# data[].attributes.body
Catherine/Lacey

1.) Temperature
2.) Color
3.) Mass

# data[].attributes.body
1. Boiling point/Freezing point, temperature, shininess, magnetism,  and flexibility

2. Color, state, volume, mass, texture, size

3. Volume and mass

# data[].attributes.body
1) it didn't make sense to use temperature, the boiling, melting or freezing point, and it wouldn't make sense to use flexibility.
2) volume and mass worked very well.
3) the volume was size depending

# data[].attributes.body
1.The physical property that didn't make sense was temperature.  Because they are solid objects and we couldn't take the temperature of the object,  instead we took the temperature of the air around us.

2. The physical property that worked well for all three object was mass. Mass worked well because all three objects we had could be weighed.

3. The size- dependent is mass

# data[].attributes.body
1. The temperature for the metal rectangle, the magnetism for the powdered sugar, and the flexibility and magnetism of the sea shell.
2. The mass worked for all three objects.
3. The mass was size-dependent.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Two physical properties that didn't make sense to use for each object was magnetism and temperature.
2. A physical property that worked for all three objects was mass.
3. Two physical properties that were size-dependent were mass and magnetism.

# data[].attributes.body
1. A physical property that didn't make sense to use with the seashell was flexibility. For the rectangular thing, it would not make sense to test the flexibility since it does not bend. And for the powder, it would not make sense to test magnetism.
2. The thermometer worked well for all the items.
3. The mass of each objects was size dependent.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Temperature, boiling and melting point, and flexibility all did not make sense to use for each object. They didn't make sense to use because we weren't using water that would allow us to measure temperature. Also, they weren't bendable.
2. Color, and texture worked well for all 3 objects because these physical properties were easy to identify for each object. For example, color was easy because we just used our eyes, and texture was easy because we used our hands to feel the items from the bag.
3. The physical properties that were size-dependent were mass, volume, and density.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Magnetism because we had soap, Plastic Ping Pong Ball , and a Bronze Key.

2. Mass worked well because the mass was different for all three objects.

3. Volume because the ping pong ball was lighter then the key but it had more volume because it was larger in size.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The object that did not make seance/ did not work out was the temperature. The objects did not have a temperature other than room temp of 2.7 degrees Celsius.
2. The grams were the measurement that worked for all the objects because they all weighed  something in grams.
3. One size dependent object is the weight. If the size was changed to a bigger size than i would weight a lot more in grams. It weighted 106.3 grams .

# data[].attributes.body
1.  Temperature because our objects were not measurable with a thermometer.
2. Mass, because it was super simple and we were able to compare the masses with all of the objects.
3. Mass, because if the size of the objects were small, then the weight of the objects would be less grams. But if the object was larger, then the weight would increase. This reasoning doesn't include the volume of the objects.

# data[].attributes.headline
After completing the physical properties lab, answer the following questions:

# data[].attributes.subject
After completing the physical properties lab, answer the following questions:

# data[].attributes.body
1.  Which physical properties did not make sense to use for each object?

2.  Which physical properties worked well for all 3 objects?

3.  Which physical properties were size-dependent?