# data[].attributes.body
- Identify barriers to engagement
- Compare to literature
- Amendments to teaching
- Engagement levels at the end

# data[].attributes.body
Was missing limitations of the enquiry project.

# data[].attributes.headline
Discussed statistically significant results. Discussed effect of outliers

# data[].attributes.subject
Discussed statistically significant results. Discussed effect of outliers

# data[].attributes.body
Discussed key results and major findings well.

# data[].attributes.headline
Data on engagement, achievement and work completion all collected, however, baseline data not overly clear for comparison.

# data[].attributes.subject
Data on engagement, achievement and work completion all collected, however, baseline data not overly clear for comparison.

# data[].attributes.body
Literature included links to context

# data[].attributes.headline
Summarised literature based on themes/key ideas

# data[].attributes.subject
Summarised literature based on themes/key ideas

# data[].attributes.body
Describes action research as well as interpretivist paradigm with support from literature. Have potentially included a bit too much detail though.

# data[].attributes.headline
Action research described but details around the implementation of the intervention and how the data is collected is not provided.

# data[].attributes.subject
Action research described but details around the implementation of the intervention and how the data is collected is not provided.

# data[].attributes.headline
Clearly stated each step in the process, included a list of the questions that were asked in a pre/post quiz

# data[].attributes.subject
Clearly stated each step in the process, included a list of the questions that were asked in a pre/post quiz

# data[].attributes.body
All pieces stated their school's SES status, % of EALD students and % of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students

# data[].attributes.body
In terms of findings the presentation of the data was difficult to follow. A theory was offered that growth mindset would lead to motivation and engagement but the data described goal setting and provided self evaluation regarding engagement. Survey findings were presented separately in two graphs not side by side so it was difficult to make sense of the data

# data[].attributes.body
Clearly defined key terms using literature, provided support for their proposed enquiry

# data[].attributes.headline
Used high-level statistical analysis to investigate results

# data[].attributes.subject
Used high-level statistical analysis to investigate results

# data[].attributes.body
- Looked at a whole class level and used summative assessments as a measure of success
- Individual student analysis (achievement and engagement with activity) and compared these against one another

# data[].attributes.body
Context: Students with low literacy,

RQ:  implement Explicit Instruction strategies such as daily reviews, using explicit models, providing scaffolds with prompts and to improve their literacy and overall extended answer response outcomes
Method: Action Research
Pragmatic paradigm Qualitative and Quantitative research

# data[].attributes.headline
Gave a summary of what was done, and elaborated on the limitations a fair bit. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Gave a summary of what was done, and elaborated on the limitations a fair bit. 

# data[].attributes.body
ie. sample size, effect of coaching etc.

# data[].attributes.body
Context is well linked to suggested pedagogical intervention

# data[].attributes.headline
Described context and identified learning need of students and research question

# data[].attributes.subject
Described context and identified learning need of students and research question

# data[].attributes.body
as Action research but doesn't justify mixed method paradigm

# data[].attributes.body
Provided a summary of the research question, context, the methods and the results.