# data[].attributes.headline
I choose to be born as recently as possible in the past 100 years and while I would have no prior knowledge to my socio demographics, the fact that there is more access to education and healthcare certainly since 1945 in the UK and at the end of ww2,  makes it more appealing.Furthermore, science technology and medicine has come a long way and although 2 years ago we did not have any knowledge of covid 19 and the corona virus, thanks to science this has enabled the quickest response to a vaccine ever! Also, although climate change is upon us, we have the capability to slow things down, and repair some of the damage that has been done, this too is down to  science and education. Therefore, this is my preferred time to be born

# data[].attributes.subject
I choose to be born as recently as possible in the past 100 years and while I would have no prior knowledge to my socio demographics, the fact that there is more access to education and healthcare certainly since 1945 in the UK and at the end of ww2,  makes it more appealing.Furthermore, science technology and medicine has come a long way and although 2 years ago we did not have any knowledge of covid 19 and the corona virus, thanks to science this has enabled the quickest response to a vaccine ever! Also, although climate change is upon us, we have the capability to slow things down, and repair some of the damage that has been done, this too is down to  science and education. Therefore, this is my preferred time to be born

# data[].attributes.headline
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.subject
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.body
Regardless of socio-demographic profile, abilities or nationality, I would not change being born in the late 1990's. Although there is still much work to do, I believe that as a society, the majority of people are accepting and tolerant of differing beliefs, races, gender etc. Despite this acceptance developing over much of the last 20 years, I feel that we are now in a place where the media is dominated by questions of inequality. Finally, (although healthcare varies globally) we are obviously at our most advanced both medicinally and technologically and these often combine to further reduce inequality.

# data[].attributes.headline
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.subject
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.body
From what I know about the state of the world and the development within the last 100 years, I would not want to change being alive today. To my knowledge the differences between people has recently increased, however this cannot be compared to how it used to be a few generations ago. The standard of living has overall improved for the entire world population, the only question is if it will continue to do so. Despite of the unknown laying before us I believe that recent technologies and an increased focus on making the world a better place for everyone will make the future bright.

# data[].attributes.body
If you did not know anything about your socio-demographic profile, I would say I choose the time of before Pandemic. There are enough health care or high technology. That is why I am able to connect with my family or friends even if I am in the UK. In addition, the issues of gender or religious have became less than before. However, I think income inequality has increased in modern countries.

# data[].attributes.headline
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.subject
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.body
To choose a year between 1920 and 2020, if I cannot decide the nationality, society and the ability I have, I may still want to be born in the 2010s. First, according to the report of the World Bank, 'the global Gini index rose steadily by around 15Gini points between the 1820s and the early 1990s'. From that, we can see that inequality was increasingly intensified at that time which was probably due to the Industrial Revolution. Hence, the early 1990s is excluded. After that, the Second World War is another important time signpost. As Robert H. Wade said in Great Escape And Great Divergences, there is a prominent slowdown in the growth rate of GDP per capita during the half-century after the Second World War. Thus, the year before 2000 is excluded either. The crash of 2008 brought about a great influence on the world scale. Therefore, I may be better born after 2008. Given the rapid speed of globalization and neoliberalism market policy, there might be more opportunities and chances for most people, so I will choose to be given birth after 2010.

# data[].attributes.headline
If you did not know anything about your socio-demographic profile, abilities or nationality and had to choose a time to be born in the last 100 years, when would it be and why?

# data[].attributes.subject
If you did not know anything about your socio-demographic profile, abilities or nationality and had to choose a time to be born in the last 100 years, when would it be and why?

# data[].attributes.body
If I did not know anything about the socio demographic profile. abilities or nationality and had to choose a time to be born, it will be 2020 or the latest. The modern days are more effortless than last 10 years or 20 years. Today everything comes handy with the advancement of technology. The internet opens up the world to an individual who is either sitting in a village or a city. Everything is sophisticated, well connected and  customised for the person who is handling the technology associated. Apart from technology- health, education and leisure has came to great development and there is cultural integration everywhere. With improved health care and education standard of living has also became decent.

While going back to 1990s it was the time of adjustment with all the changes happening socially, culturally and economically. Capitalism was spreading its wings, cultural integration saw fewer opportunities to find its own ways down the road. Alternate media, mobile phones, internet were new to people. There were times of struggle to get familiarised by the change. People’s income were changing and getting into a stable jobs, yet poverty hung around most households. Education and Healthcare had only a small share of reach to all sectors of the society.

Compared to last 20 years, life became comfortable for people with  necessities are available in their fingertips. Again, it cant be completely categorised as easy, it's challenging in its own ways. With globalisation and market economies, choices increased but income remained almost same, education and health care became expensive. Social inequalities still haunt the people. Economic conditions are not always favourable with persisting unemployment and inflation. Again 2020 will be better than 1995, when advantages of technology in the domains of healthcare, education and everyday life can be gained without the struggles of getting adjusted to the changes.

# data[].attributes.headline
When would you be born in the last 100 years? 

# data[].attributes.subject
When would you be born in the last 100 years? 

# data[].attributes.body
At first this questions seems fairly simple, however there are more factors that needs to be considered. If I had no prior knowledge of my current socio-demographic characteristics, I would choose to be born in the present because, although there is still a substantial way to go in achieving greater equality in regards to race, class, health and gender, we have made some progress in the last 100 years (however not nearly as much as we should have and should hope to see). However, I think the ‘where’ you are born is also as significant as the ‘when’. Economic, cultural and social changes don’t happen across the world in one singular wave, places change, and sometimes regress. The ‘where’ you are born can affect your ability to move across the world, your access to health care and your access to education. In Iran, for example, women’s rights have been significantly restricted in the last 50 years or so, so if you were to be born a women within this time frame, your access to opportunities and your human rights will be hugely different compared to the 1960s or early 1970s.

# data[].attributes.body
This is a very difficult question to answer. However, I would still choose to be born in the 1990-2000s due to global advancements in medicine. Regarding the coronavirus, being born earlier would increase the likelihood of vulnerability. That being said, standards of living fluctuate and depend on a variety of factors, governmental policy being one important player.

# data[].attributes.headline
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.subject
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.body
If I did not have any knowledge of my socio-demographic profile and abilities, I would choose to be born as close to recent times as possible. This is partly due to the advancements made within technology, healthcare, and education. It is important to note that individuals’ experiences of inequality vary particularly in terms of race, class, and gender. I believe that although this has improvement within the last 100 years, these improvements have not reached the level of equality.

# data[].attributes.headline
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.subject
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.body
Without knowledge of my socio-demographic profile, abilities or nationality, I would choose to be born during the present. Although inequalities are still present, arguably recently exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic, I believe they are still less prevalent compared to other time periods in the last 100 years. Specifically, there is greater access to healthcare and technology and higher standards of living in the present day than say even 30 years ago. However, it can be argued that these improvements are only relevant to "more developed" countries in the "global north". Inequalities, in particular regarding healthcare, technology, gender, civil rights and racism have potentially experienced no improvements in the last 100 years in "less developed, third world countries in the global south". Selecting a time period to be born in is therefore tricky, as even in the present, there is no place on earth with a completely non-discriminatory welfare state, gender equal job market, quality access to healthcare, housing or public services.

# data[].attributes.headline
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.subject
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.body
I think this is a really tricky question to answer as it's so hard to consider things like this without drawing on socio-economic facotrs, inequalities and prejudices. However, I would agree with a lot of the other answers on this page and suggest the present day/most recent years. I can see why there might be factors of other decades that may seem beneficial/intriguing, but I think that advancements in medicine, technology etc would look incredible to someone who didn't understand social factors or consequences there might be to advancements such as these.

# data[].attributes.headline
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.subject
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.body
Given the strength of labour unions, the emergence of the welfare state and the recent removal of certain tyrannical/oppressive nation-states, I am inclined to be born sometime around the 1950s. Although these particular advancements have not been made as universal as they have today (excluding trade unions). In hindsight I'd choose to be born in the 2010s, not only to improve the chances of benefiting from the advanced developments listed above, but in order to live with greater access to; quality healthcare, non-discriminatory education, a more gender-equal job market, as well as improved civil rights.

# data[].attributes.headline
When would you be born in the last 100 years

# data[].attributes.subject
When would you be born in the last 100 years

# data[].attributes.body
My first thoughts were that I would want to be born as close to present day as possible, due to advances in tech and medicine, alongside improvements in gender and race prejudice. However, although changes have occurred, these issues are maybe just expressed differently, and as with economic inequality, I believe it really does matter where you are born and into what circumstances. Inequality effects different people more or less, at different times, and in different countries, so there seems no obvious choice.

# data[].attributes.headline
When would you be born in the last 100 years? 

# data[].attributes.subject
When would you be born in the last 100 years? 

# data[].attributes.body
Without any prior knowledge of my potential position within society I think I would prefer to be born as close to recent times as possible. Although we often hear that inequality is increasing, the overall standard of living for most people has also increased. While our current situation is far from perfect, it is less likely that I would be born into extreme poverty, die from a (now) curable condition or face life limiting discrimination based on race, gender, sexuality, or disability. However, as one of the other posts mentions, although statistically this is all less likely in recent years, being born at any time doesn’t exclude the possibility of (arguably) avoidable suffering.

# data[].attributes.body
I would choose to be born later in the century since there is more of a statistical chance that I would have access to food, life-saving medicines and shelter. I also think the movement away from racism, sexism, colonial/expansionist mindsets, and general intolerance has more legs than it did earlier in the century (thanks to various social movements during the century). Still, this question is difficult because I could be born to a wealthy and healthy family in Switzerland, to a homeless drug addict in Kentucky or a starving mother in Yemen. Statistics are really useful to show what we may be doing right or wrong in our mission to end poverty and starvation, but the absolute reality is that being born in this world at any time may result in extreme and unnecessary suffering.

# data[].attributes.headline
When would you be born in the last 100 years? 

# data[].attributes.subject
When would you be born in the last 100 years? 

# data[].attributes.body
Considering we were asked to answer this question without the knowledge of how our socio-demographic profile would be comprised, along with other contributing factors, at any given time point we are still playing a genetic lottery for how we would end up; our race, gender, nationality and so forth. These attributes and our environment all contribute to our access to opportunity, which governs our life trajectory. Although by no means a perfect time to be born, I would certainly choose more recent years, given the advancements made in healthcare, digital progress, education etc. There are still stark inequalities in terms of race, gender, religion, ability etc, but I believe recent years have seen an increase in conversation surrounding these discrepancies; such inequalities were previously taken as an inevitability and a necessary part of society, meaning those being born stood to loose far more depending on the profile they achieved within the genetic lottery.

# data[].attributes.body
Inequality has always existed and I do not consider that there has been a 'golden age', where irrespective of your socio-demographic profile, ability or nationality, equality has been available to all.

I think I would choose to be born in the present day. I would argue that overall, the standard of living has increased for the majority of the global population (although this does not necessarily make the experience of poverty 'easier' due to the consequences of technological and social developments, environmental impacts for example). Over the last 30 years, I think there has been an increase in awareness of the social impacts of inequality which gives me hope that inequality will continue to be less socially acceptable, and there will continue to be a shift towards greater social justice and equality.

# data[].attributes.headline
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.subject
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.body
Although asked to disregard socio-economic factors, the answer to this question (I think) depends very much on the socio-economic characteristics of divergent groups. On the whole, to be born as late as possible would seem to be preferable - as advances in healthcare, access to education/opportunities and reducing discriminatory attitudes and practices would seem to benefit the 'many'. On the other hand, factors such as climate change, rising levels of inequality and political polarisation may mean that, in fact, life is getting harder for a large proportion of people and therefore to be born earlier (perhaps post-war in western economies) may have had its advantages (at least for some specific groups!)..

# data[].attributes.headline
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.subject
When would you be born in the last 100 years?

# data[].attributes.body
While income inequality has been increasing recently, I would still chose to be born as recently as possible. This is because gender and race based prejudice, while not eliminated, has improved over the last 100 years. Therefore, since I do not know what race or gender I would be born as, I would rather live in a time where these identities play a reduced role in determining my life prospects.