# data[].attributes.body
Granted, one might believe that improving public health can be achieved by increasing the number of sports facilities. This idea makes sense because when people have easier access to gyms or playgrounds, they are more likely to exercise regularly. Regular/ FREQUENT (tránh lặp) physical activity helps reduce excessive weight gain and lowers the risk of heart disease. For instance, in Singapore, the government built community sports centres in almost every district, which encouraged more residents to join fitness programs, RESULT?. Therefore, providing more facilities can be a practical way to promote healthier lifestyles among citizens.

Khá tốt nè, cách dùng câu từ ổn hơn nhiều rồi.

Chỗ ví dụ có tí k gian time sẽ oke hơn nữa => ví dụ: nói về so what? trong thập kỷ vừa qua đã làm và tỉ lệ join tăng hẳn thì mới ra được RESULT (còn đó mới action thôi; kết quả chưa rõ nhỉ)

# data[].attributes.body
Granted, one might argue that building more sports facilities is the most effective way to improve public health because it encourages people to exercise regularly. The assumption is that when citizens have easIER access to FITNESS FACILITIES (to to trước) such as gyms, swimming pools, and football fields, they will naturally adopt healthier lifestyles and become more physically active. For instance, in Japan, local governments often invest in public gyms and walking tracks, which do provide convenient opportunities for exercise. (VẤN ĐỀ LÀ SO WHAT? invest rồi sao nữa??) However, in my opinion, this argument is not entirely convincing (dùng câu cứng cô dạy sẽ đủ oke r, sau này đỡ phải nghĩ nhiều) because access alone does not guarantee usage. Many individuals remain inactive despite having sports facilities nearby, LARGELY due to lack of time, motivation, or awareness of the importance of exercise.

Câu từ viết tốt lưu ý mấy chỗ cô feedback nha

# data[].attributes.body
Granted, the argument that studying abroad is essential for personal growth is not without foundation/ ENTIRELY BASELESS. The assumption is that his viewpoint arises from the belief that living in a foreign country pushes students to be more independent, as it involves the management of finances and problem-solving without family support. For example, a Vietnamese student in Canada may need to work part-time to afford living expenses, not only improves their financial management but also teaches them how to balance work and study effectively. However, in my opinion, this argument falls short, as such drawbacks ? sao lại bất lợi? BENEFITS hold true for students who remain in their home country may not face such challenges (đoạn này cô hơi rối), since independence can also be gained through experiences such as dormitory life and part-time employment.This demonstrates why studying abroad should not be seen as the only path to personal growth. (câu cuối oke)

chỗ này cô k hiểu lắm

Ý là ở nước mình thì vẫn học được bình thường đúng k?

# data[].attributes.body
Đề bài 5: Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
Đề bài 6: Governments in many countries have recently introduced special taxes on foods and beverages with high levels of sugar. Some think these taxes are a good idea while others disagree. Discuss both views and give you own opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
Some argue that running zoos should be banned because they are perceived as brutal. However, I strongly disagree with this viewpoint, as it fails to recognise the profound significance of zoos in many aspects including conservation and education.

granted, the claim that keeping wildlife in enclosures is unethical (em ơi cả câu này mới là chủ ngữ mà) phải viết thêm như là IS NOT ENTIRELY BASELESS mới ổn. The assumption is that cho gọn nha This perspective stems from the belief that wild animals should live freely in nature instead of being confined to settings that are potentially poor quality.Even worse, some zoos even use animals for showcases making money (informal). However, in my opinion, this argument falls short, as such drawbacks hold true for only a minority of the zoos world wild, while most still follow their main purpose and maintain high standards.This is a testament to that shutting down all zoos due to the faults of a minority would be unjust.

(oke, khá giống ý bài mà cô viết, thì cũng k sao, tuy nhiên, miễn là những gì e vừa viết là do em viết; k dùng tool thì vẫn sẽ ổn nhé). Vì 1 số câu em lấy được từ bài cô, điều đó bình thường và được khuyến khích. "as such drawbacks hold true for only a minority of the zoos world wild, while most ..." câu này cũng dùng dc cho nhiều bài)

# data[].attributes.body
Granted/ Admittedly, one might argue that

Some people argue that zoos are unethical because animals live in cages and lose their natural habits. While this argument is reasonable in some cases, it falls short because it overlooks the fact that modern zoos often protect animals from excessive threats such as poaching and habitat destruction. For instance, the Singapore Zoo has provided safe breeding programs for endangered species like the orangutan, which would face a high risk of extinction if left in the wild. This shows that although captivity may seem cruel in theory, in reality, zoos can serve as important centers for conservation and education.

Luận điểm của em cũng hay nhưng tận 2 cái lận - nếu trên em nói 1 số trường hợp có thì em có thể nói - nó cũng đúng với a few/ minority of zoos nơi mà cơ sở vật chất k đảm bảo, chứ the majority đang rất oke đi đúng chức năng bảo tồn của nó (vì link back to the POINT thì nhớ là phải về THE POINT chứ k phải point mới)

Tuy vậy, e viết cũng ổn ổn r đó

# data[].attributes.body
vy

Granted, one might argue that making public transportation free for everyone would encourage more citizens to use buses and trains instead of private vehicles. The assumption is that free access would reduce traffic congestion and lower air pollution because they do not need to worry about ticket prices when choosing between cars and public transport (câu này nên gọn, neat hơn ví du: as commuters would no longer factor in ticket costs when deciding how to travel.). For instance, in some European cities such as Tallinn in Estonia, citizens enjoy free bus services, which has indeed contributed to higher ridership and fewer cars on the roads (cẩn thận khi dùng những tên riêng khó viết, dễ sai trong phòng thi).However, in my opinion, this argument, THOUGH VALID TO A CERTAIN EXTENT, falls short because it overlooks the enormous financial burden that governments would face if they had to cover all transportation costs. Running trains and buses requires ongoing funding for fuel, maintenance, staff salaries and infrastructure upgrades. This trade-off means that while individuals may save on their daily commute, society as a whole may suffer through reduced investment in areas that directly impact quality of life.

Vy viết ổn áp quá nè

# data[].attributes.body
Đề bài 7: University education should be free to everyone.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Some people believe that studying abroad is essential for personal growth. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Many people think that public transportation should be free for all citizens. Do you agree or disagree?

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Some people believe that zoos should be banned because they are unethical. To what extent do you agree or disagree?