# data[].attributes.body
Constructive

# data[].attributes.body
informative

# data[].attributes.body
Encouraging

# data[].attributes.body
Clear/Precise

# data[].attributes.body
Grammatical Errors

# data[].attributes.body
Clarify unclear arguments

# data[].attributes.body
Correct citation errors

# data[].attributes.body
It should be overall helpful and not super judgmental for no reason

# data[].attributes.body
Gives feedback on organization and structure

# data[].attributes.body
not personal- with the intention of wanting to improve your peer

# data[].attributes.body
Ensuring the writing is following basic rubric guidelines

# data[].attributes.body
Asking about warrants (if there is none)

Warrant - justification for connection between information given and the argument

# data[].attributes.body
Gives good critique on the length

# data[].attributes.body
Focuses on the Thesis

# data[].attributes.body
Feedback that is out of context (indicative of not reading the paper)

# data[].attributes.body
personal and hurtful comments

# data[].attributes.body
Only focused on gramatical errors, typos, etc. and doesn't give feedback on the substance of the paper

# data[].attributes.body
Opinions that don’t contribute to the feedback of the paper and is instead an attack on the writer

# data[].attributes.body
Feedback that is vague without pointing specifically where and what and why it is wrong

# data[].attributes.body
Giving no feedback at all and just saying "it was good" because there's always something to improve