# data[].attributes.body
1. I agree that the people should stop blaming the victim because the students where making fun of the victim and he didn't like that, that's why he was expelled.
2. I don't disagree with the student because there should be gun restrictions in till your 21 or older.
3. You should make it so that gun  manufactures ask for your ID and if your a minor you buy a gun.

# data[].attributes.body
1.I agree that people should stop killing people and also i agree about that they nit to restrictions of gun. 2. I not disagree with anything she said because everthing she said it was almost true. 3.one solution that we can stop this problems is that we nit to stop the people that they are killing and be bulling for other people

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the third point that if people are going to get a gun they should have to get educated on that type of fire arm.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I agree with banning gun parts because it "upgrades the gun" that is being used. For example, a silencer can help in a school shooting situation if the school shooter is trying to be silent.
2. I disagree with turning this country differently because if we change this whole country, then people will get confused of what's going on in the society.
3. One solution is to check students or get police officers to guard the school. Or rewrite the second amendment because it causes problems like school shootings.   ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

💯

# data[].attributes.body
1) I  agree with banning all  gun parts.
2) I also  disagree with restricting guns because it wont make any difference.
3) I think a solution would be to not allow people from getting guns until the age of 21 instead of 18.

# data[].attributes.body
1.con lo que estoy de acuerdo es como que quiten las 2. que no vendan armas alos indescapacitados 3.la solucion es que

# data[].attributes.body
1. i agree that guns shouldn't be given out to whoever and there should more stricter gun restrictions
2. i disagree that we should put the blame on the nra or become more LlikeAustralia  or japan it was very a heartwarming speech but some of her points weren't quite enough and we should have the right to shoot guns even if we are 14 because we defend ourselves from aliens
3. there is no solution we all die some day and this is such harsh place anyway i send my thoughts and prayers to those that have died also putting teachers who kno de wea

# data[].attributes.body
1. I agree with the speech about not giving guns to people that have an illness.
2.  I disagree about being like Australia, because they never had an incident ever since they created a law. But we're not Australia.
3. Florida should have permits to get guns since they don't need permits to get a gun, all they need to do is buy a gun and leave. It's why I suggest they need permits to buy a gun.

# data[].attributes.body
1) i think there should be more restrictions that way theres less automatic weapons allowed in other words less accesories
2) i agree that all guns should tracked this way they people who are tracking them can know if theres a danger
3)I disagree when banning weapons since one way or another people will still get weapons and usually use it for innapropiate use

.

# data[].attributes.headline
1.I agree on the point where she said that people shouldn't be able to buy the automatic guns unless they are older than 18[clapping in the back round]  2.i disagree about when she said that government should start doing something. It is not that the government should start doing something about it is that they can not. If they does do something about guns it is gonna be biased against the people who have lots of guns. 3. People who have mental health shouldn't be able to carry or be allowed to have a firearm. Even though every US citizen has their 2nd amendment people who have "mental health" have a big  reputation about owning or carrying a firearm. [Clapping] 

# data[].attributes.subject
1.I agree on the point where she said that people shouldn't be able to buy the automatic guns unless they are older than 18[clapping in the back round]  2.i disagree about when she said that government should start doing something. It is not that the government should start doing something about it is that they can not. If they does do something about guns it is gonna be biased against the people who have lots of guns. 3. People who have mental health shouldn't be able to carry or be allowed to have a firearm. Even though every US citizen has their 2nd amendment people who have "mental health" have a big  reputation about owning or carrying a firearm. [Clapping] 

# data[].attributes.body
JIMMY PACHECO 2018!!!!!!!!!!

# data[].attributes.body
1) I agree when she said stop blaming the victim because the people that saw him with a gun or the people that sold him the gun.
2) I didnt disagree with anything because there should be restrictions to guns like she said in Australia they made restrictions and they havent had a mass shootings in years.
3) My solution would be to put gun restrictions and dont sell guns to just anyone because not everyone can handle them obviously.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the part that government isn't accountable for having a word without being paid

# data[].attributes.body
1. I agree that we need better gun control because certain people shouldn't have access to guns either because the're a felon or the're crazy.
2. I disagree that no one should have guns.
3. you should have to get a background check to own gun and not be able to own fully automatic gun. 👌 👌👌👌

# data[].attributes.body
1.I agree with the fact that she said that there should be gun restrictions because if you have a handgun as a teen you may do dumb stuff so have guns when you hit the age of 21./
2. I disagree with the fact that she had called out the shooter in such a rude manner and his family because its disrespectful to point and call  people out.
3. A solution that can fix this problem is to have a age restriction like handguns you can have one at the age of 21, age 30 for AR's and that will cause less school shootings because you would need registration to have a gun and so we wont have much teens having guns and also stop teens from entering schools with guns.

# data[].attributes.body
1. one of the things I agreed with was that we should do something about this events that keep on happening with out any consequence or action.
2.But one thing I quite don't agree with is that she said we need ti completely ban guns .people should be able to defend themselves in their own homes or use said weapons in a self defense  situation.
3.I personally think that a solution to this problem is more gun restrictions don,t let those types of weapons end in a teens hands. Although we are no able to control what happens in a teens home ,we can get schools to some how be more involved in a kids behavior in and out of schools. Many things happen that the schools completely dismiss , or just ignore so they cant clomplelty be blamed , But we should still do something get the ones in power to stop this from happening again.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I agree with this part that the government isn't doing enough to control guns because in this state don't have anything restrictions on guns but other states and country.
2. I disagree with the government because the government is doing nothing to add on to stop on gun or control. After theses mass shooting they do nothing but spared awareness.
3. The solution for guns is have control and not just talk about it but do something like send a petition.

# data[].attributes.body
1. i agree with her notion about gun restrictions. Although i believe with her opinions, there should be certain limitations about gun restrictions. Such as limitations to ammo or accessories that can cause guns to be automatic and injure many people.                          2. I do not believe that we should get rid of guns altogether because like the prohibition of alcohol, it will get worse. they will sell guns in the black market and will cause a riot.  Many consequences can come with just prohibiting guns.
3.  one solution can be to make purchasing a gun difficult or much more strict so that it can cause less purchases of guns only if necessary. Hunters wont be affected as much with this change. Also a background check will be necessary for more safety.I believe we should pass a law that will restrict guns from being purchased by minors. it should be at least 21.

# data[].attributes.body
1.I agree with her wanting to make guns harder to get.
2.Her saying that we don't try to make guns harder to get because we do.
3.Metal detectors it will make weapons at school almost impossible even for teachers.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I agreed that the government doesn't do enough to restrict fire arms. I agree because in the state of Florida, they don't have that much gun restrictions.
2. I don't disagree with anything because she had many great points in her speech, and I didn't find anything I would disagree with.
3. A solution that would stop mass shootings is to have the families stop the school shooter or at least talk to him/her. Another is to pass a law where you have to be a certain age to buy a gun.

# data[].attributes.body
1. One point that i agree with is when she said  that kid that was killing students in the school that he could have killed many other students. They didn't know if he was mental or not they just knew he was the killer. 2. One point that I disagreed with was she was saying the U.S. should make a law like Australia so people wouldn't shoot schools anymore. People might ignore that rule and keep going to schools and shoot students and teachers. 3. One solution is to own (or create) weapon censors to make sure nobody has a weapon.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The point i agree with the most in the speech is that "You shouldn't blame the victims for something the school shooter did" because it wasn't the victims fault or purpose to get harmed or killed .
2. I disagree with how she called the shooter in a kind of harsh way and she kind of insulted his family in a way where they looked bad .
3. I think one solution for this is to have EVERY state should have gun restrictions because , kids under age manage to have a gun and incidences like school shootings happen .

# data[].attributes.body
1. I agree with the part when she said that we should restrict guns because in Australia they had one massive gun shooting then they made laws about guns and after they made those laws they never had another massive gun shooting.

2. I disagree with the part when she said that we should ban guns because that will cause a lot is fights or conflicts and then we won't have protection for our selves or others.

3. A solution that I have is we should make laws about guns so that we could still have guns for our protection

# data[].attributes.body
1. Jimmy Pacheco: This scar H can be bought by people that are 18 and older! People who think they should ban these type of guns should chill. if we do ban this gun it wouldn’t be fair to other people who own this type of gun!

# data[].attributes.body
1. I agreed with how she stated that there was been  too many tragic shootings and yet another one happened and all  the government can do is send they're prayers and thoughts.
2. One thing i disagreed with is how she called out the shooter in a kind of harsh manner and how she kinda insulted his family in a way and yes he did kill 17 people but he at least deserves some privacy about his problems.
3. A solution for this issue would be the government stepping up and doing something like making certain laws so that minorities and people with mental issues can't access weapons and they should register all weapons bought by people

# data[].attributes.body
1. The part that i agree on was when she said "that the government isn't doing enough on restricting guns.
2.The part i disagree on is when she called out the shooter in a very harsh manner and how she blamed all of his family members.
3.i think that a solution would be to have to rewrite the second amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
What ?

# data[].attributes.body
1. The point that I agreed with the most with the speech was that people that accept money from the National Rifle Association should be held more accountable and should be willing to speak in public about their views on gun violence instead of remaining silent.
2. I disagreed with her point that restricting access to guns would automatically equal peace. Prohibition of things (alcohol, cocaine, marijuana) has only led to more use and abuse.
3. I think one solution would be implement a system much like a Driver's License where people would be educated on guns and would have to pass certain tests to obtain certain types of firearms.