# data[].attributes.body
Will there be a deadline for when QL-applications need to be approved or is it by the time of budget approval?

# data[].attributes.body
Does the translation of the slogan THE POWER OF TOGETHER need to very close to the original?
We would like to use "Solidaarisuutta Suomessa" and not what is proposed - as the proposed once feels a bit "mouldy"...

# data[].attributes.body
To trigger the 100 euros: How long must an event last?

# data[].attributes.body
Could there be more than 1 coach? E.g. 1 coach in different organisations, as long as the max 12 days in total is kept?

# data[].attributes.headline
Considering new TCA/NET budget line and connected needs we need the EC confirmation on the use of budget in line with needs connected with efficient TCA/NET activities development, planning, involvement of partners and participants, promotion and visibility, as well as monitoring, reporting and sharing the outcomes and outputs with the youth work community of practice and activity organisers. EC confirmation to such budget costs for TCA/NET in 2021-2027 is very much needed.

# data[].attributes.subject
Considering new TCA/NET budget line and connected needs we need the EC confirmation on the use of budget in line with needs connected with efficient TCA/NET activities development, planning, involvement of partners and participants, promotion and visibility, as well as monitoring, reporting and sharing the outcomes and outputs with the youth work community of practice and activity organisers. EC confirmation to such budget costs for TCA/NET in 2021-2027 is very much needed.

# data[].attributes.body
About the inclusion support to young people with fewer opportunities in youth mobility projects: As the funding mechanism is unit costs, we need to identify the number of young people that should receive this support. What is the base for this number? Is it the declaration by the applicant in the application form / final report? Do we foresee any mechanism to make sure the declaration meets the reality? (For example: we have signature lists to make sure that number of pax declared is the same with number of people attended. Will young people with fewer opportunities need to tick a box in this signature list or sign another declaration or…)

# data[].attributes.body
If the expert is from an organisation that applies for a KA2 project in R1, can s/he still be assessing applications for KA1 in R1?

# data[].attributes.body
in education and training a "Budget allocation rules for accredited beneficiaries" is being circulated, will Youth use a similar one? when will it be sent to NAs for consultation?

# data[].attributes.headline
In order to avoid prefinancing being spent on keeping the org. alive, followed by cancellation of project and not being able to reimburse: Can we put a hold-on of the prefinancing, waiting until activities actually takes place? Alternatively pay only e.g. 30 % in prefinancing?

# data[].attributes.subject
In order to avoid prefinancing being spent on keeping the org. alive, followed by cancellation of project and not being able to reimburse: Can we put a hold-on of the prefinancing, waiting until activities actually takes place? Alternatively pay only e.g. 30 % in prefinancing?

# data[].attributes.headline
We`re aware about embargo and PG2021, but could we start with counseling with potential applicants in a meantime in regards of the Erasmus priorities (thematic workshops), while PG was set in final version? 

# data[].attributes.subject
We`re aware about embargo and PG2021, but could we start with counseling with potential applicants in a meantime in regards of the Erasmus priorities (thematic workshops), while PG was set in final version? 

# data[].attributes.body
Could you confirm if cross-border co-operation with Norway and/or Russia is possible?

# data[].attributes.body
EU Youth Programmes - we are used to this, and have a common newsletter, social media accounts, etc. for both E+Youth and ESC - and a common landing page on web, but then differing by Prog.
We are quite puzzled that now there is emphasis to differentiate in communicating whilst on the other hand increased synergies are sought.
Question: Will COM continue speaking on EU Youth Programmes and/or would you support us doing so?!

# data[].attributes.body
As mentioned by colleagues during the NA-meeting, the model used is still a model where one participant from partner countries means the whole activity is under the heading/funding partner countries. In the past, different models have been suggested ie. only the participants from partner countries are on the partner countries budget or the whole activity if it takes place in a partner country or ... looking at this differently could have real positive impact on the programme and give a more accurate image of the programme. Is a discussion foreseen on this?

# data[].attributes.body
In the latest draft PG Participation projects are not among the eligible types of activities covered in the accreditation.
We know they will not be funded for 2021, but they will be as of 2022 and they still are selectable in the accreditation application. Could this be clarified in the PG?

# data[].attributes.body
We were warnde by our (external) Independent Audit Body of the following. Due to Covid and the subsequent financial crisis we need to foresee that, unfortunately, some organisation will wind down due to bankruptcies. Have EC considered this? What are the consequences of any considerations?

# data[].attributes.body
The lump-sum funding is a very good way of keeping admin at a lower level. At application/selection stage, though, the levels of funding are quite far apart: € 30.000 and € 60.000 - and nothing in between. We expect that some applicants will ask for too much money. Will we be able to 'relegate' them to a lower funding level or cut the (lump-sum) funding to a realistic amount?

# data[].attributes.body
when can we expect to see supporting documents to the PGs such as experts guide?

# data[].attributes.body
In the ESC draft shared last week it is stated that organisations that have applied for QL are eligible also for the budget requests. Is this decided and can we plan accordingly?

# data[].attributes.body
In the accreditation and QL, why is the financial capacity check not made until the budget request? If the financial risk is deemed to be too high can we then reject a budget request from an accredited organisation?

# data[].attributes.headline
When are the assessment webinars planned?

# data[].attributes.subject
When are the assessment webinars planned?

# data[].attributes.body
We'll have assessors' meeting mid-April, thus the question is if these webinars will be beforehand or later?

# data[].attributes.body
Currently two differing definitions exist on what consitutes an informal group of young people - the definitions have not been aligned.
Since OIDs (and the validation / certification) are not bound to programmes, how are NAs supposed to certify these groups? What happens if the group is certifiable / eligible in E+, but not in ESC?

# data[].attributes.body
Any news when these may be finalised? :-)

# data[].attributes.headline
Operational vs Financial Capacity Check?

# data[].attributes.subject
Operational vs Financial Capacity Check?

# data[].attributes.body
.how do these differ?

which type of documents are requested, and what is meant to be checked/assessed?

# data[].attributes.body
Yesterday, Jadranka mentioned the project starts for solidarity projects and volunteering. I didn't quite catch it - was it 01.08.2021? Thanks!

# data[].attributes.body
Now the TCA is within KA3 - should the NA have unused funds will there be a possibility to transfer them to projects? To what Key Action? This will be probably explained in the Delegation Agreements (are they called differently now?), but we do have them for the moment.
When TCA was part of KA2 we could make transfers to KA2 projects. And now?

# data[].attributes.body
Applications for Cooperation partnerships (one of the 2 types of Partnerships for cooperation) shall be assessed under the relevance criterium on if:

the proposal is innovative;

The proposal is complementary to other initiatives already carried out by the participating organisations;

Is it either or (in the previous programme it was and/or)? Since it is no longer called Strategic partnerships for innovation, is the idea now that the projects can be equally ranged as of high relevance even if they are not innovative? Or is it based on if they apply for funding of development of concrete project results (earlier called Intellectual outputs) that the innovative or complementary aspect of the results shall be assessed upon?

# data[].attributes.body
There are some unclarities in ACC-applications on the process, rules and technical implementation:

how and where the potential visit to the applicant org. is documented?;

in which way will the results of the visit be considered in assessment and where will that be marked?;

how, in practice, will the accredited organisations introduce changes to their strategic plan? in which tool?;

what will be the process in the NA to assess the changes? and how is it communicated?;

details on the planned/required monitoring of the accredited organisations?

# data[].attributes.headline
Funding for E+ Accreditations & QL label

# data[].attributes.subject
Funding for E+ Accreditations & QL label

# data[].attributes.body
at the NA-meeting it was said that this way of working needs further reflection and co-creation As far as we could understand, the set-up presented at the NA-meeting does not fit well with the concept of group projects. What are the next steps in this process?

# data[].attributes.body
Accreditation process is for 7 years; activity plan is for non less than three years; application for grant is forseen for one year : we n
eed practical exemples on how to manage with yearly adec and pluriannual accreditation

# data[].attributes.body
I foresee that we might not be able to have contracts ready for the beneficiaries before the start dates for the projects of both ESC and E+-youth. Would you advise us to put this on our website so the applicants can take this in to account when they plan their starts date?