# data[].attributes.body
In this essay, the author explains the good and the qualities of Robespierre, highlighting very important aspects during the period of government. However, the way of explaining all those things looks kind of simple, this could be more specific and improve. In general, a reasonable essay with good ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
my opinion of this essey is a good essey because they explain the things very good.in this essey you can see the good qualities of robespierre and the bad things. the author also explain more especific things.

# data[].attributes.body
in the essay the author have a good point of view of the bad things Robespierre did, but he mention that Robespierre have good intentions too, althoght he didn't show the good acts Robespierre did, i agree in what he is telling of how Robespierre reign with terror and make the contry went even worst than it was.
he use the sources in a good why to make his opinions become facts and help the essay became credible.
it have some grammar error but in everything else its okay.

# data[].attributes.body
What surprised me first while reading the essay was the way it was written. The author really knows how to communicate him/herself, and uses words that help to make every topic more understandable. The grammar is really good, but what I like the most is the way the topic is explained. The author uses great sources that are spread all across this essay. The author's insight is a quite interesting approach to the topic. In the author's words, he/she isn't denying Robespierre was a bad person or agreeing that he was good, but what the author wants is to rather search or find the heroic acts he used to mask his villainous intents. The essay is really well structured too, being easy to read, but full of information nonetheless. Robespierre's true self is exposed through this essay, and his malitious intents are revealed, showing the bad person he was, masked with the image of a "hero" to many. The essay was really good, and I wouldn't change anything. Well structured, great sources, good grammar, and an interesting point of view.

# data[].attributes.body
In this essay the author quotes the two faces of Robespierre and uses a lot of sources, what I dislike about this essay is that the sources they used, they put them exactly how they were written and forgot to put their opinions on some of the sources. While the author had some grammar errors, they actually let their point of view clear with a lot of facts.

# data[].attributes.body
Even the short it is it explains alot of the procedures he did to get the name:  The reign of Terror. He supported it with some facts and even specified were or whate were they whcih is really good, he talks about both sides of his mentality so he si not laying in a single place

# data[].attributes.body
I think this was a really good essay, because it has good arguments to explain his ideas clearly. I also liked it because he gives las examples to show the good and the bad side of Robespierre. It´s an essay that´s easy to understand because of the simple way in which it is written.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay shows clearly and very precisely the point of view of the author, his way of expresing himself make the essay to be understood in a very clear way, even though it has some grammatical errors such us when he says "Robespierre was someone who had good intentions but the methods, he used to accomplish them were bad." The comma there isn't necessary and makes the essay a little confusing the reading. Also, I recommend the author to use a justified format. This format looks more organized and well presented, making more easier to read the essay. Leaving those things aside I think this essay is well written and the ideas it contains can be understood. The authors ideas are very interesting, showing us that, according to him/her, showing us the ways Robesppierre masked himself to be shown as a hero, and after reveling us the villain behind it. It has some errors that could be improved but over all Its a great essay.

# data[].attributes.body
In this essay can see the good qualities that have Robespierre, and some importants aspects during the goverment period, but something that they could improve is the way of talking.

# data[].attributes.body
In this essay the author explains the good and bad things that Robespierre do, the author talks about important things that could be a little more specific, beyond what he wants to talk to us because the way he expresses himself is a bit simple but it's still very interesting

# data[].attributes.body
I like it because the author explains both parts, the good and the bad part, that Robespierre was a good person that wanted to improve France, but he didn't make good decisions because he thought that everyone were traitor and he killed many people, but it also says that this ''bad qualities''  don't discredit the good work he did for a better France.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay contains very important aspects. The author explains clearly how things were during the period of Robespierre. Very nice ideas on the topic related to the way he developed the ideas and how they make an impact on society. Nothing to regret in this essay. In conclusion, very good ideas and very nice effort making the differences between the good things and the bad things.

# data[].attributes.body
Something that i liked from this author on this essay was that he had a good point of view, according to the author, Robespierre also has goods intencions, this is a very important thing on a person.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay shows many arguments and shows several interesting points of view, Robespierre in this essay shows himself as a person who was qualified of being a great leader in France but his lack of conviction to improve on his mistakes was what destroyed him and ended up making him what he is, in a hated revolutionary in France. I think this essay is very good for starting to see who this character in the history is.

# data[].attributes.headline
In this essay the autor have a good point, but he cites a lot of bad things about robespierre and he put few ideas of the other side of "the coin", so that makes that the essay is very parcial and he don't try to contradict the opinions of the people that have a different point of view than him, so that can make that his point of view is not strong. Also in the essay he has some grammar errors. Because of this errors the essay can lose credibility and that can make that the readers do not agree with his point. In conclusion he needs to try to contradict the good things people think about robespierre, so he can persuade people to get his same point of view of this history.

# data[].attributes.subject
In this essay the autor have a good point, but he cites a lot of bad things about robespierre and he put few ideas of the other side of "the coin", so that makes that the essay is very parcial and he don't try to contradict the opinions of the people that have a different point of view than him, so that can make that his point of view is not strong. Also in the essay he has some grammar errors. Because of this errors the essay can lose credibility and that can make that the readers do not agree with his point. In conclusion he needs to try to contradict the good things people think about robespierre, so he can persuade people to get his same point of view of this history.

# data[].attributes.body
I like how his ideas get that well expressed within each source he decided to gathered makes the idea get supported really good

# data[].attributes.body
This essay is very clear, the way in which the author expresses himself makes the essay very clear and his point of view can be seen, for this he uses many sources, he speaks of the two faces of Robespierre, his good face in the which one wanted a good country to help the needed persons and the bad one in which it murdered, lied, etc. In summary the author uses good ideas and a good expression but some grammar errors

# data[].attributes.body
This one is a good essay because of it ideas; it has very good ideas and they are well explained, but there are only bad ideas of Robespierre, but there is no problem because
how well it is written makes up for it.

# data[].attributes.body
In this essay the author explains the great e qualities of Robespierre, highlighting very important aspects of his period of government. And i like that since the creator clarifies both parts, the great and the bad part, that Robespierre was a great person that needed to make strides France, but he didn't make great choices since he thought that everybody were traitors and he killed many people. However  the way of clarifying all those things looks kind of basic a sensible exposition with great thoughts. 🦶

# data[].attributes.body
In this essay the author has gramatical errors, and a goos point, but he says a lot of bad things about robespierre and odes not put the ideas from the other point of view so he makes the essay very cut off and does not try to contradict the opinions of people who have a diferrent point of view, so that makes weak his point of view

# data[].attributes.body
His way of talikng is kinda sophisticated as he decides to go further in detail, The author shows a way of desscribing it generally as a bad person which is how he represents him or that hows he said it  made them look like it, although we can't cover the other opinions and facts that not also makes him bad but a person determinated and with goals too, just he didn't knew how to manage the influence (robespierre) as the author keeps supporting each, but the problema there was some not written in the las t about a source which should have been showed

# data[].attributes.headline
Santiago Marin BROBESPIERRE, ANGEL OR DEVIL? It seemed to me that the Essay is very well done, having a good vocabulary, ideas that make the Essay interesting and an opinion from Robespierre which left me impressed. The author had evidence which made the article very convincing of the author's opinion of Robespierre.What most caught my attention is how having evidence that made his opinion true, it seems to me that he convinces the reader of his opinion and for these reasons, for me this Essay can attract the attention of anyone.

# data[].attributes.subject
Santiago Marin BROBESPIERRE, ANGEL OR DEVIL? It seemed to me that the Essay is very well done, having a good vocabulary, ideas that make the Essay interesting and an opinion from Robespierre which left me impressed. The author had evidence which made the article very convincing of the author's opinion of Robespierre.What most caught my attention is how having evidence that made his opinion true, it seems to me that he convinces the reader of his opinion and for these reasons, for me this Essay can attract the attention of anyone.

# data[].attributes.body
For my this is a very good text because talk about like the good things of Maximilian and also the bads. Also the person who reacts that text is like a person of that country because demonstrates like the love to their country.

# data[].attributes.body
Un this text we can see someone that need changes in the laws and others things of her country. Also talks about like the bad person who was Robespierre and the bad decisions he takes but in general is a gods text because I like hoy is reacted.

# data[].attributes.body
in the essay it talks about Robespierre's errors , the bad thing is that it talks more almost the bad than the great portion and I think it ought to talk in a adjusted way almost both, in any case what it says  the bad portion is very true since he supports it with proofs and facts . but he specify that Robespierre have great things, he didn't center or indeed appear the great things Robespierre did. but in general i liked.
I think he did a great job but he needed to be more equitable with the good and bad point and show more facts. 🌿

# data[].attributes.body
This text talk about like the thinks that Robespierre wants and the things tan they do, Robespierre want always gods things but always do very bad things because he was like crazy. Robespierre things that their was a god but no the people don’t thing de same and because of that he was like ridiculous. For me this was a very bad React text because is like very confused.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay has some grammatical errors, but apart from that, it talks about Robespierre's mistakes, the bad thing is that it talks more about the bad than the good part and I think it should speak in a balanced way about both, however what it says about the bad part is very true since he supports it with facts and I agree with what he said.

# data[].attributes.body
The author of this essay explains in a very simple way how Robespierre handled the government during his period. The use of sources is kind of weird, and quotations aren't used. Has good ideas, but the way they are explained is kind of explicit. I would like to find some specific ideas that could make the essay more interesting, but there aren't any of those. In conclusion, an essay with ideas but a low quality of explanation and order in the writing.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay shows in a very understandable matter the points of view of the author, the grammar is excelent and the format she is using makes the essay very easy to read, showing us that you don't need a very formal language ( even though she use it not in a very large scale) to show to the readers her point of view. She cites all the sources perfectly and uses them to prove her points and persuade the reader.The essay first shows us the good things of Robespierre, showing us why the french saw him us their hero, but slowly shows us the bad things, how he lost his horizon. Finally, she concludes saying that "a person who considers himself a role model or who has so much influence on people would not behave like this he would not kill people just for opposing and giving his opinion". showing us that Robespierre was a person with great ambitions, but also a person that opressed anyone who didn't agreed with him.

# data[].attributes.body
this essey is good because the ideas of the author he explain very well the ideas the bad part is that have grammatical errors. he

# data[].attributes.body
I didn't like how he managed the words and ideas as you can see some stuff just doesn't makes a lot of sense in there, I can see the author has a point and wants to show it, but is a rush of ideas so he doesn't have the time to organize each but not only that even tho that happened he still had such great ideas that still made it really good as he also communicates to the reader in such way it gives curiosity

# data[].attributes.body
robespierre in this essay talk about the to differents parts of the topic, the good one and the bad ones, he was a good person on france that distrusts about all people becase he thougth all were traidors, but he makes france better and this essay is easy to understand.

# data[].attributes.headline
This essay goes straight to the point since the beginning, exposing the two sides of this topic. The author didn't put quotation marks in the sources, so it might be difficult to find them at a first glance. The essay has a good structure, but I think it could be better. The topic could be explained in a more detailed manner, since the explanations are a bit rough sometimes. I liked this essay, but it could be written in a different to be more understandable. The simple fact of properly quoting the sources could make the essay more understandable and easier to read.

# data[].attributes.subject
This essay goes straight to the point since the beginning, exposing the two sides of this topic. The author didn't put quotation marks in the sources, so it might be difficult to find them at a first glance. The essay has a good structure, but I think it could be better. The topic could be explained in a more detailed manner, since the explanations are a bit rough sometimes. I liked this essay, but it could be written in a different to be more understandable. The simple fact of properly quoting the sources could make the essay more understandable and easier to read.

# data[].attributes.body
i am disagree with this essay because talk very puntually.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay seemed entertaining to read as it uses good language and has good spelling, what I would correct is that although it is attacking Robespierre, it should not only mention his bad actions, although the author thinks that he was a bad leader, he should mention his good works to inform well, apart from that, I found it a good essay and even entertaining to read.

# data[].attributes.body
ROBESPIERRE AND TERROR
For me this Essay explains something simple and I find it somewhat strange the sources it uses, in general it uses its ideas well, but for me I may have made it more interesting if I had further covered the subject with more truthly sources.

# data[].attributes.body
Roberspierre: the controvercial figure
This Essay shows us a great view of the author and a very well elaborated gramar, in my opinion it has very truthly sources, another thing to note is that her point of view is very well explained and this makes her able to persuade the reader. His point of view covers many topics that are very important of Roberspierre and to conclude this Essay is very well done, in my opinion it is highly recommended to read since he uses his ideas very well and make it one of the best Essays that I read.

# data[].attributes.body
In this essay the author uses good ideas explaining the two faces of robespierre, he can explain their ideas like more complex, the sources aren't with a good quotation, he can do a essay more especific with more interesting ideas that can get the really atraction of the reader

# data[].attributes.body
This essay  is excellent, in a simple way explains who is robespierre, his good manners as a leader for the French revolution and the serious mistakes they made him what he is today.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay show us the starts of the ideal of robespierre, ideas for the people, for the common good, enlightened ideas. It states "that a good leader’s goals will always be in function of the society." showing us that the ideas of Robespierre weren't bad at the begenning, they started to became bad when he iniciated to implement this ideas with violence, killing thousands of people. He/she also uses a lot of different sources, persuading the author that the things he/she is saying are true, using them as way to support the essay. His/her ponit of view is quite different from the other essays, he/she thinks that Robespierre was a person with the " best ideas of the country" even though the ways of implementation weren't good. He/she doesn't directly says that Robespierre was bad, instead he/she shows us the good and bad things, in an equal way, accomplishing the most difficult task of any author, don't being biased. One thing I didn't like was the presentation, the essay seems made without atention to detail, without a justified format it doesn't seems very organized, even though when you carefully read it through you can see the effort he/she put in this work. Over all is a great essay.

# data[].attributes.headline
This is a very good essay. It is structured correctly, has a bit of grammar errors but the words are correctly used to describe his point of view in the situation and what idea he wants to transmite. In one part of the essay the autor could put another citation to make his point stronger, but that is not a big problem in this essay because he has other sources to support its argument. Also this essay is perfectly balanced because he don´t disprove the other people thinking, but with his contradiction to the arguments that oppose his point of view he do it very well, and thats the way how an essay gets strong.

# data[].attributes.subject
This is a very good essay. It is structured correctly, has a bit of grammar errors but the words are correctly used to describe his point of view in the situation and what idea he wants to transmite. In one part of the essay the autor could put another citation to make his point stronger, but that is not a big problem in this essay because he has other sources to support its argument. Also this essay is perfectly balanced because he don´t disprove the other people thinking, but with his contradiction to the arguments that oppose his point of view he do it very well, and thats the way how an essay gets strong.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay has good ideas, but it struggles greatly when trying to convey them. This is mainly due to misuse of words and grammar mistakes that make reading through this essay somewhat difficult. These mistakes can definetly be fixed, and doing so would make this essay a great read. It quotes its sources really well, except for a section in which there is some brackets with what I assume would have been a quote, but the author seems to have either missed or forgotten it.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, this essay is really well elaborated, they quote good and bad things and of course his point of view, I think this essay has a lot of credibility since there is not grammar problems and it has everything that a critique should have and it is a really understandable and easy to comprehend essay.

# data[].attributes.body
While reading this essay, I inevitably  noticed the grammatical errors, since there are quite a lot. The sources are used correctly, that's a plus. The author had good ideas and interesting points of view, but the structure of the text could be better, and doing a quick check of the grammar at the end would've helped to receive the author's message easier. Although this errors, the content of the essay is pretty good, and the author managed to express their thoughts without being biased, and that's definitely good. Are there things to change? Yes, but mainly the grammatical errors, since it can turn a bit distracting. What I recommend is simply giving the essay a quick read before finishing, in order to catch the grammatical mistakes and correct them. Otherwise, the essay was really good.

# data[].attributes.body
In this essay you see in direct ways the key mistakes as revolutionary, I think it lacks a little more explanation of the positive things that did robespierre to get to the revolution but I feel it is a good essay.

# data[].attributes.body
The way the author wrote this essay was great he talk about how robespierre help the french country but he have a point of view in where making what ever you want for helping people isn´t okay, i agree with what he said, that you can help people in right way with out making others people lives worst.

# data[].attributes.body
My opinion about this essay is that the author had a great point of view of the "situation" because you see that the other authors talk about Robespierre as a good or a abad person, but in this text the author gives clarity of what he thinks about Robespierre, that is that he was not a bad man, but he took bad decisions.
Also I saw that the author had arguments for all and explains very well the main idea of the text.

# data[].attributes.headline
in this essay the autor have to explain a way better his piont of view and to express his ideas, so he can change people mindset and to make them stronger

# data[].attributes.subject
in this essay the autor have to explain a way better his piont of view and to express his ideas, so he can change people mindset and to make them stronger

# data[].attributes.body
on this essay we could find clear explanations of robespierre´s period, and how make a change on society by saying very good ideas and a very well explained making difference between the good and bad,i like it :)

# data[].attributes.body
his essay de is entertaining, Very nice ideas on the topic and very well related everything. I found it a great essay and entertaining, in general all good😳

# data[].attributes.body
This essay has a very good point in its favor, which is that it explains why Robespierre was the way he was. Many other essays simply describe him as a monster, but this one goes in-depth to see why he was a monster. However, this essay does have its drawbacks. Minor spelling mistakes and confusing writing makes it hard to understand, and the conclusion is very hard to make sense of. Overall, I would say this essay had great ideas, but not the best execution. If improved, it could certainly be exceptional.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay has a very good point in its favor, which is that it explains why Robespierre was the way he was. Many other essays simply describe him as a monster, but this one goes in-depth to see why he was a monster. However, this essay does have its drawbacks. Minor spelling mistakes and confusing writing makes it hard to understand, and the conclusion is very hard to make sense of. Overall, I would say this essay had great ideas, but not the best execution. If improved, it could certainly be exceptional. 

# data[].attributes.body
This essay has very interesting reasons to back up their opinion. I really liked these since they show both sides of the argument but manage to convince the reader of their point. However, this essay has one glaring flaw: it is extremely confusing to read. Wrong punctuations, random words in bold, and strange transitions make this essay hard to read, therefore making it harder to understand the interesting views it tries to convey. With some organization, this essay could be an amazing one, because of the aforementioned interesting views and the ways it backs them up.