# data[].attributes.body
In response to the 77% of respondents who haven't used the video vignettes; I find that the students pay attention to the details of the video better and it's more concise than when I explain it to them.

# data[].attributes.body
We found it interesting that nearly 50% of respondents only occasionally connected their testing results to components of health-related fitness.

# data[].attributes.body
Students do use their data to help write fitness-related goals. Some students struggle with data interpretation.

# data[].attributes.body
There is a high percent of teachers that don't show the testing protocol videos in SmartCoach. I wonder if showing these videos would help increase the fidelity of test protocols?

# data[].attributes.body
Would Fitnessgram be willing to actually modify which tests are included for Muscular Strength/Endurance?

# data[].attributes.body
Administering these tests with fidelity is almost impossible at the elementary level.

# data[].attributes.body
We are all very familiar with how to administer and score the Fitnessgram components. And it is easy to report scores and give those scores back to the students.

# data[].attributes.body
It is interesting that only 22.6% of teachers use the SmartCoach videos to help explain fitnessgram and health related concepts to students.

# data[].attributes.body
What is this philosophy you call H.E.L.P.?

# data[].attributes.body
Most people agree that FitnessGram data does help make a decision on their Instructional lessons.

# data[].attributes.body
18.9% of respondents can finish the FITNESSGRAM testing in 1-2 class periods- I'd like to know who is able to do this with fidelity at the elementary level.

# data[].attributes.body
Everyone agrees that the curl up test is too difficult to administer with fidelity. Couldn't we universally agree to use a different test ex: flex arm hang as a measure of muscular endurance instead and not report on Curl ups for the Fitnessgram.

# data[].attributes.body
Surprised to see how many felt testing window time was reasonable. Especially at the elementary level.

# data[].attributes.body
We feel like the program is very user friendly.

# data[].attributes.body
Surprised to see that only 52.8%  of teachers have used the SmartCoach resources.

# data[].attributes.body
We felt like the fidelity issue is tough because of the amount of time we have and the amount of ways that students can "cheat" the different assessments

# data[].attributes.body
Surprised that only 11.3% of surveyors thought that the testing window was too short

# data[].attributes.body
We noticed that 62% of respondents said they were testing with fidelity, but only 28% have used the smart coach resources. This seems like a possible disconnect.

# data[].attributes.body
Most of the people who took the survey were familiar with the program and how to use it.