# data[].attributes.body
I believe that violence is sometimes necessary in certain situations to end other injustices that are going on. A prime example of this was the Civil war and slavery. However, I do think that we can try to limit the amount of violence during these situations.

# data[].attributes.body
To be completely honest, violence can only ever be justified if what is being fought for is coherent with my own views if I am left to judge the morality of an action (or not be justified at all). In most cases, violence is evidently never the answer and more peaceful alternatives should always be considered before taking that route (this still does not mean that the violence is justified). In conclusion, violence cannot be justified, but I will try by best to defend it if the violence was done to fight for something I, myself, believe in.

# data[].attributes.body
I think not because everyone has their own opinion, so because if everyone has their own opinion then we know that there is always going to be violence because this isn't a world where peace is a thing.

# data[].attributes.body
I think violence can be justified for a political goal but it varies due to the violence in which is being acted and I think when it draws the line is by it possibly affecting or posing a threat towards innocent or civilian lives and also possibly breaking the freedom and rights people have.

# data[].attributes.body
i believe that violence can be justified, but not in every situation. in some circumstances, violence may be a necessity, although not in great amounts. the line can be drawn at violence fighting for a good cause and violence simply to cause chaos and other injustices.

# data[].attributes.body
For certain people, violence has a specific drive; whether it be vengeance, revenge, or a bloodlust. Vengeance may be justified, if perhaps the receiving end has done something truly wrong to the aggressor. There might also be a certain goal beyond violence.

# data[].attributes.body
I think violence can't be justified in pursuit of political or social goals because in the constitution it states you are allowed freedom of speech. Never does it justify killing or harming any for social goals. I draw the line when violence comes into play.

# data[].attributes.body
there are times where violence could be justified but there's an obvious line of where it's drawn. of course, the act of murdering for the sake of justice or whatever is the line but sometimes violence is the only way someone could understand the impact of it and its severity. but for crimes such as a protest gone wrong could be something of an accident or merely provoking the party.

# data[].attributes.body
The only justifiable form of violence(in my opinion) is self defense or a form of war. You can't just kill somebody because they have a different opinion or political view than you. Social goals also wouldn't be a reason to get violent. Starting parades and other forms of large groups trying to convince others in a peaceful way rather than resorting to violence would be best for you and others.

# data[].attributes.body
Violence that needs to happen to break tension is quite justifiable. But violence happening where it doesn't need to be is just not very smart. For example, in the Civil war violence needs to happen to correct our wrong way of life using slaves. In ww2 even though we bombed imperial japan there was no doubt we were in the right because they were going to commit worse atrocities if we did not.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that violence is necessary in some cases to reach their goal or to even be recognized as something within this society. In most cases, rallies and protests that are entirely peaceful don't get much public recognition. Other protests, however, that end up in violence (either from the government's side or from the protester's side) end up blowing up on the media. Therefore, while I don't condone violence I think to actually push for societal change, violence is almost always necessary.

# data[].attributes.body
No, I don't think that violence can ever be justified in the pursuit of political goals if it is against other humans or animals. If violence is used to destroy land and or territory, then it can be justified in some ways, since sometimes it is necessary to use violence to voice your opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
I think violence cannot be justified, unless it is in self defense. No matter the situation, there will always be people who appose it and people who justify it, but it usually depends on which side a person is on. A peaceful way is always the most logical thing to do, but if there is oppression or threats against someone than there us usually no other choice.

# data[].attributes.body
I think violence can be justified to a certain point, it depends on the situation of social or political goals. In certain situations violence could be necessary for ending or protecting a claim someone could have made. There are certain extent to violence as well such as killing people without real motive or starting riots/rampages without real motive.

# data[].attributes.body
Violence can be justified in pursuit of political or social goals depending on the situation how ever its better to try other methods like protests or something of that sort first, you cant always chose violence first you have to try to reason out of it, if this does not work I think that depends on the person if they want to choose violence in order to be heard and change things. Sometimes its hopeless to do protests and thats when the use of violence helps them because they have no other choice.

# data[].attributes.body
Personally, I believe that in the in the act of violence political goals, social goals, economic goals can be met and through violence all parties can come to a compromise or consensus. For example, the invasion of Ukraine by Russia is an attempt by Russia to gain more power, fighting back war with another unit (Ukraine) can help regain peace and at some point will stop. In almost all cases of international violence or war is met by a treaty. In turn, goals will be met. Obviously there will be biased opinions as in if you are a Russian fighter, you may think this violence is justified, but if you are on the side of Ukraine you will think the violence is barbaric and unjust.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that violence in certain situations can be justified in pursuit of political and social goals because sometimes, violence is needed to end a certain  argument or injustice. I think that the line can be drawn when violence is causing chaos or causing other issues. I also believe that if the violence is being taken to far, as in murdering then I believe violence should not be justified. There are other ways to settle an argument or injustice for example talking it out or if its a big issue maybe a protest.

# data[].attributes.body
I think violence can be justified but not in every situation . There is a line where as violence goes but depending on the situation, violence may be needed. Though it is not the best to go for violence at first, like if it is a small incident it would be best to reason it out. The line where someone should never pass through violence would be murder or torture, that kind of violence could not be justified.

# data[].attributes.body
I think violence in some cases can be justified is pursuit of political or social goals because in some cases violence is the only way to end an issue. Sometimes they should draw the line when someone is being affected by violence with no real cause.

# data[].attributes.body
It depends on the situation. Sometimes violence is necessary for people to get their point across. But there are boundaries, if people use violence as a way to intentionally harm people, that is where the line should be drawn. Violence is sometimes necessary for crucial situations like war, but I think that we should try to lower the chances of violence as much as possible.

# data[].attributes.body
I think (in my opinion) that there are occasions where violence is needed or used to get to goals, but of course there must be some type of limit where it starts being unjustifiable.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that violence can sometimes be justified when no other methods will work but not when there is too much of it or if there is no actual motive.