# data[].attributes.body
Abstract

The study addresses the perception of graphing calculators (GCs) among students learning Probability, a subject often viewed as challenging. It highlights how low motivation and interest in Mathematics lead to disengagement in the classroom. Teachers have been exploring various methods to enhance student engagement, and GCs are introduced as a potential solution. The findings indicate that students responded positively to GCs in their Probability lessons, noting improvements in their understanding of concepts, increased confidence in problem-solving, better communication skills, and a more favorable attitude towards learning Mathematics.

Keywords

Handheld technology: Refers to portable computing devices used in educational settings.

Graphing calculator: A tool that allows for complex mathematical calculations and visualizations.

Beliefs and perceptions: The attitudes and opinions students hold about learning Mathematics with GCs.

Probability: The branch of mathematics dealing with the likelihood of different outcomes.

Research Purpose

The primary aim of the research was to explore how incorporating graphing calculators in Probability lessons affects students' perceptions and experiences. It sought to determine whether GCs could help reduce anxiety related to learning Probability and enhance the quality of mathematics education. By focusing on students' reactions, the study aimed to provide insights for educators and policymakers on effectively integrating technology into the curriculum.

Sample Group

The sample consisted of 32 students enrolled in a foundation program at a private university in Malaysia. The group included:

Demographics: 24 male and 8 female students, representing a multiracial composition, including Malay, Chinese, Indian, and a few international students.

Age Range: Participants were aged between 17 and 21 years old.

Context: The study was conducted over a trimester, with students having no prior experience using GCs in their learning.

Statistical Data

To assess students' perceptions, the researchers developed a questionnaire titled "Questionnaires on Students’ Perception on the use of Graphing Calculator in the learning and teaching Probability (QSP)." Key details include:

Structure: The questionnaire consisted of 22 Likert-scale questions ranging from 'strongly disagree' to 'strongly agree.'

Focus Areas: The six aspects measured were:

1. Calculator usage

2. Quality of output from the calculator

3. Understanding of Probability concepts

4. Student confidence in problem-solving

5. Communication

6. Student attitude towards learning Probability

Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze the responses. The overall findings indicated that students rated their experiences with GCs positively, with average scores exceeding 4.05. The aspect with the highest score was "Quality of output from the calculator," with a mean of 4.64, indicating strong agreement on the effectiveness of GCs.

Conclusion

The study concluded with several key insights:

Positive Reception: Most students preferred learning Probability with GCs, finding them easy to use and helpful in understanding complex concepts.

Enhanced Understanding: GCs were credited with improving students' comprehension of Probability topics, leading to greater confidence in solving related problems.

Improved Engagement: The use of GCs fostered a more interactive learning environment, encouraging discussions and collaboration among peers.

Motivation and Attitude: The majority of students reported that learning with GCs was fun and enjoyable, which contributed to a more positive attitude towards Mathematics.

Recommendations: The findings support the wider adoption of GCs in Malaysian mathematics education, emphasizing the potential for these tools to enhance student learning and engagement in a subject often perceived as difficult.

# data[].attributes.body
Abstract

The article provides a comprehensive review of the TI-84 Plus graphing calculator, highlighting its significance in the educational landscape since its release. It notes that while newer models like the TI-84 Plus CE have been introduced, the TI-84 Plus continues to be immensely popular, especially among high school and college students. The review assesses the calculator’s features, usability, and the impact of software updates on its functionality, particularly focusing on its acceptance in standardized testing environments.

Keywords

TI-84 Plus: A widely used graphing calculator in education.

Graphing calculator: A tool essential for visualizing mathematical concepts.

Education: The primary context in which the calculator is utilized.

TI-84 Plus CE: The newer color version of the TI-84 Plus.

Standardized testing: Refers to exams like the ACT, where the calculator is permitted.

Research Purpose

The article aims to evaluate the TI-84 Plus calculator's relevance and effectiveness in modern educational settings. It seeks to inform potential buyers—students and educators—about the benefits and limitations of the TI-84 Plus compared to its newer counterpart, the TI-84 Plus CE. The review draws on the author's extensive experience working with students to assess the calculator's performance, usability in classroom settings, and acceptance in standardized testing.

Sample Group

The review is based on qualitative observations rather than a specific quantitative sample. The author draws on:

Classroom Experience: Direct interaction with high school and college students using the TI-84 Plus.

Math Team Participation: Engagement in competitive math environments where the calculator is utilized.

Test Preparation: Experience in preparing students for standardized tests like the ACT, which influences calculator choice.

Statistical Data

While the article does not include formal statistical analyses or numerical data, it provides anecdotal evidence reflecting the TI-84 Plus's widespread acceptance in educational contexts:

Market Presence: The TI-84 Plus is noted as one of the top-selling graphing calculators, indicating its popularity.

Standardized Testing Acceptance: The article highlights that the TI-84 Plus is accepted on nearly all standardized tests, making it a reliable choice for students.

Conclusion

The review concludes that although the TI-84 Plus is not the latest model, it remains a highly effective calculator for students. Key points include:

Continued Relevance: The TI-84 Plus is still favored for its user-friendly interface, extensive resources, and teacher familiarity.

Recommendation for Upgrade: The TI-84 Plus CE is recommended for its superior features, including a color display, backlighting, and rechargeable battery, making it easier to read and more convenient for long-term use.

Budget Considerations: For students on a budget, the author suggests looking for used TI-84 Plus calculators, which remain durable and functional for educational needs.

Overall Value: The TI-84 Plus is portrayed as a solid investment for students, with a long-standing reputation in mathematics education, ensuring that it meets academic requirements effectively.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The TI-84 CE Plus has better color screen, battery life, software, and a more compact size than its predecessors.

# data[].attributes.body
Abstract

The article discusses the influence of graphing calculators on secondary mathematics education, identifying three pivotal themes from the literature:

1. Access to Graphing Calculators: How availability affects student engagement and performance.

2. Curricular Integration: The role of graphing calculators within the mathematics curriculum.

3. Pedagogical Practices: The relationship between calculator use and teaching methodologies.

The findings indicate that appropriate use of graphing calculators can lead to significant improvements in student achievement and problem-solving skills, emphasizing the need for effective teacher education.

Keywords

Graphing Calculators: Tools that aid in visualizing mathematical concepts.

Secondary Education: The level of education typically covering grades 9-12.

Mathematics Teaching: The methodologies and practices involved in teaching math.

Pedagogical Practices: Teaching strategies and styles employed in the classroom.

Teacher Education: Programs designed to prepare educators for effective teaching.

Student Achievement: Measurable performance outcomes of students.

Research Purpose

The primary objective of the research is to evaluate how graphing calculators impact mathematics teaching and learning. The study aims to:

Identify barriers to effective use of calculators in classrooms.

Understand the connection between access to technology and student learning outcomes.

Provide recommendations for teacher education programs to better prepare educators in integrating technology into their teaching.

Sample Group

The article synthesizes findings from multiple studies involving:

Teachers: Middle and secondary mathematics educators, with varying levels of experience in using graphing calculators.

Students: Diverse student populations across different educational settings, including those with limited and extensive access to calculators.

While specific numerical data on sample sizes is not provided, the referenced studies collectively encompass a broad range of educational scenarios.

Statistical Data

Key findings from the studies include:

Access: A survey revealed that about 70% of teachers had calculators available but often did not utilize them in their instruction.

Performance: Studies highlighted that students with extended access to graphing calculators utilized a broader range of problem-solving strategies and tended to perform better on assessments.

Impact of Limited Access: Research indicated that even limited exposure to calculators could positively influence students' mathematical approaches, but these effects were not always linked to deep understanding.

Specific studies referenced include:

Harskamp et al. (2000): Found that students with longer access to calculators achieved higher scores and utilized more graphical strategies.

Hong et al. (2000): Showed that students with short-term access could solve computational problems but often lacked conceptual understanding.

Conclusion

The article concludes that:

Access Alone Is Insufficient: Providing calculators without appropriate pedagogical frameworks does not guarantee improved learning outcomes.

Curriculum and Pedagogy Matter: Effective integration of graphing calculators into the curriculum, alongside innovative teaching practices, is essential for maximizing their educational benefits.

Implications for Teacher Education: Teacher training programs must focus on:

Familiarizing educators with graphing calculators.

Encouraging reflection on technology use in teaching.

Offering practical experiences that illustrate the effective use of calculators in classrooms.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Research On Graphing Calculators at the Secondary Level: Implications for Mathematics Teacher Education – CITE Journal

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Graphing calculators were first introduced in 1985 and within a few years mathematics educators began to study the role and impact of this tool on the teaching and learning enterprise. The field has amassed a significant body of research on students’ performance and learning with graphing calculators and a small, now growing, body of research on teachers’ use and knowledge of graphing calculators. An analysis of research studies published in peer-reviewed journals over the past 2 decades suggested a framework for summarizing the findings and implications of this research. Three themes emerged that cut across the existing literature: access to graphing calculators, the place of graphing calculators in mathematics curricula, and the connection between graphing calculators and pedagogical practice. This article addresses what this literature suggests about teaching and learning mathematics with graphing calculators, as well as the implications of these research findings for preservice and in-service teacher education.

# data[].attributes.body
Abstract

The literature review delves into the impact of graphic calculators on the final grades of college algebra students. Notably, it points out the significant gap in research regarding this technological tool, despite college algebra being a foundational course for many students. The review highlights high failure rates among students in this course, aiming to explore the specific influences of graphic calculators on student performance, motivation, and satisfaction. The theoretical framework combines constructivist theory and technology-assisted instruction theory, suggesting that these approaches can enhance learning outcomes.

Keywords

Graphic calculators: Tools that aid in visualizing mathematical concepts.

Teaching and learning strategies: Approaches adopted to facilitate learning.

Post-secondary education: Education beyond high school, particularly in colleges and universities.

College grades: Academic performance indicators in college-level courses.

Student satisfaction: The degree to which students feel their educational needs are met.

Motivation: The internal drive that influences students to engage and succeed in their studies.

Research Purpose

The primary purpose of the literature review is to investigate how graphic calculators affect the academic success of college algebra students. It aims to fill the existing knowledge gap concerning the application of graphic calculators in post-secondary mathematics education. The review focuses on three key areas:

1. Student performance: Analyzing how the use of graphic calculators can lead to better academic outcomes.

2. Student motivation: Exploring how these tools encourage engagement and interest in mathematics.

3. Student satisfaction: Assessing the overall satisfaction levels of students when using graphic calculators in their learning process.

Sample Group

The literature review synthesizes findings from various studies conducted on college students enrolled in algebra courses. Specific demographic details, such as age or gender, are not explicitly outlined; however, the research predominantly focuses on students facing challenges in college algebra. The studies referenced span a range of educational institutions and contexts, with much of the literature published between 2011 and 2015.

Statistical Data

While specific statistical analyses are not detailed in the review, it references various studies that collectively demonstrate the following trends:

Increased passing rates among students who used graphic calculators compared to those who did not.

Enhanced understanding of complex mathematical concepts due to the visual and interactive capabilities of graphic calculators.

Positive correlations between the use of graphic calculators and improved student engagement and motivation.

Qualitative data from student feedback indicating a more enjoyable learning experience when using this technology.

Conclusion

The literature review concludes that incorporating graphic calculators into college algebra courses can significantly benefit student outcomes. Key findings include:

Improved Performance: Students using graphic calculators tend to achieve higher grades and better understand course material.

Enhanced Motivation: The use of technology makes learning more engaging, fostering a deeper interest in mathematics.

Increased Satisfaction: Students report higher satisfaction levels when learning with graphic calculators, as these tools help demystify complex concepts and encourage active participation.

The review emphasizes the importance of combining constructivist and technology-assisted instructional approaches to maximize the educational benefits of graphic calculators. It also calls for continued research to explore the broader implications of technology in mathematics education, addressing potential challenges and best practices for implementation.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE EFFECTS OF THE USE OF GRAPHIC CALCULATORS IN COLLEGE ALGEBRA COURSES

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Download as a PDF or view online for free

# data[].attributes.body
Abstract

The study addresses the issue of mathematics anxiety and achievement among Malaysian students, noting that many students find mathematics to be a challenging and stressful subject. The research focuses on the TI-84 Plus graphing calculator as a potential tool to improve students' performance and reduce their anxiety. Over a ten-week period, the study involved two public schools in Selangor, Malaysia, with the experimental group utilizing the TI-84 Plus while the control group received traditional instruction. The findings suggest that the use of the calculator significantly improves achievement and lowers anxiety levels.

Keywords

Achievement: Refers to the students' performance in mathematics, typically measured through test scores.

Anxiety: Specifically relates to mathematics anxiety, which can hinder performance and overall interest in the subject.

Mathematics anxiety: A psychological phenomenon where students experience fear or apprehension specifically related to math tasks.

Graphing calculator: A technological tool that allows for the visualization of mathematical concepts and functions.

Technology: Refers to the integration of tools like the TI-84 Plus in educational settings.

Research Purpose

The study aims to:

1. Investigate the impact of the TI-84 Plus: To determine whether using this graphing calculator can lead to better academic outcomes in mathematics.

2. Assess the effect on anxiety: To evaluate if the calculator can help reduce anxiety associated with learning and performing in mathematics.

3. Provide evidence for technology integration: To support the argument for incorporating technological tools into mathematics education, especially in contexts where students struggle.

Sample Group

The sample consisted of:

Participants: Four classes of Form Four students from two public schools in Selangor, Malaysia.

Groups:

Experimental group: 54 students who used the TI-84 Plus for their math lessons.

Control group: 55 students who received instruction without the use of the calculator.

Duration: The intervention lasted for ten weeks, during which regular teachers facilitated the lessons using the graphing calculator.

Statistical Data

Pre- and Post-Tests: Both groups were assessed before and after the intervention using a paper-and-pencil test for achievement and an anxiety test developed by the researchers.

Results: The analysis indicated a statistically significant difference in both achievement and anxiety levels for the experimental group, with a significance level of p < 0.01. This suggests that the use of the TI-84 Plus was effective in enhancing students' performance and reducing anxiety.

Conclusion

The study concludes that:

Positive Impact: The TI-84 Plus graphing calculator significantly enhances students' mathematical achievement while simultaneously reducing their anxiety levels.

Educational Implications: The findings advocate for the integration of graphing calculators into the mathematics curriculum, emphasizing their role in creating a more supportive learning environment.

Future Research: The article suggests further studies to explore long-term effects and the potential of other technological tools in alleviating anxiety and improving academic performance in mathematics.