# data[].attributes.body
A significant argument in favour of cycling is that it is effective to reduce public living cost in transport. When the citizens drive a car, they have to spend a lot of funds in car such as petrol, car decoration and park fee. It is expensive for the public to cost regularly. While cycling can cost a large amount of funds in the short term that cyclist require to buy some related equipment like a good quality bike and a helmet, there is known to decrease the daily cost in transportation in the long term. Consequently, cycling can benefit to public finance.

Comment: counter argument is not clear. Others okay.

# data[].attributes.body
A major benefit of cycling is that it has significant health benefits .Cycling can be seen as a form of exercise. In addition,cycling can relax mood and  reduce the pressure.A number of urban dwellers has health problems due to busy work .Therefore, by cycling to work  would improve general fitness levels and also reduce work pressure.In light of this , cycling has positive impacts both on physical and mental. While some argues that cycling can result in serious injury if accidents occur , the probability of an accident is low . To promote cycling, government should build more bike lanes which can improve safety and reduce accidents . Thus,cycling is an ideal transportation because it has remarkable health benefits.

comment:

# data[].attributes.body
The major in support of cycling is that it provides considerable health benefits. The workers often lack of exercise duo to busy lifestyle, and this would cause several disease,Howere, cycling to work can address this problem through the physical activity. Meanwhile, it is also effective for mental health as well, because of the fresh air and scenic beauty. While this process needs numerous economic outcome for local councils to build more bike lanes, it could provide the significant health benefits to societies in the long term. As consequence, cycling is an optimal from of transport for busy urban centers.

# data[].attributes.body
One argument for cycling is that it contributes to a health lifestyle.Firstly, a number of urban dwellers face health disorder due to an extremely busy work,which leads to a sedentary lifestyles.By cycling to work, this can provide an opportunity to improve fitness level and reduce the incidence of disease.In addition,cycling also bring some benefits to mental health.In reference to this,Fry(2016)asserts that cycling can help citizen reduce anxiety  and improve the depression or other mood disorders.It can be seen as a treatment to some psychological problems.In light of
this,cycling benefits city dwellers in not only physical but also mental considerations and lead them a healthy lifestyle

# data[].attributes.body
The major argument for cycling is that it provides many benefits for public health.Many employees may have a sedentary life in a long term.It oftens interfere with health so they need to take exercise in leisure time,no matter how busy they are.Cycling is the most suitable sport for them because this way makes good use of the time to go to workplace.Cycling is not the same as during need for sedentariness even avoid traffic jams .But if the governments want to promote this method,they need to build more bike lines to guarantee public’s health.Consequently,Cycling is an positive mode of transport for busy urban centers and beneficial for public’s health

# data[].attributes.body
Another argument in support of cycling as a means of transport around modern cities is that it brings numerous health benefits for the public. Due to the busy work, most of cities do not have time to do physical activities to keep healthy. Therefor, cycling is a good way for improving residents' fitness levels such as sleep quality in order to Prevent the cancer and improve immunity. Thus, cycling play a postive role on the public health.

# data[].attributes.body
Another argument for cycling is that it is beneficial for  the individual finance, compared with cars. The cost of bicycle is lower and do not need extra cost such as parking fees. In addition, to acquire qualification for driving drivers need pay for the exam to gain driver licenses. Some argue that riders need to buy extra equipment such as helmet and kneepads, which are also expensive. However, compared with cars such expenditure is an initial cost, which means that bicycle riders do not need to buy petroleum regularly. Therefore, numerous benefits for the individual finance can be seen to apply bicycle as a main transportation.

In conclusion, there are significant arguments for cycling as an optimal transportation in city. It could provide numerous benefits to the environment and individual finance. Given this incentives, government should make some policies to support the public apply bicycle as a main transportation.

1.always repeat the same words.(more than 4 times)
2.argument structure is good.
3.

# data[].attributes.body
Another argument against cycling is that it can cause a higher congestion on public transportation. Despite  cycling might also lead to traffic congestion, it can be argue that the governments could establish some regulation to construct the cycling lane beside the main commuting road and encourage the public to wear helmets to decrease the risk of death. Thus, many nations should continue to encourage building more cycling lanes.

# data[].attributes.body
First of all, cycling can lead to good  environment. Comparing with some motor vehicles, cycling trends to consume less fossil fuels and even can avoid this problem. This means that cycling can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants. Furthermore, cycling may also play a significant role in building environmentally-friendly society due to the fact that it has a widely influence in students, clerks or even some elder. While advance of technology such as electricity cars can reduce the emissions of autobile  exhausts, it can be argued that some relevant technology is limited and more investment from some companies of government seem to be inevitable. From this perspective if cycling become an ideal mode of transport in the long term, it can save many funds for governments and companies and theses funds can be used for other fields.

COMMENTS
1.good explanation
2.confusion about argument structure (the second supporting idea is the same as the first )