# data[].attributes.body
this is supported by source b. source b states,"after the great famines caused at that time'' and "Stalin ignoring the great cost in human life and misery between 1932-1933".hence, source b corroborates with source A that there were server famines and executions which made life hard under Stalin's collectivisation. Hence,Source A is reliable in terms of showing negative economic and social impacts.

# data[].attributes.body
source a states," Collectivisation soon became a grim and bitter struggle. Not surprisingly, food and production fell and there was a famine between 1932-1933. Those who survived, were sent to labour camps or were executed" This shows harsh conditions due to the lack of food and possibility of death which shows the negative economic and social impacts

# data[].attributes.body
source a is useful as it is reliable in showing negative economic and social impacts of Stalin's collectivisation plan as source a states facts

# data[].attributes.body
Similarly, Source B states "ignoring the great cost in human life and misery between 1932-1933." shows the negative social impact. "...great famines..." shows the economic impact

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is supported by Source B is showing the short term negative social impact and economic impact of Stalin's Collectivization Programme. Source A states "...soon became a grim and bitter struggle... Those who survived, were sent to labor camps or were executed" This shows the social impact of the programme. "...famine between 1932-1933" Shows the economic impact.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is useful as it is reliable and tells the truth about the short term negative social impact and economic impact of Stalin's Collectivization Programme.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A's claim that there were negative short-term social and economic impacts from Stalin's Collectivization program is supported by Source B. Source B states that "Stalin ignoring the great cost in human life and misery between 1932-1933" and "after the famines at that time". Source B implies that there were negative short-term social impacts such as a huge loss of life and negative short-term economic impacts such as shortages of food from Stalin's Collectivization program.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A states that "food and production fell and there was famine between 1932-1933. Those who survived were sent to labor camps or were executed." This implies that Stalin Collectivization program caused the standard of living for people of the Soviet Union to deteriorate through food shortages, forced labor and lives being lost.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is useful as it is reliable in showcasing the negative economic and social impacts of Stalin's Collectivization program in the short term by providing facts.

# data[].attributes.body
source a is also supported by source B which states "Stalin ignoring the great cost in human life and misery between 1932-1933, claimed that collectivisation was a success; for, after the great famines caused at the time" which serves to show that the negative social and economic impacts in source A are truthful and factual. thus, source A is useful and reliable in showing the negative social and economic impacts of Stalin's collectivisation and is a trustworthy source of information on the effects and impacts of collectivisation.

# data[].attributes.body
This is supported by source B which states 'great famine caused at the time' and 'haunt the Russian people'. This shows that the Russians were always hungry and the famine lasted so long and was so severe it would haunt them even after it was over. This supports the fact that living conditions were terrible due to the 5 year plan which is how source A is supported by source B

# data[].attributes.body
source A states 'Not surprisingly,food and production fell and there was a famine between 1932-1933.Those who survived,were sent to labour camps or were executed'. This shows that living conditions were terrible due to the 5 year plan because people were always hungry and were subjegated to the terrible living conditions in labour camps or even worse, excecuted

# data[].attributes.body
source A states that "Collectivisation soon became a grim and bitter struggle" showing the social impacts that the people disagreed with collectivisation. source A also says that "there was famine between 1932-1933" showing the short term negative economic impact

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is useful as it is reliable in showing the social and economic failures of the 5 year plan

# data[].attributes.body
source A is useful as it is reliable in showing the negative short term social and economic impacts of Stalin's collectivisation. it is useful as it is factual and true.

# data[].attributes.headline
Source B supports the source as it states "Stalin ignoring the great cost in human life amd misery between 1932-1933" and "after the great famines caused at the time" which confirms the negative social impacts of Stalin's Collectivization, thus showing that Source A is reliable and useful in providing information on the effects of Stalin's Collectivization programme.

# data[].attributes.subject
Source B supports the source as it states "Stalin ignoring the great cost in human life amd misery between 1932-1933" and "after the great famines caused at the time" which confirms the negative social impacts of Stalin's Collectivization, thus showing that Source A is reliable and useful in providing information on the effects of Stalin's Collectivization programme.

# data[].attributes.headline
source A states "Collectivization Source A states ¨collectivization soon became a grim and bitter struggle. Not surprisingly, food and production fell and there was a famine between 1932-1933. Those who survived, were sent to labour camps or were executed." this shows that collectivization was very harsh and caused negative social effects to the peasants, such as resulting in the loss of lives and shortage of food for others.

# data[].attributes.subject
source A states "Collectivization Source A states ¨collectivization soon became a grim and bitter struggle. Not surprisingly, food and production fell and there was a famine between 1932-1933. Those who survived, were sent to labour camps or were executed." this shows that collectivization was very harsh and caused negative social effects to the peasants, such as resulting in the loss of lives and shortage of food for others.

# data[].attributes.headline
Source A is useful in content about the effects of Stalin's Collectivization as it is reliable in showing the negative short terms social impacts of Collectivization on the peasants. It is useful as it gave facts and is supported by Source B

# data[].attributes.subject
Source A is useful in content about the effects of Stalin's Collectivization as it is reliable in showing the negative short terms social impacts of Collectivization on the peasants. It is useful as it gave facts and is supported by Source B

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is useful as it is supported by source B which states how collectavisation has negatively affeced the soveit This is evident in soruce B "Stalin ignoring the great cost in human life amd misery between 1932-1933" and "after the great famines caused at the time" which shows how stalin's collectavisation has caused much suffering in the soviet union and caused many deaths showing how it has negatively impacted the soveit union

# data[].attributes.body
This is evident in source A 'Those who survived, were sent to labour camps or were executed " This shows how the rich pesants were poorly and brutally treated by the soveit union durign collectavisation

# data[].attributes.body
source A is usuful in content about the effects of stalin's collectavisation as it is reliable in stating the negative social impacts on the kosacks.

# data[].attributes.body
Similarly,source B states:"Stalin,ignoring the great cost in human life and misery between 1932-1933,claimed  that collectivisation was a success;for,after the great famines caused at that time"Source B also shows that there was also human suffering due to a lack of food,and there was also costs in human lives such as when kulaks got killed,which is same as source A's claim of human suffering due to lack of food  between 1932 and 1933 and kulaks suffering due to opposing collectivisation

# data[].attributes.body
Source A states:"Stalin had a difficult time convincing the peasants about the collectivization,but this was slight compared to the opposition of the kulaks who owned their land.Collectivisation soon became a grim and bitter struggle.Not surprisingly,food and production fell and there was famine betweeen 1932-1933.Those who survived,were sent to labour camps or were executed"This shows that collectivisation caused people to suffer from lack of food between 1932 and 1933 and kulaks also suffered due to them opposing collectivisation

# data[].attributes.body
This claim can be supported by source B which states " Stalin ignoring the great cost in human life and misery between 1932-1933". This suggests that Collectivization was a major social failure as the Soviets were miserable and unhappy with their current lives. Many executions were held which led to the destruction of many happy families. These executions also struck fear into the other Soviets. Hence, source A is useful as it provides true facts and is reliable in showing the negative short-term economic and social impacts of Stalin's Collectivization.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A states " food and production fell and there was famine between 1932-1933." This shows that the Soviet economy was experiencing a decline to the point where the Soviets could not feed themselves. This was also a social problem as the Soviets had to suffer in hunger. Source A also states" Those who survived, were sent to labour camps or executed." This suggests that Stalin's Collectivization was a social failure as it had robbed the Soviets of their freedom, and lives for some, causing them to live in fear daily.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is useful as it provides true facts and is reliable in showing the negative short-term economic and social impacts of Stalin's Collectivization programme.

# data[].attributes.body
source A is useful as it is reliable as it is telling me true facts about negative social short term impacts of stalin's collectivization programme

# data[].attributes.body
Source B supports Source A by stating, "Stalin ignoring the great cost in human life and misery between 1932-1933 ". This implies that Stalin lacked empathy and did not care for his people. This also shows that Stalin was more interested in carrying out his Collectivization Programme, eliminating all threats and resistances at all costs. Thus Source B validates Source A by suggesting the negative impacts that the Russian peasants had to endure.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A states, "food and production fell and there was famine between 1932-1933. Those who survived, were sent to labour camps or were executed." This suggests that Collectivisation has caused suffering and hunger to all the peasants, especially those who displayed disloyalty to Stalin. This overall caused multiple deaths and suffering in Stalin's rule

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is useful in content regarding the negative effects of Stalin's Collectivization Programme as it is reliable in providing facts about how the Russian peasants suffered from this programme.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is supported by Source B which states: ¨Great cost in human life and misery between 1932-1933¨ This also shows not just the negative short term social but also economic impacts of Stalin's collectivisation programme.

# data[].attributes.body
This is supported by Source B, which states "Stalin ignoring the great cost in human life and misery between 1932-1933". Source B supports Source A in that there was a huge loss of lives, making Source A a reliable source that is useful in showing the negative side-effects of collectivisation.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A states "Collectivisation soon became a grim and bitter struggle. Not surprisingly, food and production fell and there was famine between 1932-1933. Those who survived, were sent to labour camps or were executed." This showed the harsh living conditions for the people during the collectivisation program, with the purges of the kulaks and the shortage of food

# data[].attributes.body
This is evident in Source A which states: ¨Food production fell and there was famine between 1932-1933¨, showing short term negative economic impacts. In addition, ¨Collectivisation soon became a grim and bitter struggle¨ shows the short term negative social impacts of Stalin's collectivisation.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is useful in content as it is reliable and tells the truth in showing the negative short-term social impacts of Stalin's collectivisation program.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is useful as it is reliable in showing the negative short term social and economic impacts of Stalin's collectivisation by stating true information.

# data[].attributes.body
source A is reliable and is true a s it is supported by source B which states'' the great cost in human life and misery between 1932-1933''. and '' after the great famines caused at the time...no more famines came to haunt the russian people''. this implies that during that time, there was a huge lost of lives thus collectivisation caused negative short term social impacts and supports source A. also, source B shows that there was famine during 1932-1933 but aftervthat there was no more famine thus supports source A that the negative economic impact was short term

# data[].attributes.body
source A states'' Collectivisation soon became a grim and bitter struggle. Not surprisingly, food and production fell and there was famine between 1932-1933'' this shows that it has caused a negative impact on the lives of the people there and 'famine' shows that their economy also suffered

# data[].attributes.body
source A is useful on terms of showing the short term negative social and economic impacts caused by stalins collectivisation, as the information is factual and true

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is supported by source B which states " Stalin ignoring the great cost in human life and misery between 1932-1933 ". This shows that Stalin was not bothered by the mass suffering of the russian peasants but focused on carrying out the Collectivisation plan without any form of resistance. Thus, this validates source A as it implies how large amounts of russian peasants can be sacrificed and tortured just to carry out Collectivisation which negatively impacted the russian peasants.

# data[].attributes.body
source A is supported by source B which similarly states "Stalin ignoring the great cost in human life and misery between 1932-1933...after the great famines caused at the time". this correlates with source A's claim that collectivization had many negative social impacts for people in the short term.

# data[].attributes.body
source A states "Collectivization soon became a grim and bitter struggle. Not surprisingly, food and production fell and there was a famine between 1932-1933. Those who survived, were sent to labour camps or were executed." this shows that collectivization was very harsh and caused the standard of living for many people to drop, as well as resulting in the loss of lives and shortage of food for others.

# data[].attributes.body
source A is useful in content about the negative short term social impacts of Stalin's collectivization, as it is reliable and shows true facts about it

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is useful in terms of content as it states "Those who survived, were sent to labour camps or were executed ". This implies that Collectivisation caused mass suffering to the peasants who disobeyed Stalin's orders. Hence, this led to their deaths and torture in the concentration camps when caught resisiting.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is useful in content about the effects of Stalin's Collectivization as it is reliable in providing factual information on the negative impacts of Collectivization on the russian peasants.

# data[].attributes.body
This is further supported by Source B, which states that "Stalin ignoring the great cost in human life and misery between 1932-1933...after the great famines caused at the time". This shows the negative short-term social and economic implications that Stalin's Collectivisation Programme inflicted on the Russian Peasants, with devastating and treacherous conditions faced by the Russian Peasants. Thus, since Source B corroborates with Source A, Source A is useful in content and reliable in showing the negative short-term social and economic impacts of Collectivisation.

# data[].attributes.body
In Source A, the article states that "Collectivisation soon became a grim and bitter struggle...Not surprisingly, food and production fell and there was famine between 1932-1933...Those who survived, were sent to labour camps or were executed". From the aforementioned pieces of evidence, it implies the social and economic failures of the Collectivisation Programme in the short-term, with the Russian Peasants having to tolerate hardship and bitter food shortages, while the peasants who opposed the programme were tortured or had to face their demise.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is useful in content as it is reliable in showing the negative short-term social and economic impacts of Stalin's Collectivisation Programme that was inflicted on the Russian Peasants. Source A is useful as it provides factual details that are backed and supported by Source B.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is supported by Source B which states,''Stalin ignoring the huge costs of human life and misery between 1923-1933...after the great famines caused at that time''Thus, Source A corroborates with Source B in showing the negative short term economic and social effects caused by the collectivisation programme.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A states,"Not surprisingly,food and production fell and there was a famine between 1932-1933.Those who survived,were sent to labour camps or were executed." This implies that collectivisation was an economic and social failure,as evidenced from the lack of food and the huge numbers of deaths respectively. The Kulaks were forced to give up private properties such as their farm land. As such, they burned their crops and ate their own animals. Those who resisted the collectivisation programme were shipped off to Siberia,forced to work in labour camps or executed which led to millions of deaths.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is useful as it is reliable and telling the truth about the negative economic and social short term effects of Stalin's collectivisation programme.

# data[].attributes.body
This is supported by source B which says ‘ignoring the great cost of human life and misery’ which shows that many people would die or suffer, and hence it validates Source A to be a useful source in terms of showing the negative social impacts as it is reliable

# data[].attributes.body
Source A states that the collectivisation programme brought ‘misery and suffering to the peasants’, and that anyone who opposed him would be ‘sent to labour camps or executed’ and hence I know that the peasants were forced to give up their land to be turned into the collective farms and anyone who refused to comply, or rebelled by slaughtering and eating their animals would be punished by death, especially the Kulaks, which led to millions of peasants dying or going through hardship

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is useful as it is reliable as it tells me true facts about the negative short term impacts of Stalin’s collectivisation programme

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is supported by Source B which states, "Stalin ignored the great cost in human life and misery between 1932-1933... and after the great famines caused at that time". This shows that the people of Russia had to suffer under Stalin's Collectivisation; which took a huge toll on them both physically, due to lack of food, and mentally, from the low standard of lives they had. Thus, Source A is useful in content and reliable about the effects of Stalin's collectivisation as it is supported by Source B.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A states, "Collectivisation soon became a grim and bitter struggle. Not surprisingly, food and production fell and there was a famine between 1932-1933. Those who survived, were sent to labour camps or were executed." This shows that Collectivisation made life difficult for people during the period, who had to suffer from the lack of food caused by Collectivisation. And those who did not obey Collectivisation were dealt with severely.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is reliable and telling the truth about the negative social impact Collectivisation had on the rich peasants in Russia.

# data[].attributes.body
This agrees with Source B which states 'ignoring the cost in human life and misery between 1932-1933' and 'great famine caused at the time' which would 'haunt the Russian people'. As such, source A is useful in allowing us to better understand the negative social impacts of Collectivization on the Russian peasants, such as famines between 1932-1933 that were so devastating they would 'haunt' the Russian people.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is supported by Source B.  Source A states 'He had brought about misery and suffering to the peasants.' and 'Collevtivization soon became a grim and bitter struggle. Not surprisingly, food and production fell and there was famine between 1932-1933'.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is useful in content about the effects of Stalin's Collectivization as it is reliable in showing the negative short terms social impacts of Collectivization on the peasants. It is useful as it is true and supported by Source B and gives us a greater understanding of the social impacts of Collectivization.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is useful as it is reliable in showing the negative short term effects of stalin's collectvisation plan and how it had impacted the russian people and russian economy socially and economically. It is useful as it is facts that are supported by other sources and thus true

# data[].attributes.body
This is supported by soruce B which states "Stalin ignoring the great cost in human life amd misery between 1932-1933" and "after the great famines caused at the time" which validates both the negative short-term economic and social impacts of Stalin's Collectivization, thus showing that Source A is reliable and useful in providing information on the effects of Stalin's Collectivization programme.

# data[].attributes.body
This is evident form source A which states "Collectivization soon became a grim and bitter struggle" which shows the negative short-term social impacts and " food prodcution fell and there was famine between 1932-1933" which shows the negative short-term economic impacts.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is useful as it is reliable in showing the negative short-term social and economic impacts of Stalin's Collectivization as it provides facts.