# data[].attributes.body
If I remember correctly, we are supposed to delete the most extreme high & low timing. In our example, we have 5 timing, so we don't count the highest & lowest timing. And we take the average of the 3 timings left. The one whose mean is closest to 30s is the better one.

# data[].attributes.body
Transfer the outcome from individual Google Sheet discussion to this Padlet to continue your learning journey.

If you intend to share the Google Sheet result, you can consider to snapshot and share.
***** Avoid embedding the link that requires other learner to re-direct to the Google Sheet. (This would enhance all learners' user experience)

# data[].attributes.body
During the discussion, use positive and constructive phrase and avoid hostile/harassment type content

# data[].attributes.body
You are encourage to participate in this discussion, including the other group's outcome.

Use the Thumb Up and Down function to indicate agreement (Thumb Up) or disagreement (Thumb Down) under each post/comment

Use the "Add comment" function to supplement and provide suggestion/advise on your peer's work/comment

# data[].attributes.body
Our group's mean is 33.28 while Standard deviation is 0.95

# data[].attributes.body
I would say that Group 1 did a better job because our standard deviation is lower at 0.95. Even though Group 2's mean is 29.36, but there is no consistency because the standard deviation is 7.73.

# data[].attributes.body
As a auditor, there is only conformance and non conformance. Hence it will be how many data point is within the allowable range

# data[].attributes.body
I am not sure if Group 2 is Good, but i think Group 1 is bad.. Looking at their data, all their data is more than the target.

# data[].attributes.body
In my work, we also pull out the Mean to judge who did a better job. For example, as long as my spending is average around $200 per week, it does not quite matter if I constantly spend $200 per week or I spend $600 for 1 week and don't spend anything for the next 2 weeks.

# data[].attributes.body
Just like my budget, I set at 600 and I will control the standard deviation at 100. I would the Chef who can control the standard deviation is the better Chef

# data[].attributes.body
However, I think both groups are equally good because one group mean is very near the target while the other group has a small standard deviation

# data[].attributes.body
In this case, I think Group 2 did a better job as their result is closer to the target.

# data[].attributes.body
All of you made a great contribution to this topic. Have you ever thought of combining all your ideas and come out with 1 method to consider both Mean and Standard Deviation during the comparion?