# data[].attributes.body
The cartoonist in source A agrees with the teacher. The cartoonist is discouraging people from using ChatGPT by giving a very one-sided view of it. The cartoonist only talks about the negative sides of ChatGPT and discourages people from using ChatGPT. However, in source B, it gives a more balanced view by talking about the positive and negative effects of ChatGPT by telling us how information given by ChatGPT can help improve students' thinking.

# data[].attributes.body
the cartoonist in source a would disagree with the teacher in source b in his views of chat gpt. Source A has a more one sided view on chatgpt while Source B has a more objective view on chatgpt. Source A is a cartoon which tends to overexaggerate issues in order to emphasize their negative stance on chatgpt. in source b, it is published by the ministry of education, a reputable source. hence they give a more objective view on chatgpt, talking about the good and the bad of chat gpt, showing that there are useful uses f chatgpt. hence both soures have differing views on chatgpts usefulness

# data[].attributes.body
The cartoonist would agree with the teacher in source B as both sources depict AI helping students academically. Source A shows a student using AI to answer questions, while source B is a teacher's recount on how AI has assisted in his teaching. Since both sources portray the same image of AI being helpful in supplicating a student's learning, the cartoonist would agree with the teacher in source B.

The cartoonist would disagree with the teacher in source B on the reliability of AI for learning. Source B states that "With ChatGPT addressing the more straightforward and factual questions, he has more time to delve into the subject matter" showing that ChatGPT can be used to answer simple questions, however source A shows ChatGPT giving a student the wrong answer to a simple question such as 2+2. This shows that AI such as ChatGPT can provide wrong answers to factual answers, thus making it unreliable for learning, directly contradicting the teacher's stance in source B. Hence, the cartoonist would disagree with the teacher in source B.

Overall, the cartoonist would disagree with the teacher in source B on the use of AI for learning due to a difference in agenda. Source A is written by a cartoonist in an online publication, trying to dissuade the use of AI in classrooms due to its unreliability, as shown in the cartoon where AI provides a student with the wrong answer to a simple question. However, source B is written by a teacher from the Ministry of Education, who is promoting the use of AI in classrooms as he recognises the opportunities it presents for learning, allowing students to understand and learn more in a shorter period of time. Hence, due to a difference in viewpoints, the cartoonist in source A would disagree with the teacher in source B.

# data[].attributes.body
The cartoonist would agree with the teacher in source A that ChatGPT can sometimes give out false information. From source A, it shows us that ChatGPT's answers might not always be accurate and can affect students' learning when learning something new. Similarly, in source B, it states, ¨ evaluate the accuracy of the information it generates ¨ suggests that the information given out by ChatGPT might not always be accurate and needs to be evaluated.

The cartoonist disagrees with source A about ChatGPT improving students' thinking process since the ChatGPT gave an inaccurate answer in source A by saying 2+2=22, students did not process the information and just gave the teacher their answer. Hence, this shows that students do not process the information given out by ChatGPT. However, in source B, it states ¨students can clarify their learning against what ChatGPT throws up.¨ Suggest that students can compare their ideas with ChatGPT which can improve their thinking process and deepen their thinking.

# data[].attributes.body
The cartoonist in Source A would disagree with the teacher in Source B that ChatGPT should be used in class. Source A says that ChatGPT should not be used during lessons. This is evident as Source A shows a cartoon depicting a student believing that 2+2=22 just because ChatGPT says so. This shows that due to ChatGPT, it can alter student's thoughts even though the information ChatGPT gives is false information. Whereas Source B says that ChatGPT should be used to help in the learning process. This is evident as Source B states that "students may clarify their learning against what ChatGPT throws up" This shows that the teacher thinks that ChatGPT can be used to help clarify the student's question and correct their misunderstandings if there are any. Thus The cartoonist in Source A would disagree with the teacher in Source B that ChatGPT should be used in class

The cartoonist in Source A would agree with the teacher in Source B in saying that ChatGPT shouldn't be fully relied on by students for their learning. This is evident as Source A shows a cartoon depicting a student believing that 2+2=22 just because ChatGPT says so. This shows that due to ChatGPT, it can alter student's thoughts even though the information ChatGPT gives is false information. This is also evident as Source B states that "With ChatGPT addressing the more straightforward and factual question" This suggests that ChatGPT should only be used in simpler question which can prevent it from generating false information and the complex question should be answered by the teacher as ChatGPT might mistake the question as another question and feed the students false information which the student would believe in. This will hinder the students learning process instead of helping it. The cartoonist in Source A would agree with the teacher in Source B in saying that ChatGPT shouldn't be fully relied on by students for their learning.

# data[].attributes.body
The cartoonist agrees with the teacher in source B that ChatGPT should be used for the more straightforward and simple questions. In source A, it shows the student asking ChatGPT what is 2+2. This shows that ChatGPT can be used for simple questions. In source B, it states that ¨with ChatGPT addressing the more straightforward and factual questions...¨ this shows that both source A and Source B agree that ChatGPT should be used for simple questions.

Source A

# data[].attributes.body
cartoonist would disagree with the teacher in saying that chatgpt is a tool that enhances students' learning experiences. in source a, it depicts a student, telling his teacher that 2+2=22 according to chatgpt. the teacher then gives him a confused look. the cartoonist is trying to convey the message that students do not use their brains anymore and solely rely on chatgpt, even on simple equations like "2+2" and that students are gullible enough to think that chatgpt is never wrong. however in source B, the teacher states that "students may clarify their learning against what chatgpt throws up and evaluate the accuracy of the information it generates before sharing their thoughts." this however is the complete opposite of what the cartoonist in source A is trying to convey, as in this scenario in source B, chatgpt is used as a learning tool in the classroom, to help students fact check their answers, and not to give them the answers.

# data[].attributes.body
How different are these sources? Explain your answer.

# data[].attributes.body
How far would the Director in Source C agree with the student in Source B? Explain your answer.

# data[].attributes.body
1) CLUE may be in Q5 (esp. the diff / disagreement)

2) One source is supportive of ____ vs One source is unsupportive of _____

3a) HLA 1: INTENTION OF AUTHOR, KAMO

3b) HLA 2: OBJECTIVE TREATMENT OF ISSUE (+ and -) vs 1-SIDED TREATMENT

# data[].attributes.body
How far would the cartoonist in Source A agree with the teacher in Source B?