# data[].attributes.body
The I DO, WE DO, and YOU DO were very explicit and easy to follow along. (e.g. usage of the 1-6 steps provided)

- For the time of the WE DO portion, maybe it should be longer than just 5 mins as you are trying to assess Rolex for both spelling & reading.

# data[].attributes.body
Very clear I do We do You do

To be clearer:

"Teacher will make mistake/ appear confused on purpose"

What strategy? What are the 4 steps of the strategy?? --> OH it's in your Model (we do)

Can have a 4-step checklist appended

Q: Be specific on types of phonics used? Also how to use phonics to teach sight words?

# data[].attributes.body
Very systematic and step by step

Good to be explicit in writing what exactly is expected in terms of 'checking for understanding'- for introduction stage. You may want to work on clarity in terms of your instruction

Material needed to be put in the material section instead of the Lesson Development

# data[].attributes.body
Strength:
- differentiated learning was provided where teacher will provide suggestion if student does not know what to draw

Areas to improve:
- to refer as SENO instead of teacher
- to specify what is the strategy that will be taught during lesson
- unsure who's the other adult that's referred to from lesson development: "Teacher will pretend to ask an adult to pronounce the word, and listen to how the word is read"

# data[].attributes.body
10 steps well elaborated, very guided and very clear

AOI: Reward system to encourage student

WELL DONE!!

# data[].attributes.body
- the lesson is centred on Rolex's interest in mazes which is a plus for student engagement and provides the kinaesthetic movement needed for him
- the explicit teaching was clear and shows step-by-step showed the gradual change from teacher to student so that maximises learning for him

# data[].attributes.body
Strength:
- interesting game that caters to the child's interest
- structured breakdown of I Do, We Do, You Do
- explicit, talks about what to do if he reads wrongly

Areas for Improvement:
- very effective so.. nil

# data[].attributes.body
Strength:
- steps provided are clear (but wondering if finding right spelling in dictionary is necessary?)

Areas to improve:
- inconsistent when referring teacher as SENO
- whole body listening may not be a DI

# data[].attributes.body
Like the simple short steps that are created to read the sight words. It will be useful for Rolex learning. Having the exit ticket was creative and a good idea for SENO to gather feedback from Rolex.

- For the praising of Rolex, shouldn't he be praised for trying his best rather than just having done all the corrected words?

# data[].attributes.body
Strength:
+ SAFMEDs method is a good for recall
+ Consistency on focusing the number of words to be taught. In all 3 stages.

AFI:
- Suggest to include the phrase "I Do", "We Do" and "You Do"
- Include error correction procedure

# data[].attributes.body
Very clear steps laid out in I Do

AOI: Can use backup plan/ DI in case student is not able to follow theb steps and instructions at all

# data[].attributes.body
Introductions motivate the student - makes effort to build rapport and remind the student of success. Clear expectations on how the student behaves in class and good rationale behind the learning. Systematic lesson plan. Interesting strategy for closing the lesson - 3-2-1 Exit ticket.

Suggestion to cut down the number of words for guided practice so that students has more opportunity to try and eventually work towards independence.

# data[].attributes.body
Strength:
- Guided and clear 'I Do', 'We Do' and 'You Do'
- Differentiated learning is provided
- Use of SAFMEDS is good

Areas for Improvement:
- To avoid using the word 'cannot'

# data[].attributes.body
Clear explanation of evidence-based strategy used

Great that there is checking for accuracy and understanding

Great that there is gradual increment of difficulty

AOI: Steps involved can be put inside the I Do section itself instead of only found in appendices

# data[].attributes.body
Fabulous work done in ....
- The 'I do, We do and You do' segments were clear.
- We liked that a monitoring plan in the introduction was mentioned but 'Appendix D'  was missing

Area of improvement ...
- The 4 steps of the strategy were not presented explicitly. (numbering the strategy will help)

# data[].attributes.body
Strength:
- good that recap was done for list 2C
- child can take ownership by selecting own words

Areas to improve:
- DI (teaching whole body listening) may not be relevant as this lesson focuses on reading sight words
- visual support can be provided for You Do section

# data[].attributes.body
Fabulous in ...
- applying CUED Spelling strategy to teach spelling of the sight words
- the 10 steps were well-presented in the lesson plan
- 'I do, We do and You do' not chunky! We love it!

Areas of concern ...
- the 10 steps could be simplified as the student might find the process too demanding (student has severe difficulty both receptive and expressive language ability)

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths
-  Stated where SENO should be seated.
- There's a schedule
- Checklist
- I do, we do and you do is very detailed.

Area of improvement
- 5 seconds response time may not be enough time for the child to respond.
- There's a lot of content within the introduction. May be good to spend more time on it instead of 5 minutes.

# data[].attributes.body
- we were wondering if there'll be a check-in portion and a reward system for him?
- steps were clearly written
- would it be better if the immediate correction could be done at the step he missed or step before? Just a thought

# data[].attributes.body
Can please organise? We are very confused.

Introduction unclear -- Why lesson objective getting highlighted again? check for what understanding?

AOI:

Materials needed not necessary within Lesson Development

How to clarify and correct?

# data[].attributes.body
Strength:
- Great job setting expectation and reminders at the start of the class
- Clear steps for student to follow

Areas for Improvement:
- Under "I Do" can consider to explicitly state how are you going to check for understanding (e.g., ask him question? arrange the steps?)

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths:
+ Instructions are explicit enough
+ Included follow-up/parents involvement after intervention

AFI:
- Have clear check-in and introduction
- Lesson objective to be placed under the appropriate heading instead of Introduction
- "Materials needed" in part 8 should be placed under part 7

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths:
- Good that interest of Rolex is incorporated into lesson

Areas to improve:
- since Sight Words Pathway game is the main strategy, it shouldn't be repeated in the DI column

# data[].attributes.body
8. Introduction

+ve -=>

·         introduced lesson objectives

·         Conducted pre-test ( base line)

Could add =>

·         specify what strategies, I am assuming (consonant digraphs (sh, th, ch, wh) and vowel teams (e.g. ea, ee and au).

·         Inform student of the rationale behind lesson objectives

·         Check in?

9. Lesson Development - Model

+ve -=> is the teacher demonstrating thinking a loud?

Could add =>

•             Specify what strategies is being used, I am assuming thinking a loud.

# data[].attributes.body
Very clear steps and easy to follow

Good think aloud during I do

AOI:

Q: How is the word cards differentiated?

# data[].attributes.body
Fabulous in ....
- Fernald Model is interesting as it is a different take to Look, Cover, Write and Check. This strategy is good for both reading and spelling. Student has the autonomy to choose the words to learn.

Areas for improvements …
- objective was to read 17/20 words but student's reward indicated as read and spell (no alignment)

# data[].attributes.body
Strength:
- good that reinforcement and collaboration is done with parents

Areas to improve:
- session objective and materials can be removed from the sequence of activities since it's already mentioned in the other sections of the plan
- strategy on how to achieve the objective is not provided

# data[].attributes.body
Strength:
One Minute Dash strategy is used to recall sight words.

Areas for Improvement:
Teaching whole body listening is not aligned to the session's objective.

# data[].attributes.body
Very systematic step-by-step. Easy-to-follow lesson plan .

Good to mention explicitly the rationale for learning sight words in brief. Lesson activity should align to the domain . But, anyway, it is a good attempt as there are step by step instructions with evidence-based strategies.

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths:
- Included checking in
- Included a schedule
- It's good that SENO included more words to practice in the "WE DO" portion.

Areas of improvement:
- Timing not stated for introduction
- Might be good to use a visual cue on the 10 steps of Cued Spelling strategy.

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths:
+ Strategies used are clearly written
+ Instructions are explicit

AFI:
- To check for student's understanding during We do

# data[].attributes.body
Very systematic and easy to follow the lesson plan.

Good to include an appendix for the 'Decoding Strategy Guide'
During the I Do stage, perhaps focus on getting the students to learn the strategy first more than getting the student to read or remember the strategy. (Aquire the strategy first).

# data[].attributes.body
·         Good intro

·         Got DI with rationale

·         Very specific and detailed
Well done

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths:
+ Rationale was written clearly
+ Included differentiated instructions to cater to student's needs

AFI:
- A little lengthy
- Sight words pathway should be included in appendix

# data[].attributes.body
Strength:
- exit ticket is a good way to check for student's understanding

Areas to improve:
- objective of lesson and lesson strategy may not be aligned. the lesson strategy seemed to be focusing on the handwriting instead of learning how to read the sight words.

# data[].attributes.body
Very organized in terms of how the lesson plan is crafted. using headers and sub headers.

Activity however seems to incline more on spelling instead of reading the word. Maybe just focus on the step1 and step 3 to  have a more focus intervention - reading.

Closure to have a better alignment to the session objective and domain.

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths:
+ Tapped onto student's interest
+ Included exit ticket

AFI:
- Strategy not clearly defined
- Independent practice should be "You do" instead of "I do"

# data[].attributes.body
Fabulous in ...
- presenting the lesson plan which well and explicitly. We had a wonderful time reading the lesson plan. The whole piece of work was easy to read. Thank you!

Area for improvement ...
- to add a generalisation comment for student to apply the decoding strategy in his class

# data[].attributes.body
WELL DONE!! Everything is clear. Maybe just put the 4 stage steps within the Lesson Development itself.

# data[].attributes.body
Ee like the fact they include the feeling chart and whole body listening strategy to help student remain on task

Will be good to state explicitly what will be written on the whiteboard (session schedule).
Review activity should be in the introduction stage instead of at the modelling stage.

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths:
+ Visuals provided for student's reference
+ Closure activity is aligned with assessment of learning

AFI:
- If it's a new strategy to be taught, maybe omit the word "recap"?
- Maybe cut down on "I do" if strategy has been taught previously

# data[].attributes.body
Fabulous in  ...
- aligning the activities to match student's interest

Areas for improvement  ...
- there were too many tasks to complete in a 5 min introduction

# data[].attributes.body
Fabulous in …
-involving parents to apply the strategy at home

Areas of improvement ...
- there was no explicit explanation or steps in clarifying or correcting student when needed