# data[].attributes.body
I am currently enrolled in the Educational Leadership program with the goal of obtaining an administrative role in Special Education. As a teacher for the past eighteen years, I am passionate about ensuring that students with unique learning needs receive the support and services they require through Individualized Education Plans (IEPs). My perspective is rooted in the belief that education should be inclusive, equitable, and tailored to meet the diverse needs of all students.

Topic: A Guide for Educators in Implementing a Student's Individualized Education Plan (IEP)

This guide is intended for general and special education teachers, as well as administrators, who are responsible for creating, implementing, and overseeing IEPs to ensure that students with disabilities receive appropriate and effective educational support.

I chose this topic because of my passion for special education and commitment to supporting students with disabilities. It is crucial for educators and administrators to effectively implement and comply with the provisions outlined in a student's Individualized Education Plan (IEP). The legally binding nature of IEPs necessitates a high level of accuracy and fidelity in their implementation, and I aim to provide educators and administrators with the knowledge and resources needed to fulfill these obligations effectively.

# data[].attributes.body
Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) are crucial in education because they ensure tailored support for students with disabilities.

IEPs are legally binding documents designed to meet the unique learning needs of these students, bridging the gap between policy and practice and ensuring that students with disabilities have the same e

The implementation of Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) significantly impacts education by promoting inclusivity, equity, and personalized learning.

Ensuring that teachers possess the essential skills, knowledge, and resources to implement Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) effectively is crucial. Providing educators with training on how to interpret an IEP, offer accommodations, and properly document the process is essential for upholding the quality and effectiveness of IEP implementation.

# data[].attributes.body
IEP Development - National Association of Special Education Teachers (NASET)

Link: https://www.naset.org/index.php?id=1763

The National Association of Special Education Teachers (NASET) provides a detailed guide for developing and implementing Individualized Education Programs (IEPs).

This resource offers strategies for :

1. establishing measurable annual goals and specific short-term objectives

2. defining behavioral objectives

3. involving parents

4. integrating assistive technology

5. insights on determining and documenting necessary supplementary aids and services to facilitate the student's access to the curriculum.

This guide equips educators with the necessary knowledge to create effective IEPs that meet federal and state regulations while addressing students' specific needs, ensuring meaningful progress and inclusion.

The APA citation is not completely correct. The correct format for the citation should include the author's last name, initial(s), the publication date in parentheses, the title of the document, and the source URL. Here's the corrected APA citation for the given text:

National Association of Special Education Teachers. (n.d.). IEP Development. https://www.naset.org/index.php?id=1763

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court Unlocks New Path to Relief for Disabled Students

Link: https://www.theregreview.org/2023/03/30/supreme-court-unlocks-new-path-to-relief-for-disabled-students/

The Supreme Court's decision in Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools established a new avenue for disabled students to seek recourse when their rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) are violated.

The case highlighted the significance of completing the IDEA administrative process before pursuing claims under other federal laws, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The latest ruling has clarified that families are not required to exhaust IDEA administrative processes when pursuing remedies that are not available under IDEA, such as monetary damages, under other federal laws.

This decision emphasizes the ongoing challenges in effectively implementing IDEA, including disparities in access to and quality of services for students with disabilities.

The APA citation you provided is almost correct. However, in APA format, the publication date should be followed by a period. Additionally, the title of the article should be in sentence case, which means only the first word of the title and subtitle (if any) should be capitalized. Here's the corrected APA citation:

The Regulatory Review. (2023, March 30). Supreme Court unlocks new path to relief for disabled students. https://www.theregreview.org/2023/03/30/supreme-court-unlocks-new-path-to-relief-for-disabled-students/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Your source of news, analysis, and opinion on regulatory law and policy sponsored by the Penn Program on Regulation at the University of Pennsylvania

# data[].attributes.body
Shifting the Focus of Research on Effective Professional Development: Insights From a Case Study of Implementation

Link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10833-021-09446-y

This article emphasizes the importance of context in implementing educational interventions, such as IEPs.

It explains how the unique circumstances of each educational setting significantly impact the success of these plans, emphasizing the necessity of effective professional development for educators, which directly relates to the proper execution of IEPs.

Well-trained teachers are crucial for tailoring education to meet individual student needs as outlined in IEPs.

The article provides a framework for understanding how interventions like IEPs can be systematically and effectively adopted within schools, ensuring better outcomes for students with disabilities.

It emphasizes the collaborative efforts required among educators, parents, and administrators to continuously adapt and improve IEP implementation and ensure that students receive the support they need.

This article is highly relevant to the necessary conditions and practices that facilitate effective implementation.

Various. (2022). Shifting the focus of research on effective professional development: Insights from a case study of implementation. Journal of Educational Change. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10833-021-09446-y

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Shifting the focus of research on effective professional development: Insights from a case study of implementation - Journal of Educational Change

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Globally, teacher professional development is heralded as a key mechanism for educational reform. With governments investing heavily in PD programs, the aim of these interventions is not only enhanced teacher knowledge and practice but, ultimately, improved student outcomes. A substantial body of re…

# data[].attributes.headline
Slide # 6 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)

# data[].attributes.subject
Slide # 6 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)

# data[].attributes.body
20 U.S.C. § 1400

Statutory Law

https://sites.ed.gov/idea/regs/b/d/300.320

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires that public schools develop a personalized education plan, known as an Individualized Education Program (IEP), for each student with a disability.

The IEP must include:

1. a statement of the child’s present levels of academic achievement and functional performance

2. measurable annual goals

3. a description of how the child’s progress towards meeting the annual goals will be measured

4. the special education and related services to be provided.

The statutory components of IDEA ensure that the IEP process is collaborative and must involve:

1. the student’s parents

2. at least one regular education teacher

3. at least one special education teacher

4. a representative of the local education agency

5. an individual who can interpret the instructional implications of evaluation results

6. the student, when appropriate (usually once they turn 14)

IDEA provides parents with procedural safeguards to ensure their involvement in the IEP process. This includes the right to examine educational records and seek an independent educational evaluation at public expense if they disagree with the school’s evaluation.

IDEA mandates that students with disabilities should receive education in the least restrictive environment, which means they should be placed in general education settings with appropriate aids and support as much as possible.

U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).

# data[].attributes.headline
Slide # 7 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973

# data[].attributes.subject
Slide # 7 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973

# data[].attributes.body
29 U.S.C. § 794

Statutory Law

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/504faq.html

Section 504 has a broader definition of disability, covering any student with a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. Students who may not qualify for an IEP under IDEA might still receive accommodations under a Section 504 plan.

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is a significant federal law that mandates that schools are required to make reasonable accommodations and modifications for students with disabilities to ensure they have equal access to education and can participate fully in educational programs alongside their peers.

Administrators and educators must be well-versed in both laws to effectively support the diverse needs of students with disabilities.

U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). Frequently Asked Questions About Section 504 and the Education of Children with Disabilities. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/504faq.html

# data[].attributes.headline
Slide # 8 Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District

# data[].attributes.subject
Slide # 8 Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District

# data[].attributes.body
Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, 580 U.S. (2017)

Judicial Law

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-827_0pm1.pdf

The Endrew F. decision is a landmark in the rights of students with disabilities.

In this case, the United States Supreme Court clarified what qualifies as a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).

This decision mandates that schools guarantee students make more than minimal progress through their IEPs.

Schools are required to provide custom IEPs that address the unique needs of the child to help students make substantial progress. This tailored approach ensures that student's individual needs are met rather than using a one-size-fits-all method.

The Court emphasized the importance of ongoing assessment and improvement of IEPs. Schools must regularly monitor and adjust the educational plans to ensure that they remain effective and aligned with the child’s evolving needs and circumstances.

Administrators must ensure that their teams understand the requirements and regularly review and update IEPs to reflect each student’s progress and changing needs.

The ruling emphasizes the need for thorough documentation and evidence-based practices in IEP development to comply with the heightened standards set by the Supreme Court.

The decision moved away from the previous standard established in Board of Education v. Rowley, which required only that the IEP have some educational benefit.

Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, 580 U.S. ___ (2017). https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-827_0pm1.pdf.

4o

# data[].attributes.headline
Slide # 9  Texas Education Code, Chapter 29, Subchapter A - Special Education Program

# data[].attributes.subject
Slide # 9  Texas Education Code, Chapter 29, Subchapter A - Special Education Program

# data[].attributes.body
Tex. Ed. Code, § 29.001

Statutory Law

https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/ED/htm/ED.29.htm

This section of the Texas Education Code states that the IEP must specify the extent to which the student will participate in regular education programs and any accommodations or modifications necessary for the student to succeed.

Students with disabilities should be educated in the least restrictive environment. This means they should be placed in general education settings to the maximum extent appropriate, with supplementary aids and services provided as needed.

The code ensures parental involvement and awareness of their rights, including the right to attend meetings, access records, and seek independent education. The team is responsible for developing, reviewing, and revising the IEP to address the student's needs.

The IEP must be reviewed at least annually to determine whether the annual goals are being achieved and to revise the plan as necessary, ensuring that the IEP remains relevant and effective in addressing the student’s evolving needs.

Texas Education Code, Chapter 29, Subchapter A - Special Education Program, Tex. Ed. Code, § 29.001. (https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/ED/htm/ED.29.htm).

# data[].attributes.headline
Slide # 10 Organizational Policy: Texas Administrative Code, Commissioner's Rules Concerning Special Education Services

# data[].attributes.subject
Slide # 10 Organizational Policy: Texas Administrative Code, Commissioner's Rules Concerning Special Education Services

# data[].attributes.body
Tex. Admin. Code. (2021), § 89.1050.

Local Administrative Law

https://tea.texas.gov/about-tea/laws-and-rules/commissioner-rules-tac/coe-tac-currently-in-effect/ch089aa.pdf

These guidelines establish specific protocols for formulating, evaluating, and amending IEPs in the state of Texas.

The IEP team must consider the student's strengths, parental concerns, evaluation results, and specific academic, developmental, and functional needs.

IEPs must be reviewed at least once a year to revise the IEP as necessary, to address any lack of expected progress, the results of any reevaluation, information provided by the parents, the child's anticipated needs, or other matters.

Teachers and administrators must ensure that any changes to the IEP are made with the input of all IEP team members, and parents must be kept informed of their child’s progress.

This law emphasizes that students with disabilities should be educated with their nondisabled peers to the maximum extent appropriate. Special classes, separate schooling, or other removal of children with disabilities from the regular educational environment should occur only when the nature or severity of the disability is such that education in regular classes with supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily.

Beginning at 14, the IEP must include appropriate measurable postsecondary goals based upon age-appropriate transition assessments related to training, education, employment, and, where appropriate, independent living skills. The IEP must also include the transition services (including courses of study) needed to assist the child in reaching those goals.

Texas Administrative Code, Title 19, Part 2, Chapter 89, Subchapter AA - Commissioner's Rules Concerning Special Education Services, Tex. Admin. Code § 89.1050 (2021). https://tea.texas.gov/about-tea/laws-and-rules/commissioner-rules-tac/coe-tac-currently-in-effect/ch089aa.pdf

# data[].attributes.body
Ethical Code: Professional Responsibility

Administrators must ensure that they and their staff uphold ethical standards in all educational practices, particularly those involving students with special needs. This includes implementing IEPs, which are conducted with integrity and fairness. By adhering to these ethical standards, principals ensure that students with disabilities receive the appropriate support and resources necessary for their success, as outlined by their IEPs.

Link: https://www.npbea.org/psel/

National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2015). Professional Standards for Educational Leaders 2015. https://www.npbea.org/psel/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
National Policy Board for Educational Administration

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
- National Policy Board for Educational Administration

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
How were the standards developed? The Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) and The National Policy Board for Educational Administration (NPBEA) guided the two-year development process. It involved a thorough review of empirical research and included the input of researchers and more than 1,000 school and district leaders through surveys and focus groups to ...

# data[].attributes.body
Resource on Implementing IEPs:

The book "Collaborative Teams for Students with Severe Disabilities: Integrating Therapy and Educational Services" by Beverly Rainforth and Jennifer York-Barr is an invaluable resource for comprehending the difficulties of implementing IEPs.

1. It offers guidance on establishing and sustaining effective collaborative teams.

2. The authors stress the significance of educators, therapists, and family members collaborating to create and execute individualized plans tailored to each student's unique needs.

3. It provides practical strategies for communication, team dynamics, and the integration of therapy into educational settings, all of which are crucial for administrators overseeing IEP implementation.

By adhering to the best practices outlined in this resource, administrators can ensure the faithful execution of IEPs, thus providing students with the comprehensive support they require to thrive both academically and socially.

Amazon - Collaborative Teams for Students with Severe Disabilities: Integrating Therapy and Educational Services https://www.amazon.com/Collaborative-Teams-Students-Severe-Disabilities/dp/1557664632

Rainforth, B., & York-Barr, J. (1997). Collaborative teams for students with severe disabilities: Integrating therapy and educational services. Paul H Brookes Publishing.

# data[].attributes.headline
Slide # 13 My Recommendations/Best Practices

# data[].attributes.subject
Slide # 13 My Recommendations/Best Practices

# data[].attributes.body
By following these recommendations, educators and administrators can ensure that IEPs are legally compliant, ethically sound, and grounded in best practices, providing the best possible educational outcomes for students with disabilities.

1. Stay updated on IDEA and Section 504 to understand legal requirements for IEPs and ensure procedural safeguards are met.

2. Set specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound goals within the IEP.

3. Implement regular progress monitoring to assess and document student achievements and areas needing adjustment.

4. Facilitate parental participation in IEP meetings by ensuring clear communication and respecting parental insights and concerns.

5. Implement research-supported instructional strategies and interventions proven effective for students with similar needs. Continuously evaluate and adapt to individual student requirements.

6. Assess and integrate appropriate assistive technologies into the IEP to support the student's learning and communication needs. Ensure that staff are trained to use these technologies effectively.

7. Keep detailed records of all IEP meetings, communications, evaluations, and modifications for transparency, accountability, and legal compliance.

8. Educators need to receive ongoing training on special education laws, instructional strategies, and technologies to maintain professional competence and stay informed about new developments.