# data[].attributes.body
Machines may take away jobs from citizens but they have positive outcomes on big companies which boost our economy.

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 1
-No breaks
-No paychecks needed
-No emotional barriers

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 1
-having machines doing everything takes away from the learning chance that teens get from their first jobs and earning their own money

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 1
- teens could lose job experience
- there is no guarantee at how efficient these machines will work
- too many people would be poor and in poverty

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 1
People lose their social skills

# data[].attributes.body
45% of Americans are out of work because of machines

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 1
-cuts alot of jobs
- machines cost money and costs even more to fix
-if we keep using machines for everything

# data[].attributes.body
perspective 2
-things can be made faster

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 1
Less human interaction is required causing a decrease in social skills in further generations.

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective Two
-Can handle more complicated tasks
-Quicker production
-Non-stop production
-Forever developing

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 1
- Job loss
- less human interaction/communication
- Machines are expensive
- People become dependent on machines

# data[].attributes.body
perspective 2
- way faster than human perform a job
-it is cheaper

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 1
no to minimum social skills
45% of Americans cant work because of machines
People are relying too much on technology

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 2
-Items are produced faster
-Its Cheaper
-Products would have less error
-Not having to pay workers, or give vacation, breaks

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 2
With machines, owners don't have to worry about workers suing

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 2
Good at low repetitive jobs.
Good at high repetitive jobs.
Cheaper.

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 1
-Loss of social skills
-Loss of jobs
-Lose interaction
-People will become more dependent on government

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 2
-Don't have to pay machines
-More precise, fewer errors
- Less injuries/deaths for humans if the machines do it.
-achines won't take vacations, sick days or days off.

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 2
-Faster than humans
-Less pay
-No vacation or breaks
-More money to expand the company

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 2
-High speed jobs
-Low Skill
-Work Better than humans
-Efficient

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 2
-Faster than human performed jobs.
-Cheaper than paying actual employees.
-Can work long hours compared to humans.
-It does a job so that humans do not mess it up.

# data[].attributes.body
Pers. 1
-  Social skills are minimized
- People will not know how  interact with each other
- Will resort to using technology for research instead of other people
- More unemployment
- Machine malfunctions
- machines cost a lot of money to repair
- can be a risk to people operating and the facility
- May not work as well as presumed

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 3
-Machines help out people
-People help out machines
-Better together/Get more efficiency
(team work makes the dream work)

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 2
-More items produced faster
-Cheaper
-Don't have to give workers breaks, vacation, or days off
-Products have less of a chance of having mistakes

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 2
- More things are made faster and quicker
-Machines can do the dangerous jobs
-Don't have to pay for many workers

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective 2
-cost of machines would be less than having to pay workers in the long run.
-no breaks
- no health endangerment
-things would be faster
-have little errors