# data[].attributes.body
The book, "To Kill a Mocking Bird", by Harper Lee has faced numerous challenges due to it's profane language and portrayal of a white savior narrative. In 2021, the Burbank Unified School District in CA banned it from the district's reading lists due to concerns about the book's use of the N-word and racism portrayal. Similarly, in 2017, the book was removed from the 8th grade curriculum for public schools in Biloxi, Mississippi after complaints about racial slurs.

# data[].attributes.body
Arguments for censoring the book often focus on it's use of racial slurs and it's white savior narrative, which can be offensive to many students. The defense for this center around the role of this book in teaching many fundamental English skills in classrooms. Teachers often use the book to teach foreshadowing, literary devices, and critical thinking skills. Some defenders also argue that the book is a crucial text for understanding historical and social justice issues.

# data[].attributes.body
Personally, I believe that those who want the book to stay in the curriculum have a stronger argument. While I understand the concern about young readers being exposed to explicit language and sensitive topics, the book presents an opportunity to educate the and encourage valuable discussion about race, justice, and empathy. Moreover, the educational value of the book in teaching crucial English skills weighs more than the discomfort that might arise from reading a book about such sensitive topics.

# data[].attributes.body
These challenges typically arose from discomfort and with the book's use of explicit racial language. Some of these challenges aimed to protect the young readers and some trying to remove it for pushing open discussions on complex topics. The First Amendment protections often come into play, with supporters for the book arguing that removing it could amount to censorship and limit intellectual freedom of the reader. Another concern about banning the book is it's educational value.

# data[].attributes.body
I think defending the Bible’s place in education makes sense if it’s approached purely as literature or history. It’s important to maintain the separation of church and state, but completely excluding the Bible overlooks its significant influence on culture, language, and literature. Allowing the Bible for academic study without promoting any religious beliefs creates a balanced approach between education and secularism. This method respects both the book's educational value and the need to keep religious neutrality in public institutions.

# data[].attributes.body
Challenges arise from concerns about keeping a nonreligious environment in public spaces and preventing religious indoctrination. Opponents argue that including the Bible in schools risks violating the separation of church and state. On the other hand, defenders highlight its literary and historical importance, suggesting that it can provide valuable educational context when approached from a neutral perspective. This debate centers on balancing religious neutrality in schools with acknowledging the Bible's cultural significance.

# data[].attributes.body
Arguments for censoring the Holy Bible focus on its promotion of religious beliefs in nonreligious spaces and explicit themes like violence and sexuality. Defenders argue that the Bible is culturally and historically significant, often used in classrooms to study literary devices and historical context. Some suggest using selected excerpts to prevent religious indoctrination while maintaining its educational value. This compromise aims to balance concerns about religious influence in public institutions with the text's academic importance.

# data[].attributes.body
The Holy Bible has faced bans and challenges in public schools and libraries due to its religious content and explicit themes. In 2022, the Holy Bible was challenged in Utah over concerns about its sexual content and violence. Similarly, in Texas, the book faced scrutiny for promoting specific religious beliefs in a public school setting. Both challenges raised concerns about the separation of church and state and the appropriateness of religious texts in public institutions.