# data[].attributes.headline
YOUTH specific TCA/NET consultation group

# data[].attributes.subject
YOUTH specific TCA/NET consultation group

# data[].attributes.body
Consultative group YOUTH specific should be called asap on this new approach for TCA/NET as there are different needs and the budget is relatively much larger.

# data[].attributes.body
Number of deadlines 2 + 1 (optional)
Group 1 agrees
Group 2 agrees but for solidarity projects, we need more than 1 deadline, 3 will be ideal for young people
Group Porto 1: agrees with 2 plus one optional (and yes, more than one needes for solidarity projects)
group 3: the option to have a third deadline is very important. The 2nd deadline could be optional but the starting date should still cater for the summer activities.

# data[].attributes.body
Align deadlines for youth (E+: Youth KA1, KA2 & ESC)
group 3 agrees

# data[].attributes.body
PARTNER COUNTRIES vs. THIRD COUNTRIES – the former nomenclature of “Partner Countries” should be restored in the new Erasmus+ Legal Base.

# data[].attributes.body
Change about the eligibility of informal groups in mobility of youth workers? A Group of young people can apply for Mobility of Youth Workers, but they have to be between 13 and 30 years old. We see how this is relevant for youth activities, but this activity is for youth workers, and we do not see the relevance of the age limit. If we shall accept applications from informal groups, it would make sense if the criteria would rather be that they have a pedagigical role in youth activities or similiar.

# data[].attributes.body
KA2 same consortium rule: Interpretation of "The same consortium of partners can submit only one application and to one Agency only per deadline." Is needed. Does this mean that if the project proposals are completely different (topic, target groups, aims, results) NAs are to reject the applications? Also, can the same consortium apply to different fields KA2 (e.g.youth and adult edu) if the projects are completely different? Can the same consortium apply for Yes, the same consortium can apply for different KA2 actions in the same field (small scale and cooperation partnerships) taking into consideration the different scope of the actions, eligibility and award criteria?

# data[].attributes.body
EUNGO in KA2 as partners: It is not clear from the PG eligibility criteria for KA2 Cooperation Partnerships if EU NGOs are eligible as participants or not. PG criteria "Which types of organisations are eligible to participate in the project" is pretty general and misleading for the potential beneficiaries if EU NGOs are not eligible as partners, stating that ... Any public or private organisation, established in a Programme Country ... can participate in a Cooperation Partnership Irrespective of the field impacted by the project, Cooperation Partnerships are open to any type of organisation active in any field of education, training, youth, sport or other socio-economic sectors as well as to organisations carrying out activities that are transversal to different fields ... Depending on the priority and the objectives addressed by the project, Cooperation Partnerships should involve the most appropriate and diverse range of partners in order to benefit from their different experiences, profiles and specific expertise and to produce relevant and high quality project results.

# data[].attributes.body
Deadlines as described under Programme Guide E+ general

# data[].attributes.body
Include TCA WG in the planning of TCA lump sums and work program planning

# data[].attributes.body
Management of TCA/NET and Learning Cycle: The budgets for TCA/NET and the Learning Cycle are considerable. At the moment it is included in the GforNAs that NAs can outsource the activities. But it would help NAs a lot (and thus increase quality and impact of activities) when additionaly the temporarily hire of staff will be included.

# data[].attributes.body
Will green and digital SALTO/SALTO's be joint for EDU and YOU?

# data[].attributes.body
E+ and ESC budget info needed: 2022-2027 budget for Erasmus+ and ESC prognosis is needed for multiannual strategic planning of our work at the NA level.

# data[].attributes.body
Management budget for DiscoverEU: The NA's will have new tasksk and workload increase to implement DiscoverEU regular and DiscoverEU Inclusion. Is this increase considered in 2022 NA management budget?

# data[].attributes.body
Currently in European Solidariy Corps this group has to consist of at least five young people, all adults, while in E+ the group can consisf of five people and it can also include minors. This is a serious technical issue as a validated OID for an informal group in E+ becomes invalid in ESC if it consists of four young people (or minors).

# data[].attributes.body
How do we check if projects are double funded or if there is multi submission in teh current system of ESC 51( no title, no budget at submission, no participating organisations). Guidelines are missing in NA guide annexes and ESC dashboard does not provide datas

# data[].attributes.body
IT tools need to work and be in line for the needs of programme implementation

# data[].attributes.body
The portal or IT system does not allow to check if there is a supporting organisation when sending volunteers abroad. We had cases where young people are abroad without supporting org and NA play the role of supporting org in case of issues

# data[].attributes.headline
One fixed deadline for accreditations like in E&T

# data[].attributes.subject
One fixed deadline for accreditations like in E&T

# data[].attributes.body
19th october, the projects deadline should be on the first deadline

# data[].attributes.headline
Double funding in volunteering only on the level of volunteers at final report stage

# data[].attributes.subject
Double funding in volunteering only on the level of volunteers at final report stage

# data[].attributes.body
As long as the volunteers are not the same you can not speak of double funding. This should be dealt with at centralised level as we don't have access to volunteers data.

# data[].attributes.body
Give flexibility for accreditation budget approach to NAs: extremely complicated system at the moment.

# data[].attributes.headline
Clarify objectives of small scale projects. Is it open to all organisations and not only to newcomers?

# data[].attributes.subject
Clarify objectives of small scale projects. Is it open to all organisations and not only to newcomers?

# data[].attributes.body
The following sentence is confusing: "These partnerships should act as a first step for organisations into cooperation at European level", in order not to exclude organisations the sentence should be rephrased into 'could' (or deleted)

# data[].attributes.body
Create additional support budget for KA1 accreditations (as we have for QL Support for organisations) to support KA1 accredited organisation in ita work.

# data[].attributes.body
Need more guidelines for NAs to set up datas, instructions on how to use this check

# data[].attributes.headline
Transfers on non-spent TCA money - Proposals for the use

# data[].attributes.subject
Transfers on non-spent TCA money - Proposals for the use

# data[].attributes.body
- Is it possible to transfer this money as originally foreseen?
- Possible to remain in member states with a clarified purpose?

# data[].attributes.headline
Video applications would lower the threshold for applicants

# data[].attributes.subject
Video applications would lower the threshold for applicants

# data[].attributes.headline
system development and outreach activities should be eligible activities also under the annual grant request for accredited organisations

# data[].attributes.subject
system development and outreach activities should be eligible activities also under the annual grant request for accredited organisations

# data[].attributes.headline
Low budget for ESC is a missed opportunity

# data[].attributes.subject
Low budget for ESC is a missed opportunity

# data[].attributes.body
Many good projects have to be rejected due to budgetary reasons. It was the flagship of E+ and really has an impact on young people

# data[].attributes.headline
Regional SALTOs should deinitely continue their work

# data[].attributes.subject
Regional SALTOs should deinitely continue their work

# data[].attributes.body
We would still like to see flexibility up to 25% between TCA/NET lump sum budget and other actions.

# data[].attributes.body
We would support the same approach for all support structures (SALTO, EURODESK) as we have for Management fee for NAs. What is the point of lump sums for ED, if there is actually no simplification.

# data[].attributes.headline
25% for partner countries limit-issue is not clear for accreditations

# data[].attributes.subject
25% for partner countries limit-issue is not clear for accreditations

# data[].attributes.body
At proposal level we don't know how many participants will be from partner countries. The exact grant amount for partner country projects is only known at final report stage. Our suggestion is to exclude accreditations from the 25% limit

# data[].attributes.body
Accountancy costs, costs for rental etc, should be eligible costs for ED, SALTOs. NAs hosting SALTOs are not in the same positions as other NAs.

# data[].attributes.body
Participation projects should be an integral part of the Accreditation grant request as of 2022. This has already been communicated as well as accreditations have been approved.

# data[].attributes.body
Increase in KA1 budget for 2022 is because of DiscoverEU Inclusion, so there is actually no increase for mobilities, which is a lot of lost opportunities to involve young people in the programme.

# data[].attributes.body
To allow bigger accessibility to newcomers and to youth field target groups in general, there should be at least 2 deadlines + 1 optional deadline per year in the field of Youth. I - Mid February, II - April (optional) and III - 1st of October 2022.

# data[].attributes.headline
Fear of ESC beeing too administratively heavy  - especially concerning QL and budget allocation

# data[].attributes.subject
Fear of ESC beeing too administratively heavy  - especially concerning QL and budget allocation

# data[].attributes.body
Many of us thought this matter was settled on 2 plus one opt.

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe alligned with KA2 for E&T - easier to administrate in joint NA's

# data[].attributes.body
Too difficult for NA staff to claculate. Too much up to the individual NA to decide - hard to make it see-through for applicants

# data[].attributes.body
We advocate that co-creation between COM and Youth NAs for implementation and especially development of programmes is re-established and further strengthen.

# data[].attributes.body
The IT-trainings should be prepaired  by IT-staff from the EC, a EC content person as well as NA-staff. At the moment the quality is not sufficient as tools are often presented with insufficient feeling for the reality of the programme/actions and with tools that are still in development phase. In addition they should have a facilitator.

# data[].attributes.body
It is important to keep EC staff included in the preparation of the trainings. In addittion their presence physically at the training is an added value to see the reality of the work in the programma and the NAs. The peer-learling aspect cannot be underestimated.