# data[].attributes.body
pages 1-22

topics 1.1-1.4

20 marks (45mins)

tectonics

# data[].attributes.body
well-labelled diagram

just branch out and say what it is

annotation requires explanation and elaboration

# data[].attributes.body
annotation hw by next Monday (today is 21/1)

submit respond in padlet (assignment 2 )

# data[].attributes.headline
core assignment 2 + volcanoes worksheet by Friday 4/11

# data[].attributes.subject
core assignment 2 + volcanoes worksheet by Friday 4/11

# data[].attributes.body
essay question

landslides are the most dangerous hazard associated with earthquakes." How far do you agree with this statement ? Explain your answer with evidence

body paragraph-landslides

-PEEL format (point explain example link)

# data[].attributes.body
examples is important. without examples , 3 good paragraphs might still stay at level 1

level 1 (1-2 marks)

arguments unclear with limited description or may be listed (list and don't elaborate)

students who only talk about only ONE factor would be stuck in level 1

students who talk about 2 factors but no elaboration and "touch and go"

no examples provided or examples don't have statistics , dates , or location ( in YEAR , LOCATION had earthquakes...STATISTIC people died and as a result tsunami is the worst...)

level 2 (3-4 marks)

2 good paragraph with 1 good example for one of the paragraph - can get 4marks

level 3 (5-6 marks)

2 body paragraph supporting ur point , 1 paragraph going against ur point

both side of ur point must be discussed , pros n cons

minimum requirement : 3 body paragraphs with at least 2 good examples

conclusion-opinionated (not from textbook) - 6 marks

# data[].attributes.body
type 1

give one factor and you need to choose the rest (3 paragraph)

have 3 body paragraph (one is given for factor and 2 your choosing)

agree/disagree cus u compare so beside what factor was given , compare with another 2 more factors

INTRODUCTION

pick a stand (agree or disagree - "i agree/disagree that landslides is the most ..." if its only to a certain extend , say it in conclusion instead of introduction , intro can only have agree/disagree

define the topic that is in context - define what is an EQ (if EQ is what is give in the question )

briefly talk about the other factors that are in play - "besides landslides there are impacts of earthquakes that can be hazardous such as soil liquefaction and tsunami"

type 2

give 2 factors and asked to compare (2 paragraph)