# data[].attributes.body
I agree Christopher - I really liked the Thriving and Surviving idea. It provides confidence and goal areas of improvement.

# data[].attributes.body
So many good ideas. Zach and Hunter. Thank you!  Taking a "we are all in this together" stance is what I heard. .  Build on the things going well for the new teachers and dig into a few areas to improve with feedback.  I liked the Thrive - Survive idea!  The observations in the classrooms should include debriefing  conversation  rooted in the framework of we all are working to improve that is NOT all about teaching and learning....buidling a relationship is the key.

# data[].attributes.body
Thanks for your perspective on Thriving versus surviving. I'm glad you had such great co facilitating coaches who can meet your needs as a first year teacher.

# data[].attributes.body
Zach and Hunter are willing to teach with vulnerability and they are awesome!!   Relationships and ordinary acts of helping are great ways to reach out to new teachers!

# data[].attributes.body
I appreciated the two areas of focus for coaching a science teacher or any teacher who is not in a content area where you (as the coach) don't have experience/expertise:
1. clarity of instruction
2. Management strategies
keeping it simple :)
Thanks for sharing!

# data[].attributes.body
We're planning to integrate the IC map as part of the OpenSciEd work.  I'm also wondering if it would make a good entry point for teachers to reflect on their current practice and then develop a learning plan to engage with small learning modules (thinking along the lines of micro-credentials) that target the area(s) they want to work on and then complete it again at the end of their learning to look at potential growth.

# data[].attributes.body
skellogg@postville.k12.ia.us

Working with the science PLC - the IC map can focus our next steps and move forward with implementation goals. It will also be a great resource for reflection throughout the process to ensure we are pushing ourselves forward.

# data[].attributes.body
jmartin-hiner@aea1.k12.ia.us

Through our OpenSciEd work (and in other places), we continually run into the challenges of getting students to talk.  Here is a poster we've been using:  https://www.openscied.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/OpenSciEd-Communicating-in-Scientific-Ways-Poster.pdf

Trying table tents, science notebook inserts etc. to keep these starters in front of them.

# data[].attributes.body
kari.murray@carlislecsd.org

One thing that we have started doing more as a science department is station teaching (this is not necessarily a specific science teaching practice). In station teaching, students learn a concept in 2 or 3 stations that they rotate through. We use intentional grouping to determine student flow to the stations.

# data[].attributes.body
hallw@wdmcs.org

Actions:
1.  NLT 7th Grade Science Meeting 11/15/19.
2. In learn portion, will present  info about argumentation.
3. Ask for Notice, Like and Wonder about CER and Argumentation.
4. Determine next steps in how this could be used with upcoming standards.
5. Determine when this will be done.
6. Video lesson from one or more teachers.
7. Reflect on what went well and what could be improved.
8. Continue the cycle adding tools into our classes.

Thanks for the information.

# data[].attributes.body
kari.murray@carlislecsd.org
My action step is to share the Bozeman cards with our 9-12 science team. They are currently trying to identify how they are incorporating Science Practices into their units, and I think those would be a good resource for the team in working toward their team goal.

# data[].attributes.body
My action will be to share the resources (that I don't already have in my district) with other coaches and science teachers.