# data[].attributes.body
(unpaid) carers should be a more clear feature in the HICM, and working with carers in early discharge planning, MDT discussions etc are a great enabler to good discharges that don't fail or negatively impact carers and residents

# data[].attributes.body
Are there plans to update / refresh the other HICMs to further help the alignment?

# data[].attributes.body
When will the dashboard be visible?

# data[].attributes.body
Please can you clarify is the system dashboard currently in development? Will it be rolled out to systems? If so, what are the timescales for rolling it out? Or is this just an example of what might be possible?

# data[].attributes.body
how did spend comparison reflect spend outside of BCF on equivalent scheme types?

# data[].attributes.body
How did you measure value for money in the review?

# data[].attributes.body
How did you manage relationships when having difficult conversations over de-prioritising certain schemes? Would the teams involved be re-deployed to focus on other higher value schemes?

# data[].attributes.body
Why not review all money in the BCF?

# data[].attributes.body
How long did the review take overall and how many FTE staff were involved?

# data[].attributes.body
How did you use the review data?

# data[].attributes.body
Sorry if you have already mentioned this, but can you tell us what are the proposed next steps around the updated HICM? When will it be finalised / when can we start using the updated model?

# data[].attributes.body
presumably all will be up for review, irrespective of if it serves, ASC, NHS or joint priorities?

# data[].attributes.body
Just interested in knowing what you plan to do next? Is this going to result in any changes? Will it involve disinvestment in some schemes to release funding to invest in new priorities? Very difficult to achieve if the existing funding is being used to maintain existing services.

# data[].attributes.body
You mentioned costs incurred for LGA review. Could you say what those costs are and what for?

# data[].attributes.body
Without the formal BCF policy, do you think that your approach to integration would have been at risk?

# data[].attributes.body
What was the most important added value of the BCF support offer for Thurrock. What would you say to anyone who is considering accepting support

# data[].attributes.headline
How does this work fit into the wider NCL system and what are the plans for the other 4 areas?

# data[].attributes.subject
How does this work fit into the wider NCL system and what are the plans for the other 4 areas?

# data[].attributes.headline
How does this fit in with the borough partnership

# data[].attributes.subject
How does this fit in with the borough partnership

# data[].attributes.body
is this about improving the process of discharges to care homes or about avoiding them?

# data[].attributes.body
Lots of legacy work and admire/appreciate the need to review schemes. Is this best done as a big swipe ICB or piecemeal?

# data[].attributes.headline
How is the resource for this work funded - e.g. who employs Carl?

# data[].attributes.subject
How is the resource for this work funded - e.g. who employs Carl?

# data[].attributes.headline
How did you mitigate not get above the minimum ICB contribution?

# data[].attributes.subject
How did you mitigate not get above the minimum ICB contribution?

# data[].attributes.headline
the flexible, iterative nature of updating the HICM

# data[].attributes.subject
the flexible, iterative nature of updating the HICM

# data[].attributes.body
this sounds good, but could this be at the cost of partner buy-in? if you put updates out more quickly, can you properly engage with ADASS, LGA, UEC, DHSC, etc, and might that result in other programmes putting out their own HICMs?

# data[].attributes.body
We reflected on the importance of doing a detailed review. It should be part of regular housekeeping, and encourages helpful conversations and ensures spend is targeted as effectively as possible. Needs to be done at the appropriate time with a realistic timeframe

# data[].attributes.body
do you have a view/vision on what your BCF is for - more core or more innovative schemes?

# data[].attributes.body
Sometimes there isn't a neat fit between existing outcome measures and BCF schemes. Sometimes you have to rely on proxy measures. The system reforms and other changes also means that data isn't always available at place-level. Has this been a challenge for you? Would be interested in knowing how you are approaching this to align your expenditure and activity to meaningful outcomes?

# data[].attributes.body
How did the LA feel about the ICB reducing or stopping certain ASC schemes? How were the relationships managed to maintain trust?

# data[].attributes.body
London developed a HICM for mental health - for parity, when will something like this be published?