# data[].attributes.body
Worst grade less muscle and more fat

# data[].attributes.body
Grades that are in between the highest percentage of yield versus the lowest grade

# data[].attributes.body
Best muscling with least fat waste highest percentage of retail cut

# data[].attributes.body
Same frame size as No.2 but less thickness and width than No.2

# data[].attributes.body
Same frame size as No.1 but less muscled back and loin appear sunken in.

# data[].attributes.body
The size of the animal is smaller than other grades but animal displays thick muscling throughout

# data[].attributes.body
same frame size as No.2 but less thickness and width than No.2

# data[].attributes.body
Same as frame No.1 but less muscling as compared to No.1
loin and back have a sunken appearance

# data[].attributes.body
Animal with a moderate or average frame size and thick muscling throughout

# data[].attributes.body
Same frame size as No.2 but with less thickness and width than No.2

# data[].attributes.body
Same frame size as No.1, but has slightly less muscling. Back and loin have a sunken appearance.

# data[].attributes.body
Animal that is taller in size compared to others and displays thick muscling throughout body.

# data[].attributes.body
less thickness and width between

# data[].attributes.body
Narrow throughout, legs set close together, back and loin have sunken appereance

# data[].attributes.body
Slightly thick throughout moderate width between legs

# data[].attributes.body
Shorter bodied and not not as tall as medium sized cattle

# data[].attributes.body
Slightly large in size for their age

# data[].attributes.body
Tall and long bodied for their age