# data[].attributes.body
1. Gather the ingredients. Preheat an outdoor grill for high heat and lightly oil the grate.

2. Rub the outside of each trout generously with olive oil and sprinkle with sea salt.

3. Sprinkle inside cavities with salt and black pepper. Place 1/2 of the lemon and onion slices into cavity of each trout as well, along with minced garlic, sprig of rosemary, and sprig of thyme.

4. Turn preheated grill down to low and place the trout directly onto the grill; cook until flesh flakes easily and the skins are browned, 6 to 7 minutes per side, flipping once.

# data[].attributes.body
Called paganens in traditional language, this indigenous soup recipe forms a creamy concoction made with simple stock, parsley, salt, and black pepper, shallots, and hazelnuts. All you have to do is blend everything together and heat it up. Modern chefs may want to use a food processor for this recipe to break down the roasted nuts or strain the soup at the end to prevent lumps.

# data[].attributes.body
traditional Eskimo ice cream 1 cup reindeer caribou or moose fat

1 cup animal oil (seal walrus or whale) divided 1/2 cups of berries (blue berries.

cloud berries

cranberries, salmonberries or

blackberries

fresh

# data[].attributes.body
traditional Eskimo ice cream

1 cup reindeer caribou or moose fat

1 cup animal oil (seal walrus

or whale) divided

1/2 cup water or 2 cups loose snow

1/2 cups berries (blue berries, cloud berries

cranberries, salmonberries or blackberries)

fresh

# data[].attributes.body
1. Gather the ingredients. Preheat an outdoor grill for high heat and lightly oil the grate.

2. Rub the outside of each trout generously with olive oil and sprinkle with sea salt.

3. Sprinkle inside cavities with salt and black pepper. Place 1/2 of the lemon and onion slices into cavity of each trout as well, along with minced garlic, sprig of rosemary, and sprig of thyme.

4. Turn preheated grill down to low and place the trout directly onto the grill; cook until flesh flakes easily and the skins are browned, 6 to 7 minutes per side, flipping once.

# data[].attributes.body
1 (3 pound) rabbit, cleaned and cut into pieces

1 tablespoon ground black pepper

1 ¾ teaspoons salt

¼ cup vegetable oil

1 onion, chopped

1 cup water

¾ cup ketchup

1 ½ tablespoons Worcestershire sauce

4 teaspoons white sugar

1 tablespoon paprika

1 clove garlic, chopped

# data[].attributes.body
Three Sister Stew Recipe

1 onion, chopped

3–4 cloves garlic, minced

2 cups cubed squash (butternut, pumpkin, or acorn)

2 cans (15 oz each) beans (kidney, pinto, black-eyed peas, or your favorite)

1 to 1½ cups corn kernels (fresh, frozen, or canned)

1 can diced tomatoes (no salt added recommended)

4 cups vegetable broth or water

1–2 teaspoons ground cumin

1–2 teaspoons chili powder

1 teaspoon dried oregano

Salt and black pepper to taste

Optional: smoked paprika, red pepper flakes for heat

Olive oil or sunflower oil for sautéing

Fresh cilantro or parsley for garnish

# data[].attributes.body
*1-2ib caribou cubed

*3large potatoes, diced(or quartered)

3-4 medium carrots ,sliced thickly

1 celery( cut diagonally)

1 large onion, chopped

1 bay leaf

2 tablespoons soya sauce

2/3 cups water

1 (1/4 ounce) can tomato soup ( optional to replace 1 cup of water)

1 tablespoon fresh ground beef pepper (to taste)

1/4 cup cornstarch, and water mixture for thickening (to your liking).

Sofia V

# data[].attributes.body
4 cups all-purpose flour

2 tablespoons baking powder

2 teaspoons salt

2-4 cups warm to very warm water

4cups canola oil

# data[].attributes.body
Traditional Eskimo Ice Cream:

1 cup reindeer, caribou, or moose fat (back fat)*

1 cup animal oil (seal, walrus, or whale), divided

1/2 cup water or 2 cups loose snow

4 1/2 cups berries (blueberries, cloudberries, cranberries, salmonberries, or blackberries), fresh

# data[].attributes.body
Apples: About 6 to 8 medium-sized apples, preferably tart varieties like Granny Smith or a mix of tart and sweet apples for balanced flavor.

Granulated Sugar: Around 3/4 to 1 cup, to sweeten the filling.

Brown Sugar: Optional, 1/4 cup to add depth and caramel notes.

Ground Cinnamon: 1 to 2 teaspoons for warm spice flavor.

Ground Nutmeg: 1/4 to 1/2 teaspoon as a complementary spice.

Lemon Juice: 1 to 2 tablespoons to add brightness and prevent browning of the apples.

All-Purpose Flour or Cornstarch: About 2 tablespoons as a thickener to help the filling set.

Salt: A pinch to enhance flavor.

Butter: 1 to 2 tablespoons, to dot on top of the filling before baking, adding richness.

Pie Crust Ingredients (for a double crust)

All-Purpose Flour: 2 1/2 cups for the dough.

Cold Unsalted Butter: 1 cup (2 sticks), cut into small cubes for flakiness.

Salt: 1 teaspoon.

Ice Water: 4 to 6 tablespoons, added gradually to bring the dough together without melting the butter.

Optional Sugar: 1 tablespoon, sometimes added to the crust for a subtle sweetness.

# data[].attributes.body
12 oz salmon fillet

Salt, black pepper, and a pinch of cayenne

2 tbsp honey

1 tbsp warm water

1.5 tsp apple cider vinegar (or lemon juice)

1 tbsp olive oil

3 garlic cloves, minced

½ lemon, sliced

1 tbsp chopped parsley

# data[].attributes.body
Lamel hamilton

Braised Rabbit with Wild Herbs

Ingredients:

1 whole rabbit, cut into pieces

2 tbsp vegetable oil or rendered fat

1 onion, chopped

2 cloves garlic, minced

1 cup wild mushrooms (or button mushrooms)

1 cup vegetable or game stock

1 tbsp fresh sage or thyme

Salt and pepper to taste

Instructions:

1. Heat oil in a heavy pot over medium heat. Brown rabbit pieces on all sides.

2. Remove rabbit and sauté onion and garlic until translucent.

3. Add mushrooms and cook for 5 minutes.

4. Return rabbit to the pot, add stock and herbs.

5. Cover and simmer for 1.5 to 2 hours, until meat is tender.

6. Season with salt and pepper. Serve with wild rice or roasted squash.

# data[].attributes.body
Squirrel pot pie recipe

This recipe makes 12 personal pot pies.

Ingredients

Squirrel

8 quartered squirrels

Chicken broth

Water

Pastry

3 cups of all-purpose flour

1 tsp salt

1 ½ cups of cold butter

1 egg

5 tbsp of cold water

1 tbsp of distilled white vinegar

Pie filling

1 large yellow onion

3 celery stalks

3 peeled carrots

¼ cup of all-purpose flour

½ stick of butter

2 cups of chicken broth

1 chicken bouillon cube

¼ cup white wine

1 cup heavy cream

3 sprigs of thyme

Salt and pepper, to taste

# data[].attributes.body
Ingredients:

Flour: This sweet cornbread recipe starts with a cup of all-purpose flour.

Cornmeal: Opt for yellow cornmeal for this recipe, as it's sweeter than its white counterpart.

Sugar: Use ⅔ cup white sugar for the perfect amount of sweetness.

Baking powder: Baking powder acts as a leavener, which means it helps the cornbread rise.

Salt: A teaspoon of salt enhances the flavors of the other ingredients.

Milk: Use whole milk, 2% milk, or your favorite alternative milk to add moisture and help create the perfect batter consistency.

Oil: A neutral oil, such as vegetable oil, keeps the cornbread nice and moist.

Egg: One egg lends moisture and acts as a binding agent.

# data[].attributes.body
backed fish

Ingredients

1 ¼ pounds

Fish Fillets

1 teaspoon

Seasoned Salt

add

Pepper

add

Optional

3 tablespoons

Butter (melted)

add

Fresh Dill And Lemon Wedges

Directions

1. Preheat the oven to 400°F. Place the fish in a greased 11x7-inch baking dish. Sprinkle with seasoned salt, pepper and, if desired, paprika. Drizzle the melted butter over the fillets.

2. Cover with foil and bake until the fish just begins to flake easily...

Read full directions

# data[].attributes.body
ingredients: Grilled salmon with hints of different herbs and spices, 2 squeezes of 2 lemons, 2 taps of salt from a little glass bottle, little bit of pepper, lay the spices and herbs on the well cooked salmon, your lunch is ready!

David arias

# data[].attributes.body
½ cup water

½ (12 ounce) can CONTADINA Tomato Paste

1 teaspoon dried oregano, crushed

1 teaspoon dried basil, crushed

½ teaspoon garlic powder

½ teaspoon onion powder

½ teaspoon sugar

½ teaspoon salt

¼ teaspoon black pepper3 ¼ cups all-purpose flour, or more as needed

2 (.25 ounce) envelopes FLEISCHMANN'S Pizza Crust Yeast or RapidRise Yeast

1 tablespoon sugar

1 ½ teaspoons salt

1 ⅓ cups very warm water (120 degrees F to 130 degrees F)

⅓ cup oil

# data[].attributes.body
Ingredients

1

POUND CARIBOU
ground

4

OUNCES GROUND PORK

SALT AND BLACK PEPPER
to taste *

½

MEDIUM ONIONS
chopped

BREAD CRUMBS
or other cereal, optional *

1

EACH EGGS
to bind the ingredients

SPICES
favourite burger spices *

Directions

Mix all the ingredients handling as little as possible.

Heat grill or broiler.

Brush burgers with vegetable oil and grill about 4 minutes; turn and cook to desired doneness.

Serve on rolls with your choice of condiments.

By Aaron Perez

# data[].attributes.body
Flour

Baking powder

Salt

Egg (optional)

Milk

Cooking oil (canola or vegetable oil)

Tomato sauce or honey (optional)
The exact measurements of the ingredients may vary depending on the recipe. For example, one recipe calls for 1 +1/2 cups flour, 2 tsp. sugar, 1/2 tsp. salt, 3 tsp. baking powder, 1 egg, 1/2 cup warm milk, 1/2 cup flour for kneading, and enough cooking oil to be 1/2 in. deep in whatever sized skillet you are using to fry the bread.

# data[].attributes.body
2 tablespoons

Olive Oil

½ cup

Yellow Onion  (or diced white, or sub 1 large shallot)

1 ear

Fresh Corn  (kernels sliced off, or 1 1/2 cups frozen)

1 cup

Stock  (veggie, chicken or fish, or sub water- or use corn stock, see notes)

½ teaspoon

Kosher Salt

add

Pepper

0.12 cup

Fresh Basil Leaves  (cut into ribbons or torn)

3 tablespoons

Half And Half  (Optional 2)

8 ounces

Fish  (halibut, sea bass, wild Alaskan cod, haddock, salmon, black cod, shrimp, scallops)

add

Oil  (for searing)

add

Salt And Pepper

# data[].attributes.body
2 tablespoons

Olive Oil

½ cup

Yellow Onion  (or diced white, or sub 1 large shallot)

1 ear

Fresh Corn  (kernels sliced off, or 1 1/2 cups frozen)

1 cup

Stock  (veggie, chicken or fish, or sub water- or use corn stock, see notes)

½ teaspoon

Kosher Salt

add

Pepper

0.12 cup

Fresh Basil Leaves  (cut into ribbons or torn)

3 tablespoons

Half And Half  (Optional 2)

8 ounces

Fish  (halibut, sea bass, wild Alaskan cod, haddock, salmon, black cod, shrimp, scallops)

add

Oil  (for searing)

add

Salt And Pepper

# data[].attributes.body
Ingredients

1 lb. extra lean ground beef

1/4 cup PLUS 2 Tbsp. Hellmann's® or Best Foods® Garlic Aioli, divided

1/4 cup plain dry bread crumbs

2 tbsp. olive oil

1 box (10 oz.) cremini mushrooms, thinly sliced

1 medium onion, thinly sliced

4 hamburger buns, toasted

Directions

1. Combine ground beef, ¼ cup Hellmann's® or Best Foods® Garlic Aioli and breadcrumbs in large bowl until well blended. Shape into 4 patties and set aside.

2. Heat olive oil in large nonstick skillet over medium-high heat and cook mushrooms and onions, stirring occasionally, until browned, about 5 minutes. Remove to bowl and stir in remaining 2 Tbsp. Aioli. Set aside.

3. Grill, broil or fry burgers to desired doneness. Place on toasted buns and evenly top with creamy garlic mushroom and onion mixture. Serve, if desired, with additional garlic aioli spread on buns.

# data[].attributes.body
Filé powder is used in Louisiana Creole cuisine in the making of some types of gumbo, a thick Creole soup or stew often served over rice.[1] Several different varieties exist. In New Orleans, what is known as Creole gumbo generally varies from house to house though still retaining its Native American origins. The Creoles of Cane River make a gumbo focused much more on filé. Filé can provide thickening when okra is not in season, in types of gumbo that use okra or a roux as a thickener for gumbo instead of filé.[clarification needed][2] Sprinkled sparingly over gumbo as a seasoning and a thickening agent, filé powder adds a distinctive, earthy flavor and texture.[3]

Filé powder is made by harvesting the young leaves and stems of the sassafras tree and grinding them.[4] Filé powder is generally not added until after the vegetables and meats or seafood are finished cooking and removed from the heat source.

# data[].attributes.body
three sister stew 2 cups dried pinto beans (or substitute black beans, kidney beans, or your favorite variety), soaked overnight

1 medium winter squash, such as butternut or acorn (or substitute summer squash or pumpkin), peeled and cubed

4 ears of corn, kernels removed (about 2 cups) (or substitute frozen or canned corn)

1 large onion, diced

4 cloves garlic, minced

1 can (14.5 oz) diced tomatoes (or substitute fresh tomatoes when in season)

4 cups vegetable or chicken broth (use vegetable broth for a vegan version)

2 tsp ground cumin

1 tsp dried oregano

1/2 tsp smoked paprika

1 bay leaf

Salt and pepper to taste

Fresh cilantro for garnish

Optional add-ins:

Diced carrots or celery for extra vegetables

Chopped kale or spinach for added greens

A splash of lime juice for brightness

A pinch of cayenne pepper for heat

# data[].attributes.body
Three sister stew recipe

2 tablespoons olive oil

1 medium onion, diced

2 cloves garlic, minced

2 cups butternut squash or acorn squash, peeled and cubed

1 cup fresh or frozen corn kernels (or canned, drained)

1 cup cooked kidney beans or black beans (drained and rinsed if canned)

2 medium tomatoes, diced (or 1 can diced tomatoes)

4 cups vegetable broth or water

1 teaspoon ground cumin

1 teaspoon smoked paprika

1/2 teaspoon dried thyme or Oregano

salt and pepper to taste

fresh cilantro or parsley for garnish (optional)

# data[].attributes.body
6 Tbsps. cornmeal
1/2 cup cold water
1 cup boiling water
1 tsp. salt
1 Tbsp. butter
1 packet active dry yeast
1/4 cup lukewarm water
1 cup mashed potatoes
2 cups all-purpose flour
2 cups finely ground leached acorn meal

# data[].attributes.body
Three sister stew recipe

2 tablespoons olive oil

1 medium onion, diced

2 cloves garlic, minced

2 cups butternut squash or acorn squash, peeled and cubed

1 cup fresh or frozen corn kernels (or canned, drained)

1 cup cooked kidney beans or black beans (drained and rinsed if canned)

2 medium tomatoes, diced (or 1 can diced tomatoes)

4 cups vegetable broth or water

1 teaspoon ground cumin

1 teaspoon smoked paprika

1/2 teaspoon dried thyme or oregano

Salt and pepper to taste

Fresh cilantro or parsley for garnish (optional)

# data[].attributes.body
Three Sister Stew Recipe

2 tablespoons olive oil

1 medium onion, diced

2 cloves garlic, minced

2 cups butternut squash or acorn squash, peeled and cubed

1 cup fresh or frozen corn kernels (or canned, drained)

1 cup cooked kidney beans or black beans (drained and rinsed if canned)

2 medium tomatoes, diced (or 1 can diced tomatoes)

4 cups vegetable broth or water

1 teaspoon ground cumin

1 teaspoon smoked paprika

1/2 teaspoon dried thyme or oregano

Salt and pepper to taste

Fresh cilantro or parsley for garnish (optional)

# data[].attributes.body
4 cups all-purpose flour

2 tablespoons baking powder

2 teaspoons salt

2-4 cups warm to very warm water

4 cups canola oil

# data[].attributes.body
This means that even the skin and blubber are put to good use to make a popular snack known as muktuk. It is usually prepared by chopping the blubber and skin of a beluga, bowhead, or narwhal whale into bite-sized bits.

# data[].attributes.body
2 tablespoons olive oil

1 medium onion, diced

2 cloves garlic, minced

2 cups butternut squash or acorn squash, peeled and cubed

1 cup fresh or frozen corn kernels (or canned, drained)

1 cup cooked kidney beans or black beans (drained and rinsed if canned)

2 medium tomatoes, diced (or 1 can diced tomatoes)

4 cups vegetable broth or water

1 teaspoon ground cumin

1 teaspoon smoked paprika

1/2 teaspoon dried thyme or oregano

Salt and pepper to taste

Fresh cilantro or parsley for garnish (optional)

# data[].attributes.body
add pound

Ground Turkey (or 2 lbs ground chicken)

2 pounds

Ground Turkey (or 2 lbs ground chicken)

add tablespoons

Oil

add tablespoons

Oil

add slices

Bacon (chopped, if you are not using bacon as the pan dripping, add 1/2 tsp salt, optional, or 3 slices salt substitute, optional)

add slices

Bacon (chopped, if you are not using bacon as the pan dripping, add 1/2 tsp salt, optional, or 3 slices salt substitute, optional)

2 2-(14 ounces) cans

Whole Kernel Corn (drained or 2 cups frozen corn, thawed)

14 ounces

Whole Kernel Corn (cans, drained or 2 cups frozen corn, thawed)

add cups

Green Seedless Grapes (chopped fine)

add cups

Green Seedless Grapes (chopped fine)

1

Large Yellow Onion (diced)

add

Yellow Onion (diced)

add

Eggs

add

Eggs

add cups

Coarse Yellow Cornmeal

add cups

Coarse Yellow Cornmeal

1 teaspoon

Pepper

add teaspoon

Pepper

add

Cooking Spray

add

Cooking Spray

add

(Optional)

add

(Optional)

1 teaspoon

Garlic Salt (optional)

add teaspoon

Garlic Salt (optional)

# data[].attributes.body
Fish cakes

2 large Potato's

1 pound white fleshed fish cooked

1 large egg

2 tablespoons sour cream

3 tablespoons chopped fresh parley

1 teaspoon sea salt

1/4 teaspoon freshly ground black pepper

1/2 teaspoon dry ground mustard

panko breadcrumbs

oil for frying

Cain Morales

# data[].attributes.body
Caribou Stew

1 pound boneless caribou, diced
oil, for browning meat
1 onion, diced
6 cups seasoned beef broth (do not use low sodium)
1 clove garlic
1/2 cup red wine
1 tablespoon Worcestershire sauce
4 small potatoes, quartered
2 carrots, peeled and sliced
2 ribs celery, chopped
black pepper, to taste

Brown the meat in oil in large skillet. Remove the meat from the skillet with a slotted spoon (leave oil in pan). Add browned meat to Dutch oven or large soup pot.

Add the onion and celery to the skillet and saute until just starting to soften. Add to the Dutch oven.

Add remaining ingredients to Dutch oven. Bring just to a boil then reduce heat to a simmer and cook for 30-45 minutes or until meat is tender and vegetables are cooked.

# data[].attributes.body
three sisters stew

2 Tbsp. cooking oil (vegetable or olive)

1 red onion, diced

2–3 garlic cloves, minced

1 tsp. dried oregano

1 tsp. cumin

½ tsp. garlic powder

½ tsp. onion powder

1 can (7 oz.) diced green chiles

2 cups cubed butternut squash

1 can (15 oz.) kidney beans, drained and rinsed

1 can (15 oz.) corn, drained and rinsed

1 can (15 oz.) fire-roasted diced tomatoes

2 cups vegetable broth

2 cups water

Salt and pepper to taste

Optional garnish: fresh parsley or cilantro

Instructions

1. Sauté aromatics. In a large soup pot or Dutch oven, heat the oil over medium-low heat. Add the diced onion and cook until soft and translucent, about 5 minutes.

2. Add garlic and spices. Stir in the minced garlic and cook for 30 seconds, until fragrant. Add the oregano, cumin, garlic powder, and onion powder and stir to combine.

3. Combine ingredients. Add the diced green chiles, butternut squash, rinsed beans, corn, diced tomatoes, vegetable broth, and water. Stir all the ingredients together.

4. Simmer the stew. Bring the stew to a boil, then reduce the heat to a low simmer. Cover the pot and cook for 30–45 minutes, or until the squash is tender when pierced with a fork.

5. Season and serve. Season the stew with salt and pepper to taste. Ladle into bowls and garnish with fresh parsley or cilantro, if desired.

# data[].attributes.body
Old fashioned rabbit stew

3 tablespoons

Plain Flour

2 teaspoons

Dried Thyme (or 2 tbsp chopped fresh thyme leaves)

add

Salt (and freshly ground black pepper)

15 grams

Butter

3 tablespoons

Sunflower Oil

1

Large Farmed Rabbit (or 2 young wild rabbits, jointed into 8 pieces)

6 rashers

Rindless Smoked Streaky Bacon (cut into 2cm/3/4 in squares)

2

Onions (chopped)

500 milliliters

Dry Cider

300 milliliters

Vegetable Stock (or chicken)

2

Bay Leaves

350 grams

Chantenay Carrots (peeled)

150 grams

Peas (frozen)

# data[].attributes.body
*1-2lb caribou cubed

*3 large potatoes, diced (or quartered)

*3-4 medium carrots, sliced thickly

*1 celery (cut diagonally)

*1 large onion, chopped

*1 bay leaf

*2 tablespoons paprika

*2 garlic cloves ,minced

*2 tablespoons soya sauce

*2-3 cups beef broth

*1 cup water

*1 (1/4 ounce) can tomato soup ( optional to replace 1 cup of water)

*1 tablespoon fresh ground pepper (to taste)

1/4 cup cornstarch, and water mixture for thickening (to your liking)

# data[].attributes.body
Cuisine is a distinctive style of cooking, characterized by specific ingredients, techniques, and dishes associated with a particular culture or geographic region.

# data[].attributes.body
caribou stew

1 -2lb caribou, cubed

3large potatoes, diced (or quartered)

3 -4medium carrots, sliced thickly

1 celery (cut diagonaly)

1large onion, chopped

1 bay leaf

2tablespoons paprika

2 garlic cloves, minced

2tablespoons soya sauce

2 -3cups beef broth

1cup water

1(14 ounce) can tomato soup (optional to replace 1 cup of water)

1tablespoon fresh ground pepper (to taste)

¹⁄₄cup cornstarch, and water mixture for thickening (to your liking)

# data[].attributes.body
1 pound

Caribou Meat (cubed)

2 tablespoons

Vegetable Oil

1

Onion (chopped)

2

Carrots (sliced)

2

Potatoes (cubed)

3 cups

Beef Broth

1 cup

Water

2 cloves

Garlic (minced)

1 teaspoon

Thyme

1 teaspoon

Rosemary

add

Salt And Pepper

Directions

1. Heat oil in a large pot over medium heat. Add caribou meat and brown on all sides.

2. Add onion and garlic, cook until softened.

3. Add carrots and potatoes, cook for a few minutes.

4. Pour in beef broth and water. Add thyme and rosemary.

5. Bring to a boil, then re...

Read full directions

Diego I Martinez

# data[].attributes.body
1. Preheat the oven to 400 degrees F (200 degrees C). Lightly spray a 9x13-inch baking dish with nonstick spray.

2. Combine orzo, corn, zucchini, and onion in the prepared baking dish; crumble Boursin cheese over the top. Pour in bone broth, milk, and 1 tablespoon olive oil. Season lightly with 1/2 teaspoon salt; stir to combine evenly. Nestle in salmon fillets. Brush salmon with remaining olive oil and season with remaining salt and Cajun seasoning. Cover the pan tightly with foil.

3. Bake in the preheated oven for 20 minutes. Uncover, gently stir orzo around the edges, leaving salmon filets intact, and return to the oven uncovered. Bake until orzo is tender and creamy and salmon flakes easily with a fork, 10 to 15 minutes. Squeeze lemon juice over salmon, and serve immediately.

# data[].attributes.body
caribou stew

1 quart beef stock

4 large carrots peeled and diced medium

2 large onions peeled

3 stalks celery

2 potatoes

3 large tomatoes

3cloves garlic

1 bay leaf

1 quart beef

1/2 cup of flour

salt and pepper

1 teaspoon of Rosemarry

4 ounces 1 stick meted flour

made by alexander corado p6

# data[].attributes.body
Three Sister Stew Recipe

1 cup dried or 2 cups cooked beans (such as kidney beans, pinto beans, or black beans)

2 cups fresh or frozen corn kernels (or cut from 2 medium ears of corn)

2 cups diced butternut squash or any winter squash

1 small onion, chopped

2 cloves garlic, minced

2 cups vegetable broth or water

1 can (14 oz) diced tomatoes (optional)

1 teaspoon ground cumin

1 teaspoon smoked paprika or chili powder (optional for mild heat)

Salt and pepper to taste

2 tablespoons cooking oil (olive oil or vegetable oil)

Fresh herbs like cilantro or parsley for garnish (optional)

- Renata Sanchez

# data[].attributes.body
bison stew

3 tablespoons canola oil, divided

2 pounds bison meat, cut into 1-inch cubes

1 cup minced yellow onion

½ cup minced celery

2 cloves garlic, minced

2 tablespoons flour

4 cups low-sodium chicken broth

1 (8 ounce) can tomato sauce

1 cup water

2 tablespoons white wine

2 tablespoons chopped fresh parsley

1 teaspoon salt (Optional)

½ teaspoon ground black pepper

3 whole cloves

¼ teaspoon ground thyme

# data[].attributes.body
Courtesy of the Alaska Native Medical Center

Start to Finish: 120 minutes

Servings: 4

Ingredients:
1 to 2 pounds seal bones, including meat and fat (see note)
8 cups water
2 carrots, diced
2 stalks celery, diced
1/2 onion, diced
2-3 cloves garlic, minced
Salt and pepper (to taste)
1 cup uncooked rice, dried macaroni or raw, diced potatoes
Optional: 1 cup beach lovage or seaweed

# data[].attributes.body
one recipe I found is This is a simpler stew, passed down by the Hualapai people, that focuses on a few key ingredients. The stew typically includes rabbit, onion, celery, pine kernels, salt, and pepper. These ingredients are combined in a pot and covered with water or broth, then boiled and simmered until the rabbit is tender. The full recipe and ingredients can be found in the source documents.

# data[].attributes.body
¹⁄₄cup pine nuts, plus

2tablespoons pine nuts

¹⁄₂cup yellow cornmeal

¹⁄₄cup flour

1teaspoon salt

¹⁄₂teaspoon cayenne pepper

¹⁄₄teaspoon ground cumin

4 catfish fillets

¹⁄₄cup vegetable oil

Ingredients/ Fish recipe

-------------------------------------------

Directions

Preheat oven to 350.

Spread pine nuts on a baking sheet and toast in oven for about 5 minutes or until golden brown.Cool.

Grind 1/4 cup of pine nuts and reserve remaining for garnish.

Mix ground pine nuts,cornmeal, flour, salt, cayenne pepper and cumin in a shallow dish.

Dredge fillets in the pine nut mixture.Set aside.

Heat oil in a large skillet over medium heat. Fry catfish fillets two at a time in the hot oil for 4 minutes on each side or until fish flakes easily when tested with a fork .

Sprinkle fillets with whole pine nuts and serve.

--------------------------------

Elizabeth Gutierrez

# data[].attributes.body
Dry meat
Potatoes
Salt pork
Water – boil it down (this is where you get the flavor) do not add water as you cook
Hominy (if you don’t want to use potatoes)

Directions

Boil water in a large sauce pan, add the dry meat. This process will take a while as you need to get the dry meat soft. This process may take up to three to four hours.

During this process, you can change the water out.

Once the dried meat is soft, add the potatoes or hominy and salt pork. At this point, you do not want to change the water because this is where you capture all of the flavor.

Bring the soup to a boil then turn to medium heat until the remaining ingredients are cooked through.

Related recipes

# data[].attributes.body
ingredients for Dry meat soup

Dry meat
Potatoes
Salt pork
Water – boil it down (this is where you get the flavor) do not add water as you cook
Hominy (if you don’t want to use potatoes)

Directions

Boil water in a large sauce pan, add the dry meat. This process will take a while as you need to get the dry meat soft. This process may take up to three to four hours.

During this process, you can change the water out.

Once the dried meat is soft, add the potatoes or hominy and salt pork. At this point, you do not want to change the water because this is where you capture all of the flavor.

Bring the soup to a boil then turn to medium heat until the remaining ingredients are cooked through.

# data[].attributes.body
one of the major foods that native Americans eat is corn because it it one of the easiest food to get and it can be made into tortillas

# data[].attributes.body
Three sisters Stew recipe

1 tablespoon vegetable oil

1 medium onion, chopped

2 cloves garlic, minced

2 cups butternut squash, peeled and cubed

1 cup corn kernels (fresh or frozen)

1 can (15 oz) pinto or kidney beans, drained and rinsed

1 can (14.5 oz) diced tomatoes

2 cups vegetable broth

1 teaspoon ground cumin

Salt and pepper to taste

Fresh cilantro or parsley for garnish (optional)

# data[].attributes.body
Ingredients For Pemmican 1. Pound meat very thin and dry in the oven.

2.Grind the dried meat in a food processor.

3.Add the chokecherries and blend together.

4.The consistency should be dry and loose with fruit broken up.

5.Add melted lard slowly while mixing.

6.Two tablespoons of fat are used for each 4-5 ounces of meat plus 1/3 cup of fruit.

7.Fat changes the consistency and makes it appear semi-moist instead of dry and improves the flavor and texture. Store in paper bags.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Gather the ingredients. Preheat an outdoor grill for high heat and lightly oil the grate.

2. Rub the outside of each trout generously with olive oil and sprinkle with sea salt.

3. Sprinkle inside cavities with salt and black pepper. Place 1/2 of the lemon and onion slices into cavity of each trout as well, along with minced garlic, sprig of rosemary, and sprig of thyme.

4. Turn preheated grill down to low and place the trout directly onto the grill; cook until flesh flakes easily and the skins are browned, 6 to 7 minutes per side, flipping once.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Gather the ingredients. Preheat an outdoor grill for high heat and lightly oil the grate.

2. Rub the outside of each trout generously with olive oil and sprinkle with sea salt.

3. Sprinkle inside cavities with salt and black pepper. Place 1/2 of the lemon and onion slices into cavity of each trout as well, along with minced garlic, sprig of rosemary, and sprig of thyme.

4. Turn preheated grill down to low and place the trout directly onto the grill; cook until flesh flakes easily and the skins are browned, 6 to 7 minutes per side, flipping once.

# data[].attributes.body
corn is a major food source for native Americans it is a staple food all around the world it can be boiled and combined with other foods the ingredients are corn.

# data[].attributes.body
Jazmine r- One recipe that i found that native Americans made is Fry bread the ingredients in this are 4 cups

All-Purpose Flour

2 tablespoons

Baking Powder

2 teaspoons

Salt

4 cups

Very Warm Water (warm to)

4 cups

Canola Oil

it is 255 calories and 22 serves .

# data[].attributes.body
Mix ingredients (except eggs) in an Olympic size pool filled with non-chlorinated water.

Heat to boiling.

Simmer 2 to 3 weeks, or until tender.

If it appears that the stew may not serve the entire group, add snowshoe rabbit. This requires caution, however, as some people dislike hare in their food.

# data[].attributes.body
Native Americans made Akutaq which was made by whipping together animal fat, berries, seal oil, and sometimes fish, along with snow or water

# data[].attributes.body
One recipe I found that is native to the indigenous people is the three sister soup, the three sister soup includes 2 cups canned white or yellow hominy, drained, 2 cups fresh green beans, trimmed and snapped, 2 cups peeled and cubed butternut squash, 1 ½ cups diced peeled potatoes, 5 cups water, 1 ½ tablespoons chicken bouillon granules, 2 tablespoons all-purpose flour, 2 tablespoons butter, melted, and ¼ teaspoon freshly ground black pepper. The most important is corn, squash, and beans. It is 150 calories per serving.

# data[].attributes.body
One recipe that native Americans made is

pemmican: a concentrated mixture of dry meat, fat, and sometimes berries

# data[].attributes.body
Buffalo berries, buffalo berries is basically something belonging to the genus shepherdia are hardy shrubs native to North America, known for their tart red or yellow berries that are used in various culinary applications.

# data[].attributes.body
Seal Flipper Pie:

Ingredients: Seal meat, vegetables (like turnips and carrots), dumpling pastry.

Preparation: Season seal meat, fill jars with meat and vegetables, cover, and bake until the pastry is done.

# data[].attributes.body
Frybread: This dish/food became iconic in modern Native American cuisine, often made simple ingredients like flour and water.

-Nina Granados Cumi

# data[].attributes.body
Camille Perez- I found a recipe for a type of porridge made by the Native Americans of California. It is made out of Acorns. First, you will gather acorns and ground them into fine grain. Next, you'll add water and boil it. Lastly, you could add bay leaves or mint for flavoring. Its called Wiiwish.

# data[].attributes.body
Quapaw Fried Rabbit is a recipe based on a major food source of some Native American Indian tribes, including the Cherokee. Rabbit was historically hunted by various tribes for sustenance, and this particular recipe is based on a method by the Quapaw people.

# data[].attributes.body
Pemmican:

A nutrient-dense food made from dried meat, rendered fat, and often berries, prized for its long shelf life and energy-boosting qualities, making it vital for hunts and travel.

# data[].attributes.body
The American Indian Foods program, certifies use of the Made/Produced by American Indians trademark. Developed in 1991, the trademark was created to protect Indian producers and consumers from fake and falsely advertised Indian-made products.

# data[].attributes.body
Raising the minimum driving age to 18 has some clear benefits. It can lead to fewer car accidents, as older teens are generally safer and more mature drivers. It might also encourage healthier habits, like walking or using public transportation. However, there are drawbacks too. Teens could lose some independence, families might have to drive them around more, and they would get less early driving experience while still under parental guidance.

16 Pros and Cons of Raising the Driving Age – ConnectUS

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The ability to earn a driver's license at the age of 16 is a rite of passage for many families in the United States. With education programs allowing for the provision of an instructional at the age of 15 1/2 in some communities, it is an exciting stage that occurs for teens during the process of growing up.

Although there are several advantages for a family when another driver can run errands, teen drivers are also at a higher risk of accident or injury compared to any other population demographic. There are specific challenges that young people face behind the wheel because of their general lack of experience while driving as well.

One of the ideas proposed to counter the disadvantages of earning a driver's license at 16 is the raise the driving age. By allowing for a longer period of instruction, the thought is that young people can become individual drivers with better skills because they have had more time to practice with their parents or instructors.

These are the significant pros and cons of raising the driving age.

List of the Pros of Raising the Driving Age

1. It could reduce the number of fatalities that occur on the road with teen drivers.
One-third of the deaths in the 13-19 age demographic occur in motor vehicle crashes each year. That's because young drivers are more likely to take risks when compared to the older generations behind the wheel. Every additional passenger in a vehicle with a 16- or 17-year-old driver increases the risk of a fatality occurring. Drivers who are 16 also have the highest crash rate than any other age. By requiring an instructor to stay with the teen until they got older, it would allow each young driver a chance to develop more positive habits.

2. It would encourage teens to be more physically active.
If the driving age were raised from its current limits, then it would encourage young drivers to be physically active when they want to go somewhere outside of the home. Since getting behind the wheel would be off-limits, there could be an increase in walking, cycling, and other exercise-based movements. With up to 1 in 3 teens in some states being overweight or obese, we could encourage our children to work on their health while they also get more time to practice for their eventual driving test.

3. It would provide more opportunities to gain experience.
75% of the serious crashes that involve teen drivers are due to critical errors that happen behind the wheel. There are three common steps that young people miss when they are driving which account for almost half of all crashes: scanning for traffic and hazards to avoid, going too fast for the current conditions, and being distracted by something inside or outside of the vehicle. Since many new drivers exit their instructional period with significant deficits in these skill areas, the extra experience could help to reduce these risks.

4. It could reduce the cost of automotive insurance for families.
When teen drivers are added to their parent's automotive insurance, the price of a policy typically skyrockets. The average annual rate quoted for a teen driver in the United States is $2,267 as of 2017. Even adding one driver to an existing policy adds more than $600 to the cost of coverage on your vehicles. By raising the driving age, parents could show their child is a safe driver and secure some additional discounts to reduce this financial impact.

Even teens who maintain a clean driving record in the 15-19 age demographic face significantly higher auto insurance rates because they are four times more likely to be in a crash when compared to older drivers. Since rates don't start to decline until the age of 25, some changes to how we issue a license could be beneficial to everyone.

5. It would create consistency throughout the U.S. for driving standards.
Depending on the state where you live, there are different standards in place for when teens can obtain a license or permit. Some geographic regions allow teens as young as 14 to receive a learner's permit. You can sometimes receive a restricted driver's license at 16, while others offer an unrestricted adult license at that time. The global standard for driving is 18, but in the U.S., what is legal for a teen in one state might illegal in another.

6. It could reduce the amount of congestion on the road.
Because there are fewer drivers on the roadways with an increase in the independent driving age, there could be less congestion in some communities. Schools would require fewer parking spots to accommodate student drivers, which means the land could be used for other facilities or needs. Fewer vehicles would also mean lower emissions generated for our transportation needs since students would carpool or take the bus to school, which could give our environment a small boost.

7. It would allow a teen's physiology to mature.
Science shows us that the human brain tends to be underdeveloped and volatile during one's teenage years. That is one of the reasons why kids in this age demographic tend to be impulsive, emotionally unstable, and fail to predict what the consequences of their actions will be. Because all of these skills are essential to the driving process, raising the driving age would allow for young people to finish physically maturing in a way that will eventually make them better drivers.

8. It gives new drivers an opportunity to work with today's intuitive assistance technologies.
Driving today is a very different experience for young drivers than it was even a generation ago. Teens in the 1990s were still managing all aspects of the driving experience through their personal skill because vehicles came with minimal features. Now 16-year-olds have access to lane assist technology, automatic braking, and some vehicles can even park themselves. By working with these features early, they can begin to master them as they gain more wisdom behind the wheel.

List of the Cons of Raising the Driving Age

1. It doesn't guarantee an increase in driving skills.
Raising the driving age from 16 to any age does not matter if there isn't something in the societal infrastructure that provides the new driver with experience. Even someone who gets behind the wheel at age 25 without any experience will struggle in the same ways that a 16-year-old does during their first driving sessions. The only way for this disadvantage to disappear is to offer meaningful, affordable lessons in each community that gets people driving since you can't learn everything in the classroom environment.

2. It makes the family schedule more challenging to manage.
When kids reach a certain age, they begin to manage a job while they are going to school. There are athletic practices to attend, often right after school. If a 16-year-old (or 17) is unable to drive because the driving age was raised, then someone else in the family must step up to provide these transportation services. If that isn't possible, then carpooling with other families would also be necessary. This added pressure could make it challenging to manage the career responsibilities of the parents in a single-guardian home or one where both are working to make ends meet.

3. It communicates a lack of trust in the young drivers.
Although young drivers do make significantly more serious mistakes on the road when compared to others, it would be incorrect to say that 16-year-olds are responsible for every major incident. If we decide to raise the driving age because of these statistics, then we are effectively discriminating against these kids since the same process is not followed for older drivers. This disadvantage shows that we do not trust all drivers of a certain age, even though there are many young teens who are very responsible behind the wheel and never in accidents.

4. It would prevent them from learning the responsibilities of vehicle ownership.
The idea of getting behind the wheel is very exciting for most new drivers, but the responsibility of vehicle ownership is a necessary part of the experience. Raising the driving age would prevent some teens from learning about the responsibility of budgeting for fuel expenses while traveling to school and work. You would also miss the experience of applying for an insurance policy or getting added to the parent/guardian plan. There are even the lessons on vehicle maintenance to consider that wouldn't always be taken as seriously since there is less independence.

5. It could place the safety of our children at risk.
Although taking 16-year-olds out of the vehicle would potentially reduce the risk of being in an accident, having them take public transportation or carpool just increases the potential for problems in other areas. Teens who walk, take a bicycle, or ride a bus to school have a higher risk of encountering a dangerous person or situation without adult supervision present to protect them. They have limited mobility without the vehicle to get away. In neighborhoods where the crime rate is high, this issue just trades one problem for another.

6. It eliminates a family's freedom to choose what is necessary for their needs.
It is interesting that the right to drive a vehicle creates a passionate debate about safety when teens can receive training to handle firearms. If we raise the driving age, then kids could legally possess long guns and ammunition in the United States, but they wouldn't be permitted to get behind the wheel. There are approximately 3,000 automotive related deaths among teens in the United States each year, which is about the same number of kids who die from gunshot wounds. How can we debate the merits of taking a driver's license away if we will not debate the same need for firearm ownership for young people?

7. It would still leave a patchwork of confusing driving laws.
Individual states in the U.S. have the power to regulate what the driving age is within their state borders. Even if every legislature decided to add requirements that stopped 16-year-olds from getting behind the wheel, there would still be differences in state laws that teen drivers would encounter that could get them into trouble if they were unaware of the change. The only want to really see all of the advantages of this idea would be for the federal government to institute a nationwide change somehow. Since the structure of the government makes this a challenging outcome, we may never see the full life-saving benefits which we might achieve when implementing this idea.

8. It would create an economic deficit for the insurance industry.
The premiums are so high for teen drivers because of the risks that they pose on the road. Although 16-year-old drivers are at a higher risk of being in an accident, not every kid with a driver's license has this happen to them. About 60% of teen drivers are never in an accident before the age of 20 when they are behind the wheel. The insurance companies can charge inflated premiums because of the collected statistics today that they wouldn't be able to do tomorrow with a higher age limit. That action could create some economic deficits that might even put some professionals out of a job.

In Conclusion with the Pros and Cons of Raising the Driving Age

Whether you are for an increase in the driving age or you believe that the current structure in society should remain the same, we can all agree on the need for training above everything else. If an untrained driver of any age gets behind the wheel of a vehicle, then that action increases the risks for everyone else on the road. The problem is often a lack of experience more than it is a problem with maturity or awareness.

Although the rate of accidents drops dramatically when comparing a 16-year-old driver to an 18-year-old one, the data suggests that the reason why this occurs is because of the experience that drivers get behind the wheel. Is it possible to gain that wisdom with a restricted license or a permit that requires another driver to be in the vehicle? Or should an unrestricted adult license be the better solution?

The pros and cons of raising the driving age often create more questions than answers. Some states in the U.S. might offer opportunities that are below the global standard, but the question must be answered by legislatures across the country. If you feel this debate is something that could save lives one day, then contact your state legislators to share with them how you feel.

Author Bio
Natalie Regoli is a child of God, devoted wife, and mother of two boys. She has a Master's Degree in Law from The University of Texas. Natalie has been published in several national journals and has been practicing law for 18 years.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
16 Pros and Cons of Raising the Driving Age

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The ability to earn a driver's license at the age of 16 is a rite of passage for many families in the United States. With education programs allowing for the provision of an instructional at the age of 15 1/2 in some communities, it is an exciting stage that occurs for teens during the process of growing up.

# data[].attributes.body
Raising the diving age to 18 could help make roads safer because 16- and 17-year-olds have higher crash rates than older drivers. Older teens are usually more mature and make better decisions, which could lead to fewer accidents. On the other hand, making teens wait longer to get their license could make it harder for them to get to school, work, or activities, especially in places without good public transportation. Some people think that age isn't the real problem, but rather that new drivers just need more experience. Instead of raising the age, it might be better to improve diver education and use programs that give teens more time to practice driving with limits first.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Teen Drivers: Get the Facts | Transportation Safety | Injury Center | CDC

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
As the nation’s health protection agency, CDC saves lives and protects people from health, safety, and security threats.

# data[].attributes.body
Potential benefits. Is watching your child get behind the wheel when you don't yet trust him to do his own laundry is a daunting moment. Driver's licensing ages vary between states while many states require drivers to be 16 or 17 some states allow 14–15-year-olds to drive alone safety. Experts and politicians have proposed raising the driving age to 18 high schools. Craving independence aren't the only ones who question wisdom of such a change.

Pros & Cons of Changing the Driving Age to 18 | How To Adult

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
From changing a diaper to your daughter’s first date, How to Adult provides expert tips to help answer all your most pressing parenting questions.

# data[].attributes.body
Many 16- and 17-year-olds rely on driving for school, work, or family responsibilities. Delaying licensure could limit their mobility. : Parents may need to provide more transportation, which can be a burden, especially in areas with limited public transit Teens contribute to the workforce, and driving is often essential for jobs. Raising the age could limit employment opportunities for younger teens.

# data[].attributes.body
According to iihs.org, raising the driving age to 18 could reduce crash rates, as 16-17 are statistically more likely to be involved in fatal accidents due to inexperience and immaturity. It could also give teens more time to develop better decision-making skills. However, it may also limit teen's independence and access to jobs or activities, especially in areas lacking public transportation.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
IIHS-HLDI crash testing and highway safety

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Information from IIHS-HLDI on teen drivers, including graduated driver licensing

# data[].attributes.body
Some benefits to this would be increased safety, education and skills. Raising the minimum age may reduce the number of teenage drivers on the road, potentially reducing traffic accidents and fatalities. Teenagers may have more time to focus on education and acquiring essential life skills. Some drawbacks would include Increased administrative burden and cause an Impact on transportation equity. This is shown in 16 Pros and Cons of Raising the Driving Age – ConnectUS

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The ability to earn a driver's license at the age of 16 is a rite of passage for many families in the United States. With education programs allowing for the provision of an instructional at the age of 15 1/2 in some communities, it is an exciting stage that occurs for teens during the process of growing up.

Although there are several advantages for a family when another driver can run errands, teen drivers are also at a higher risk of accident or injury compared to any other population demographic. There are specific challenges that young people face behind the wheel because of their general lack of experience while driving as well.

One of the ideas proposed to counter the disadvantages of earning a driver's license at 16 is the raise the driving age. By allowing for a longer period of instruction, the thought is that young people can become individual drivers with better skills because they have had more time to practice with their parents or instructors.

These are the significant pros and cons of raising the driving age.

List of the Pros of Raising the Driving Age

1. It could reduce the number of fatalities that occur on the road with teen drivers.
One-third of the deaths in the 13-19 age demographic occur in motor vehicle crashes each year. That's because young drivers are more likely to take risks when compared to the older generations behind the wheel. Every additional passenger in a vehicle with a 16- or 17-year-old driver increases the risk of a fatality occurring. Drivers who are 16 also have the highest crash rate than any other age. By requiring an instructor to stay with the teen until they got older, it would allow each young driver a chance to develop more positive habits.

2. It would encourage teens to be more physically active.
If the driving age were raised from its current limits, then it would encourage young drivers to be physically active when they want to go somewhere outside of the home. Since getting behind the wheel would be off-limits, there could be an increase in walking, cycling, and other exercise-based movements. With up to 1 in 3 teens in some states being overweight or obese, we could encourage our children to work on their health while they also get more time to practice for their eventual driving test.

3. It would provide more opportunities to gain experience.
75% of the serious crashes that involve teen drivers are due to critical errors that happen behind the wheel. There are three common steps that young people miss when they are driving which account for almost half of all crashes: scanning for traffic and hazards to avoid, going too fast for the current conditions, and being distracted by something inside or outside of the vehicle. Since many new drivers exit their instructional period with significant deficits in these skill areas, the extra experience could help to reduce these risks.

4. It could reduce the cost of automotive insurance for families.
When teen drivers are added to their parent's automotive insurance, the price of a policy typically skyrockets. The average annual rate quoted for a teen driver in the United States is $2,267 as of 2017. Even adding one driver to an existing policy adds more than $600 to the cost of coverage on your vehicles. By raising the driving age, parents could show their child is a safe driver and secure some additional discounts to reduce this financial impact.

Even teens who maintain a clean driving record in the 15-19 age demographic face significantly higher auto insurance rates because they are four times more likely to be in a crash when compared to older drivers. Since rates don't start to decline until the age of 25, some changes to how we issue a license could be beneficial to everyone.

5. It would create consistency throughout the U.S. for driving standards.
Depending on the state where you live, there are different standards in place for when teens can obtain a license or permit. Some geographic regions allow teens as young as 14 to receive a learner's permit. You can sometimes receive a restricted driver's license at 16, while others offer an unrestricted adult license at that time. The global standard for driving is 18, but in the U.S., what is legal for a teen in one state might illegal in another.

6. It could reduce the amount of congestion on the road.
Because there are fewer drivers on the roadways with an increase in the independent driving age, there could be less congestion in some communities. Schools would require fewer parking spots to accommodate student drivers, which means the land could be used for other facilities or needs. Fewer vehicles would also mean lower emissions generated for our transportation needs since students would carpool or take the bus to school, which could give our environment a small boost.

7. It would allow a teen's physiology to mature.
Science shows us that the human brain tends to be underdeveloped and volatile during one's teenage years. That is one of the reasons why kids in this age demographic tend to be impulsive, emotionally unstable, and fail to predict what the consequences of their actions will be. Because all of these skills are essential to the driving process, raising the driving age would allow for young people to finish physically maturing in a way that will eventually make them better drivers.

8. It gives new drivers an opportunity to work with today's intuitive assistance technologies.
Driving today is a very different experience for young drivers than it was even a generation ago. Teens in the 1990s were still managing all aspects of the driving experience through their personal skill because vehicles came with minimal features. Now 16-year-olds have access to lane assist technology, automatic braking, and some vehicles can even park themselves. By working with these features early, they can begin to master them as they gain more wisdom behind the wheel.

List of the Cons of Raising the Driving Age

1. It doesn't guarantee an increase in driving skills.
Raising the driving age from 16 to any age does not matter if there isn't something in the societal infrastructure that provides the new driver with experience. Even someone who gets behind the wheel at age 25 without any experience will struggle in the same ways that a 16-year-old does during their first driving sessions. The only way for this disadvantage to disappear is to offer meaningful, affordable lessons in each community that gets people driving since you can't learn everything in the classroom environment.

2. It makes the family schedule more challenging to manage.
When kids reach a certain age, they begin to manage a job while they are going to school. There are athletic practices to attend, often right after school. If a 16-year-old (or 17) is unable to drive because the driving age was raised, then someone else in the family must step up to provide these transportation services. If that isn't possible, then carpooling with other families would also be necessary. This added pressure could make it challenging to manage the career responsibilities of the parents in a single-guardian home or one where both are working to make ends meet.

3. It communicates a lack of trust in the young drivers.
Although young drivers do make significantly more serious mistakes on the road when compared to others, it would be incorrect to say that 16-year-olds are responsible for every major incident. If we decide to raise the driving age because of these statistics, then we are effectively discriminating against these kids since the same process is not followed for older drivers. This disadvantage shows that we do not trust all drivers of a certain age, even though there are many young teens who are very responsible behind the wheel and never in accidents.

4. It would prevent them from learning the responsibilities of vehicle ownership.
The idea of getting behind the wheel is very exciting for most new drivers, but the responsibility of vehicle ownership is a necessary part of the experience. Raising the driving age would prevent some teens from learning about the responsibility of budgeting for fuel expenses while traveling to school and work. You would also miss the experience of applying for an insurance policy or getting added to the parent/guardian plan. There are even the lessons on vehicle maintenance to consider that wouldn't always be taken as seriously since there is less independence.

5. It could place the safety of our children at risk.
Although taking 16-year-olds out of the vehicle would potentially reduce the risk of being in an accident, having them take public transportation or carpool just increases the potential for problems in other areas. Teens who walk, take a bicycle, or ride a bus to school have a higher risk of encountering a dangerous person or situation without adult supervision present to protect them. They have limited mobility without the vehicle to get away. In neighborhoods where the crime rate is high, this issue just trades one problem for another.

6. It eliminates a family's freedom to choose what is necessary for their needs.
It is interesting that the right to drive a vehicle creates a passionate debate about safety when teens can receive training to handle firearms. If we raise the driving age, then kids could legally possess long guns and ammunition in the United States, but they wouldn't be permitted to get behind the wheel. There are approximately 3,000 automotive related deaths among teens in the United States each year, which is about the same number of kids who die from gunshot wounds. How can we debate the merits of taking a driver's license away if we will not debate the same need for firearm ownership for young people?

7. It would still leave a patchwork of confusing driving laws.
Individual states in the U.S. have the power to regulate what the driving age is within their state borders. Even if every legislature decided to add requirements that stopped 16-year-olds from getting behind the wheel, there would still be differences in state laws that teen drivers would encounter that could get them into trouble if they were unaware of the change. The only want to really see all of the advantages of this idea would be for the federal government to institute a nationwide change somehow. Since the structure of the government makes this a challenging outcome, we may never see the full life-saving benefits which we might achieve when implementing this idea.

8. It would create an economic deficit for the insurance industry.
The premiums are so high for teen drivers because of the risks that they pose on the road. Although 16-year-old drivers are at a higher risk of being in an accident, not every kid with a driver's license has this happen to them. About 60% of teen drivers are never in an accident before the age of 20 when they are behind the wheel. The insurance companies can charge inflated premiums because of the collected statistics today that they wouldn't be able to do tomorrow with a higher age limit. That action could create some economic deficits that might even put some professionals out of a job.

In Conclusion with the Pros and Cons of Raising the Driving Age

Whether you are for an increase in the driving age or you believe that the current structure in society should remain the same, we can all agree on the need for training above everything else. If an untrained driver of any age gets behind the wheel of a vehicle, then that action increases the risks for everyone else on the road. The problem is often a lack of experience more than it is a problem with maturity or awareness.

Although the rate of accidents drops dramatically when comparing a 16-year-old driver to an 18-year-old one, the data suggests that the reason why this occurs is because of the experience that drivers get behind the wheel. Is it possible to gain that wisdom with a restricted license or a permit that requires another driver to be in the vehicle? Or should an unrestricted adult license be the better solution?

The pros and cons of raising the driving age often create more questions than answers. Some states in the U.S. might offer opportunities that are below the global standard, but the question must be answered by legislatures across the country. If you feel this debate is something that could save lives one day, then contact your state legislators to share with them how you feel.

Author Bio
Natalie Regoli is a child of God, devoted wife, and mother of two boys. She has a Master's Degree in Law from The University of Texas. Natalie has been published in several national journals and has been practicing law for 18 years.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
16 Pros and Cons of Raising the Driving Age

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The ability to earn a driver's license at the age of 16 is a rite of passage for many families in the United States. With education programs allowing for the provision of an instructional at the age of 15 1/2 in some communities, it is an exciting stage that occurs for teens during the process of growing up.

# data[].attributes.body
According to https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=8af5d9e1d96370af561162514eb03858570a2f9a5ac657e4fe1b8fdd822c70e8JmltdHM9MTc1MDI5MTIwMA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=4&fclid=25bfe96f-b941-6d8d-2043-fc75b8d36c79&psq=Article+about+young+driver+age+being+18&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuY2RjLmdvdi90ZWVuLWRyaXZlcnMvcmlzay1mYWN0b3JzL2luZGV4Lmh0bWw&ntb=1 car crashes are one of the leading deaths in the U.S. teens from 13-19 are killed, per year 2,883 teens are killed and with the age requirement going up maybe it can narrow down some of those deaths, but also with lifting the age limit more teens still have to master driving and driving is not a easy task to do. Instead of changing the age requirement they should at least do driving school for more than they should to master it. -Francine perez

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Learn about the risk factors for teen drivers.

# data[].attributes.body
By raising the driving age, jurisdictions have seen a reduction in accidents involving inexperienced and immature drivers. Older individuals tend to exhibit greater maturity, judgment, and decision-making skills, leading to a decrease in risky behaviors on the road. This shift has contributed to fewer collisions, injuries, and fatalities among young drivers. Furthermore, delaying the age at which individuals can obtain a driver's license allows for more time to develop cognitive abilities, emotional intelligence, and risk assessment skills before taking on the responsibilities of driving .The potential increase in the minimum driving age could have significant implications for teen independence. Access to a driver's license is often seen as a rite of passage that signifies newfound freedom and responsibility. Delaying this milestone could impact teenagers' ability to explore their independence, as driving provides a sense of autonomy and opens up opportunities for social interactions and extracurricular activities.

# data[].attributes.body
Isabella Pinedo: There are many benefits and drawbacks to raising the age to obtain a driver's license to 18. For example, the potential benefits of raising the age would be the reduction of accidents in young drivers, and when you receive a license at 18, you will possibly be more mature and experienced with drivers' education and more of a serious driver. It would also reduce economic costs for accidents, and people who are 18 with a license will possibly know how to handle insurance more than being 16. To support my reasoning is from the conectus.org article about the pros and cons of raising the driving age. They also state in their article that younger drivers have a higher risk of fatal injuries due to a lack of experience.

# data[].attributes.body
Raising the minimum driving age to 18 offers potential safety benefits by ensuring more mature and better-prepared drivers hit the roads, possibly reducing accidents among inexperienced teens. However, it may also limit independence for young people, especially in areas where public transportation is sparse, restricting their ability to commute to school, work, or social activities. This change could disproportionately affect rural or low-income communities and would require thoughtful planning to avoid unintended hardships. Ultimately, it presents a tradeoff between enhanced safety and access to early mobility. Jonathan Lagunas

# data[].attributes.body
According to 16 Pros and Cons of Raising the Driving Age – ConnectUS, pros of raising the minimum age of driving would be reducing the number of road fatalities caused by teen drivers, as well as providing more opportunities to gain experience, however there are downsides to this, for example an increase to the driving limit to eighteen does not guarantee an increase to driving ability. furthermore, raising the driving age would prevent teens from learning the responsibilities of owning vehicles

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The ability to earn a driver's license at the age of 16 is a rite of passage for many families in the United States. With education programs allowing for the provision of an instructional at the age of 15 1/2 in some communities, it is an exciting stage that occurs for teens during the process of growing up.

Although there are several advantages for a family when another driver can run errands, teen drivers are also at a higher risk of accident or injury compared to any other population demographic. There are specific challenges that young people face behind the wheel because of their general lack of experience while driving as well.

One of the ideas proposed to counter the disadvantages of earning a driver's license at 16 is the raise the driving age. By allowing for a longer period of instruction, the thought is that young people can become individual drivers with better skills because they have had more time to practice with their parents or instructors.

These are the significant pros and cons of raising the driving age.

List of the Pros of Raising the Driving Age

1. It could reduce the number of fatalities that occur on the road with teen drivers.
One-third of the deaths in the 13-19 age demographic occur in motor vehicle crashes each year. That's because young drivers are more likely to take risks when compared to the older generations behind the wheel. Every additional passenger in a vehicle with a 16- or 17-year-old driver increases the risk of a fatality occurring. Drivers who are 16 also have the highest crash rate than any other age. By requiring an instructor to stay with the teen until they got older, it would allow each young driver a chance to develop more positive habits.

2. It would encourage teens to be more physically active.
If the driving age were raised from its current limits, then it would encourage young drivers to be physically active when they want to go somewhere outside of the home. Since getting behind the wheel would be off-limits, there could be an increase in walking, cycling, and other exercise-based movements. With up to 1 in 3 teens in some states being overweight or obese, we could encourage our children to work on their health while they also get more time to practice for their eventual driving test.

3. It would provide more opportunities to gain experience.
75% of the serious crashes that involve teen drivers are due to critical errors that happen behind the wheel. There are three common steps that young people miss when they are driving which account for almost half of all crashes: scanning for traffic and hazards to avoid, going too fast for the current conditions, and being distracted by something inside or outside of the vehicle. Since many new drivers exit their instructional period with significant deficits in these skill areas, the extra experience could help to reduce these risks.

4. It could reduce the cost of automotive insurance for families.
When teen drivers are added to their parent's automotive insurance, the price of a policy typically skyrockets. The average annual rate quoted for a teen driver in the United States is $2,267 as of 2017. Even adding one driver to an existing policy adds more than $600 to the cost of coverage on your vehicles. By raising the driving age, parents could show their child is a safe driver and secure some additional discounts to reduce this financial impact.

Even teens who maintain a clean driving record in the 15-19 age demographic face significantly higher auto insurance rates because they are four times more likely to be in a crash when compared to older drivers. Since rates don't start to decline until the age of 25, some changes to how we issue a license could be beneficial to everyone.

5. It would create consistency throughout the U.S. for driving standards.
Depending on the state where you live, there are different standards in place for when teens can obtain a license or permit. Some geographic regions allow teens as young as 14 to receive a learner's permit. You can sometimes receive a restricted driver's license at 16, while others offer an unrestricted adult license at that time. The global standard for driving is 18, but in the U.S., what is legal for a teen in one state might illegal in another.

6. It could reduce the amount of congestion on the road.
Because there are fewer drivers on the roadways with an increase in the independent driving age, there could be less congestion in some communities. Schools would require fewer parking spots to accommodate student drivers, which means the land could be used for other facilities or needs. Fewer vehicles would also mean lower emissions generated for our transportation needs since students would carpool or take the bus to school, which could give our environment a small boost.

7. It would allow a teen's physiology to mature.
Science shows us that the human brain tends to be underdeveloped and volatile during one's teenage years. That is one of the reasons why kids in this age demographic tend to be impulsive, emotionally unstable, and fail to predict what the consequences of their actions will be. Because all of these skills are essential to the driving process, raising the driving age would allow for young people to finish physically maturing in a way that will eventually make them better drivers.

8. It gives new drivers an opportunity to work with today's intuitive assistance technologies.
Driving today is a very different experience for young drivers than it was even a generation ago. Teens in the 1990s were still managing all aspects of the driving experience through their personal skill because vehicles came with minimal features. Now 16-year-olds have access to lane assist technology, automatic braking, and some vehicles can even park themselves. By working with these features early, they can begin to master them as they gain more wisdom behind the wheel.

List of the Cons of Raising the Driving Age

1. It doesn't guarantee an increase in driving skills.
Raising the driving age from 16 to any age does not matter if there isn't something in the societal infrastructure that provides the new driver with experience. Even someone who gets behind the wheel at age 25 without any experience will struggle in the same ways that a 16-year-old does during their first driving sessions. The only way for this disadvantage to disappear is to offer meaningful, affordable lessons in each community that gets people driving since you can't learn everything in the classroom environment.

2. It makes the family schedule more challenging to manage.
When kids reach a certain age, they begin to manage a job while they are going to school. There are athletic practices to attend, often right after school. If a 16-year-old (or 17) is unable to drive because the driving age was raised, then someone else in the family must step up to provide these transportation services. If that isn't possible, then carpooling with other families would also be necessary. This added pressure could make it challenging to manage the career responsibilities of the parents in a single-guardian home or one where both are working to make ends meet.

3. It communicates a lack of trust in the young drivers.
Although young drivers do make significantly more serious mistakes on the road when compared to others, it would be incorrect to say that 16-year-olds are responsible for every major incident. If we decide to raise the driving age because of these statistics, then we are effectively discriminating against these kids since the same process is not followed for older drivers. This disadvantage shows that we do not trust all drivers of a certain age, even though there are many young teens who are very responsible behind the wheel and never in accidents.

4. It would prevent them from learning the responsibilities of vehicle ownership.
The idea of getting behind the wheel is very exciting for most new drivers, but the responsibility of vehicle ownership is a necessary part of the experience. Raising the driving age would prevent some teens from learning about the responsibility of budgeting for fuel expenses while traveling to school and work. You would also miss the experience of applying for an insurance policy or getting added to the parent/guardian plan. There are even the lessons on vehicle maintenance to consider that wouldn't always be taken as seriously since there is less independence.

5. It could place the safety of our children at risk.
Although taking 16-year-olds out of the vehicle would potentially reduce the risk of being in an accident, having them take public transportation or carpool just increases the potential for problems in other areas. Teens who walk, take a bicycle, or ride a bus to school have a higher risk of encountering a dangerous person or situation without adult supervision present to protect them. They have limited mobility without the vehicle to get away. In neighborhoods where the crime rate is high, this issue just trades one problem for another.

6. It eliminates a family's freedom to choose what is necessary for their needs.
It is interesting that the right to drive a vehicle creates a passionate debate about safety when teens can receive training to handle firearms. If we raise the driving age, then kids could legally possess long guns and ammunition in the United States, but they wouldn't be permitted to get behind the wheel. There are approximately 3,000 automotive related deaths among teens in the United States each year, which is about the same number of kids who die from gunshot wounds. How can we debate the merits of taking a driver's license away if we will not debate the same need for firearm ownership for young people?

7. It would still leave a patchwork of confusing driving laws.
Individual states in the U.S. have the power to regulate what the driving age is within their state borders. Even if every legislature decided to add requirements that stopped 16-year-olds from getting behind the wheel, there would still be differences in state laws that teen drivers would encounter that could get them into trouble if they were unaware of the change. The only want to really see all of the advantages of this idea would be for the federal government to institute a nationwide change somehow. Since the structure of the government makes this a challenging outcome, we may never see the full life-saving benefits which we might achieve when implementing this idea.

8. It would create an economic deficit for the insurance industry.
The premiums are so high for teen drivers because of the risks that they pose on the road. Although 16-year-old drivers are at a higher risk of being in an accident, not every kid with a driver's license has this happen to them. About 60% of teen drivers are never in an accident before the age of 20 when they are behind the wheel. The insurance companies can charge inflated premiums because of the collected statistics today that they wouldn't be able to do tomorrow with a higher age limit. That action could create some economic deficits that might even put some professionals out of a job.

In Conclusion with the Pros and Cons of Raising the Driving Age

Whether you are for an increase in the driving age or you believe that the current structure in society should remain the same, we can all agree on the need for training above everything else. If an untrained driver of any age gets behind the wheel of a vehicle, then that action increases the risks for everyone else on the road. The problem is often a lack of experience more than it is a problem with maturity or awareness.

Although the rate of accidents drops dramatically when comparing a 16-year-old driver to an 18-year-old one, the data suggests that the reason why this occurs is because of the experience that drivers get behind the wheel. Is it possible to gain that wisdom with a restricted license or a permit that requires another driver to be in the vehicle? Or should an unrestricted adult license be the better solution?

The pros and cons of raising the driving age often create more questions than answers. Some states in the U.S. might offer opportunities that are below the global standard, but the question must be answered by legislatures across the country. If you feel this debate is something that could save lives one day, then contact your state legislators to share with them how you feel.

Author Bio
Natalie Regoli is a child of God, devoted wife, and mother of two boys. She has a Master's Degree in Law from The University of Texas. Natalie has been published in several national journals and has been practicing law for 18 years.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
16 Pros and Cons of Raising the Driving Age

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The ability to earn a driver's license at the age of 16 is a rite of passage for many families in the United States. With education programs allowing for the provision of an instructional at the age of 15 1/2 in some communities, it is an exciting stage that occurs for teens during the process of growing up.

# data[].attributes.body
According to ConnectUSFund.org, raising the driving age to 18 could reduce teen fatalities because “drivers who are 16 also have the highest crash rate than any other age”. The article explains that younger drivers are more likely to take risks and make critical errors due to inexperience. However, it also notes that this change could limit teens’ independence and make it harder for them to get to school, work, or help their families. Instead of just raising the age, the source suggests that giving teens more time to practice with instructors or parents could help them develop safer habits.

# data[].attributes.body
Elevating the minimum driving age addresses safety concerns by reducing risky behaviors among young drivers and promoting better decision-making skills and responsibility. This shift correlates with fewer accidents and improved overall road safety. Additionally, delaying access to driving can lead to enhanced maturity, problem-solving abilities, and risk evaluation skills in older individuals. The benefits extend to better judgment in various scenarios and reduced peer pressure influences. Further exploration of the topic reveals the social and economic implications, impact on teen independence, and access to education and employment.

# data[].attributes.body
It would reduce risky behaviors among young drivers, improved young decision-making skills, and responsibilities, fewer accidents and improved road safety, lower rate of fatal crashes, and possibly help with the youth obesity issue. It would be potential benefits, but the drawbacks are inexperience behide the wheel may still lead to problems, and potential impact on underage drinking laws. --- Angelica Ortiz

# data[].attributes.body
Adriana Zakour: A potential benefit of raising the minimum age to 18 fora driver license is that you are more mature. 16 and having a license can be irresponsible to some that think it is cool and a flex to have. According to the article,"16 pros and cons of raising the driving age" it states, "It could place the safety of our children at risk." Being 18, you are an adult to know right from wrong and are ensured the safety for the rest of the drivers that are on the street. In the same article it also claims, "One-third of the deaths in the 13-19 age demographic occur in motor vehicle crashes each year." This shows why the age should be raised to 18.

16 Pros and Cons of Raising the Driving Age – ConnectUS

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The ability to earn a driver's license at the age of 16 is a rite of passage for many families in the United States. With education programs allowing for the provision of an instructional at the age of 15 1/2 in some communities, it is an exciting stage that occurs for teens during the process of growing up.

Although there are several advantages for a family when another driver can run errands, teen drivers are also at a higher risk of accident or injury compared to any other population demographic. There are specific challenges that young people face behind the wheel because of their general lack of experience while driving as well.

One of the ideas proposed to counter the disadvantages of earning a driver's license at 16 is the raise the driving age. By allowing for a longer period of instruction, the thought is that young people can become individual drivers with better skills because they have had more time to practice with their parents or instructors.

These are the significant pros and cons of raising the driving age.

List of the Pros of Raising the Driving Age

1. It could reduce the number of fatalities that occur on the road with teen drivers.
One-third of the deaths in the 13-19 age demographic occur in motor vehicle crashes each year. That's because young drivers are more likely to take risks when compared to the older generations behind the wheel. Every additional passenger in a vehicle with a 16- or 17-year-old driver increases the risk of a fatality occurring. Drivers who are 16 also have the highest crash rate than any other age. By requiring an instructor to stay with the teen until they got older, it would allow each young driver a chance to develop more positive habits.

2. It would encourage teens to be more physically active.
If the driving age were raised from its current limits, then it would encourage young drivers to be physically active when they want to go somewhere outside of the home. Since getting behind the wheel would be off-limits, there could be an increase in walking, cycling, and other exercise-based movements. With up to 1 in 3 teens in some states being overweight or obese, we could encourage our children to work on their health while they also get more time to practice for their eventual driving test.

3. It would provide more opportunities to gain experience.
75% of the serious crashes that involve teen drivers are due to critical errors that happen behind the wheel. There are three common steps that young people miss when they are driving which account for almost half of all crashes: scanning for traffic and hazards to avoid, going too fast for the current conditions, and being distracted by something inside or outside of the vehicle. Since many new drivers exit their instructional period with significant deficits in these skill areas, the extra experience could help to reduce these risks.

4. It could reduce the cost of automotive insurance for families.
When teen drivers are added to their parent's automotive insurance, the price of a policy typically skyrockets. The average annual rate quoted for a teen driver in the United States is $2,267 as of 2017. Even adding one driver to an existing policy adds more than $600 to the cost of coverage on your vehicles. By raising the driving age, parents could show their child is a safe driver and secure some additional discounts to reduce this financial impact.

Even teens who maintain a clean driving record in the 15-19 age demographic face significantly higher auto insurance rates because they are four times more likely to be in a crash when compared to older drivers. Since rates don't start to decline until the age of 25, some changes to how we issue a license could be beneficial to everyone.

5. It would create consistency throughout the U.S. for driving standards.
Depending on the state where you live, there are different standards in place for when teens can obtain a license or permit. Some geographic regions allow teens as young as 14 to receive a learner's permit. You can sometimes receive a restricted driver's license at 16, while others offer an unrestricted adult license at that time. The global standard for driving is 18, but in the U.S., what is legal for a teen in one state might illegal in another.

6. It could reduce the amount of congestion on the road.
Because there are fewer drivers on the roadways with an increase in the independent driving age, there could be less congestion in some communities. Schools would require fewer parking spots to accommodate student drivers, which means the land could be used for other facilities or needs. Fewer vehicles would also mean lower emissions generated for our transportation needs since students would carpool or take the bus to school, which could give our environment a small boost.

7. It would allow a teen's physiology to mature.
Science shows us that the human brain tends to be underdeveloped and volatile during one's teenage years. That is one of the reasons why kids in this age demographic tend to be impulsive, emotionally unstable, and fail to predict what the consequences of their actions will be. Because all of these skills are essential to the driving process, raising the driving age would allow for young people to finish physically maturing in a way that will eventually make them better drivers.

8. It gives new drivers an opportunity to work with today's intuitive assistance technologies.
Driving today is a very different experience for young drivers than it was even a generation ago. Teens in the 1990s were still managing all aspects of the driving experience through their personal skill because vehicles came with minimal features. Now 16-year-olds have access to lane assist technology, automatic braking, and some vehicles can even park themselves. By working with these features early, they can begin to master them as they gain more wisdom behind the wheel.

List of the Cons of Raising the Driving Age

1. It doesn't guarantee an increase in driving skills.
Raising the driving age from 16 to any age does not matter if there isn't something in the societal infrastructure that provides the new driver with experience. Even someone who gets behind the wheel at age 25 without any experience will struggle in the same ways that a 16-year-old does during their first driving sessions. The only way for this disadvantage to disappear is to offer meaningful, affordable lessons in each community that gets people driving since you can't learn everything in the classroom environment.

2. It makes the family schedule more challenging to manage.
When kids reach a certain age, they begin to manage a job while they are going to school. There are athletic practices to attend, often right after school. If a 16-year-old (or 17) is unable to drive because the driving age was raised, then someone else in the family must step up to provide these transportation services. If that isn't possible, then carpooling with other families would also be necessary. This added pressure could make it challenging to manage the career responsibilities of the parents in a single-guardian home or one where both are working to make ends meet.

3. It communicates a lack of trust in the young drivers.
Although young drivers do make significantly more serious mistakes on the road when compared to others, it would be incorrect to say that 16-year-olds are responsible for every major incident. If we decide to raise the driving age because of these statistics, then we are effectively discriminating against these kids since the same process is not followed for older drivers. This disadvantage shows that we do not trust all drivers of a certain age, even though there are many young teens who are very responsible behind the wheel and never in accidents.

4. It would prevent them from learning the responsibilities of vehicle ownership.
The idea of getting behind the wheel is very exciting for most new drivers, but the responsibility of vehicle ownership is a necessary part of the experience. Raising the driving age would prevent some teens from learning about the responsibility of budgeting for fuel expenses while traveling to school and work. You would also miss the experience of applying for an insurance policy or getting added to the parent/guardian plan. There are even the lessons on vehicle maintenance to consider that wouldn't always be taken as seriously since there is less independence.

5. It could place the safety of our children at risk.
Although taking 16-year-olds out of the vehicle would potentially reduce the risk of being in an accident, having them take public transportation or carpool just increases the potential for problems in other areas. Teens who walk, take a bicycle, or ride a bus to school have a higher risk of encountering a dangerous person or situation without adult supervision present to protect them. They have limited mobility without the vehicle to get away. In neighborhoods where the crime rate is high, this issue just trades one problem for another.

6. It eliminates a family's freedom to choose what is necessary for their needs.
It is interesting that the right to drive a vehicle creates a passionate debate about safety when teens can receive training to handle firearms. If we raise the driving age, then kids could legally possess long guns and ammunition in the United States, but they wouldn't be permitted to get behind the wheel. There are approximately 3,000 automotive related deaths among teens in the United States each year, which is about the same number of kids who die from gunshot wounds. How can we debate the merits of taking a driver's license away if we will not debate the same need for firearm ownership for young people?

7. It would still leave a patchwork of confusing driving laws.
Individual states in the U.S. have the power to regulate what the driving age is within their state borders. Even if every legislature decided to add requirements that stopped 16-year-olds from getting behind the wheel, there would still be differences in state laws that teen drivers would encounter that could get them into trouble if they were unaware of the change. The only want to really see all of the advantages of this idea would be for the federal government to institute a nationwide change somehow. Since the structure of the government makes this a challenging outcome, we may never see the full life-saving benefits which we might achieve when implementing this idea.

8. It would create an economic deficit for the insurance industry.
The premiums are so high for teen drivers because of the risks that they pose on the road. Although 16-year-old drivers are at a higher risk of being in an accident, not every kid with a driver's license has this happen to them. About 60% of teen drivers are never in an accident before the age of 20 when they are behind the wheel. The insurance companies can charge inflated premiums because of the collected statistics today that they wouldn't be able to do tomorrow with a higher age limit. That action could create some economic deficits that might even put some professionals out of a job.

In Conclusion with the Pros and Cons of Raising the Driving Age

Whether you are for an increase in the driving age or you believe that the current structure in society should remain the same, we can all agree on the need for training above everything else. If an untrained driver of any age gets behind the wheel of a vehicle, then that action increases the risks for everyone else on the road. The problem is often a lack of experience more than it is a problem with maturity or awareness.

Although the rate of accidents drops dramatically when comparing a 16-year-old driver to an 18-year-old one, the data suggests that the reason why this occurs is because of the experience that drivers get behind the wheel. Is it possible to gain that wisdom with a restricted license or a permit that requires another driver to be in the vehicle? Or should an unrestricted adult license be the better solution?

The pros and cons of raising the driving age often create more questions than answers. Some states in the U.S. might offer opportunities that are below the global standard, but the question must be answered by legislatures across the country. If you feel this debate is something that could save lives one day, then contact your state legislators to share with them how you feel.

Author Bio
Natalie Regoli is a child of God, devoted wife, and mother of two boys. She has a Master's Degree in Law from The University of Texas. Natalie has been published in several national journals and has been practicing law for 18 years.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
16 Pros and Cons of Raising the Driving Age

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The ability to earn a driver's license at the age of 16 is a rite of passage for many families in the United States. With education programs allowing for the provision of an instructional at the age of 15 1/2 in some communities, it is an exciting stage that occurs for teens during the process of growing up.

# data[].attributes.body
Erik Bermudez

# data[].attributes.body
Eduardo Casillas

# data[].attributes.body
jacob castanos

# data[].attributes.body
Hector

# data[].attributes.body
Joe

# data[].attributes.body
Giovanna L.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
NHTSA offers info on teen driving safety issues, such as teen safe driving tips, along with links to states’ teen driver license requirements.

# data[].attributes.body
Paul G.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
IIHS-HLDI crash testing and highway safety

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Overview

Teen drivers have crash rates nearly 4 times those of drivers 20 and older per mile driven. Immaturity leads to speeding and other risky habits, and inexperience means teen drivers often don't recognize or know how to respond to hazards.

Graduated licensing reduces teens' driving risk. Graduated licensing allows teens to practice driving with supervision before getting their license and restricts driving after they are licensed. Today all states have at least some elements of graduated licensing. The current best practices are a minimum intermediate license age of 17, a minimum permit age of 16, at least 70 required hours of supervised practice driving, and, during the intermediate stage, a night driving restriction starting at 8 p.m. and a ban on all teen passengers.

Alcohol is a factor in many teen crashes. Although young drivers are less likely than adults to drink and drive, their crash risk is higher when they do. The combination of drinking and driving is made worse by teenagers' relative inexperience both with drinking and with driving.

By the numbers

In 2022, 2,898 teenagers (ages 13-19) died in the United States from crash injuries. Such injuries are one of the leading causes of death in this age group ( National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2024).

Teenagers drive less than all but the oldest people, but their numbers of crashes and crash deaths are disproportionately high. The fatal crash rate per mile driven for 16-17 year-olds is about 3 times the rate for drivers 20 and older. Based on police-reported crashes of all severities, the crash rate for 16-19 year-olds is nearly 4 times the rate for drivers 20 and older. Risk is highest at age 16. Based on data from the 2016-17 National Household Travel Survey, the crash rate per mile driven is just over 1½ times as high for 16 year-olds as it is for 18-19 year-olds.
Passenger vehicle crash rates per mile traveled, by driver age, April 1, 2016 - March 31, 2017
Crash risk among teenage drivers is particularly high during the first months of licensure ( Gershon et al., 2018; Senserrick et al., 2021).

Immaturity and inexperience

Both age and experience have strong effects on teenage drivers' crash risk ( Curry et al., 2015) Young drivers tend to overestimate their own driving abilities and, at the same time, underestimate the dangers on the road.

Young drivers' immaturity is apparent in risky driving practices such as speeding. At the same time, teenagers' lack of experience behind the wheel makes it difficult for them to recognize and respond to hazards.

Characteristics of teens' fatal crashes include:

Driver error. Compared with adults' fatal crashes, those of teens more often involve driver error.

Speeding. Excessive speed is a factor in just over a quarter of teens' fatal crashes.

Single-vehicle crashes. Many fatal crashes involve only the teen's vehicle. Typically these are high-speed crashes in which the teenage driver loses control.

Passengers. Just over half of teen passenger deaths occur in crashes with teen drivers. Studies have shown that the presence of passengers increases crash risk among teenage drivers but decreases crash risk among drivers ages 30 and older (Villavicencio et al., 2019; Williams et al., 2007).

Night driving. Per mile driven, the fatal crash rate of 16-19 year-olds is about 4 times as high at night as it is during the day. Based on the 2016-17 National Household Travel Survey, teenagers' rate of fatal nighttime crash involvements is nearly 3 times as high as the rate for adults age 30-59.

Graduated licensing

Graduated driver licensing (GDL) is designed to provide beginning drivers with an opportunity to gain experience behind the wheel under conditions that minimize risk. It was introduced in New Zealand in 1987.

Florida was the first U.S. state to adopt graduated licensing in 1996. Today all U.S. states and the District of Columbia have graduated licensing, although the systems vary in strength. In most U.S. jurisdictions, the policies apply only to license applicants younger than 18.

There are three stages in a graduated system: a supervised learner's period; an intermediate license, which is granted after a young driver passes a road test and which limits driving in high-risk situations (e.g., at nighttime or with teen passengers); and a license with full privileges. All states allow at least some exceptions so that novices may drive for specified purposes during restricted hours.

Evaluations of graduated licensing systems in U.S. states, Canadian provinces and Australia have shown they reduce crashes substantially (Williams, 2017; Senserrick et al., 2021).

A pair of national studies by the Institute and HLDI found that strong restrictions on nighttime driving and teenage passengers, as well as delayed licensing age, reduce fatal crashes and insurance losses for teenage drivers ( McCartt et al., 2010; Trempel, 2009). In addition, the studies found that delaying permit age reduces fatal crashes and that increasing practice hours reduces insurance losses.

Other research also has found the length of the learner's permit holding period to be important ( Masten et al., 2013).

The current best practices in the United States are a minimum permit age of 16 and at least 70 supervised practice hours, a minimum intermediate license age of 17, and, during the intermediate stage, a night driving restriction starting at 8 p.m. and a ban on all teen passengers.
Graduated licensing laws by state, in detail
Between 1996, when the first three-stage graduated driver licensing program was implemented in the United States, and 2022, teenage crash deaths declined by 50% (from 5,819 to 2,883).

The rate of crashes involving teen drivers per population has also gone down since 1996, and the largest declines occurred for 16-year-olds ( Foss et al., 2014).

Fatal passenger vehicle crashes per 100,000 people, by driver age, 1996-2022

Past studies have shown conflicting results regarding the effects of GDL programs on older teen drivers, who have aged out of the restrictions, but the most recent work confirms earlier findings that GDL policies do not increase crash rates for older teens ( Masten et al., 2011; McCartt et al., 2010; Trempel, 2009; Foss et al., 2014; Thompson et al., 2016).

New Jersey is the only U.S. state that doesn't license until age 17. This policy eliminates most crashes involving drivers who are 16, and studies confirm that the combined crash rate of 16- and 17-year-olds in New Jersey is far lower than in neighboring states with younger licensing ages ( Ferguson et al., 1996; Williams et al., 1983). New Jersey's graduated licensing system also reduces crashes among 18-year-olds, a group largely unaffected by the graduated systems in effect in other states ( Williams et al., 2010).

New Jersey also applies full GDL policies to all new drivers under age 21, and recent studies support the benefit of extending graduated licensing to 18-20-year-old new drivers ( Curry et al., 2017; Curry et al., 2018).

Raising the minimum licensing age is one of the more important steps states can take to reduce teen fatalities. Even after controlling for the effects of other components of graduated licensing, teenagers in states with older licensing ages have lower fatal crash rates and fewer insurance collision claims. Raising the licensing age from 16 to 17, for example, is associated with a 13% lower fatal crash rate among 15-17 year-olds ( McCartt et al., 2010) and a 9% reduction in collision claim rates among 16-year-old licensed drivers ( Trempel, 2009).

Role of parents

Even in states that lack strong laws for teen drivers, parents can enforce rules along the same principles as a model GDL law: They can require practice driving and supervise it and, once their teen is licensed, restrict passengers and night driving.

In-vehicle monitoring devices have the potential to help engage parents more fully in supervising their children's driving and to keep young drivers safer when their parents are not in the vehicle. The devices monitor driving and can give feedback to teenagers or their parents.

An IIHS study of the effects of an in-vehicle monitoring system on teenagers' driving behaviors found that seat belt use improved when violations were reported to parents, and improved even more when in-vehicle alerts were activated ( Farmer et al., 2010). Consistent reductions in speeding were achieved only when teenagers received alerts, believed their speeding behavior would not be reported to parents if corrected, and when parents were being notified of such behavior.

Other randomized control studies have found similar results. One study reported that immediate visual feedback to teenagers on their risky driving behavior, coupled with feedback to parents, reduced risky driving ( Simons-Morton et al., 2013). However, the feedback to teenagers alone did not.

Vehicle choice

IIHS research has shown that teenagers often don't drive the safest vehicles.

When teenagers begin driving, most drive vehicles their families already own. This was the case for more than half of the teenagers whose parents were surveyed by the Institute in 2014. In comparison, 43% were driving vehicles purchased when the teens began driving or afterward ( Eichelberger et al., 2015). A large majority of purchased vehicles were used (83%), and the median cost of purchased vehicles was $5,300.

The survey also found that many teenagers were driving older vehicles, which are less likely than newer models to be equipped with key safety features, or minicars or small cars, which provide less protection in a crash than larger vehicles.

Other IIHS studies showed that teenagers killed in crashes were more likely than middle-age drivers to have been driving small vehicles and older vehicles, and this trend has persisted for at least the past decade (; McCartt & Teoh, 2015 Weast & Monfort, 2021).

A recent study of drivers of all ages found that both older and younger drivers were more likely than middle-aged drivers to drive older vehicles without electronic stability control (ESC) or side airbags, and this effect was exacerbated by socioeconomic status. Across all age groups, those in the lowest income bracket drove vehicles almost twice the age as those driven by individuals in the highest income bracket ( Metzger et al., 2020)

Although teenagers are at greater risk of crashing than adults regardless of the vehicle they drive, an analysis of insurance collision claim rates showed this risk is exacerbated when teenagers drive sports cars or small vehicles ( HLDI, 2014).

Teenagers should drive vehicles that reduce their chance of crashing in the first place and then protect them from injury in case they do crash. To help parents choose safer vehicles, the Institute and Consumer Reports have compiled a list of recommended affordable used vehicles for teenagers based on several guiding principles:

Young drivers should stay away from high-horsepower models, which could encourage them to speed.

Bigger, heavier vehicles provide better protection in a crash than smaller, lighter vehicles, so there are no micro or minicars on the recommended list.

ESC is a must. It substantially reduces fatal crash risk due to loss of control of the vehicle.

Vehicles should have the best crash test ratings possible. At a minimum, the recommended vehicles have a good rating in the Institute's original moderate overlap front, original side, roof strength and head restraint tests and a good or acceptable rating in the driver-side small overlap front test.

Used vehicles that meet these criteria are included in the Institute's list of recommended vehicles for teenagers. For those families interested in spending a little more, the new-vehicle section of the list includes models with state-of-the-art protection.

Driver education

Formal evaluations of U.S. high school driver education programs indicate little or no reduction in crashes per licensed driver ( Lonero & Mayhew, 2010; Mayhew et al., 2014; Mayhew et al., 2017; Peck, 2011). Other school-based programs, such as those intended to reduce alcohol-impaired driving, have not been shown to be effective, at least in the short term ( Williams, 1994).

Skid control training and other kinds of advanced skill training seem to increase crash risk, particularly among young males ( Mayhew et al., 1998; Christie, 2001; Williams & Ferguson, 2004). A possible explanation is that young drivers trained in these skills may become overconfident, leading them to take unnecessary risks.

A study evaluating hazard perception training, which aims to change a driver's awareness and perception of potential risks while driving, did not find a significant overall effect on crashes among young drivers; however, males ages 16-18 who had taken the training had a 24% lower crash rate relative to males in the control group ( Thomas et al., 2016).

Alcohol

Despite declines in teen drinking, alcohol continues to be a big factor in teen crashes. In 2022, 31% of fatally injured passenger vehicle drivers ages 16-19 had positive blood alcohol concentrations (BACs).

Young drivers are less likely than adults to drive after drinking alcohol, but their crash risk is substantially higher when they do. This is especially true at low and moderate BACs and is thought to result from the relative inexperience of young drivers with drinking, with driving, and with combining the two ( Mayhew et al., 1986).

At the same BAC, drivers ages 16-20 are far more likely than older drivers to get into a fatal or nonfatal crash ( Peck et al., 2008; Voas at al., 2012).

Drivers ages 16-20 with BACs of 0.05%-0.079% are 12 times more likely to be killed in single-vehicle crashes than sober teenage drivers ( Voas at al., 2012). At BACs of 0.08%-0.099%, fatality risk is even higher, 32 times that of sober drivers. At the same BAC, the risk of involvement in a fatal crash and the risk of dying in a single-vehicle crash are the same for 16-20-year-old male and female drivers.

The drinking age of 21 limits access to alcohol among teenagers. In the 1960s and early 1970s, many states lowered their minimum purchasing ages from 21 to 18 or 19 ( McCartt et al., 2010). However, states gradually restored higher minimum purchasing ages so that, by the end of 1984, 22 states had minimum purchasing ages of 21 in effect. Federal legislation was enacted to withhold highway funds from the remaining 28 states if they did not follow suit. Since July 1988, the minimum alcohol purchase age has been 21 in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

When many states lowered the minimum alcohol purchasing age in the 1960s and early 1970s, Institute research indicated an increase in the number of drivers younger than 21 involved in nighttime fatal crashes ( Williams et al., 1975). As states restored the minimum legal drinking age to 21, numerous studies found that doing so reduced teenage crashes ( Williams et al., 1983; DuMouchel et al., 1987; General Accounting Office, 1987; O'Malley & Wagenaar, 1991; Shults et al., 2001; Wagenaar & Toomey, 2002). The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that laws establishing 21 as the minimum purchase age in every state saved 2,624 lives during 2012-16 ( NHTSA, 2016).

In all 50 states and D.C. people younger than 21 are prohibited from driving after drinking. Typically, these laws prohibit driving with a BAC of 0.02% or greater. Federal legislation enacted in 1995 that allowed for the withholding of highway funds played a role in motivating states to pass such zero-tolerance laws.

Studies of zero-tolerance laws indicate they reduce crashes among drivers younger than 21. A study of 12 states that passed zero-tolerance laws reported a 20% reduction in the proportion of fatal crashes that were single-vehicle nighttime events (a category of crashes likely to involve alcohol impairment) among drivers ages 15-20 ( Hingson et al., 1994). A more recent study considered relative contributions of a wide range of alcohol possession, consumption, and intoxicated driving laws on teen drivers and concluded that future reductions in alcohol-related crashes among teen drivers would be achieved through policies and efforts that targeted teen drinking behavior, rather than by further limiting teen driving ( Romano et al., 2015).

The percentage of high school seniors who report driving after drinking declined from 16% in 2001 to 9% in 2011, according to a nationally representative survey ( O'Malley & Johnston, 2013). A different nationally representative annual survey found that, in 2015, within the 30 days prior to taking the survey, 8% of high school students drove after drinking alcohol, and 20% reported riding with a driver who had been drinking ( Kann et al., 2016).

States and communities could further reduce teen drinking and driving by making it more difficult for teenagers to obtain alcohol. A study of 45 communities in Oregon conducted in 2005 found that alcohol was sold to youthful-looking decoys on 34% of purchase attempts ( Paschall et al., 2007).

According to an annual survey of young people in the United States, the perceived availability of alcohol has declined significantly among eighth and 10th graders since 1996 but has been fairly steady among high school seniors ( Johnston et al., 2019). In 2018, 86% of high school seniors believed it was fairly easy or very easy to get alcohol.

IIHS researchers found zero-tolerance laws difficult to enforce in some states because police must suspect that a young driver has a high BAC before administering an alcohol test for any measurable BAC ( Ferguson et al., 2000). Offenders with low BACs may not display the erratic driving that leads to a traffic stop. Surveys of young people in three states found limited knowledge about zero-tolerance laws, and many of those who knew about the laws did not believe they were enforced often ( Ferguson & Williams, 2002).

When zero-tolerance laws are enforced they can be effective. An IIHS study of Washington state's zero-tolerance law found that it increased the likelihood that an underage person would be sanctioned for drinking and driving, especially among drivers with BACs less than 0.08% ( McCartt et al., 2007). An IIHS study in West Virginia found that a college community's program of publicized, strong enforcement of minimum alcohol purchasing age laws and drinking and driving laws, including the zero-tolerance law, was associated with significant reductions in young drivers' BACs, relative to young drivers in a comparison community without an enforcement program ( McCartt et al., 2009).

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Information from IIHS-HLDI on teen drivers, including graduated driver licensing

# data[].attributes.body
Camila T: The potential

# data[].attributes.body
Ruth Sanchez

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Between the risk-taking behaviors and novice skills teen drivers possess, 16- to 19-year-olds are more at risk for crashing a car than other age groups. In 2011, emergency rooms treated roughly 292,000 teens for motor vehicle-related injuries, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control 1. While the statistics are scary, you can reduce the risk and help your teen to be a safer driver. Driver's education classes help teens to learn safe practices and understand the rules of the road, and the classes may even put some money back in your pocket 4.

Paying for Classes

Some states that require driver's ed classes for new drivers also require that you pay for them. While some public schools and state-run agencies offer these classes at no charge, you might have to pay a private company. For example, a 16-year-old in Georgia must complete a state Department of Driver Services-certified driver's education class to obtain a license 4 5. Even though the state certifies the schools, they are independent from any publically funded agency. Private driving schools, such as these, require a fee per class. The fees for driver's education courses vary depending on the school 4. Whether your state offers free driver's ed or you must pay for it, the classes provide multiple benefits for new drivers.

Getting a License

Graduated driver licensing is a process that helps teens to slowly get acquainted with driving through education and hands-on practice 4. The goals behind state GDL programs including expanding the learning process with more supervised practice, gaining experience through low-risk driving before moving on to other conditions, and motivating teens to use safe-driving behaviors, notes the American Academy of Pediatrics' HealthyChildren.org website.

State's GDL requirements vary. Completing a driver's ed course is typically part of the process. In some states, teens can't get an instructional or learner's permit until they have completed the educational part of driver training. Taking driver's ed may be required before your teen can get her license. If she skips this step, she may have to wait until she is 19 or older to drive.

Learning Safe Driving Skills

Even though getting license as soon as possible is a definite plus for your teen, in your eyes, safety may be more of a consideration. Driver's education classes provide your child with knowledge he needs to make smart decisions, follow the law and operate an auto in a safer way 4. For example, the state of Virginia's driver's ed programs aim to teach students general driving skills, ways to respond in dangerous situations and a safe driving attitude 4. This knowledge may make your teen less likely to engage in risky behavior behind the wheel or help him in a sticky situation such as a snow storm or foggy night.

Giving You a Discount

Not only does driver's ed give your teen some of the skills she needs to get behind the wheel, but it also has a financial benefit. Aside from the sense of security you feel when you think of the hours your teen spent learning how to be a safe driver, you may also enjoy a discount from your auto insurance provider. The requirements vary, so ask your insurance carrier about discounts for teens who complete driver's ed courses and what proof they might need, such as certificates of completion.

Adding in Real-World Practice

It takes more than classes to create safe drivers. Used alone, driver's ed classes may not significantly reduce the number of teen auto accidents in America, notes the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Safer Car website.

Sitting in a classroom and reading books gives your teen facts she needs to know, but it doesn't provide real-world practice. Choosing a driver's ed course that also includes a practical component raises the likelihood your teen will better understand what safe driving truly is. Graduated driver licensing programs that require teens to take driver's education along with racking up a set number of supervised driving hours work best to build safe behaviors and attitudes 4.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
From changing a diaper to your daughter's first date, How to Adult provides expert tips to help answer all your most pressing parenting questions.

# data[].attributes.body
derek

# data[].attributes.body
Anthony Perez

# data[].attributes.body
Abraham Alba

# data[].attributes.body
Sandro V.

# data[].attributes.body
Francisco Garcia:

# data[].attributes.body
Emiliano Pineda,

According to 16 Pros and Cons of Raising the Driving Age – ConnectUS (connectusfund.org),

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The ability to earn a driver's license at the age of 16 is a rite of passage for many families in the United States. With education programs allowing for the provision of an instructional at the age of 15 1/2 in some communities, it is an exciting stage that occurs for teens during the process of growing up.

Although there are several advantages for a family when another driver can run errands, teen drivers are also at a higher risk of accident or injury compared to any other population demographic. There are specific challenges that young people face behind the wheel because of their general lack of experience while driving as well.

One of the ideas proposed to counter the disadvantages of earning a driver's license at 16 is the raise the driving age. By allowing for a longer period of instruction, the thought is that young people can become individual drivers with better skills because they have had more time to practice with their parents or instructors.

These are the significant pros and cons of raising the driving age.

List of the Pros of Raising the Driving Age

1. It could reduce the number of fatalities that occur on the road with teen drivers.
One-third of the deaths in the 13-19 age demographic occur in motor vehicle crashes each year. That's because young drivers are more likely to take risks when compared to the older generations behind the wheel. Every additional passenger in a vehicle with a 16- or 17-year-old driver increases the risk of a fatality occurring. Drivers who are 16 also have the highest crash rate than any other age. By requiring an instructor to stay with the teen until they got older, it would allow each young driver a chance to develop more positive habits.

2. It would encourage teens to be more physically active.
If the driving age were raised from its current limits, then it would encourage young drivers to be physically active when they want to go somewhere outside of the home. Since getting behind the wheel would be off-limits, there could be an increase in walking, cycling, and other exercise-based movements. With up to 1 in 3 teens in some states being overweight or obese, we could encourage our children to work on their health while they also get more time to practice for their eventual driving test.

3. It would provide more opportunities to gain experience.
75% of the serious crashes that involve teen drivers are due to critical errors that happen behind the wheel. There are three common steps that young people miss when they are driving which account for almost half of all crashes: scanning for traffic and hazards to avoid, going too fast for the current conditions, and being distracted by something inside or outside of the vehicle. Since many new drivers exit their instructional period with significant deficits in these skill areas, the extra experience could help to reduce these risks.

4. It could reduce the cost of automotive insurance for families.
When teen drivers are added to their parent's automotive insurance, the price of a policy typically skyrockets. The average annual rate quoted for a teen driver in the United States is $2,267 as of 2017. Even adding one driver to an existing policy adds more than $600 to the cost of coverage on your vehicles. By raising the driving age, parents could show their child is a safe driver and secure some additional discounts to reduce this financial impact.

Even teens who maintain a clean driving record in the 15-19 age demographic face significantly higher auto insurance rates because they are four times more likely to be in a crash when compared to older drivers. Since rates don't start to decline until the age of 25, some changes to how we issue a license could be beneficial to everyone.

5. It would create consistency throughout the U.S. for driving standards.
Depending on the state where you live, there are different standards in place for when teens can obtain a license or permit. Some geographic regions allow teens as young as 14 to receive a learner's permit. You can sometimes receive a restricted driver's license at 16, while others offer an unrestricted adult license at that time. The global standard for driving is 18, but in the U.S., what is legal for a teen in one state might illegal in another.

6. It could reduce the amount of congestion on the road.
Because there are fewer drivers on the roadways with an increase in the independent driving age, there could be less congestion in some communities. Schools would require fewer parking spots to accommodate student drivers, which means the land could be used for other facilities or needs. Fewer vehicles would also mean lower emissions generated for our transportation needs since students would carpool or take the bus to school, which could give our environment a small boost.

7. It would allow a teen's physiology to mature.
Science shows us that the human brain tends to be underdeveloped and volatile during one's teenage years. That is one of the reasons why kids in this age demographic tend to be impulsive, emotionally unstable, and fail to predict what the consequences of their actions will be. Because all of these skills are essential to the driving process, raising the driving age would allow for young people to finish physically maturing in a way that will eventually make them better drivers.

8. It gives new drivers an opportunity to work with today's intuitive assistance technologies.
Driving today is a very different experience for young drivers than it was even a generation ago. Teens in the 1990s were still managing all aspects of the driving experience through their personal skill because vehicles came with minimal features. Now 16-year-olds have access to lane assist technology, automatic braking, and some vehicles can even park themselves. By working with these features early, they can begin to master them as they gain more wisdom behind the wheel.

List of the Cons of Raising the Driving Age

1. It doesn't guarantee an increase in driving skills.
Raising the driving age from 16 to any age does not matter if there isn't something in the societal infrastructure that provides the new driver with experience. Even someone who gets behind the wheel at age 25 without any experience will struggle in the same ways that a 16-year-old does during their first driving sessions. The only way for this disadvantage to disappear is to offer meaningful, affordable lessons in each community that gets people driving since you can't learn everything in the classroom environment.

2. It makes the family schedule more challenging to manage.
When kids reach a certain age, they begin to manage a job while they are going to school. There are athletic practices to attend, often right after school. If a 16-year-old (or 17) is unable to drive because the driving age was raised, then someone else in the family must step up to provide these transportation services. If that isn't possible, then carpooling with other families would also be necessary. This added pressure could make it challenging to manage the career responsibilities of the parents in a single-guardian home or one where both are working to make ends meet.

3. It communicates a lack of trust in the young drivers.
Although young drivers do make significantly more serious mistakes on the road when compared to others, it would be incorrect to say that 16-year-olds are responsible for every major incident. If we decide to raise the driving age because of these statistics, then we are effectively discriminating against these kids since the same process is not followed for older drivers. This disadvantage shows that we do not trust all drivers of a certain age, even though there are many young teens who are very responsible behind the wheel and never in accidents.

4. It would prevent them from learning the responsibilities of vehicle ownership.
The idea of getting behind the wheel is very exciting for most new drivers, but the responsibility of vehicle ownership is a necessary part of the experience. Raising the driving age would prevent some teens from learning about the responsibility of budgeting for fuel expenses while traveling to school and work. You would also miss the experience of applying for an insurance policy or getting added to the parent/guardian plan. There are even the lessons on vehicle maintenance to consider that wouldn't always be taken as seriously since there is less independence.

5. It could place the safety of our children at risk.
Although taking 16-year-olds out of the vehicle would potentially reduce the risk of being in an accident, having them take public transportation or carpool just increases the potential for problems in other areas. Teens who walk, take a bicycle, or ride a bus to school have a higher risk of encountering a dangerous person or situation without adult supervision present to protect them. They have limited mobility without the vehicle to get away. In neighborhoods where the crime rate is high, this issue just trades one problem for another.

6. It eliminates a family's freedom to choose what is necessary for their needs.
It is interesting that the right to drive a vehicle creates a passionate debate about safety when teens can receive training to handle firearms. If we raise the driving age, then kids could legally possess long guns and ammunition in the United States, but they wouldn't be permitted to get behind the wheel. There are approximately 3,000 automotive related deaths among teens in the United States each year, which is about the same number of kids who die from gunshot wounds. How can we debate the merits of taking a driver's license away if we will not debate the same need for firearm ownership for young people?

7. It would still leave a patchwork of confusing driving laws.
Individual states in the U.S. have the power to regulate what the driving age is within their state borders. Even if every legislature decided to add requirements that stopped 16-year-olds from getting behind the wheel, there would still be differences in state laws that teen drivers would encounter that could get them into trouble if they were unaware of the change. The only want to really see all of the advantages of this idea would be for the federal government to institute a nationwide change somehow. Since the structure of the government makes this a challenging outcome, we may never see the full life-saving benefits which we might achieve when implementing this idea.

8. It would create an economic deficit for the insurance industry.
The premiums are so high for teen drivers because of the risks that they pose on the road. Although 16-year-old drivers are at a higher risk of being in an accident, not every kid with a driver's license has this happen to them. About 60% of teen drivers are never in an accident before the age of 20 when they are behind the wheel. The insurance companies can charge inflated premiums because of the collected statistics today that they wouldn't be able to do tomorrow with a higher age limit. That action could create some economic deficits that might even put some professionals out of a job.

In Conclusion with the Pros and Cons of Raising the Driving Age

Whether you are for an increase in the driving age or you believe that the current structure in society should remain the same, we can all agree on the need for training above everything else. If an untrained driver of any age gets behind the wheel of a vehicle, then that action increases the risks for everyone else on the road. The problem is often a lack of experience more than it is a problem with maturity or awareness.

Although the rate of accidents drops dramatically when comparing a 16-year-old driver to an 18-year-old one, the data suggests that the reason why this occurs is because of the experience that drivers get behind the wheel. Is it possible to gain that wisdom with a restricted license or a permit that requires another driver to be in the vehicle? Or should an unrestricted adult license be the better solution?

The pros and cons of raising the driving age often create more questions than answers. Some states in the U.S. might offer opportunities that are below the global standard, but the question must be answered by legislatures across the country. If you feel this debate is something that could save lives one day, then contact your state legislators to share with them how you feel.

Author Bio
Natalie Regoli is a child of God, devoted wife, and mother of two boys. She has a Master's Degree in Law from The University of Texas. Natalie has been published in several national journals and has been practicing law for 18 years.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
16 Pros and Cons of Raising the Driving Age

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The ability to earn a driver's license at the age of 16 is a rite of passage for many families in the United States. With education programs allowing for the provision of an instructional at the age of 15 1/2 in some communities, it is an exciting stage that occurs for teens during the process of growing up.

# data[].attributes.body
Genesis C

# data[].attributes.body
brian gamez

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Pros And Cons Of Raising The Driving Age

You may have heard the phrase 'freedom on wheels' before, but what if that freedom is limited by age? The debate over raising the driving age has been a topic of discussion for years. Some argue that it would increase safety on the roads, while others believe it would be an unnecessary restriction on young adults' independence. In this article, we will explore both sides of the issue and provide you with an informed perspective.

Firstly, there are several arguments in favor of raising the driving age. Those who support this idea claim that younger drivers lack experience and maturity behind the wheel, leading to more accidents and fatalities on the roadways. Additionally, many teenagers engage in distracted driving behaviors such as texting or using social media while driving, which further increases their risk of being involved in a collision.

On the other hand, opponents of raising the driving age argue that it unfairly limits young people's mobility and ability to pursue job opportunities or attend school activities. So what are some specific pros and cons? Let's dive deeper into both sides of this contentious issue.

Pros of Raising the Driving Age

1. Improved Road Safety: By raising the driving age, the number of inexperienced drivers on the road could potentially decrease. Younger drivers are more likely to take risks, and their reaction times might not be as honed as those of older, more experienced drivers. Thus, waiting a few more years could mean fewer accidents due to inexperience.

2. Reduction in Traffic Congestion: With fewer young drivers on the road, there could be a temporary reduction in traffic congestion. Fewer vehicles mean smoother traffic flow and possibly a decrease in traffic-related stress for everyone.

3. Environmental Benefits: Fewer young drivers could result in fewer cars on the road, which could lead to decreased emissions and a reduced carbon footprint. With growing concerns about climate change, this could be a step toward a more environmentally-friendly transportation model.

4. Economic Savings: Fewer accidents involving young drivers could lead to a decrease in insurance claims, potentially leading to lower insurance premiums for everyone. Moreover, families might save money by not having to support their teenager's car expenses at a younger age.

5. More Emphasis on Public Transportation: If young people can't drive until later, they might become more accustomed to using public transportation or other alternatives. This shift could boost the demand for improved public transit systems, resulting in better and more efficient transport options for everyone.

6. Better Mental Preparedness: Waiting a few more years can give young adults more time to mature mentally, which is crucial when making split-second decisions on the road. Older drivers might have better judgment and an improved ability to handle stressful driving situations.

7. Decreased Peer Pressure: Younger drivers can often be influenced by their peers to engage in risky behaviors while driving. By raising the driving age, the influence of youthful peer pressure on driving habits might be reduced.

8. Focus on Academics: Without the distraction of driving, younger individuals can place more emphasis on their studies and extracurricular activities. They might be able to concentrate better on schoolwork without the added responsibilities of car maintenance and driving.

9. Health Benefits: If teenagers are less reliant on cars, they might be more inclined to walk or bike to their destinations. This increase in physical activity could lead to better overall health.

10. Delayed Exposure to Road Rage: By waiting a few more years before driving, individuals might be more emotionally equipped to handle aggressive drivers or road rage situations, leading to safer roads for all.

Cons of Raising the Driving Age

1. Limitation on Independence: Driving offers young individuals a sense of independence. Delaying the driving age might make them feel more restricted and dependent on their parents or guardians for longer.

2. Increased Load on Parents: Parents might have to continue chauffeuring their children to school, work, or other activities, resulting in a longer period of added responsibility and potential inconvenience.

3. Potential for Late Start in Driving Experience: Delaying the driving age means that individuals start gaining driving experience later in life, which might be a disadvantage when comparing with peers who started earlier in other regions or countries.

4. Reduced Job Opportunities: Many teenagers take up jobs that require driving, such as delivery services. Raising the driving age might limit their job opportunities, affecting their financial independence and work experience.

5. Inequity for Rural Areas: In rural areas where public transportation might be scarce, young individuals would face challenges in commuting. They might miss out on opportunities due to a lack of personal transportation.

6. Over-reliance on Public Transport: If public transport systems are not adequately developed, raising the driving age could strain the existing infrastructure, leading to overcrowded and less efficient transportation modes.

7. Potential for Older First-time Drivers: Raising the driving age might result in a surge of older, yet still inexperienced drivers. While they may be older, they would still face the challenges and risks associated with learning to drive.

8. Loss of Revenue for Driving Schools: Driving schools rely on a steady influx of young learners. Delaying the driving age might lead to a temporary decrease in their clientele, potentially harming their business.

9. Loss of Revenue for Auto Industry: Fewer young drivers could mean fewer car sales, impacting the auto industry's revenue. This change might have a ripple effect on related businesses such as auto repair shops or car insurance companies.

10. Loss of Tradition and Milestone: For many, getting a driver's license is seen as a rite of passage. Raising the driving age might take away this traditional milestone, changing the way young adults transition into their responsibilities.

Advantages of Raising the Driving Age

You'll have more time to explore other modes of transportation and gain new experiences beyond just being behind the wheel. With a later driving age, you can take advantage of public transportation, biking, or walking to get around. This not only helps reduce traffic congestion but also promotes a healthier lifestyle.

Furthermore, raising the driving age can result in safer roads and decreased accidents. Studies show that younger drivers are at a higher risk of getting into accidents due to their lack of experience on the road. By waiting until they're older, drivers are more likely to be responsible and cautious while behind the wheel, leading to fewer accidents overall.

Negatives of Raising the Driving Age

It's important to consider the potential downsides of raising the driving age, such as a decrease in teenage employment opportunities due to limited transportation options.

In addition, there may be negative effects on teenage behavior. For some teenagers, obtaining a driver's license is seen as a rite of passage and an important step towards independence. Delaying this milestone could lead to frustration and rebellion.

While driver safety is certainly an important concern, it's worth noting that simply raising the driving age doesn't necessarily guarantee safer roads. Teenagers who are 18 or 19 years old can still engage in risky behaviors behind the wheel, and they may have less experience than their slightly younger counterparts who started driving at 16.

Instead of focusing solely on age restrictions, it's crucial to address issues like distracted driving and drunk driving through education and enforcement efforts.

Alternatives to Raising the Driving Age

One option to consider instead of changing the legal driving age is to focus on education and enforcement efforts targeting risky driving behaviors. Graduated licensing programs can be implemented to gradually expose young drivers to different driving situations, such as night-time driving or driving in bad weather conditions. This approach has been successful in reducing car accidents among young drivers in many countries.

Additionally, public transportation options should be improved, especially for those who live in areas with limited access to public transportation. This could encourage more people, including young adults, to take public transportation rather than drive their own cars. Another alternative is promoting ride-sharing services like Uber or Lyft, which provide a safe and convenient way for people of all ages to get around without having to drive themselves.

This could also reduce the number of drunk drivers on the road since people would have an easy alternative after drinking alcohol at social gatherings or events. Furthermore, bike-sharing programs could be expanded and made more accessible so that people have another option besides cars when it comes to getting around town.

Overall, there are alternatives available that don't involve raising the legal driving age that can help improve road safety and reduce car accidents caused by reckless behavior among young drivers.

International Examples

Have you ever considered that in Sweden, where the legal driving age is 18, the number of fatalities among drivers aged 18-24 has decreased by 50% since they implemented a graduated licensing program? This program allows young drivers to gain experience gradually by limiting their driving hours and enforcing strict rules on speeding and alcohol consumption. It has also proven to be beneficial for the economy as it reduces healthcare costs associated with car accidents.

Cultural differences also play a significant role in determining the appropriate driving age. For instance, in some countries like Germany and Australia, teenagers can legally drive at the age of 17. However, this does not mean that these countries have higher rates of accidents among young drivers. The culture around driving education and safety measures differ from country to country, which affects how teenagers approach driving.

Therefore, before making any decisions about raising or lowering the driving age, it's essential to consider cultural factors and implement educational programs that cater to specific needs.

Conclusion and Future Implications

As you look ahead, consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of implementing graduated licensing programs that prioritize safety and experience over age alone. While it may seem like raising the driving age could solve some of the issues related to young drivers, there are other possible solutions that could have a greater impact on society.

Graduated licensing programs that gradually introduce new drivers to more complex situations and require them to gain experience before getting full driving privileges can be effective in reducing accidents. Some possible solutions include mandatory driver training courses, increased penalties for traffic violations, and stricter enforcement of existing laws. These approaches not only encourage safer driving habits but also help establish a culture of responsible driving among younger generations.

In addition, these programs can lead to lower insurance premiums for young drivers as they prove their ability to drive safely over time. Overall, while raising the driving age may seem like a simple solution, implementing more comprehensive measures is likely to yield greater long-term benefits for both individuals and society as a whole.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current driving age in different countries around the world?

Picture yourself cruising down the road with your hands on the wheel, feeling independent and free. But what age did you have to be to legally experience this freedom?

The current driving age varies in different countries around the world. In Japan, for example, you can get behind the wheel at 18 years old, while in China it's 18-21 depending on the province. In contrast, most states in America allow teenagers as young as 16 to drive with a license.

Each country has their own set of laws and regulations when it comes to driving, making it important to research before hitting the open road abroad.

How would raising the driving age affect the economy, particularly in terms of jobs for driving instructors and sales of cars?

If the driving age were raised, it would have a significant impact on the economy. Specifically, it could lead to a shortage of driving instructors and a decrease in car sales.

The driving instructor shortage would result from fewer people needing to learn how to drive since they can only do so at a later age. This could also lead to an increase in car insurance premiums because there will be fewer experienced drivers on the road.

Car manufacturers may see a decrease in demand for their vehicles as younger individuals will no longer be able to purchase them, further impacting the economy.

What is the process for changing the driving age in a particular state or country?

Changing the driving age in your state or country is a legal process that involves several steps. First, a bill proposing the change must be introduced and debated in the appropriate legislative body. This can take time and will require support from lawmakers who agree with your point of view.

Once passed, the new law would need to be signed by the governor or head of state before taking effect. Public opinion also plays a role in this process, as lawmakers want to ensure they're representing their constituents' views. It's important to consider all factors before pursuing such a change, including potential benefits and drawbacks for drivers, families, and society as a whole.

Would raising the driving age lead to an increase in other risky behaviors among teenagers, such as drug use or alcohol consumption?

If you raise the driving age, teenage rebellion may lead to other risky behaviors such as drug use or alcohol consumption.

It's important for parents to take responsibility and educate their children on the dangers of these activities. However, simply raising the driving age may not solve the issue entirely.

It's crucial to address underlying issues, such as peer pressure and societal influences that contribute to these behaviors. Ultimately, it's up to individuals and their families to make responsible decisions and prioritize safety over impulsivity.

Are there any studies or statistics that suggest raising the driving age would have a significant impact on reducing car accidents and fatalities?

Looking at the effectiveness debate surrounding raising the driving age, there are mixed opinions on whether it would significantly reduce car accidents and fatalities.

While some studies have suggested that younger drivers are more likely to be involved in accidents due to their lack of experience, opposition arguments point out that simply increasing the driving age may not necessarily lead to safer roads.

Other factors such as distracted driving and impaired driving can also contribute to accidents, regardless of age.

Ultimately, while raising the driving age may have some impact on reducing accidents among teenagers, it may not be a foolproof solution for improving road safety overall.

Conclusion

So there you have it, the pros and cons of raising the driving age. While there are valid arguments on both sides, it ultimately comes down to prioritizing safety versus convenience.

However, one common objection to raising the driving age is that it would limit teenagers' independence and hinder their ability to participate in extracurricular activities or after school jobs.

But let's not forget that safety should always be our top priority when it comes to driving. By implementing alternative solutions such as improved driver education programs and stricter licensing requirements, we can still ensure safe roads without limiting young adults' opportunities.

It's time we start prioritizing safety over convenience and take steps towards creating a safer future for all drivers on the road.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
20 Pros and Cons of Raising the Driving Age | Ablison

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Pros And Cons Of Raising The Driving Age