# data[].attributes.headline
Logan Govic - The difference between the Eastern and Western side is they were divided into 2 empires. The cause was corruption, and while the western side of Rome got destroyed the Eastern was strong enough to stay up.

# data[].attributes.subject
Logan Govic - The difference between the Eastern and Western side is they were divided into 2 empires. The cause was corruption, and while the western side of Rome got destroyed the Eastern was strong enough to stay up.

# data[].attributes.headline
Angel Montalvo- The Differences Between the Wealth of the Two Europe Empires

# data[].attributes.subject
Angel Montalvo- The Differences Between the Wealth of the Two Europe Empires

# data[].attributes.body
The difference between Eastern Roman Empire and Western Roman Empire was that Eastern Roman Empire had more power and riches compared to the Western Roman Empire. One of the causes to corruption was the fact that the throne was being handed over to way to much people. The French and the Vietnam crusaders were getting paid by Alexios Angelo for helping him get the throne.

# data[].attributes.headline
Hairo Sotelo- The Differences Between The Wealth Of The 2 Europe Empires

# data[].attributes.subject
Hairo Sotelo- The Differences Between The Wealth Of The 2 Europe Empires

# data[].attributes.body
The Difference between the Eastern and Western Roman Empire was They were divided into two Empire's. The Eastern Empire, Had more power than the Western. I am sure one of the situations that caused corruption was that the throne was being handed to many different emperors. For example The video Say's, Alexios Angelo Told the French and Also Venetian crusaders He will give them money if they'dhelp him take the throne from his Uncle Sam. When Alexios did get the throne, He was killed, So The were unhappy and the crusaders were unpaid.

# data[].attributes.body
The two sided of the different cultures were very different the Western side of the Roman empire was destroyed and the Eastern side was strong enough to keep the Roman culture going. Also the Eastern side was much wealthier side than the western side.

# data[].attributes.headline
Kellen Garcia- The differences between the wealth of the two sides of the empire

# data[].attributes.subject
Kellen Garcia- The differences between the wealth of the two sides of the empire

# data[].attributes.body
The difference between the two is that the Eastern side was much wealthier than the Western side, meaning the western side depended on the eastern. This is why the western was so easily overtaken. Another reason is that while the eastern empire was ruled by Constantinople, the western side had been ruled by Rome.

# data[].attributes.headline
Kaydence Cohn - The between the wealth of the two sides of the Empire

# data[].attributes.subject
Kaydence Cohn - The between the wealth of the two sides of the Empire

# data[].attributes.body
The Eastern side of the Roman Empire was much wealthier. They were also stronger than the Western Empire. But the other side of the Roman Empire was weaker, and poor. Later on, the Eastern Empire was taken over and demolished by a large army of crusaders. Those crusaders were hired, and promised lots of riches after they helped Alexios Angelos win back the throne from his Uncle.

# data[].attributes.headline
Ethan Welch - The differences between the wealth of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western Roman Empire

# data[].attributes.subject
Ethan Welch - The differences between the wealth of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western Roman Empire

# data[].attributes.body
The difference between the  Eastern Empire and the Western Empire, is that the Eastern Empire had all the riches and technologies they had back then, and The Western Empire was corruption and had almost no money because all of the Emperors kept getting overthrown causing a collapse. The Eastern Empire was then destroyed by a group of crusaders that were hired by Alexios Angelos how was then the next Emperor until he was overthrown. The crusaders never got their money because he Emperor was killed so the destroyed The Eastern Empire until 1/3 of it was ashes.

# data[].attributes.headline
Sabri Jones - The differences between the wealth of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western

# data[].attributes.subject
Sabri Jones - The differences between the wealth of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western

# data[].attributes.body
The difference between the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western was that they were divided into two parts, such as one side, which was the Eastern Empire, clearly had more power than the Western. I am sure one of the situations that caused corruption was that the throne was being handed to many different emperors. For an example from the video, Alexios Angelos promised the French and Venetian crusaders to help him to take the throne from his uncle with money. When Alexios did get the throne, he was killed, and that grew more chaos when the crusaders were unpaid. This sums up that people paid others to get what they wanted. Basic bribery.

# data[].attributes.headline
Gabriel Godoy-The Differences between the wealth of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western.

# data[].attributes.subject
Gabriel Godoy-The Differences between the wealth of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western.

# data[].attributes.body
The difference between the two is that they were divided in to two different sections. One was the Eastern Empire which had more wealth and power compared to the Western Empire. Another reason what could have lead to the fall was how so many people were paying soldiers so they could eliminate/overthrow the emperor. So the whole thing was just corrupted or just in chaos.

# data[].attributes.headline
Katherine Zeman- The differences between the wealth of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western 

# data[].attributes.subject
Katherine Zeman- The differences between the wealth of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western 

# data[].attributes.body
The difference is that the Empire had divided into 2 parts the Eastern empire and the Western empire. The Eastern empire had more power and was wealthier than the western so that could be why it was easier to conquer. I think it also has to do with the lack of good emperors and people paying soldiers and/or other people to overthrow the emperor.

# data[].attributes.headline
Mia Pates- The differences between the wealth of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western 

# data[].attributes.subject
Mia Pates- The differences between the wealth of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western 

# data[].attributes.body
when the roman empire was to large to manage they divided into 2 parts the east was ruled by constantinople were as the east was ruled by east rome

# data[].attributes.headline
Colin Actkinson- The differences between the wealth of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western Roman Empire led to the fall of Rome because not all could fight for example if it was all even and every one could fight maybe it would have been different.

# data[].attributes.subject
Colin Actkinson- The differences between the wealth of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western Roman Empire led to the fall of Rome because not all could fight for example if it was all even and every one could fight maybe it would have been different.

# data[].attributes.headline
Lily felder- the differences in wealth between the two sides of the empire, led the Western Roman Empire to its end. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Lily felder- the differences in wealth between the two sides of the empire, led the Western Roman Empire to its end. 

# data[].attributes.body
in 285 a.d  the roman empire was to big to manage. he divided roman in 2  parts. eastern empire and western empire. the eastern empire was ruled by Constantinople.  the western empire was ruled by Rome