countries have tried to adopt similar affordable housing models but haven’t been as successful. It highlights Vienna's unique success.

2a. I found the idea of Vienna’s affordable housing very effective.

2b. What stood out was how the city managed to provide high-quality, affordable apartments on a large scale while keeping rent prices stable.

3a. The video made me think differently about housing.

3b. I was surprised by how Vienna's long-term planning and commitment to affordable housing made such a big impact. It showed how government policies can shape cities for the better.

# data[].attributes.body
The thing I most like about the housing model in Vienna is that it looks at affordability, quality, and community all together. That 62% of its residents living in affordable housing, including public housing, just shows how Vienna is committed to making housing a right rather than a luxury to ensure social stability and promote inclusivity-something quite effective.

It was the developer competition model that caught my interest. It not only made sure that subsidized housing is available at an affordable price but was also well designed, sustainable, and socially diverse. During the process of building this type of housing, high architectural standards and development of community space have been achieved so as to make the living environment both attractive and livable.

I was surprised by the concept of gentle urban renewal: instead of pushing out its residents with gentrification, Vienna renovates its existing public housing to make it competitive with the private market. This really challenged my perception of how cities could evolve without pushing out low-income communities.

Overall, this model made other states/countries reconsider how cities might better balance density, affordability, and amenity. It is better compared to those cities whose housing policies often lead to segregation, poor design, and unaffordability.

# data[].attributes.body
1a. The part I liked the most was when they talked about competitions between architects when it comes to the design of these buildings

1b. I feel that these competitions can make sure that the housing not only looks good, but also makes sure that the building process is affordable. It also surprised me how such good quality houses are affordable

2a. The entire concept of social housing seems really effective

2b. Not only are the houses of good quality, but also go for affordable prices. There are also a wide range of amenities like balconies and swimming pools. Social housing also provides amenities such as water and electricity. In the future, if other countries with housing crisis start this practice hopefully slums might come to an end

3a. What surprised me was the history of public housing

3b. I did not know that they started this project since 1920. I always thought it was more of a modern concept

# data[].attributes.body
I like the idea of social housing, this idea interest me. The nice appearance of the social housing make me surprise because the price of house is affordable but the house seems good quality. Viennese housing has a full range of facilities such as markets and swimming pool. The house also rationalises the use of land, as it is built on an old airfield. And it prevents many people from living in slums. I think it may drive the country's economic development and create a good。 international impression.

# data[].attributes.body
1a+b. I like how they subsidized the social housing. They made it such that people in Vienna could have high quality and yet affordable housing. Stereotypically, I feel like in most parts of the world, if the quality of something is high, the price will also be expensive. Thus, it's interesting how these two contrast each other, breaking this stereotype.

2a. I think the fact that they have a competition between designers is really unique but at the same time effective. This will push up the quality of the design, as the competition will allow developers to think out of the box and also really take into account about factors like safety and accessibility.

2b. The fact that there is a competition between the developers. I believe that whoever thought of this is creative and yet thought thoroughly on how to boost the standard of these social housings. (Thus, from the root/ start of development: Housing Developers)

3a+b.I think just the exterior design of the social housing in Vienna really surprised me. Compared to slums, or other social/ cheap housing, these housings seem to be really well up kept and thought through.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked the part that the housing in Vienna is not just for the people that have weak socio-economic background. I liked that everyone is being cared and nobody is left out. It was cool that some of the housings were made by occupants. It stood out to me because it is rare that the the builders design the housing with occupant's wants. The part that said every company should submit the design to compete surprised me because it show that housing is ensured to be sustainable.

# data[].attributes.body
One part of the video that I liked the most is when they introduced the area in Vienna where most houses are built because it is interesting how the houses in that area looks very modern and affordable at the same time. One solution presented in the video that I think is cool is multi-family housing, because I think it is really effective that people are given the opportunity to work together and design their own apartments. One moment that surprised me is that Vienna's active land policy would mobilize historical land reserves.