# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Ayant la chance de recevoir mon Leica M rapidement, je vous propose le test et la prise en main de ce nouveau boitier de la firme Allemande.

Tout d'abord, je précise que cet article n'a pour but que de faire partager ma prise en main avec ceux qui s'intéressent à ce boitier. En tant qu'amateur passionné, je n'ai aucune intention de faire de l'ombre à qui que ce soit ni de vendre quoi que ce soit. Il est d'autant plus regrettable que certains aient pu voir dernièrement dans mes très modestes articles et dans ma démarche autre chose qu'un partage, allant jusqu'à me taxer de prétentieux ayant la volonté de promouvoir son site (sans arguments étayés malgré tout)... Pourtant, bien évidemment, rien ne les oblige à lire mes écrits et on se passerait facilement de leurs commentaires acerbes et sans fondement !!

Prise en main :

Le déballage est véritablement un moment privilégié lors de l'achat d'un boitier Leica. La présentation est pour le moins remarquable. Il est évident que le prix de 6200 euros permet à nos amis Teutons de faire un effort particulier. Simplement, il est clair que tout a été pensé pour produire son effet. La boite en carton s'ouvre en étoile, laissant apparaitre une boite noire cartonnée dure pourvue d'aimants. Une fois le rabat supérieur levé, la boite grise de l'appareil est là, d'un gris accordé élégant. Au niveau inférieur, deux tiroirs accueillent respectivement la documentation et l'ensemble des accessoires (chargeur, câbles, batterie...) dans des poches en tissus estampillées Leica. La grande classe, simple mais redoutable de bon goût...
Pas de surprise en ce qui concerne le boitier lui même, il s'agit bien d'un M...
L'esthétique est magnifique pour celui qui aime le concept du M. Il est légèrement plus lourd et très très légèrement plus volumineux que le M9 sans que ce soit gênant plus que cela. Les touches sur l'arrière sont devenues rectangulaires. le pad arrière est pratique et plutôt bien placé, la couleur grise de celui ci et de la molette est à mon goût par contre plutôt inesthétique. Cependant, cette différence de couleur permet de bien discerner les deux éléments en faible lumière. Le bossage situé à côté de la molette est vraiment utile et agréable, il permet à mon sens de se passer d'un Thumb-up sans problème. La manette de changement de cadre ainsi que la prise de la connexion USB ont disparus. La touche vidéo se trouve sur le dessus du boitier, à droite du déclencheur.

Les menus ont été revus entièrement, ils sont restés sobres et efficaces mais ont bénéficié d'une refonte esthétique que je trouve particulièrement réussie. sans que ce soit révolutionnaire, ce changement nécessaire est très appréciable.

Les cadres de visée dans le viseur peuvent êtres blancs ou rouges. Il me tardait de tester les cadres de visée à Led rouge. On aimera ou pas mais il est clair que cela amène une visibilité plus importante. Plutôt agressifs à la première utilisation, je m'y suis très bien fait par la suite. L'intensité lumineuse de ces cadres peut être réglé selon son goût ou laissé en mode automatique, ce qui permettra une variation de cette intensité selon l'environnement d'éclairage de la scène photographiée.

Le déclencheur est très doux, très agréable. Le bruit émis bien plus feutré que celui du M9 est vraiment un bon point car cela permet de faire des images dans les environnements les plus silencieux sans gros risque.

L'écran arrière est enfin au niveau de la concurrence. De taille raisonnable (3 pouces), il est clair et de bonne qualité d'affichage. Il s'agit d'un écran de type " Corning Gorilla Glass " qui est un verre feuilleté traité pour éviter rayures et éclats.

Mise en images :

Toute la question était de savoir si le M, avec son capteur CMOS, aurait cette signature Leica dont beaucoup parlent et que je partage sans restriction. Premier boitier sans capteur CCD de la marque sorti de l'usine de Solms, il existait réellement une inquiétude sur ce point. Le petit test rapide que j'avais pu faire avec un boitier de prêt début Mars m'avait véritablement rassuré. Pas de surprise donc et les images sont bien celles d'un Leica, piquées avec ses arrières plans si esthétiques. Après tout, les objectifs n'ont pas changé et le capteur restitue bien la qualité d'image que j'avais tant apprécié sur le M9. il est simplement plus fin encore et selon des spécialistes, véritablement très proche des capteurs moyens formats. N'ayant pas de référence dans le domaine, je me garderai bien de corroborer ceci.

Simplement, en post traitement, il faudra être attentif à ne pas pousser les curseurs trop fort car la définition supérieure du capteur (18 MP pour le M9, 24 pour le M) peut engendrer une sensation de sur-accentuation peu naturelle et inesthétique. Pourtant, le M dispose d'une latitude de post-traitement plus large que le M9 et le capteur CMOS encaisse bien mieux les hautes lumières, c'est une certitude.

L'apport du Capteur CMOS sur le M permet bien évidemment une montée en haute sensibilité bien meilleure et là ou le M9 plafonnait à 1250 isos, le M permet d'utiliser la page de sensibilités jusque 6400 isos.

Dans les faits, il est vrai que je me cantonne à 3200 isos. A ce niveau le M est en tout point remarquable, non seulement l'image est propre avec un grain très fin et esthétique mais aussi les couleurs restent très fidèles. On pourra donc utiliser le mode iso-auto sans restriction. C'est ce que j'ai fait en câlant le maximum à 3200 isos, le M se chargeant de choisir la sensibilité la plus appropriée en fonction de la scène. Ce qu'il fait très bien d'ailleurs car il privilégie toujours la sensibilité la plus faible.

En ce qui concerne la mesure de la lumière, la nouveauté se situe dans la mise en place de trois mesures différentes. Une mesure pondérée Centrale, visiblement la même que le M9, une mesure matricielle et une mesure Spot. Les essais que j'ai réalisés à ce jour sur les trois modes font que je privilégie toujours la mesure pondérée Centrale qui me permet, vraisemblablement par grande habitude, de réussir mes prises de vue facilement. Chacun devra tester les différents systèmes pour trouver la configuration qui lui convient le mieux.

Côté optiques, rien à signaler de particulier si ce n'est que tous les objectifs du système M sont compatibles avec le nouveau boitier. La définition supérieure du capteur pouvait faire craindre que certaines pièces anciennes aient du mal à suivre qualitativement. Pas de problème constatés à ce niveau, mon Summicron de 1995 donne des résultats excellents et le vieux Summicron 40 de 1972 essayé passe très bien l'examen de contrôle, les images sont proportionnellement bien au niveau de celles du M9 avec cette optique.

Les Plus du M (par rapport au M9) :
Le Focus-Peaking :
Simple à mettre en oeuvre. Je le trouve plutôt fiable et efficace lorsque l'on accroche une zone qui permet de visualiser la zone de netteté matérialisée en rouge. Mais encore faut il pouvoir effectivement identifier cette zone. Dans un certain nombre de cas, la scène photographiée n'offre pas une zone qui permet d'utiliser le Focus-Peaking efficacement et il faudra discerner les faibles liserés rouges pour pouvoir faire sa mise à point. Cependant, je précise que, à mon sens, ce mode est utilisable et qu'avec une certaine habitude, il doit être relativement facile de réussir ses images. Je précise en outre que c'est mon premier appareil qui offre cette fonctionnalité et que je n'ai donc pas de référence en la matière. J'ai entendu dire que des appareils comme les Sony Nex étaient beaucoup plus performant sur ce point. Peut être que par Firmware, Leica saura rendre ce mode plus abouti encore.

N'étant pas un spécialiste dans ce domaine, je me garderai bien de porter un jugement de valeur sur cette fonction. Ce que je peux dire malgré tout est que le mode video semble d'une qualité fort acceptable. Je mets un exemple de petit film réalisé par le boîtier. Le M ne sera certainement pas une référence en la matière mais il permettra au photographe qui souhaite disposer de la possibilité de réaliser une petite vidéo de le faire sans matériel supplémentaire. Il y a fort à parier que c'est le but recherché par Leica.

Classique et facile, c'est à mon sens un vrai plus sur le boitier. Cela permet de pouvoir réaliser le cadrage d'une image qui est irréalisable en mettant son oeil dans le viseur. Sur ce plan là, pas de souci, tout fonctionne parfaitement. L'écran arrière octroie une bonne vision et les images se font sans problème majeur. Il est cependant toujours regrettable que l'écran ne soit pas orientable comme il l'était sur l'Olympus OM-D EM-5. D'aucuns diront que ce n'est pas l'esprit Leica. C'est peut être vrai mais le Live-view avec un écran orientable, c'est vraiment nettement plus jouissif...

Une critique qui revenait souvent par rapport au M9 était sur le plan de l'autonomie. Même si je ne partageais que partiellement cet opinion, il faut avouer que la grosse batterie du M qui permet de faire 1500 à 2000 images sans sourciller devient plus qu'intéressant. Là encore, il s'agit d'une vraie avancée car je pense que je n'aurai même pas besoin d'acheter une deuxième unité pour ma pratique. Par contre, il faut prendre en compte que j'utilise très peu le Live-view et pas du tout la vidéo. La recharge est rapide avec le chargeur Leica pour lequel le fabricant Allemand a poussé l'élégance jusqu'à produire le dit chargeur avec le profil des M.

Le Leica M, à l'instar du Système S, a été doté du processeur Maestro qui assure au boitier une vitesse d'exécution nettement plus élevée que le M9. Cette rapidité se matérialise notamment à l'affichage des images sur l'écran arrière et à l'enregistrement des images faites sur la carte. Je conseille d'ailleurs de prendre les cartes les plus rapides qui permettront de bénéficier pleinement de l'apport de ce nouveau processeur. Ma carte actuelle de 64 Go qui plafonne à 30Mb/s n'est certainement au niveau de performance que permet le M. Mais dans mon cas, ce n'est pas très grave car je ne recherche pas une extrême rapidité.

Le viseur électronique :

Autre nouveauté qui a son importance, le Leica M dispose d'un emplacement qui permet la mise en place d'un viseur électronique pour obtenir une visée reflex tout en bénéficiant du Focus-Peaking. Il existe un modèle dans la marque mais celui-ci coûte la bagatelle de 400 euros. Pour les petits malins, Olympus commercialise le même modèle sous la référence VF-2. C'est rigoureusement le même modèle à ceci près que son prix est de 180 euros environ et s'adapte parfaitement au M. Il est en plastique noir ou gris, dispose d'un correcteur dioptrique, peut être équipé d'un oeilleton large en caoutchouc. Sa résolution de 1,44 MP est très correcte sans être exceptionnelle. Pour avoir fait l'essai en magasin, un peu d'habitude permet de faire la mise en point facilement et efficacement. Malgré les conditions de lumière difficiles, je n'ai pas éprouvé de difficulté et les images réalisées sont ressorties nettes. La critique principale formulée sera les saccades marquées lors de la visée sur des sujets mobiles. C'est assez courant pour ce genre de viseurs mais d'autres ont déjà fait beaucoup mieux sur le marché. Malgré tout, cela reste parfaitement utilisable en l'état et apporte un vrai plus sur les longues focales (supérieures ou égales à 90mm). A savoir que ce viseur articulé permet aussi la visée au dessus au boitier.

Le M permet, au moyen d'une bague d'adaptation, de monter des optiques en monture Leica R. Ne possédant ce type d'objectif, je ne m'étendrai pas sur cette opportunité et ne pourrai bien évidemment pas porter de jugements sur les aspects de cette fonction.

Conclusion :

Le Leica M est bien né. Je ne regrette pas mon achat et l'évolution par rapport au M9 est réelle par toutes les nouvelles fonctionnalités présentes sur le petit nouveau. Celui qui aime le côté plus radical et simpliste du M9 avec d'une qualité d'image impeccable en bonne condition de lumière, le passage au M ne sera pas une nécessité, il pourra même s'avérer déroutant de par ses nombreuses nouvelles possibilités.

Par contre, pour celui qui souhaite un boitier plus moderne avec un bien meilleur écran, la possibilité d'un EVF pour une visée reflex, une meilleure batterie, une diversité des systèmes de mesure de la lumière, le Focus-Peaking, le live-view, la vidéo... Alors le M devient incontournable et est pour moi une réussite. Il reste dans la longue tradition du constructeur Allemand tout en amenant la touche nécessaire de modernité que les aficionados de la marque attendaient.

Galerie d'images au M (quelques images au M9 se sont maladroitement glissées...) :

Cliquez sur la première image voir voir la galerie...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Ayant la chance de recevoir mon Leica M rapidement, je vous propose le test et la prise en main de ce nouveau boitier de la firme Allemande. Tout d'abord, je précise que cet article n'a pour but que de faire partager ma prise en main avec ceux qui s'intéressent à ce boitier.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This episode, Chris Niccolls braves the cruel Canadian winter to look at the new Leica M Type 240 digital rangefinder. This is Leica's first M rangefinder with Live View and video capture. Will these new additions help create the greatest M of all, or take away some of what made rangefinder photography so appealing?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Introduction

Retiring previous M9 and M9 P versions this latest model - known simply as the Leica M, sits alongside the Leica M-E Typ 220 as the two full frame cameras in the German manufacturer's renowned M series. With a list price of $6950 (body only), streamlined functionality and rangefinder viewfinders Leica cameras are unusual in the digital era but they continue to hold reverence with some photojournalists.

Quality engineering using brass and magnesium combined with simple controls and petite proportions make the M solid as well as portable and quick for reportage photographers. The rangefinder style of composition provides a rough indication of framing using guidelines in the viewfinder that adjust as you change lens. This is done via a sensor in the body to read the lens profile and allows the image processor to apply lens-based corrections as files are saved.

Compatible with both M mount as well as Leica R lenses via the $310 R Adapter M, there's a wide choice of high quality Leica optics available for the M, but it only offers manual focus. The new 3.0in 920k LCD does feature live view for more precise framing however and makes shooting with macro or telephoto lenses a realistic possibility. Live view also offers a 10x magnification for precise manual focus.

Despite remaining true to simplicity this latest model does incorporate a few updated specs such as HD video, a 100 - 6400 ISO range, 3fps burst shooting and compatibility with the $465 EVF2 viewfinder, which plugs into the hot shoe, but there's no built-in flash. Lets find out if the new 24-megapixel CMOS sensor can catch up with the latest DSLR competition.

Leica M: New 24-megapixel CMOS sensor significantly improves image quality

Achieving an overall DxOMark Sensor Score of 84 the Leica M ranks 11 th for all sensors on database and 8 th overall for full frame cameras. Ahead in the full frame category remain the latest generations of full frame Nikon and Sony cameras but the M's new CMOS sensor does just nudge out Canon DSLRs. Its individual category rankings are all down on 11 th place however making it a good all rounder without a particular strong point.

A Portrait ( Color Depth) score of 24 bits places the Leica M 21 st, a Landscape ( Dynamic Range) score of 13.3 Evs is 17 th and its Sports (Low light ISO) is a bit off the pace with the best in this class with a rating of 1860 ISO placing it 13 th.

During testing we did also observe under certain lighting conditions the problem of colour shading, which was low but noticeable when using certain lenses. Overall however though this is a significant improvement in image quality for the Leica M thatseries and puts itLeica back in the hunt with the full frame competition.
Note: Since testing the M running firmware version 1.0.2.0 Leica have updated to version 1.1.0.2, which provides a small improvement for video quality, lens support and stability.
Leica M-E Typ 220 Vs Leica M Typ 240 Vs Leica M9 P: A big step forward for the latest M

The 18Mp CCD previously used in Leica M rangefinders hasn't fared well in our tests ranking towards the bottom for full frame sensors. The new 24Mp CMOS model is a big improvement however boasting 6 million more pixels than its predecessor and delivering a 1 Stop improvement in image quality, too. With a +1 Stop improvement for both Color Depth and ISO, as well as an impressive +1.6 Stops better Dynamic Range, it seems switching to a CMOS sensor was certainly a good move for Leica. It's interesting to note too that no RAW smoothing is applied to files from the new model, as was previously the case from ISO 400 on earlier versions.

Leica M Typ 240 Vs Sony RX-1 Vs Nikon D800: Leica M remains behind the best new sensors

Two of the best full frame sensors we've tested in the fixed lens Sony RX1 and Nikon D800 DSLR offer a +2/3rds of a Stop image quality overall compared to the Leica M. Drill down into the different categories and the superior RX1 and D800 sensors deliver + 2/3rds of a Stop better Color Depth and Low-Light ISO performance. The Leica M's measured base ISO of 134 compared to ISO 81 and ISO 74 for the RX1 and D800 respectively mean the Sony and Nikon cameras have an immediate advantage and deliver +1 Stop improved Dynamic Range overall with scores of 14.3 (RX1), 14.4 Evs (D800) and 13.3Evs (M). As sensitivity is increased on all three cameras Dynamic Range drops at roughly the same trajectory up to ISO800 where the Leica M takes a further dip. The impact of this is good Dynamic Range of 10Evs and over is only achievable on Leica M up to ISO1600, while the RX1 / D800 are good until ISO 3200 and these better sensors offer the same Dynamic Range at ISO 25600 as Leica M at its maximum sensitivity of ISO 6400.

Leica M Typ 240 Vs Nikon D4 Vs Canon EOS 1Dx: Leica M catching up the sensor performance in top of the range DSLRs

Compared to the full frame sensor in Canon's flagship DSLR, the 1Dx, the Leica M just wins overall with 84 points to 82. For Color Depth there's little in it with 24 bits for the M compared to 23.8 bits for the 1Dx, so it's left to Dynamic Range and Low-light ISO to separate them. At base ISO sensitivities the Leica M offers significantly improved Dynamic Range +1.5 Stop better than the 1Dx, although this changes quickly as sensitivity is increased.

While the 1Dx delivers consistently good Dynamic Range of around 11.8Evs up to ISO 800 the Leica M performance drops markedly as sensitivity is increased and by ISO 800 the two cameras are the same. The trend persists past ISO 800 too where the Leica M's Color Sensitivity continues to drop rapidly and the 1Dx offers better Dynamic Range at ISO 25600 than the Leica M at ISO 6400.

Nikon's top end DSLR the D4 ranks 1/3 rd Stop better than the Leica M overall scoring 89 points compared to 84. The D4 is also ½ Stop better for Color Sensitivity at base ISO with 24.7 bits to 24 bits, but as the Leica M's performance takes a dip as ISO sensitivity is increased the D4 offers +2/3rds of a Stop Color Sensitivity at ISO 1600 compared to the Leica M at the same sensitivity. While the D4 and the Leica M have similar Dynamic Range at base ISO sensitivity of 13.3Evs (M) to 13.1Evs (D4) the same pattern emerges as sensitivity is increased, so while good Dynamic Range of +10Evs is possible on the Leica M up to around ISO 800 the D4 delivers the same results up to ISO 3200.

No doubt you've picked up on the pattern here that while the Leica M can deliver comparable results at base ISO it struggles at higher sensitivities. With a DxOMark Low-light ISO score of 1860 ISO (M) compared to 2965 ISO (D4) and 2786 ISO (1Dx) the rangefinder offers around -1 Stop ISO performance compared to these flagship DSLRs.

Leica M: CMOS sensor provides a welcome boost for Leica M image quality scores

Featuring a new higher resolution sensor and updated functionality expectations are high for the new Leica M and it doesn't disappoint. Although remaining true to their 'no gimmicks' approach the addition of an improved LCD screen with live view, as well as the increased ISO sensitivity range are welcome additions that update Leica's digital rangefinder for the modern era.

The latest 24-megapixel CMOS sensor offers not only six million extra pixels but DxOMark's Sensor Scores indicate a +1 Stop improvement in overall image quality compared to the previous 18Mp CCD sensor. As well as offering more consistent Color Sensitivity across the ISO range there's also an impressive extra +1.6 Stops boost for Dynamic Range and its low-light ISO scores are improved too, again beating previous versions by around +1 Stop.

So a big step in the right direction although the new sensor doesn't quite match the heights of the best sensors DxOMark have tested or those of flagship DSLRs. Compared to the best sensors the Leica M is a little off the pace with the Sony RX1 and Nikon D800 boasting around +1 Stop better image quality overall.

Against the Nikon D4 and Canon 1Dx the overall scores indicate the Leica M is either better or not far off in terms of Color Sensitivity and Dynamic Range. These overall scores are a little misleading however as image quality on the M drops quickly as ISO sensitivity is increased compared to this DSLR competition, which deliver a more consistent performance up to ISO 3200.

Nonetheless a welcome improvement in image quality demonstrates Leica made a wise choice switching to a CMOS sensor. If you're after a Leica digital rangefinder and your budget can stretch to $6950 the new M offers better image quality, features and functions compared to the $5450 M-E Typ 220.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Leica M review: How does the new 24-megapixel CMOS sensor in Leica's latest rangefinder perform? - DxOMark

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Announced at Photokina 2012 the new Leica M digital rangefinder camera is available for pre-order and expected to ship soon. Although the 4th rangefinder in the M range to feature a full frame sensor, Leica have changed from the previously used Truesense 18Mp CCD to a CMOSIS 24Mp CMOS model.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Leica M 240 Real World Camera Review 2013 by Steve Huff

2014 UPDATE: The ever growing Leica M 240 Sample Gallery is HERE

Wow. I can not believe it is March 2013 and I am sitting here at my big white Ikea desk writing about the new digital Leica M! No, NOT the M10 but the M Typ 240. Yes, Leica decided to be clever and call their new 24 Megapixel monster M, simply "M" with a number attached at the end to distinguish models. Problem is they were already doing this with the M (M3-M9) successfully but with shorter numbers. Now we have more to type when we write or talk about the M as we have to add "240" to the end...and that is a pain. The "220" is the M-E, which in reality is an M9. After much thought, I would have preferred the new M to be called the M10. Much easier, shorter and it would have kept with the history of the company using sequential numbering. Then again, Leica just wants us to call it the "M". But I know if I tell someone I have an M, they will ask "Oh, Which one"? 🙂 Then I will have to say, "Oh, the M 240".
Yours Truly with the M240 and Voigtlander 15mm
But hey, I am no Leica big wig. I am just a guy that writes on a blog about his passion, and man have I always been passionate about Leica cameras. So much so in fact that I have been labeled a "Leica Fanboy", especially in 2009-2010 when I heavily used my trusty M9 for just about everything. From family to casual and even tons of pro work and it never failed me.

But what those people who were trying to irritate me did not realize is I actually considered myself a Leica fanboy! I mean, what is a fanboy? I see it as someone who REALLY loves something and is crazy passionate about that something. Leica and photography go hand in hand and always have. Using a Leica is a wonderful experience and when you shoot with one you know you have a piece of quality gear as well as the history of the company behind you. If that makes me a Leica fanboy then so be it! I guess I am also an Olympus fanboy and Sony fanboy as well though because I love what they are doing for photography as well with the OM-D and RX1.
The new 50 APO Cron wide open at f2
So yea, I love Leica products, well...most of them (but NOT all). The Leica M9 has been my favorite camera ever since its release but can the new M change that? I know the answer to that question and you too shall soon see the answer because I am about to write my review of the new M 240 and I bet you will not find a more passionate real world review of this camera anywhere else (at the time of this writing anyway)! So thank you for taking the time to read my ramblings, my thoughts and viewing the sample images I was able to snap during the review period.
The color...oh the color. Color can be MUCH MUCH richer and more beautiful than it was with the M9. This was while driving home with the 50 set to infinity..2nd image shows the wide Dynamic Range and smoothness of the files
It's no secret I was one of the worlds biggest fans of the M9 and I was not shy about saying so. Millions of people have read my "Big Bad Ass Leica M9 Review" and hundreds if not thousands have purchased the M9 due to me pouring out my love for such a machine over the past few years. I am not tooting my own horn but it is a fact. The words I write on these pages seem to be heavily influential just as a movie reviewer influences the publics movie choices, which is why I always keep it real and am always honest and let my heart do the talking, even if I get grump-o's attacking me for being overly enthusiastic. That is just who I am and when I am excited about something...you guys will know it.

The fact is that myself and Thorsten Overgaard (the original Leica web presence) have probably done more for the M9 than anyone else has due to us oozing our passion for that camera over the past few years. We have taken heat from many of those who disagree with us but that is OK, it is well worth it. I will always speak my mind and speak the truth about the cameras I write about. Period. As for Thorsten, he is a GREAT guy and after meeting him in Berlin for the Monochrom event I sensed his Leica passion as well. He is the real deal and I have been reading his words since the Digilux 2 days. He also just received his M 240 and I look forward to seeing what he has to say.

If you go to the "About me" tab above you can see that most of the galleries there were shot with an M9 from Seal to Rural Landscapes to Street. Yes, the M9 gave me the one thing I loved about photography. Simplicity. Of course it gave me the quality as well and when using those gorgeous Leica lenses (the best in the world, period) everything just came together. The M9 was not and is not perfect but no camera is 🙂 Even with the lowest DXO score of any full frame sensor ever, the M9 sensor delivers stunning results in real world photos as long as you keep the ISO under 800 or so.

FACT: DXO can not judge real photo results but I am sure when they test the new M, it will rank fairly high and much better than the M9 sensor.

The M9 and the competition

With the M9 I had the classic body, the classic feel, and the classic rangefinder system. It was all there, everything I needed. Being a rangefinder with a rangefinder focusing mechanism all you needed to be sure of was a properly calibrated body and lens and there was nothing like the output of the M9. Nothing. It had its own unique flavor or rendering images in 2009-2010 and it was a pretty exciting time for Leica fans to be able to shoot the 1st full frame digital Leica.

But that was in 2009-2010 and in 2011-2012 we started getting cameras coming in from other manufacturers such as the Fuji X100 and that camera was able to deliver gorgeous results at 1/10th the cost of a Leica setup. The M9 was still on top but other cameras were creeping in with much better high ISO, faster processing times, bug free SD card use, AF and even in Leica shaped bodies. Competition is always good as this is what pushed Leica to improve the digital M once again but these other cameras, while technically superior in many, ways had one problem.
They simply were not Leica and did not give the M experience.
Those cameras were NOT rangefinders at all though somehow many felt the Fuji X-Pro 1 was indeed an RF. That just was not so and shooting the X-Pro 1 was/is nothing like shooting a real Leica M. The experience is not even close in my opinion and it all comes down to that unique rangefinder experience that you can not get from anything other than a true RF camera. If you want that RF experience, the only way to get it digitally is with a Leica ( or an old RD-1). That my friends is a fact. But then again, that RF experience is not for everyone. Some hate it because it does take some getting used to, especially if you have never shot with one. There are also some limitations, like close focusing, or needing a massive burst of 20-30 shots. You will really not get that with a Leica M digital RF.
Kids having fun..always a great photo opportunity (50 APO) Below: Shot with the old 1940's 50 Summarit 1.5 wide open, flare and all!
But was that all Leica had going for it by the time 2012 hit? The "RF experience" and name? Well, not really. I still feel the M9 sensor is a great sensor, mainly at base ISO. When shooting an M9 you just know what to expect. But it was no secret that Leica needed to move on to something bigger and better with more modern features otherwise they faced the possibility of DOOM like the not so old days before they launched the M9 and were headed for troubled roads. They indeed had some improvements and changes to make so as early as 2010, behind closed doors they started to decide what to do with the M10, which became the M (Typ 240).
It looks like an M, feels like an M and that is because it is still an M
The Big Worry - Uneasy Feelings about the CMOS sensor

Most Leica shooters were worried when Leica announced the new M 240. Why? Well for starters many assumed that doing away with the CCD of the M8 and M9 that gave those cameras their unique look and feel would be a mistake, but yes...a change was gonna come. Instead of CCD, Leica was going to use a custom made CMOS sensor, made just for the new M. CMOS? Isn't that what is in every DSLR today that gives us somewhat different output than what we are used to with our beloved M9's and even Monochrom? Yep. That CMOS. Now there are debates and some feel there is no difference while others feel there is. I fall into the camp that know there is a (very slight) difference but is that a bad thing? No, not at all because the difference is actually a BETTER one.

My camera of the year 2102, the Sony RX1 uses CMOS and that sensor is amazing. So yes CMOS can be superb and better than CCD and I am telling you now that there is no need to worry. At all. Really 🙂
The Leica 35 Summicron and the new M - Lightroom 4.4
Being that this is Leica, many of us assumed they would in no way harm their reputation by releasing a camera that was anything less than the previous 09/09/09 Leica M9 and we all had hopes that it would beat the M9 output not just equal it..or God forbid...be below it.

So worry was all over certain forums about CMOS..and the addition of video..and the addition of Live View and the addition of a big fat EVF. I even felt a bit slighted when I saw all of the new additions but I also knew it was needed. This is 2013 after all and Leica has to do what they feel they have to do!

It appeared that Leica wanted to move to the future with the new M instead of sticking in the past with a basic but powerful featureless camera like the M9. In the beginning I sort of disagreed on that though as I felt the new M did not need video..did not need an EVF to sit on top nor did it need to be modernized. It just needed:

1. a smoother shutter - M 240 has it

2. bug free operation - M240 has it

3. better LCD and menu system - M240 has it

4. Better battery life - M240 has it

5. Weather sealing - M240 has it

6. A better CCD sensor - Oops, M240 has CMOS

But Leica had some balls and decided to risk it all with basically an all new camera. The new M 240 is really a ground up camera and it is in no way a tweaked M9 but instead it offers MANY improvements over the M9, MANY. After shooting with it for a while now my concerns on the CCD vs CMOS issue have faded 110%. I will state right up front that it does NOT share the same exact look or output as the M9 but the M9 did not share the same look of the M8 and guess what? The M output is even better than the M9 in every single way (and I know many M9 shooters are shaking their fist at me right now) and once someone works with the files of the new M they will see this for themselves.
But yes, you heard that right... I feel the M 240 is an improvement in every single way over the M9 and in this review I will go over each and every one of these things, even things other reviewers may have missed.
So for the "Big Worry"...you can ease your mind. No need to be worried as the M 240 can and does deliver the goods, it just may take a while to get used to the new look ( of rich color and extended DR) if your brain has been used to seeing those M9 files, which to me now look a bit off after shooting the new M for a while.

The good thing is that once you use this new M you will begin to slowly but surely appreciate the sensor in this camera. It is technically better than the M9 sensor and does offer the Leica look but it offers much more as well.
Shooting at an Aquarium to see how the M does in low light. ISO 1000, 50 1.4 at 1.4
On March 1st I heard from PopFlash.com that they were getting in ONE and only ONE M from Leica. I tried to buy it from Tony Rose but I was not on his list at all so of course that did not work 🙂 Minutes later I heard from The Pro Shop Leica store and they said " we have gotten ONE M in and only ONE "...it was sold of course but I was wondering..."what is Leica doing? Sending out 50 of these as a beta test or are they trying to build up hype to create big demand". I mean, they had a long time to manufacture these but as early as a week ago I was reading how the new M was still being beta tested. Hmmm. Not sure why Leica was being so stingy with the M stock but I am sure they have their reasons.

There are loads of people on pre-order lists and sending one camera to select dealers was sort of odd. Sounds like the same old Leica tactics to me but I really have zero inside info so who knows. I am just thrilled to death that I managed to get one of the 1st 50 in the USA.

-
The 50 Summilux is one of the best, if not THE best Leica lens available. To me it has much more character than the new 50 APO Summicron. Sometimes, too perfect is too boring and from what I have seen of the M and 50 APO I felt the results were a little "sterile". I prefer MOJO to perfect. I prefer EMOTION to PERFECT. I also prefer imperfections to stunningly perfect.
Even so...minutes later I heard from Ken Hansen whose list I was indeed on from months and months ago. In fact, I was put on his list before the M was announced as my crystal ball told me it was coming, he he he. So I was 1st in line and Ken informed me he was shipping the camera to me. WooHoo! The very next day, Saturday, my mailman delivered the box..just one day after the email from Ken letting me know he had just received ONE M. I did not even pay the guy yet and the camera was in my house. Damn, he is good.
I immediately did my unboxing video and held the camera for the 1st time
I can tell you that I was pretty excited. Not quite as excited as the day the M9 landed in my house in 2009 or even when the M8 was delivered to my door but I was excited. This was the new M here..the latest and greatest M! It was almost 4 years since the M9 (not quite but almost) and 4 years in digital camera time is HUGE. My expectations were super high (This was Leica!!!) but as I was soon to find out, I have become quite spoiled. How so? Well, when shooting the M9, Monochrom and even the Sony RX1 you will indeed get spoiled by uncompromising image quality. When shooting these three cameras your eyes and brain get used to huge levels of detail (monochrom), dynamic range (RX1) and 3D depth and pop (M9).
The M with the 50 Lux wide open at 1.4 - LR 4.4
To make a long story short, my very 1st snaps (which are not in this review) with the M 240 left me a bit disappointed. I was seeing increased dynamic range for sure (over the M9) but the detail and pop that I was so used to seeing with my M9 and Monochrom files was missing in action. The files were pleasing, had good color but was just missing something when directly comparing to my old M9 files. But it was way early and all I have done was take a few snaps with my 50 Lux. I had a LONG way to go. I was also just looking at the OOC JPEGS and the images were just lower light indoor snaps with slow shutter speeds. HARDLY a way to test a new camera.

But as time went on and I became comfy with the camera and even using the EVF I realized that this sensor has its own new look. It is a mix of something like the D800 and Leica M9 mixed in with some Fuji color. The color is much much different than the M9. The color signature is not like the D800 or 5D II or II either. It is what I call "The new Leica color" and it is much richer, deeper (than the M9) and the sensor handles reds much better as well where the M9 had a tendency to blow them.
Hmmm. I see the Leica look here. The pop, the 3D depth, the color... ALWAYS SHOOT RAW/DNG with the LEICA M!
Once RAW processing is figured out the files look gorgeous with a smooth and deep tonality that has lots to appreciate. Yes..always shoot DNG RAW with any digital M for best results. Period.

Be Careful What You Wish For

I remember back in 2010 there were so many people bashing the M9 (those who never owned one of course) just due to cost and then there were those bashing the M9 saying it had a horrible sensor. Others were saying they wished Leica would have just used the Canon 5DII sensor. So many were saying they would buy an M9 in a heartbeat if it just had the 5D sensor..well, that wish may have just come true for all of you who wished for it! While the sensor in the M240 is NOT the one in any of the 5D cameras, the sensor is now CMOS and can do the things no other M is capable of doing.
Lovely rendering even in harsh daylight sun..this was NOT taken in the golden hour but instead, mid day. Lightroom 4.4 - 35 Summarit.
In fact, if you keep reading this review ( it may get long) then somewhere down there I will have a comparison with the M-E (M9) and Sony RX1 - same shot, same lens, same settings, same subject and light. I will do this with high ISO and low base ISO just so we can see what all of these differences are, if any.

But enough of the CCD vs CMOS debate, let's get on with the review and talk about the new M and what is new because there is really nothing to complain about with the IQ, instead there is loads to rave about. It looks and feels like Leica because it is the LENS that draws the image, and the new M retains the character of the glass you use and this new sensor is beautiful.
The M with the 50 Summilux ASPH - missed focus a bit on the guys face but still liked the shot.
The New M 240 Is An All New Camera

The new M 240 is a beast of a camera. It is like a Sony RX1 on steroids. It is more muscular, has a viewfinder, is heavier, has longer battery life and is also a full frame sensor camera. In fact, this new M is not really much like previous M's at all. Some will say THIS is the definitive digital M. Others will say the M9 is the definitive M digital. What do I think? Well, keep reading and somewhere in this review I will let you know 🙂

When Leica decided to start planning the design of the new M they had some tough choices to make. They collaborated with many of their long time Beta testers who gave their input on wether video should be implemented, wether they should go with CMOS over CCD and wether they should even ditch the RF and go EVF all the way. In many ways they caved under the pressure of certain folks who told them they would be doomed if they did not go the way of the future with CMOS, Live View, etc. Is that true? Maybe. Probably.
The new M has a very smooth way of rendering images. There is no harshness at all with the output, no matter the light . DR is huge, sharpness is just right and the color is sooo nice.
What they ended up with is a digital M that is a "tour de force" digital M that includes everything but the kitchen sink. This is good for the majority of camera buyers I guess, just not great for Leica die hards who love their simplicity and refuse to go any more modern than the M9. With the new Leica factory and their newfound ability to manufacturer in mass quantities they needed a solution for their new M that would allow them to break into new markets..such as the full frame DSLR user who may want a Leica but avoided them in the past due to the Leica M8 and M9 not having certain things like high ISO ability, video, live view, etc.
The new M 240 delivers really enjoyable color and the files still have that look. Click the image for larger and better version.
With this new M, Leica can attract a bigger audience and suck in some of those FF DSLR users who are now curious on the new M, and besides, the IQ coming from the new M will be right up their alley. Smooth, rich, and with great all around potential. To be honest, the IQ from the new M is improved over the M9. Better color, better dynamic range, better high ISO, richer files, more MP, and still sharp as a tack.

Like I said, the new M is all new. It is not a re-tweaked M9, it is an all new body, new button layout and new buttons, new sensor, new LCD, new video capability, microphones on top of the body ( where water can leak into, or so it seems) and even a new baseplate and tripod mount. Speaking of the baseplate, it is a great upgrade to the M9 baseplate. Beefier, solid and now the tripod mount is directly in the body, which is also an improvement. I also LOVE LOVE LOVE the new battery. It is huge but man the battery life is superb. I wish Sony did this with the RX1 instead of choosing their teeny battery. The new M 240 battery rocks and the new charger does as well. It takes about 2 hours to charge the high capacity battery and I was able to get 1700-2100 shots from a full charge using the RF to frame my shots. Incredible for a Leica M.
The 35 Summarit in WhoVille - see the wide dynamic range? This is not HDR but direct from RAW.
Leica also made the new M with the ability to use the Olympus VF-2..ooops, I mean Leica EVF just like they did with the X2. So now you can plop on the EVF and frame and shoot just like you are shooting any other mirrorless EVF camera. It works well but if it were me I would have created a viewfinder much like the Fuji hybrid where one button press would give you a high quality EVF and another would bring you back to the RF, and of course this would be all internal. This would have avoided the huge wart on top, added convenience and shooting pleasure and just been more sexy. I would have paid an extra $1000 for this alone. Maybe the M Type 260 will give us this in 2017 🙂
Below: The old 50 Summarit 1.5 for a street portrait
-

As it is though, I am happy to see the EVF ability added as this can give you confirmation that you have an RF that is either calibrated or out of whack. I have had many times with my M9 where the rangefinder accuracy drifted and I can tell you that is super frustrating as it makes the camera unusable for me. Now with the EVF and live view I can still get rock solid in focus shots, even if the RF drifts a little. I can say that the RF in this new M was calibrated correctly out of the box as it should be. That was a good thing because I did buy an M9-P once with an out of alignment RF out of the box. That really sucked.

So yes folks, the new M is a much different camera than the M9. In looks (it is slightly thicker), in use (it is faster and the new shutter is beautiful) and in output (different than M9 but this is not a bad thing).

Let me put up a list of the things that are different over the M9, just off the top of my head:

1. The body is slightly larger and thicker - wish it was M6 sized as that body is perfect IMO

2. New battery system - this is a big improvement

3. New 3″ LCD - this is HUGE over the M9 and MM

4. Newly "S2" styled menus - nice

5. Maestro Processor of the S2 - Anything S2 is good

6. Now 4 FPS for faster burst shooting

7. Live View mode for critical focus if needed - with focus peaking!

8. HD Video now on an M! One button press activates it though video is not my priority with this camera.

9. Newly designed custom CMOS sensor improves high ISO, color and DR

10. Focus assist button in front for manually activating assist using live view

11. EVF capability

12. External microphone can be added to hot shoe

13. Improved performance with ultra wide lenses

14. New electronic frame lines taken from the M9 Titanium (red or white, I prefer red)

15. New thumb wheel scroll and thumb grip - I like this better than the M9

16. New layout of buttons on back left, they feel nice and solid

17. Power on and off button is more solid

18. Shutter is a 2 stage shutter instead of 3 and is more damped and quiet. No grit.

19. Shutter button no longer has grit. Smoother to push.

20. Tripod mount is solid and now mounted to body instead of base plate

21. Weather sealed!

So there you go, just off the top of my head there are 21 things different than the M9, most of them are big improvements. What it boils down to in the end is YOUR preference. Over a new M-E (which is an M9) you will spend about $1500 more and to me, $1500 is well worth all of these improvements.

The M240 for B&W shooting. Uh Oh..I may prefer it to the Monochrom..Let me tell you why.

Oh no! I am going to get attacked for this one... no question! I have been shooting with the Leica Monochrom for many months. I tried a beta camera in Berlin and then bought one of my own but it took a while to learn it and how to process the files. In fact, the Leica Monochrom is one tough cookie to master and I chalked it up to it just being better than I am. I have friends who LOVE it to death and produce consistent gorgeous results with it but for me, after shooting the new M 240 and doing some B&W conversions...I have to say I prefer the M to the MM! Oh the insanity! But let me explain.

Why do I prefer it to the MM (Monochrom)?
Here are two shots of ME taken same time, same place, same lens, etc - the differences, even in the 100% are MINIMAL So the TOP image is the new M, the 2nd image is from the Monochrom - direct from camera and no PP - click for larger
Easy: It is not because I think the new M gives better B&W results it is because The M is cheaper by $1000 and shoots color as well as having all of the new 2013 upgrades I spoke about above and it does B&W very very well. It may not have the exact signature of the Monochrom or the ultra high ISO but I can not complain about the B&W performance of the new M, or the higher ISO. Unless you are super duper picky about your B&W, need HUGE prints, or are just a dedicated B&W only shooter I feel the new M is a better buy, unless you can afford BOTH. Then you are in Leica heaven and have the best of both worlds. I still love the MM but if buying new from scratch one has to think...$1000 less for the M that can do color and a good B&W or $1000 more for a camera that will ONLY do B&W, but excellent B&W.

Again, look at the TONES of each image not the DOF or lens character. Tonality wise they are almost the same. The M shot was not even converted using a plug in but rather just by sliding down the saturation. One more..the image below has one from each. One side is the M and the other the MM. I see the character of each, do you?

BTW, the answer is: Leica M on the left, Monochrom on the right.

Now I know there are loads of Mono users who love their Mono ( I love it as well) and technically, it can do a better job due to the sensor and insane detail it can capture with the right lenses... BUT....I just can not argue with these M B&W conversions that have a bit more snap, crackle and pop over the Mono. You can see my Monochrom gallery HERE and yes there is a difference in tones but it is personal pref as to what one will enjoy more. The Mono out of the box offers less contrast and more "sharp" in the rendering. Taking an M 240 file and using Alien Skin Exposure on it gives you the chance to do what you want. Low contrast, high contrast, deep blacks, faded blacks, etc and it is 95% as sharp as the mono file.

As always, just telling it how it is FOR ME, not for you. What you like will depend on your preferences. The MM is fantastic and the M is as well, just gives a different flavor of Monochrom. Below are all samples from the M240 that were converted to B&W in Alien Skin Exposure 4. Click them for larger views with more detail to see them correctly. BTW, if you are a B&W shooter and want to make huge huge prints, the MM can not be beat and would be the one to go with due to the detail it is capable of capturing. It also has a different way it renders those Monochrom tones.

The M is capable of high contrast (what I prefer) or low contrast (which I sometimes like) conversions or anything in between as you will see below. One image below is from the Monochrom. Can you spot it?

What I am really digging about the files from the M240 is that they are HARDY and very very "rich". Much more so than M9 files that fall apart a little easier. They are also more hardy than the MM files (Monochrom). Again, it takes getting used to if coming from an M9 but after a few days you learn to appreciate the quality of file coming out of the new M. Seriously. I am guessing you will hear this from anyone who owns the M for any amount of time.

So yes, I now prefer the new M files to the M9 files and by quite a bit actually. I do not miss the noise, limited DR and sometimes off color of those M9 files. Once again, I am getting spoiled, but this time from the new M files. I have well over 100k exposures with the M9 and only a few hundred with the new M, so the good news is I am only scratching the surface and have not even begun to see what this camera can do. I can not wait to see what comes from the camera over the next 3-4 years, not only from me but from all who shoot it. I am sure there will be some beautiful "Daily Inspirations" coming in over the next few months.

The 7 Days of the new M Creation:
An actual shot of inside the viewfinder with the RED Electronic Frame lines activated taken by my iPhone 5 🙂
And on the 1st day Leica said: Let there be ELECTRONIC FRAME-LINES!
NOTE: Some have showed concern that the electronic frame lines will be too bright but fear not! The frame lines dim in low light so they are not all bright and distracting. In fact, they are never distracting. In full sun they get a little brighter so you can still see them but they are always lit up just right.
One thing I LOVE about the new M are the electronic frame lines and the accuracy of these frame lines. You can choose to have them show up in White or Red. I prefer RED as they just pop and glow and you can easily frame your subjects plus it looks super cool. When I 1st saw these in the Titanium M9 a while back I so wanted them in my M9 but there was no way I could afford the cost of the Titanium M9. At the time a buddy owned the Titanium and he let me shoot with it a little and I do remember loving those frame lines. Now we get them in the new M and they are great. Purists may not like them but I sure do, and that is a fact. The frame lines are optimized for a 2m distance and this is also an improvement over the M9.

And on the 2nd day Leica said: Let there be a big ass & bad ass battery!

When I first saw the new battery I was upset that Leica would change this. Many M9 owners have stocked up on batteries and it would have been cool to use those when upgrading. But after using this new big battery I have grown to LOVE it and I applaud Leica for the choice of making it like this. I get almost 2,000 shots per charge using the RF (not live view). This battery is a beast and the new charger rocks too. Sleek, slim and a fast 2 hour charge. Bravo Leica, Bravo!

And on the 3rd day Leica said: Let there be a new smoother shutter!

I remember all of my M9's. I have had three M9's and two M9'Ps over the past 4 years. ALL of them had a different shutter feel. Some were gritty, some were rough, some would feel nice, some were louder than others. It was odd to me that all of them were a but different. They all had one thing in common though..and that is that they were a little rough to push/press. The new M is more of a thud/thunk sound and the shutter release is much smoother. More similar to an M6 than an M9. This is the best shutter feel and sound of any Leica M digital to date.

And on the 4th day Leica said: Let there be Live View & Focus Peaking!

There were MANY mixed feelings by Leica fans on this one. Those who love Leica for who they are and what they have stood for hate the idea of Live View on an M. It just makes it so "DSLR". I was one of those who were against it as well but damn...Live View has been a great addition and using the EVF, while slower, is nice for getting critical focus.

The focus peaking with EVF works very well and it has been easy to manual focus in this way. If your RF is out, the EVF or LCD can be used for critical focus.

I prefer using the RF but live view is nice to have on the M. It is well implemented and bug free too, which is good. Be aware though if you use the EVF there will be a slight lag when shooting. It is slower and I do prefer using the RF as already stated and would not recommend the EVF or LIve View for any kind of fast or even street shooting.

The focus peaking works like it does on the Sony cameras but it is not as pronounced..it is more "light" but you can easily see when eyes or any part of your subject is in focus, and it has been pretty accurate for me. Focus Peaking is good to have. If I could though I would wish for a more pronounced peaking level and continual focus peaking during video shooting (it is off while recording).

When shooting using Live View/EVF you also have the ability to enable focus magnification/assist. You can zoom in on the scene by up to 10X for super critical focus but when you do this it is only the center of the frame that blows up. You will just have to move the camera to where you want to focus and then recompose. You can not scroll around while zoomed in for focusing now can you choose the focus point, it will blow up the CENTER only. Once you focus critically in the magnified view you simply tap the shutter button lightly to go back to the full 1X view.

I have had no issues using this feature and all shots have been in focus when using the zoom focus assist. As I said before, it just slows things down quite a bit as it does on all mirror less cameras when using manual focus lenses so most will just prefer to use the RF which I can use MUCH faster than the EVF/Live View.
NEW METERING MODES
Oh, and Manual focus assist can be set to Automatic or manual. When in Automatic it will activate as soon as you turn the focus barrel of the lens. You can then adjust the level of magnification up to 10X using the thumb dial. If you do not use Automatic you can use the button on the front of the camera to activate it. I use "automatic" as I find this to be easy and I do not have to mess with the front button.

Another feature of Live View mode is that you can now for the 1st time ever choose Spot or Evaluative metering. Yes, the new M can be set up to use different metering than the classic center weighted of all previous M's. I have tested all modes and while spot is a but tricky to use, evaluative seemed to work great. Only problem is the lag with those modes and I much prefer to use the RF/classic for my every day shooting. Still, it is nice to have these choices if you need them.

And on the 5th day Leica said: Let's make movies!

For the 1st time EVER Leica has put HD Video capability in an M camera. This is a little weird if you ask me because A: There is no real image stabilization. B: The M body style is not the best for shooting video (if trying hand held) and C: There is no Auto Focus so you need some experience using MF for video. The video can also show the dreaded "Jello Effect" when shooting handheld.

Still, the M can take good video though not perfect or up to the standards of the video gurus. The great news is that it will let the character of your Leica glass shine through. It seems to be something for M users to try and possibly enjoy but it can also be used by those who want a great cinematic look to their video. I am sure we will see some killer video coming from someone soon because this camera delivers great colors, even in low light (as my sample video below was shot) so video looks great. If you are in funky lighting the colors will be off if you do not set white balance manually but for the most part it takes fantastic video.
See my video sample below mostly shot at night using the 35 Summarit wide open...
I suggest using a tripod to avoid jello shakes.
...and one more shooting the Noctilux 0.95 all wide open 🙂 Also, I had the camera set to B&W so the video gets shot in B&W as well.
-

Keep in mind I am not a hardcore video guy so others will do more testing with this. Still, I had to include a couple of samples because no one else really has yet. Video is here but for me it is not a make or break thing as I will not use this for video at all I feel, and if I do it will just be for family fun stuff. Some will though and it hurts nothing to have this capability. If you do not want it, you do not even have to know it is there.

I'd like to see a firmware upgrade that allows us to re-assign the top movie button for those of us who will never use it so maybe they can give us this. Leica is good about firmware updates though sometimes it can take them a while to get it released.

And o n the 6th day Leica said: Let there be a solid Tripod mount!

As I mentioned earlier the baseplate of the new M is newly designed. It feels beefier but that may be due to the fact that it is a little thicker. With the M9, the tripod mount was built into the metal baseplate. In the new M, the tripod mount is mounted in the body and it looks very sturdy. This is yet another improvement in the all new ground up M. What you would expect from a hand assembled German made and designed camera. Another feature is that you can actually access the SD card without removing the baseplate if you so desire.

And on the 7th day Leica said: LET THERE BE CMOS!
The M9 files are sharp, detailed and have pop. They can be gorgeous at base ISO and in good light it doesn't get much better.
The most controversial decision was to go to CMOS from CCD and there are so many out there screaming about it. When I saw the 1st test shots that were slowly leaking out from Leica I was very disappointed but I tried to hold back judgement until I used the camera. I still see others bashing the CMOS sensor yet they have not used the camera. Instead they are judging from early images taken by others with Beta firmware. Sure, there is indeed a difference but let's break it down some:

The M 240 files at first glance do not appear to have the same pop, but in reality they really do have the same exact pop but with more richness in color and overall look. We do indeed get better color, richer color, extended dynamic range which makes it much easier to shoot in not so nice light, better high ISO performance (but not HUGE, Id go to 3200 on the new M and all the way to 10,000 on the MM) and more megapixels (which to me is not important as I prefer fatter pixels). I've already said this but the new M files are technically better than the M9 files, period. It is what it is. It is fact. It is reality.

We get more hardy files from the M as well and we can push them more and let's face it, they are still very very sharp . It doesn't matter because to my eyes, the M files are easily better in just about every way to these eyes. The new sensor is really good, and better than the M9's CCD. It pains me to say that but it is the truth. With careful RAW conversion we can equal the M9 detail while gaining all of the other benefits of the new CMOS sensor.

The new files are just so pleasing to look at as they seem to have everything one can ask for. This is not me hyping the camera, it is fact, pure and simple. Are they better files than something like a D800 or 5DIII? Probably not but to have this in the M form factor is something so many have been asking for since the launch of the M9, and they can surely equal those high end DSLR files without a problem. Add in the Leica M glass and you have that quality with the character of Leica.
These next two shots were converted from RAW using ACR and you can click them to see the full size files to see that the detail is still there, even with the CMOS sensor.
A couple of full size from RAW files. Click them for the full size.
and an image with crop - you must click it for full size crop - this was full harsh AZ mid day sun!
-

Image Quality Comparison between the M 240, M9/ME/M9P, Sony RX1 and Fuji X100s

Many out there in internet land have been claiming the new sensor in the M 240 can not compete with the M9 for pop and detail. I am here to tell you and show you that this is not true. In fact, the new sensor can not only match the M9, it can exceed it in every area. Below you will see a three sets of comparison shots. They are between the ME (which is an M9) and the new M 240. ALL images below are from RAW. Same lens, same subject, same light, and using BASE ISO of each camera which is 160 on the ME/M9 and 200 on the new M. Take a look and click on each image for the full size file (the 1st set is full size). 18Mp for the M9 and 24 MP for the New M 240. The 2nd set is resized with a 100% crop to show noise at ISO 400 in the dark area.
First, the M 240 file. Click image for full size 24 MP file. and below is the ME/M9 files, Same lens, same aperture, base ISO. Click it for full size 18MP file
The third set is the big one - 4 full size from RAW samples using the same focal length and aperture using the M 240, ME, Sony RX1 and Fuji X100s.
The 1st one is from the new M 240. If you click it then you will see a larger version with a 100% crop embedded. Both were at ISO 400, indoor, medium light, 35 Summarit at 2.5. As with all of these images you MUST click them to see the larger version. Both are from RAW/DNG. The image below is from the ME, which is the M9 with a new paint job. I much prefer the color in the M 240 shot as to my eyes it is more natural where the ME file has the M9 color signature which now appears off and ruddy when doing a direct comparison to the new M. There is also more grit in the ME crop at ISO 400.
What do you see? I see minimal difference and no loss of any Leica look or pop or depth. Period. But let us try a couple more shall we?

So for these eyes, the 1st shot is a draw but in reality the win goes to the 240. The 2nd shot for me, goes to the 240 as well. I prefer the color of the 240 here as well.

Now for the big one.
1st up the Leica M 240 - From Lightroom 4.4, exported and saved as an "8" JPEG
The four images below are all full size images direct from RAW from the M, ME, RX1 and X100s. You can click each image for the full size file. You can save them to your own computer if you want to mess with them, resize them, whatever you like. OK, so here they are and each file is marked. All cameras were shot at f/4, base ISO using the 35mm (or equiv) focal length.
Now the Leica M9 file - Lightroom 4.4 - saved as an "8" JPEG
-
The Sony RX1 file - Lightroom 4.4 - Saved as an "8" JPEG
-
The Fuji X100s file - Lightroom 4.4 - saved as an "8" JPEG
-

So there you have it! All 4 cameras give plenty of detail and pop but to my eye, after careful examination I think the M240 and RX1 wins this one overall for sure. Look at the base of the hydrant. The RX1 and M240 have plenty of detail and DR and the X100s has a little mush here. Still, the X100s is impressive because it is $1299 vs the $2799 of the RX1 and $over $8500 price of the M combo. As for the M9, it also did very well as expected with detail and really cant be faulted. What are your thoughts?

High ISO. How much better is it over the M9?

One of the reasons Leica went to CMOS besides Live View is to achieve better high ISO performance. With the M9, shooting at max ISO of 2500 was pretty rough in lower light. In order to avoid the noise we had to crush the blacks to hide the massive noise. I tried to keep my M9 shooting at lower ISO and usually avoided 1600-2500. With the new M I can comfortably go to ISO 3200 if needed, hell even 6400. So 6400 is a huge improvement since the M9 days BUT if you are shooting in the dark or VERY low light you may see some banding in ISO 6400 shots. In average light you will not see it, at least I did not.

The new M still does not get us to Monochrom ISO performance. I can use that camera at 10,000 ISO if needed and it still keeps the detail as well. The new M also loses a little bit of Dynamic Range the more you pump up the ISO so in reality, this new M is also at its best at lower ISO. 200-1600 seems to be the sweet spot for me but you can still use it with confidence up to 3200.

The incredible news is that it beats the amazing high ISO champ, the Sony RX1 from 1600-6400. This surprised me as I thought it would fall short because Leica has NEVER been known for their high ISO quality At the end of the day it is a huge improvement in real word photos over an M9. The ISO 6400 shots I am getting look better than the ISO 2500 on the M9. Want to see? Take a look at the samples below in the high ISO test.

A HIGH ISO quick comparison: Leica M, Leica M-E, Sony RX1, Fuji X100s - all at 35mm f/4

Many have asked me for this and it has been the #1 request for this review. You guys want to see the same shots, same settings, same everything, tripod mounted and all side by side. So here you go. One shot from each camera..the M, M-E (M9) and Sony RX1. You can click the images below to see the full size from RAW out of camera files. Which do YOU prefer? I decided to go to extremes - Max ISO on the M of 6400. Max ISO on the M-E of 2500 and ISO 6400 on the RX1 to match the new M.

UPDATE: Some have stated here in the comments that my results do not match that of focus-numerique. That is because their Sony high ISO samples have Noise Reduction added and their Leica M files do not. Without NR the Sony files would be just as sharp as the M with just as much if not a little more noise. So their test is flawed due to that fact. I never use NR in my ISO tests or personal shooting, it is always 100% off. You can always spot NR as it kills details and adds mush. This makes their Sony test files look very soft as well.
1 - Leica M 240 - ISO 3200 and 6400 crops embedded in file. Click it to see them full size 2 - Sony RX1 - ISO 3200 and 6400 crops embedded in file. Click them to see full size. M beats RX1 at these ISO for noise 3 - Fuji X100s - Yes, the new S 🙂 ISO 3200 and 6400 crops embedded in file. Click them for full size. Impressive! 4 - Leica ME (M9) - The MAX ISO of the M9/ME is 2500 so the crops here are ISO 1600 and 2500 crops
NOTE: I test high ISO in a way that anyone SHOULD test high ISO. In dim or low light conditions. I use the same aperture, same focal length (if possible) and use A mode for all cameras letting the CAMERA choose the exposure. Why? Because this is what you will get in the real world when USING the camera. We do not go out and shoot an RX1 saying "Oh, I have to match the exposure to the Leica M". No, 85% of shooters that use advanced cameras shoot in A mode. So what you see below is what you REALLY get. I would also NEVER EVER do high ISO tests with studio lighting for the very obvious reasons as that is a condition that is so far from "real world" it is really useless. No one will crank up the ISO to shoot with bright studio lighting unless it is by accident. I prefer to shoot a camera how it is meant to be shot so the results you see here are what YOU will get when you take the camera out to shoot.

As you can see, the high ISO champ among these contenders is the new Leica M where it beats the RX1 for noise by a tad. None of these had any Noise Reduction. What you see is what you get. I am impressed with what Leica has done as they can now say it as fact "no compromise". The X100s was added last minute and this test impresses me. It appears the X100s will be mighty good. My full review of this camera is coming in 1-2 weeks.

The ME has a greenish hue to the color and for me, the color winners are the M240 and X100s as they are closest to the real scene, which was garage lighting. All cameras were set to AWB to see how they would render the color/WB. All cameras were at 35mm and f/4 (X100s 24mm lens equals a 35mm due to sensor crop).
Here are two snaps at NIGHT at ISO 6400 with the new M. The M9 could not do this at 2500 at night and this is a nice improvement for night street shooters. You may sometimes see slight banding at ISO 6400 but this is a PUSH mode and why I would normally stick to ISO 3200 for my max.
So there ya go, the M240 chalks up another one with impressive high ISO performance.
The new "Info" screen. This was shot on day 4 with the camera and I was still on the same original battery charge with 65% left. Notice it tells me what lens is attached, my ISO, metering mode, WB mode and my quality settings. You access this screen by pressing the middle "info" button that is in the back "d-pad" on the right.
-

Dynamic Range - Can you recover shadow detail?
1st image is out of camera JPEG. 2nd image was the RAW where I pulled out the shadow detail. The DR of this sensor is HUGE.
I was shooting one day in an old abandoned house. It was smelly, nasty and a cold 34 degrees and I just wanted to take a few test shots and get out. There was one shot I snapped in a rush and when I arrived back home I realized it was underexposed a little. I decided to open the RAW file and see if I could pull out detail from the shadows. Worked like a charm. I was able to recover ALL of the detail and what was invisible before. This is a good indication that the sensor in the M is fantastic. Check out the before and after images below:

There is a new grip in town from Leica and it means business. Coming in at $895 it is insanely priced. I mean, this is a GRIP you add to the bottom of the camera and it is $895! But it does add GPS functionality to the camera so you can see exactly where all of your images were taken. The grip, which I have not seen or used seems like it adds some size to the camera. I was never a fan of the big grips for the M8 or M9 but this one does look cool and well made. Personally, I will not be shelling out the near $1k for the grip but I am sure many will. Just a bit too rich for my blood.

The M Multi-Functional Handgrip is a beast 🙂

don't miss these amazing contests at I SHOT IT with prizes of cash and Leica cameras:

The Pros and Cons of the new Leica M Typ 240
Cons

New LCD rocks!

New shutter rocks!

New Electronic Frame lines rock!

New big ass battery rocks!

Focus Peaking and Live View are a welcome addition

Camera feels great and new buttons and layout are an improvement

Camera is still beautiful and pure Leica in build and quality

Speed has been improved, new Maestro processor from the S2

New menus look 2013 instead of 2001

HD Video is on board and while not perfect, the quality is great.

EVF Capability is good for some situations

Camera has been 100% bug free. No issues at all.

Cost is $50 less than the original M9 at launch at $6950

Color is very rich, files are hardy

Dynamic Range is improved over the M9 and is incredible!

HIGH ISO is improved over the M9, ISO 3200 is VERY usable

New thumb grip helps quite a bit and thumb wheel is a nice improvement

Battery charger is very nice, slim and charges in about 2 hours

You can use the Olympus EVF or Leica EVF, same with the add on microphone.

The new CMOS sensor is exclusive and designed just for this camera.

Still feels and shoots like a classic RF, but with modern twists.

Weather sealed!

A definite improvement across the board for the digital M shooter in every way.

You can shoot your R glass with an adapter. This IS Leica's "R Solution".

More accurate frame lines now optimized for 2M distance

Less shutter lag than the M9 while in "classic mode" (not Live View)

Color and B&W both look great out of this camera.

You can now choose classic metering or evaluative or spot, but there will be a lag with spot or evaluative.

No more lag for your LCD previews like with the M9. When you take the shot they pop in immediately - crisp and clear.

ISO 800, 50 lux at 1.4 - Blown highlights at the top? This was done on purpose. I will state why in a new article soon 🙂

Camera is thicker than the M9 and the M9 is bigger and thicker than an M7. I would prefer M6 size but just not possible.

When you power on the camera there is a short 2 second delay, it is not anywhere near instant to power on and it should be.

Still no speed demon at 4FPS, but then again, that is not what the M is about.

Red dot is a bit too large IMO. Leica really wants people to know you are shooting a Leica. M9P design would have been nicer.

2 year warranty. At this price I feel at least a 3 year would be best, 5 would be perfect.

Small shutter lag when using Live View that slows it all down a tad. I do not recommend using the EVF or live view for street or where you need fast response.

AWB is improved but can still give some odd results in mixed light.

Wish there was continuing focus peaking during video shooting.

Should be a way to choose the area you want to magnify for focus assist

Banding may be seen in some situations at PUSH ISO 6400, stick with 3200 for max and that will not be an issue

Frame line preview selector switch is gone and some may miss this (I never used it ever)

HD video has some rolling shutter/Jello effects.

Sometimes there is an odd orange-ie type of color cast going on and I expect a FW fix is coming for this

Finally, there are other cameras for less money that can give similar results or come close (D800, 5DIII, RX1, and even Fuji X100s) but you lose the RF experience and Leica glass on a full frame sensor.

Is it worth an upgrade from an M9 or to buy over the M-E?

I have been watching the online comments from potential M buyers and many of them are saying "I see nothing that makes me want to upgrade from my M9". There are many passionate M9 owners and I can understand that statement because the M9 is a special camera and it somehow has a way of "attaching" itself to you. It is still a highly capable camera and always will be as long as it is functional. If you enjoy your 9 then you have all the camera you need right there.

But for those on the fence, here is what you gain over the M9 with the M, and these are my honest opinions after extensive use with BOTH:

The LCD on the new M is 100% better than the M9. It's jaw dropping when comparing them side by side.

The New M thumb grip and thumb wheel are improvements in control and feel.

The electronic frame lines are a nice improvement.

Battery life is hugely improved as is the new charger.

Live View has already saved me for a few shots using the EVF.

The new sensor will provide you with better low light results, no question!

The new sensor will provide MUCH richer and IMO better color than the M9!

The new M has improved AWB.

The new M has the ability to use old R lenses if that is your thing.

The new M has focus peaking and focus assist when using live view!

The new M has HD video capability that is quite decent.

The new files are much more hardy when processing.

Dynamic Range is much better on the new M, easier to shoot in full sun without harsh results!

The new sensor provides just as much pop and detail as the M9. Yes, it really does.

The new M has weather sealing so light rain should not be an issue or worry.

This is indeed the future of the Leica M, and will be the current model for at least three years.

The M9 is a great tool no doubt and can still take amazing images today as it did in 2009. If you are pondering an upgrade just decide if you want any of the new improvements. If not, stick with the M9. 🙂 If you are contemplating buying an M-E or the new M, the new M will set you back an extra $1500 so just be sure these new features are worth it for you. To me, they are VERY well worth it. To you they may not be. Choose what fits your needs the best. Either way you will be getting a great tool but I am telling you now, you will want this new M if you are contemplating an M and can not decide between the ME and the M 240.

My Final Word on the new Leica M Typ 240

So many of you have skipped here I bet..avoided the over 13,000 words above and just came to the conclusion. Well, if you did that then I suggest you go back up and read all that I have written. I have spent countless hours (over 80) on this review and have went out and done LOADS of shooting! Lol. BUT if you just do not have the time or desire to read it all then I guess you can get the flavor of it all in this final breakdown:
The 50 Noctilux wide open
Yes, Leica has finally delivered a modern super versatile rangefinder camera. The new M is filled with bells, filled with whistles, and all kinds of tricks that previous M's NEVER even thought about or could have even ventured into. The new 240 is loaded and to some this is good news and to others it is not so good news, but to those who feel it is bad news let me say..DO NOT FEAR. The new M is excellent and a worthy successor to the M9. In fact, it has exceeded my expectations and I have found it well worth the admission cost. I have ZERO regrets for selling my M9P for this new M. None. Zilch. Zero. Nada. In fact, if I had to go back to the M9 it would be tough now that I have seen what the new M is capable of as well as the joy of shooting it!

Some of you have seen early online samples and had mixed feelings on the new sensor. The bottom line is that many of us Leica fans have been shooting with the M9 for over 3 years. We are now so used to those M9 files they are almost hardwired in our brain. The amazing pop and detail of those M9 files with a calibrated body and lens are astounding and when we switch to this new M 240 things are not quite the same...at 1st because they look so much different. In my opinion though, they are even better and by a large margin but you do have to get used to that difference and it can take a few days.

The new CMOS sensor in this camera is much different than the Kodak CCD sensor in the M9. The look it will give you is a little bit different and you can not replicate the M9 feel with the new 240 just as you can not replicate the M 240 look with the M9 or even the look of the M9 with an M8 and vice versa.
The 50 1.4 strikes again - LR 4.4
After extensive use with this new 240 I have a deep appreciation for what this camera can do and how it goes about doing it. While we lose just some of that M9 crispness we gain so much more due to the use of the new CMOS sensor. MUCH better Dynamic Range, better high ISO performance, richer color and more robust files that can be tweaked more during PP, the ability to have Live View (which I do like having) and the image quality is up there with the top full frame DSLR's like the D800, 5DIII, and in some cases better with more character due to the gorgeous Leica glass available.

One thing I found is that it took a few days of using the new M 240 to realize what it can do. I had to relearn processing of the RAW files as they do not work like the M9 files did. Different sharpening levels are needed and there is so much more DR my usual tricks for the M9 files only made the M240 files look worse. Once I figured out my workflow it all started to come together. I started seeing the benefits of the new sensor.
So all of you Leica fans can rest easy.
Once this happened the M9 files started looking a bit "hard" in comparison..a bit "off" in color. Yep, my brain has now gotten used to the M240 files! My guess is that if the M240 came out in 2009 and the M9 was just released now that M shooters would be in an uproar asking where their color is, where their DR is as well as their ISO performance. I even prefer B&W conversions of these M files over the M9 B&W! It's a win win.

The new M 240 is a joy to shoot and while it has it "all" you can still shoot it like an old school M8 or M9 using the RF and avoiding the new features. That is what makes it so cool. You can shoot how you want and it is all there for you when you need it and it even has some weather sealing. Nice.

My 240 has been bug free and never had one freeze up, SD card issue or any problems. Seems like the most stable M yet hardware wise, so congratulations to Leica for creating this and having the balls to go into modern times with the digital RF.

When I first obtained the M I was unsure if I would keep it or go back to an M9 or M-E. After using it every day for the past 2 weeks I will not be going back to the M9, no way no how. I have once again been spoiled by the new kid on the block. While the M9 has served me well for almost 4 years, I expect the new M to do the same for the future. This is not spin or me trying to sell cameras, it is my honest to goodness opinion, as always. I even enjoy using the video feature on this camera! I am also not trashing the M9, as the M9 is a legend in my mind. Just as capable today as it was yesterday.

But yes my friends, the new M is a fantastic tool as well as a real Leica. The M has come a long way and the new 240 is a bonafide winner. The great part is that Leica did not increase the price for all of the new additions. It is actually $45 less than the M9 was at launch and comes in at $6,950. Still an insane dollar amount for a camera but as I spoke about in older M9 articles, if this is your passion and you get enjoyment in your life from it then it is well worth it.

Me, I skip the fancy cars, boats, ATV's, and other toys to afford my cameras and enjoy my photography. This is what I get enjoyment from in life (besides family and friends of course).

If you are stuck between buying an M9 or M-E or new M, I can highly recommend the new M with ease. It is my favorite camera EVER and the new king of the Leica M hill. This is the best Leica digital RF to date hands down and yes you can quote me on that. It has the Mojo, the feeling, the maturity, the soul and the history of Leica behind it. I think this will end up being my new favorite camera ever.
I have not even touched upon the new feature and ability to use Leica R glass via Adapter, out of camera JPEGS or new film modes of the M 240. Those sections will be added as I test them and the next update on JPEG and film modes will be next. Soon.
With all of that said, other cameras like the D800, Canon 5DIII, Sony RX1, and even the new Fuji X100s can get close (X100s) or equal the new M in IQ (FF DSLR's). But to those who want an M, nothing but an M will do and it is the only camera where you can use all of the gorgeous M lenses on a full frame camera.

Ken Hansen - Ken is the man. A legendary Leica dealer. Ken has done so much for me since day one of my web site and I owe him so much yet he continues to act like he owes me 🙂 Ken does not have a web site, just an email and phone number. If you need anything leica, new or used feel free to send him an e-mail ([email protected] ) and tell him I sent you. You can not go wrong with Ken or any of the dealers I recommend. Period. If it were not for him I would not have this M or the Monochrom.

PopFlash - Tony Rose at PopFlash.com is another legendary dealer. Leica fans know him by name for good reason. Me and Tony have not always been best of friends but today we are solid and he is always going out of his way to please every customer that comes his way. He also sells the cool Artisan & Artist strap you see on my Leica M. You can read about it HERE. But Tony is a great Leica guy and his website is HERE.

The Pro Shop - These guys are awesome. They know their stuff and within their walls is an official Leica Shop. They also sell Nikon and other high end cameras as they did not get the name "Pro Shop" for nothing. You can check out their site or give them a call here. Great group of guys and they may just have what you are looking for, Leica or otherwise.

B&H Photo - The store I have been shopping at for anything photographic since the early 90's. I have spent so much money at B&H it is embarrasing but one thing has been constant. In almost 20 years of shopping with them I have never had one bad experience with B&H Photo. Their website is the best, their tracking rocks, their return policy is about as good as it gets. I can only go by my experiences but B&H is known world wide. They have everything you can imagine for your photo needs and even other things like TV's, High end headphones, binoculars and much more. If you click HERE to go to their site anything you purchase..anything will help to keep this website alive. They have the new M HERE for pre-order.

Amazon - What can I say? Amazon rocks. They have the new M HERE. Same goes with Amazon, if you follow my link and end up buying ANYTHING, even a baby wipe I will get a few pennies that build up over the months and it helps to fund this site. So thank's to anyone who has helped out!
Q: What camera did you use for the product shots?
Questions you may have for me after reading this review:
Q: Do you really like the new M better than the M9?
A: I used the Sony RX1 for all product shots, all JPEG.
Q: How come you did not test resolution?
A: Yes, without a doubt. 100%. The improvements are pretty huge and it is a worthy successor. Take a look at the images from my M9 review and then at these in this review. You will see the difference in color, rendering, tonality, DR, etc all for the better in the new M. This is just IQ. When you add in all of the other things it takes it over the top for me. This is also the most fun to use digital M yet.
Baker Baker - he was in FULL sun - LR 4.4 - click it for better view Q: Did Leica send you that camera for free?
A: I do not do that. never have, never will. You can see tests like that from Sean Reid over at Reid Reviews. I like to test in a real world way, using the camera just as YOU would use it. What you see is what you get 🙂 Sean goes the other route which many love as well and Sean is a good guy. I also met him in Berlin and he let me use his Monochrom for that one hour test (though I think Leica had something to do with that).
Q: Is the camera you have a final production camera with latest firmware?
A: NO. As stated I bought mine from Ken Hansen, Leica dealer. Leica has never given me anything. Not even a lens cleaning cloth. My check has been sent to Ken. 🙂
Q: How can Leica charge $6,950 for a camera body in 2013 with so much competition?
A: Yes, this is one of the very 1st full production models in the USA. It also is running the very latest firmware.
Lightroom 4.4 for the RAW file Q: Do you like the new M more than your "Camera of the Year 2012" the Sony RX1?
A: Easy. It is a Leica. Many people have strong feelings and passion for Leica. Yes, we do pay for the name and red dot but we also pay for a finely engineered piece of gear, which when shot with and held gives a sense of price and ownership that not many cameras do. It's hard to explain unless you are already a Leica user. Plus, those lenses are the best in the world, hands down. From construction, to feel, to image quality. Yes, Leica is priced in the stratosphere and I am just glad they did not jump the price of the new M into the $8-10K range as previously rumored. They kept it at $6950 and at that price they sold loads of M9's. I mean, did you expect the new M to be $3000? No one did. Again, it is Leica. Oddly enough, when I shoot the M 240 I feel it is worth the cost for me as it gives me so much inspiration, joy and happiness.
Q: Are you paid off by Leica or the dealers you recommend?
A: Well, I LOVE my RX1 and it has given me incredible quality in a small well made body and lens. I have the EVF, the Gariz case, and it has never failed me. It has its own unique look due to the Zeiss lens and huge Dynamic Range and is a dream street machine that can even close focus. The M is a different tool all together. With the M you can change focal lengths/lenses but the RX1 is a 35mm camera only. If you shoot only 35mm, the RX1 may just be the better choice as the IQ is somewhat similar between the two, just with different color signatures and mojo. Then again, if you want the rangefinder experience, then Leica is the only game in town for digital RF. The M experience (in use) can't be replicated with a normal digital camera from Sony, Fuji, Olympus, etc. I love both cameras but to be 100% honest, if I had a choice to grab the M and a 35 or the RX1 for a day trip..I would probably take the M. For an evening street walk, it may be the RX1 or M, depending on mood. Bottom line is both are superb. Pick your poison as they say. I am keeping both.

A: Lol, No. The dealers I recommend are all dealers I shop with or have good experience with. Those dealers are also site sponsors (advertisers) but I accepted them because they are the best in the buz. Any business or dealer I recommend is due to the fact that I know you will not be ripped off or taken advantage of. They are top notch. They pay a yearly fee to have their ad on my site (as with any website/blog) but that is not why I recommend them. As for Leica, they do not give me anything..ever. In fact, they do not even send me review samples at all anymore and I have no contact at Leica due to some oddball political reasons.
Q: Does the Olympus EVF VF-2 really work on the new M? How about the $48 Olympus Microphone set?
But that is no problem as I can get their cameras to review from the dealers early on like this M. I'd rather OWN the review camera anyway instead of feeling pressure from a camera company to write a good review. Even one of the beta testers (who I deeply respect) said in his review that he will talk about good things and not the bad because his loyalties are to Leica. I like being able to say what I need to say though in the case of this new M I really do not have anything horrible to say. 🙂

A: YES, and yes. I have tried the Leica EVF and the Olympus VF-2. Both work perfect and are exactly the same in quality, build, feel and use. The Leica comes in a silver box and has the LEICA name on it, which I admit looks great on the new M. The Olympus has "Olympus" on the front which looks odd on a Leica M that cost $7k. Both are made by Epson, same EVF. The Olympus is $249 and the Leica runs around $450-$500 depending on where you buy. As for the microphone set, the Leica is the same one as the Olympus SEMA-1 which sells for under $55. The Leica version with the Leica name on it is $250-$285. Same exact mic. I tested them and found the sound quality to not be a huge improvement over the built in mic anyway. The good news is you can use the shoe adapter from the mic set to plug in any mini jack mic you want. Even though they are the same as the Olympus versions, I am seeing most M buyers springing the extra for the Leica versions just to feel "complete".

Q: Why not just spend less on a Nikon D800 and Zeiss lens?

A: If you want a rangefinder and the experience that goes along with it, as well as the size and weight advantage then a Nikon D800 just will not do. The D800 is a FINE camera and I loved the IQ coming from it when paired with a Zeiss 35 1.4. It was gorgeous in all areas of image quality. But I was happy to send the review sample back as I would never use it due to size, heft and weight.

I am a guy who takes my camera with me 90% of the time. The D800 is just too large and cumbersome for this, for ME.

Sure I can spend a little less and get a D800/Zeiss prime combo but it would end up staying at home 90% of the time. Unused.
Q: What is that red strap you have on your M?
Plus throw in the fact that I love Leica M lenses. They are just so nice, small, well made and the character of many of them are unmatched, even by Zeiss. if you want a Leica M, then you want a Leica M. It is all about what you like, what gives you enjoyment and what makes you HAPPY. If it is an M, go for an M. If it is a D800, go for a D800.

A: That is the Atisan & Artist Easy Slider and I wrote all about it and even did a video for it HERE.
Q: Why do you review in a "Real World/Real Use' style instead of battering the camera with a series of scientific tests?

A: Easy! Back about 5 years ago before my site started I used to be a guy who frequented the main forums that were all the rage back in the day. Those sites would do technical tests and long reviews and I would usually skip right to the conclusion because I really could care less about some of those "scientific tests" that they were doing. When certain tests are done it sort of starts taking away from what the camera was built to do, which is take real photos. Memories. Slices of life. Many use these cameras (Yes, even Leicas) to capture memories of their children, their family, their life and yes, even their pets. When I get a new camera in to review I test it in the only way it should be tested. By using it to take pictures. Using it at all kinds of settings - low light, bright light, mid light and indoors. What the camera gives me back in the image quality is what reality is. if I set up a studio in my garage with studio lighting and take images of wood, plants or newspapers then this tells me absolutely nothing. Do I care how surgically sharp a lens CAN be in the perfect conditions? No, not me because I will never shoot in the perfect conditions. I will not set my camera to match another cameras metering when do high ISO shooting either.

What you see in my reviews is the results of me using the camera for 1-2 weeks and beyond. Real results in all kinds of situations and the same results you will get if you end up using the same camera. Scientific testing has its place and there are some who prefer that, which is great but there are also many who prefer this style as they like to see what they can expect if they buy the camera.

I will note that this was the very 1st "Real World" camera review site online. Now there are hundreds. That right that backs up my statements that there are more who enjoy real world reviews than technical reviews.

This site started because of the lack or real world reviewing. I would not review any other way.

2014 UPDATE: The ever growing Leica M 240 Sample Gallery is HERE with TONS of new images!

I want to thank ALL of you for reading this long winded review and ramble about my experience with the new Leica M. I hope you enjoyed it and if you did not then that is OK as well but one thing is certain, it is all true from my personal feelings. Will you feel the same if you jump to the new M? I can not say as not everyone is not the same and if you have never shot an RF before expect a 2 week "getting used to" phase. In any case, thank you all! I will leave you with a few more samples from the M using the 35, 50 and 75mm focal lengths and if you have one of these on pre-order I truly hope your wait is not too long. ENJOY!
THANK YOU ALL! EXIF is embedded in each shot! Most were processed with Lightroom 4.4 and the M profile.
BTW, I will be adding to this review as I shoot more and discover more about the camera. I will also add more samples or comparisons when I can. Some of the samples below are softer due to slow shutter speeds of me missing focus slightly when shooting wide open. But click on any image for a much larger view which will always look better with more sharpness, color and pop.

PLEASE! I NEED YOUR HELP TO KEEP THIS WEBSITE RUNNING, IT IS SO EASY AND FREEE for you to HELP OUT!

Hello to all! For the past 5 years I have been running this website and it has grown to beyond my wildest dreams. Some days this very website has over 200,000 visitors and because of this I need and use superfast web servers to host the site. Running this site costs quite a bit of cash every single month and on top of that, I work full-time 60+ hours a week on it each and every single day of the week (I received 200-300 emails a DAY). Because of this, I need YOUR help to cover my costs for this free information that is provided on a daily basis.

If you ever decide to make a purchase from B&H Photo or Amazon , for ANYTHING, even diapers..you can help me without spending a penny to do so. If you use my links to make your purchase (when you click a link here and it takes you to B&H or Amazon, that is using my links as once there you can buy anything and I will get a teeny small credit) you will in turn be helping this site to keep on going and keep on growing.

Not only do I spend money on fast hosting but I also spend it on cameras to buy to review, lenses to review, bags to review, gas and travel, and a slew of other things. You would be amazed at what it costs me just to maintain this website. Many times I give away these items in contests to help give back you all of YOU.

So all I ask is that if you find the free info on this website useful AND you ever need to make a purchase at B&H Photo or Amazon, just use the links below. You can even bookmark the Amazon link and use it anytime you buy something. It costs you nothing extra but will provide me and this site with a dollar or two to keep on trucking along.
B&H PHOTO LINK - (not bookmark able) Can also use my search bar on the right side or links within reviews, anytime.
AMAZON LINK (you can bookmark this one)

You can also follow me on Facebook, Twitter, Google + or YouTube. 😉

One other way to help is by donation. If you want to donate to this site, any amount you choose, even $5, you can do so using the paypal link HERE and enter in your donation amount. All donations help to keep this site going and growing! I do not charge any member fees so your donations go a long way to keeping this site loaded with useful content. Thank you!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Leica M 240 Real World Camera Review 2013 by Steve Huff

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Leica M 240 Real World Camera Review 2013 by Steve Huff 2014 UPDATE: The ever growing Leica M 240 Sample Gallery is HERE Wow. I can not believe it is March 2013 and I am sitting here at my big white Ikea desk writing about the new digital Leica M!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Leica M 240 1st look Video, Menu Overview, Shutter Sound and more!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
My Leica M 240 Arrived on March 2nd 2013 after being on the pre-order list for MANY months with my Leica dealer Ken Hansen. I had to sell my M9P to fund the 240 and it will take me a few weeks to decide if that was a smart move.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Quite a number of readers have asked about the Leica M Typ 240 's potential for black and white usage. I think perhaps a more accurate description of the question would be: do the M 240's files convert well to black and white? And if so, how do they compare to the output of the M Monochrom? I'm going to answer this in the context of raw conversion - there will be some users who only employ out of camera JPEGs, however, like the Monochrom, the M 240 requires processing of a DNG file to get the most out of it. And yes, there is a very significant difference.

I didn't have the two cameras on hand to do a direct comparison, but looking at the file samples I've got that were shot under similar conditions, it appears that the M 240 has two advantages over the Monochrom: firstly, the sensor has a bit more dynamic range, and secondly, it also has slightly lower noise at every ISO. In theory, this means that we should have the ability to produce even smoother tonal rolloffs in the deep shadows and highlights; however, it's not quite that simple.

Those who have read my review of the M Monochrom will know that I was very enamoured of this camera's tonality: it produces very rich, dense results that are difficult to replicate with a non-CCD sensor. The D800E can do it, but it requires a significant amount of photoshop work to achieve. The M 240's native tonal response is somewhere between a CMOS and CCD, which I think gives us the best of both worlds. I found the files very easy to process into tonally rich, pleasing black and white images; in fact, not that different to the Monochrom. Granted, the M 240 doesn't have the same resolution - it still has a Bayer filter, and the 6MP increase in resolution isn't really enough to overcome the Monochrom's advantage - but for the majority of applications, it's pretty close.

Perhaps it's easiest to let you judge for yourselves, but at this stage, I'd say the M 240 makes for a much more flexible solution than a Monochrom, however, if you're going to be making very large prints, then the Monochrom still holds a noticeable resolution advantage. There are also additional images from the Monochrom available in these photoessays here and here and on my Flickr stream. EXIF data is intact on all images if you click through to their respective Flickr hosting pages; images marked 50mm were shot with the 50/2 APO Summicron ASPH, and images marked 28mm were shot with either the 28/2 ASPH or ZM 2.8/28 Biogon.
The Leica M Typ 240 is available here from B&H here in black and chrome, and Amazon here in black and chrome. The Leica M Monochrom is available here from B&H.
____________
Visit our Teaching Store to up your photographic game - including Photoshop Workflow DVDs and customized Email School of Photography; or go mobile with the Photography Compendium for iPad. You can also get your gear from B&H and Amazon. Prices are the same as normal, however a small portion of your purchase value is referred back to me. Thanks!
Don't forget to like us on Facebook and join the reader Flickr group!
Images and content copyright Ming Thein | mingthein.com 2012 onwards. All rights reserved

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
B&W samples from the Leica M Typ 240

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Quite a number of readers have asked about the Leica M Typ 240's potential for black and white usage. I think perhaps a more accurate description of the question would be: do the M 240'...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Previously in October 2012, I had a chance to handle the M Typ 240 (I'm going to call it the M 240 from hereon in) back at the Kuala Lumpur launch event, and produce a quick preview ( that can be found here). At that point, the camera was a very early functioning prototype - yet the improvement over the M9 was clear. There was of course no way to get images onto a PC for review; the SD card was glued in and the grip had no USB ports. Frustratingly, things appeared pretty good on the new (and larger) rear LCD. But we all know that such small and limited-gamut monitors are not a good way to determine image quality at all; I was thus itching to get my hands on a camera, or at very least, some good files to play around with. I'm not really a fan of long waits to availability - whilst it's nice to know what's in the works, I'd rather not have to wait six or more months before I can actually buy one. By then, the world might just have moved on.

In the meantime, we were given a bunch of rather ho-hum samples to which the internet community at large has been at best ambivalent, at worst, downright unimpressed by - I've even had multiple emails asking me if I thought it was a hoax, and expressing outrage - not that I have any influence over the camera makers. The bottom line is that the photographers weren't amateurs, and thus the fault could be either of two things: the camera, or lack of familiarity with it. I'm not going to blame or defend either man or equipment, but I'll say one thing: it would only be fair to use it myself before drawing any conclusions. I'm quite pleased with the output achieved here, even if there was some fiddling required in the process (more on that later). This was the mystery 'extra camera' I carried on my last trip to Yangon, in addition to the Ricoh GR1v and Sony RX100 (which wasn't used at all, actually).
Yes, I do my own product shots. No, you can't use them for free for your site. I've had enough people ripping me off that I'm spending a lot of money on cease-and-desist letters. Disclaimer/ objectivity: I was involved in the testing process for the camera - thank you to Jesko Oeynhausen, Sunil Kaul, Mathieu Musnier and George Wong at Leica for the invitation. What follows are my detailed observations and thoughts from my period spent testing a near-final prototype. Whether any of my dozens of observations and suggestions were incorporated or not, I can't say until the final firmware is out, but I do know that plenty of attention was given. Sample images in this review were shot with the Leica 50/2 APO-Summicron-M ASPH, Leica 28/2 Summicron-M ASPH, Zeiss ZM 2.8/28 Biogon T* and processed via ACR (no profile) in CS5.5. I won't be posting full size images as is my standard policy; there is just too little respect for intellectual property online and poor images are rather meaningless. Product images were shot with a D800E and various macro lenses. Note: please look at the original size images on Flickr (clicking through the images will get you there) - their resizing algorithm seems to introduce some haloes at smaller sizes. Original doesn't show these.
First off: the M 240 is an enormous leap forward ahead of the M9 in every area; in fact, it feels like several generations have been skipped. The shooting and usability envelope has been hugely expanded, and that doesn't include the myriad improvements that have taken place everywhere else, too. We all know the core specifications - 24 megapixels, custom CMOS sensor collaboratively designed by both Leica and CMOSIS which is now capable of around 4fps, live view and 1080p25 video. The sensor also has an improved, flatter microlens array for both higher light collection and better cooperation with legacy lenses, especially wideangles. This becomes increasingly important at the edges as the sensor's resolution increases.

Aside from that, major changes - hardware/ ergonomic and firmware/ operational - include:

The LCD is now 3″, and has VGA resolution - color, detail and brightness are pretty much close to the OM-D and D800E, though not quite as good as the 1.2MP unit on my RX100. I'd say catchup with the competition rather than a huge improvement in this area.

The camera can now take an EVF via an accessory port under the hotshoe; it shares EVF units with the X2 (and some Olympus cameras, it seems). There are also other accessories that can use this port - notably an external microphone.

There are some extra buttons: LV to toggle Live View on the row under the viewfinder; 'M' to start video recording next to the shutter, and the focus assist button where the rewind interlock toggle was traditionally located on film Ms, under the shutter button on the front panel. Here, it activates peaking and magnification (adjustable using the rear dial); if held down while turning the rear dial, then it adjusts exposure compensation - which is also visible in the viewfinder information display.

The dial surrounding the D-pad has now moved to the back of the top panel, integrated with the new thumb grip.

The frame line illuminator window is gone, replaced by LED frame lines in either red or white (personally, I prefer white)

The entire base area has been redesigned; the baseplate now attaches via a larger, more secure stud on one end, and the tripod mount is integral with the camera body instead of the baseplate. When mounted, the baseplate is thus sandwiched between the camera and tripod head, and is much, much more secure than the old solution (too many stories of the small metal flange breaking off). The baseplate covers battery compartment, SD card, and now also an I/O port that interfaces with the optional Multifunctional Handgrip M, which adds a GPS module for geotagging, AC adaptor socket, SCA hotshoe communicator, PC-sync socket and USB port. There's also a dumb-handgrip which is purely ergonomic. Both handgrips have sockets to accept a similar finger grip system as was used on the M9 Titanium.

The M 240 uses a new, larger battery - it has double the capacity of the old one, charges much faster (new charger, of course) with a rapid charge function to about 80%; battery life is around 600 shots or so with the EVF or live view, and I was averaging close to 2,000 with moderate LCD reviewing and normal viewfinder use.

The shutter is massively improved: it's crisper, quieter, better damped/ lower vibration and no longer has the buzzing rewind sound of the M8/M9. To match, the feel of the shutter button has now been similarly improved; it's no longer notchy and 'tight'. Instead, a half press activates/ locks the meter, and there's a short but distinct break to a full press. The 'discrete' and 'soft' modes of the M9 are no longer available, nor are they required. This may not seem to be much of a big deal, but shutter feel matters: both to the photographer's ability to handhold the camera at low speeds, as well as the enjoyment of using the camera.

The entire menu and firmware have been completely revamped; there are a lot more options, and as a result more closely resembles the X2 and S menus. You can still save profiles, have quick access to important settings via the SET button and a black screen, and check camera status with INFO.

Oh yes, the D-pad now has a center button - it brings up camera status when pressed from a black screen, or serves as SET/ enter/ OK in every other situation except delete.

We're no longer restricted to centerweighted metering: the M 240 has an 'advanced' mode that offers matrix and spot metering too. It uses the sensor to meter, which means both more precise metering, but lower battery life since the shutter is open and the sensor powered up and slight lag because it has to cycle the shutter - there's no electronic first curtain. The matrix mode is excellent, but I found the spot mode a bit hit and miss - there's no way to accurately determine the spot area in the optical finder. Works great with live view and EVF, though. The main centerweighted meter (that uses reflected light off the shutter curtain) still gets fooled somewhat by point light sources - though it's nowhere near as bad as the M9 was. We're talking 1-2 stops instead of 4-

The frameline preview lever is gone - I must be one of the few people who actually used and now misses it.

There's now a virtual horizon function

You can rename the filename prefix - very useful if you've got many files all titled with L-something from different cameras...

The M9's left-side notch is gone; it's now been filled in (presumably) by the microphone. Unfortunately, the placement of the microphone means that when you're shooting with EVF and your right eye, the microphone picks up the sounds of your breath...shoot with the rear LCD or the EVF in the waist level/ 90deg position instead.

The camera is slightly thicker and heavier than the M9; presumably this has something to do with the new rear LCD or the thumb hook. You do feel it in the hand; it's not quite as svelte as the film Ms (and probably can never be, given the sensor, board and LCD have to fit in the depth of the film, pressure plate and back.

For the DIY types, the vertical rangefinder adjustment now uses the same 2mm hex screw as the rangefinder infinity position (instead of the previous custom tool). People tell me I'm making far too big a deal of this.

I think it's safe to say that when you have to put in several images to visually break up the huge column of text, this is not a trivial number of changes. The overall feeling is not so much evolution as a completely new camera. Sure, the controls are mostly in the same place, it looks and feels the same in the hand, you use the viewfinder and rangefinder to frame and focus, but oh boy - the impression given in use is completely different. The M9 felt like a film camera that was missing a wind lever, but instead made a buzzing sound and produced an image on the back; it also wasn't the most reliable of cameras (the well-known SD card issues, for instance). I suppose defenders will claim that's a bit like the unpredictability of film, too - it's not, film never cost me a large job. In contrast, the M 240 feels like a mature, complete, competent camera that can both be operated like the M9 - set everything once and just focus on the main controls, ignore the LCD if you desire - and feels like it integrates well with the rest of your camera systems. The good news is that it no longer eats cards; the bad news it does have an odd startup lag - up to several seconds - that seems related to capacity, speed and how full your card is - small, fast cards are best to keep this to an absolute minimum. You can of course turn standby off and leave the camera on, which speeds things up at the expense of battery life.

At present, the M 240 is the only full frame mirrorless camera available; its short back-flange distance (the M mount is about 28mm, compared to 45mm+ for most SLRs) means that it's compatible with just about every other lens out there via an adaptor. Of course, the M 240 with EVF and suitable adaptor is also Leica's solution for legacy R-system users; not having any investment or experience in the R system, I was far more interested in how the camera would do with my Nikon F mount glass. The way I use my Nikon system now tends to be mostly tripod based with live view for critical focus; sometimes I shoot reportage with a lower resolution body/ body pair and/or an OM-D for more reach. You can see where this is going: it would be nice if I could condense my multiple systems and backup bodies down to just one or two.

I suspect that if the pricing is right, there will be a lot of pros taking a long, hard look at the Canikon flagships and wondering if this might make an interesting alternative: with the D4 and 1Dx being within 10-20% of the price of the M 240 - at least in Malaysia - it becomes a viable option. I know it's something I'm considering. Lens cost may skew the equation somewhat, but then again perhaps not - you can use your legacy lenses via adaptors, and just get native M-mount glass (Leica, Zeiss, Voigtlander) for the one or two critical focal lengths. Unfortunately, due to lack of time, location work, limited subject material, assignment schedules etc. - the one thing I didn't get to test was the way the camera worked as a studio camera - and specifically, how it would fare for horological work with my Nikon flashes slaved in SU4 mode - can't think why it wouldn't work, though. I suppose that will have to wait for next time.

The M system now has the advantage of being able to serve as both a backup location or studio camera, as well as an excellent travel setup. For precise framing and focusing with longer lenses, there's now the EVF and live view - there is no longer any need for a visoflex or second system body. I plan to streamline my systems - or at very least the backup bodies - down to just one M now that it's a viable alternative. On the subject of live view, the M's implementation makes a lot of sense: for viewing, it shows a clean image; when the shutter is half pressed, it previews the shooting exposure. (Of course, you're always looking at the lens stopped-down as there's no mechanical connection between lens aperture mechanism and the camera body.) This is a very clever, useable implementation and begs the question: why do I have to choose between viewable image or preview only with my Nikons?

I was left with mixed feelings from the EVF experience, though. On one hand, it's great to be able to focus anywhere in the frame and have a magnified centre zone (apparently technical limitations with the sensor mean that live view magnification is restricted to the centre portion of the image only, which may cause issues when shooting fast lenses with field curvature wide open) - but on the other hand, it just feels wrong. If I use my right eye with the EVF, my nose goes into the optical finder window, which means that it becomes dirty and hard to see through afterwards; and then there's the previously mentioned issue of microphone placement. (Why didn't they just put it at the front of the camera where the RF frame line illuminator patch used to be?) Don't get me wrong - the EVF itself is excellent; high resolution, of reasonably natural contrast and dynamic range, and with a pretty good refresh rate (though nowhere near as fluid as the high-speed 120fps mode of the OM-D).

There's also a bit of a wonky bug in the way the camera picks a display - it's the last one used, not the last one used for a given mode. So if you were using live view on the EVF, it'll playback there too unless you manually switch over., which can be rather annoying at times. Focus peaking works, but it could probably use a bit more customization - more or less sensitive, thicker outlines, the ability to change colors etc. Note that the sensor does not have an electronic first curtain, which means there's a small but perceptible lag whenever you shoot in live view or use advanced metering with the rangefinder (it meters off the sensor) - for this reason I prefer to use the normal optical finder and classic metering (which is restricted to centre weighted). In short, there's nothing wrong with it other than my preconceptions that this should still be a rangefinder camera. Fuji's Hybrid Optical Finder would probably feel right at home here. Assuming of course that either party would play nice with technology sharing.

I actually wonder if the appearance of the EVF on an M camera means that the rangefinder's days may be numbered; the reality is that the system requires very precise calibration, is prone to drift, is limited when it comes to zoom lenses, long lenses or off-center subjects, and is manual focus only. It made sense back in its heyday, and personally I think there are enough advantages to it to make it preferrable - the size and clarity of the view, the ability to see outside the frame, and the responsiveness of hyperfocal/ zone/ manual focusing - but what we really need is something that's the best of both worlds. Perhaps Fuji is going in the right direction after all. More interestingly, it seems that the idea of cross-system compatibility as a whole is coming of age; first with Micro Four Thirds and the other mirrorless cameras, and now with the full-frame M 240. We are no longer restricted to lenses from one manufacturer on one body - it's great because it means we can cherry-pick the best of everything, providing you have the right adaptors and a short enough flange distance on the body you're mounting things to.

Of course, the idea of full cross-system compatibility and backup would be uselessly impractical if the non-system lenses - especially wides - didn't play nice; I'm pleased to report that isn't the case. Edge performance is acceptable for most lenses, and fairly close to the lenses on their native mounts for the more telecentric designs such as the Zeiss Distagons. I tested the Zeiss ZF.2 2.8/21 and 2/28 Distagons with no issues; the 2/50 and 2/100 Makro-Planars were also excellent performers. Out of curiosity and in the interests of science, I'm pleased to report that the Hasselblad Zeiss CF 4/50 FLE, CF 2.8/80 and CF 4/120 Makro-Planar all work well too...even if they look rather ridiculous due to their size and the need to use multiple adaptors (Hasselblad V to Nikon F, Nikon F to Leica M). This says that the redesigned microlenses are working: legacy M glass looks great, too - the images in this review were shot with the 28/2 Summicron-M ASPH, 50/2 APO Summicron-M ASPH ( reviewed here) and Zeiss ZM 2.8/28 Biogon. Incidentally, the 50 AA really shines on the M 240's sensor - if anything, it confirms the mastery of this optical design (if not justifying its very high price). Other lenses don't appear to be any poorer, but it could also be because there's very little difference in real linear resolution between 19 amd 24 MP.

It's only natural for me to want to compare this camera to the current benchmark in its sensor class: the Nikon D800E. I don't think anybody would argue about that camera's resolving power, color accuracy or dynamic range; it's also a camera I'm very familiar with as it's been my workhorse since it went on sale in April 2012. In short: the M 240 compares favourably. In fact, I think it outresolves the other 24MP DSLRs thanks to its lack of antialiasing filter; there's a crispness present which certainly isn't there on my D600. There's of course no way it can beat the D800E due to sheer pixel count, but the reality is that the linear difference in resolution isn't quite as much as you think - about 22% linearly. Far more important is the pixel-level quality of the files.

The good new is the M 240 does very well here. It's pretty close to the D800E in acuity; perhaps both cameras are pushing the limits of what can be squeezed out of a Bayer-type array. ISO sensitivities run 200-6400, with a PULL 100 mode. At base native ISO - 200 - I think useable dynamic range matches that of the D800E; depending on how you process the DNG files, you're looking at somewhere in the neighbourhood of 13-4 stops. Rarely did I have situations where I clipped highlights or lost shadows, and this is shooting in bright tropical sun where 'Sunny 16' should be more like 'Sunny 32'. Recoverable dynamic range from the raw files is definitely shadow biased; you might get 2-3 stops there, but only 1 (or less) out of the highlights, which clip with a moderately harsh transition if you pull the recovery sliders too far. Needless to say, there's easily a gain of a stop or two on the M9, and you don't get the abrupt 'tearing' or 'bleeding' artefacts seen when the M9's CCD saturates - sun in center frame is a good example.

ISO comparison series. Click here for the full size screen capture made up of 100% crops.

It's a different story at higher ISOs, though; it seems that you're basically losing one stop of dynamic range for every stop in sensitivity gain, and a bit more at the 3200 and 6400 settings because the noise floor increases dramatically; by the time you hit 6400 I'd say there's no more than 6-7 stops of useable dynamic range. There's also some faint shadow pattern banding at 3200 and 6400 settings. ISO 6400 is still useable if you expose properly - highlights remain clean - even if the shadows turn into a murky mess and must be crushed to reduce visibility of banding. Pixel-level performance is roughly comparable to the D600 and D800E (minus the banding), and about 2-2.5 stops ahead of the M9. Not bad at all considering the pixels got smaller, too.

Might not look it, but it was in a dark corner - at ISO 4000.

One of the bigger debates raging across the internet is whether anything will be lost in the transition from CCD to CMOS architecture; the former tends to have a much more filmic response than the latter. I know that the raw tonal response of the M8/ 9/ Monochrom - Kodak CCD based with the same architecture - is definitely more pleasing than the D800E, especially in the quarter tones, which just seem somehow richer. The D800E of course has much more latitude for adjustment, but it does require some work to get similar tonal quality. (As a result, output tends to look a little flat.) I'm definitely not a fan of the relatively unforgiving latitude and poor signal-to-noise ratio at higher sensitivities, though. It appears that the M 240's new sensor sits somewhere between the two camps, even if the architecture is ostensibly CMOS.

We have a sensor that has some of the tonal response - i.e. nonlinearity - of a CCD, which means it produces nice quarter tones; but some of the latitude and low noise of a CMOS. The tradeoff appears to be a similarly nonlinear decrease in dynamic range as the sensitivity gets turned up. In some ways, the rendering quality of the sensor reminds me of the Nikon D2H's JFET LBCAST sensor - which itself was supposed to be a hybrid design - right down to the way you can have four perfectly clean highlight stops at high ISO, acceptable midtones, and then the shadows turn to mush. Fortunately, the usable ISO ceiling isn't restricted to about 800 or so - on the M 240, that's the point at which you start to notice there's some noise in the shadows. It doesn't actually ever become objectionable because the highlights remain clean, but it's definitely there, and not always monochromatic, either.

Saturated reds: a bit hot.

The jury is still out on color, for the main reason that Adobe has not yet released a set of profiles for the camera; as such, I've been looking at DNG files which have truly 'raw' color output with no grading or profiling whatsoever. In the course of testing and reviewing, I created my own color profiles to address this - the native response of the camera is to have strong yellow response and saturated reds that shift slightly towards pink. It's not at all accurate, and requires some considerable work to correct. I can only hope that this improves once we have official and properly calibrated profiles to work with; I'll reserve final judgement until then. Bottom line: as it stands, the M 240 doesn't have the same color response as the M9, because my profiles for that camera produce slightly strange results when used on M 240 files. I would describe the M9's files as 'cool' and 'light', with colors that tend towards richness when saturated. The M 240 is warmer and more saturated overall, but without the flatness of the D800E's raw files; the tonal map is closer to the M9's CCD.

Interestingly, the M 240's files are very good candidates for black and white conversion; straight desaturation of a raw file results in nice quarter tones and smooth tonal ramps. In fact, it's not far off the M Monochrom in this area; although the Monochrom will still hold a slight advantage in resolved detail due to the lack of Bayer filter, the high ISO advantage it previously enjoyed over the M9 is gone: top ISOs of 6400 on the M 240 and 5000 on the M Monochrom look pretty much the same, both in terms of noise and dynamic range. Unless you're a real low-ISO black and white connoisseur, I'd venture as far as to say that the M 240 can match the M Monochrom for the vast majority of situations, and with the added benefits of all of the other usability improvements and being able to shoot color . It also does no harm that it's a bit cheaper, too.

I'm not going to comment on video performance because it's not my area of expertise; I'm going to leave this to others who are more knowledgeable about these things.

I admit that I was initially very worried about dilution of purity with the new M, which is admittedly a rather nebulous concept. I've always thought of the M cameras - film or digital - as the last bastions of pure photography, in that the electronics and extraneous features/ controls/ bits were always kept to the bare minimum. The M8/9s were perhaps the only cameras that retained manual focus only, mechanical aperture dials, and a direct shutter speed dial - you could shoot them without ever entering the menu more than once, if you so desired. My initial reaction to the M 240 was a slight queasiness and feeling that the line had somehow been bastardized by the addition of video and electronic finders (it's a rangefinder camera! M stands for rangefinder, in German! What on earth were they thinking? Etc.) - live view I can live with, and is especially helpful for determining if a lens is soft or if it's merely your rangefinder that's out. After using the camera for some time, I think this is simultaneously true and untrue: I don't like the EVF experience, but I suppose it makes sense and you have the choice to use it or not.

In that respect, the M 240 delivers on a level that's at least one, if not two, complete generations ahead of the M9; it finally feels like the M system has come of maturity into the digital age. Unlike the earlier digital Ms, the camera no longer feels like the limiting factor - barring startup delays - it really does feel like the time when Nikon went full frame all over again. Leica has come under a lot of fire for the limitations of the M8, continued limitations of the M9 and somewhat stopgap means of addressing high ISO performance with the Monochrom; I freely admit that QC issues with the M8 and lenses at the time forced me to abandon Leica at the time, and I've had a love-hate relationship with the M9-P - loved the tactility and experience of shooting it, hated the unreliability and high ISO performance. I am as impressed with the image quality as I am with how much difference all of the little changes make towards overall usability. Yes, there are still things to be improved - ergonomics (that damn right strap lug!), microphone placement, EVF behaviour, colour - but for the most part, the M 240 shows Leica are firmly back in the game. MT
I will be posting plenty of additional test images from the camera over the course of the next few weeks to my Flickr page - there's a dedicated Flickr set for the M 240 test here.. Note: please look at the original size images on Flickr (clicking through the images will get you there) - their resizing algorithm seems to introduce some haloes at smaller sizes. Original doesn't show these. Update (23/2/13): Fellow testers Sean Reid and Jonathan Slack have also published their thoughts - you can find them at their respective links. The Leica M Typ 240 is available here from B&H here in black and chrome, and Amazon here in black and chrome.
____________
Visit our Teaching Store to up your photographic game - including Photoshop Workflow DVDs and customized Email School of Photography; or go mobile with the Photography Compendium for iPad. You can also get your gear from B&H and Amazon. Prices are the same as normal, however a small portion of your purchase value is referred back to me. Thanks!
Don't forget to like us on Facebook and join the reader Flickr group!
Images and content copyright Ming Thein | mingthein.com 2012 onwards. All rights reserved

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Previously in October 2012, I had a chance to handle the M Typ 240 (I'm going to call it the M 240 from hereon in) back at the Kuala Lumpur launch event, and produce a quick preview ( that can be found here).