# data[].attributes.body
9/10

The commentary is very well explained with convincing evidences and explainations that has been linked very well with the IA prompt.

# data[].attributes.body
8/10

it identifies three objects and their real-world contexts. Links between each of the three objects and the selected IA prompt are

explained. there is a justification for all the objects and evidence supporting it

# data[].attributes.body
9/10

The commentary is lucid and coherent.

The three distinct objects are strongly connected to the IA prompt and are associated with the knower's real world context.

Appropriate supporting points but could have been more precise.

# data[].attributes.body
8/ 10

The exhibition displays three objects and connections are made to the IA prompt and between the objects clearly.

The students lacks clarity and does not connect some of the references with the IA prompt

# data[].attributes.body
8/10

-The objects very well suit the IA prompt

-The content of first two objects is convincing and coherent

-The commentary of the third object feels vague.

- The justification is quite similar and repeated for all the objects.

-TOK concepts have been used

# data[].attributes.body
8/10

A clear link between the prompt and the three objects can be seen as all the objects represent a certain culture. The student explains the link between the prompt and the objects to some extent. Valid RLEs have been used and there is a clear justification for choosing those RLEs. Overall, it was a convincing response.

# data[].attributes.body
8/10

all three object are well connected with the IA prompt. Knower's knowledge on each objects were different from a person from different culture. In some objects, real world text is not well defined