# data[].attributes.body
1. I think a historical event is important and worthy to be remembered based upon the amount of people affected by it.
2. I don't think an important historical event must represent ideals or be symbolic. Some events happen for a very stupid reason but are still very influential to today. (like WW1)
3. Important events should have consequences and effects.
4. I think an important event can be devisive, and i think it has to be. Everyone can argue of the past and have different opinions but that doesn't mean that they won't learn an important lesson from the event.
5. I don't think the event has to have global repercussions, but I think it has to have affected a somewhat large amount of people.
6. I think 911 will be important because it really started the US's war on terrorism which has been really important in the last twenty years and has defined US politics as well as life in the middle east.

1. the official reason is that Russia is still so divided from the revolution but the real reason is probably that the nation's rulers hate the idea of revolution and celebrating it.
2. the kremlin states that the problems of the government are from western agressors, but the official history of the revolution is that the German affairs as well as distrust between the upper class caused the war which puts the russians at fault which they don't like.
3.Historical schitzoprenia might indicate that we are over paranoid about what happened in our past and what the population knows about that. I think Russia is portrayed pretty badly because the USSR only fell less than 30 years ago and you can't just nock down every statue to be built during that era in which people valued different things. I don't think the United States is very closed off about it's history and allows its citizens to make there own decisions about what happened and what it meant

# data[].attributes.body
1.If a historical event is going to be famous it needs to be big. Something that affects a lot of people or lasted for a long time. Weather it causes great suffering or ends it. Something that changes society or the world
2.It doesn't have to be symbolic, doesn't mean that it cant be but just because it impacts people doesn't make it symbolic.
3. I think there will be either consequences or effects to a important historical event That depends on what it is but it should in some way effect people or society.
4.Hopefully there aren't any divisive events but they happen. It could go either way or both.
5.It's not necessary for an event to have global repercussions, however it still could. It could still be very important but still on affect one country.
6. In the past 20 years there have been numerous terrorist attacks such as 9/11 and the paris Belgium attacks, which will definitely be remembered in 100 years. However I think the most remembered events will be the ozone layer hole or extreme weather disasters caused by global warming. These will be remembered because in 100 years global warming will be prominent in society and effecting everyone.
Article Questions:
1. The official reason for the Kremlin plan is because Russia is divided from the revolutions. However it is more likely that it is in place because Vladimir is scared that people will revolt against him
2. The Kremlin plan only focuses on the successful parts of Russian history because they want people to believe their amazing. The revolution doesn't fit into that history because it was a bad time for the government since they were overthrown.
3. Historical schizophrenia is the idea that they are afraid of what happened in the past and of it happening again. So they ignore bad things that happened in the past. I would say there isn't really any historical schizophrenia in the united states. Yet you could argue that the removal of monuments of figures that where part of the confederacy is some type of historical schizophrenia.

# data[].attributes.body
1. A historical event is worth remembering because it usually affects a certain population whether if its good or bad. The impact can either be big or small, for example the civil war impacted African Americans in the United States by giving them freedom from slavery. That was a very big impact for African Americans because they finally had more freedom then they ever had in America.
2. The event may be symbolic depending on what the event was, and it should represent larger ideals.
3.  Yes it should have consequences depending if it hurts any group of people or there ideas.
4. It can be both, since our world has so many different peoples with different mindsets, not everyone is going to agree on everything. So there may be people that may contradict the event and what it stands for. But that being said it can also help people come together, especially if it benefits many people or even our world.
5. I think it still depends on the event, but usually I feel that it should not have global repercussions.
6. An event that maybe important is President Barack Obama becoming president, since he was the first black african american to become president.
___________________________________

1.  The nation is still divided from the results, but it also explains that the Putin doesn't want people to think he can be overthrown
2. Kremlin prefers the narrative of a united, strong, smoothly working Russia. He's going to show how much world war II is beneficial.
3. I think it means that people see things, but can't do anything about it.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think for an event to be important and worthy of remembering decades later it has to change the course of history. It has to either offend many people or help a lot a people, and it just has to change many lives.
2. The event may be symbolic, and I think it should represent larger ideals. Many events have happened because of a groups ideas.
3. The event doesn't always have to have noteworthy consequences or effects. Most of them need to, but in some cases someone does something amazing and they do not have noteworthy consequences or effects. But usually, an event is remembered because of how affected people, good or bad.
4. The event could be unifying or divisive. A unifying event would be remembered for helping a country/people, but a divisive event could be remembered as causing more events. But either way both still affect the people that were involved.
5. I do not think the event has to have global repercussions. Many important events only affected a few country or places, but they are still very important.
6. 9/11 is an obvious answer, because it changed the relationships between countries and people majorly. It also took many people's lives, and because of that many people are scared/cautious of people of middle eastern descent.
1. The official reason is because many people's feelings still remain very divided over what happened. The more likely reason is that Putin does not want to celebrate a revolution. He doesn't want an event where the people overthrew the government to be rejoiced over, probably because he doesn't want it to happen to him.
2.  The Kremlin want to cut out the revolution because it ruins their perfect history and they think it isn't something to be proud of.
3. I think he is saying that they don't actually know what happened it their history. They do not know what is made up and what happened. I think this can happen when a government wants to change what happened because they don't want this to happen. I think this happens in United States history also, I don't have an exact moment.

# data[].attributes.body
1. In my opinion , for a historical event to be important and worthy of remembering, it means that it affected the world. To me a historical event impacts lives of people, and helps the world learn from their past mistakes.
2. Yes, I believe that that the historical event should represent something symbolic.  But if the event had/has a negative impact on the world then to me it is not a good idea to remember an event because of the negative aspects.
3. Yes, the event should have consequences. Like I said before, if it impacted the world negatively , then the consequences would be something like war, or death penalty. Or if the event did not hold significance there should not be a heavy consequence.
4. Yes. I think that it is a great idea for an event to be unifying . The lessons we learn from historical events should unify us as a country so that later in the future we can learn from our mistakes.
5. I think that the event should not necessarily have global repercussions. Every country takes their own matter into their own hands, so I would let their leader/pres. make that decision.
6. I think that 9/11 will most certainly be a part of our society and world and still be remembered throughout the remaining years.  9/11 is a memorable time in history because it effected lives and family relationships very very negatively.
__________________________________
1. The Kremlin planned to sit out of the centenary because their country is  divided so much that they are afraid of the damage it would cost between the two other countries. The official explanation is that Russia remained too divided over the years.
2. The Kremlins preferred narrative of Russian history is Color Revolution. The West had been trying to sponsor the color revolution. Russia did not fit well into this type of revolution because their heroic leaders did not fit the wanted figure. Their leader also does not want Russias perfect society to be ruined because of the revolution. He wants to keep that united front.
3. The phrase "historical schizophrenia" means  that a lot of people have forgotten what is really going on in Russia. Or that most people are losing their knowledge and getting too caught up in what they think is supposed to happen. Yes, I think that many other countries have lost their historical schizophrenia. Like the US, with all of the drama with the gov. shutting down people have lost their minds getting hooked in on Trump.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think a historic event becomes worthy of remembering when it has a greater effect on the world and has aspects that are likely to recur in the future.
2. The event should symbolize a common pattern or idea among mankind, such as the French Revolution symbolizing the importance of people having power.
3. The event should have an important effect or consequence so that people can learn from it and hopefully not make the same mistake/continue to do what was successful. This is really about being aware of important decisions/events and their effects on the rest of the world.
4. I think a historical event could be divisive or unifying, because both need to be reflected upon in order to learn from them.
5. The event could still be significant and have only local or national repercussions, but not affect on the whole world. However, the term historic event includes global occurrences, but is not limited to them in my opinion.
6. I think the United States pulling out of the Paris Agreement on climate change will be considered important, because the US is a leading nation, and our government has begun to neglect its duty to preserve the earth.
-----------------------------------------------------------
1. The official reason for not celebrating the Russian Revolution is that the nation is still divided over its results, but the more likely reason is that Putin doesn't want people to think about/celebrate revolutions out of fear that he himself could be overthrown.
2.  Kremlin prefers the narrative of a united, strong, smoothly-running Russia, and attempts to prove this to people by emphasizing the success of World War II.
3. "Historical schizophrenia" is interesting because it implies that people have lost sight of reality. I think that in some ways this is true in Russia, thought some people are actually trying to analyze the history and form opinions based off of that. I think it does exist in America too, and I think it is mostly caused by all of the outside influences and factors such as where one lives. I think some people view most events in history as all negative or all positive based on politics or other factors, rather than being realistic and looking at the event as a whole.

# data[].attributes.body
- A historic event leaves a mark on the world once the consequences impact a significant number of people, either negatively or positively. If many people are killed, disrupting the well-being of many families across the globe, it will be a well remembered event. If small changes occur in society then the event will be less memorable.
- For the event to hold true significance, it has to hold some sort of deeper meaning. It may symbolize freedom or gaining of new rights. But that's not the only characteristic of an event being memorable decades later.
- Yes, the event should be caused by a valid reason, not over smaller feuds or anger among nations. The consequences must impact humanity greatly in order for people to think it's important. Humans are selfish and many think that if something doesn't effect them then it's not important.
- Either way, if it's unifying or divisive, it will change society and draw in attention. Being divisive could benefit in the want for unification in the future.
- Since many Americans are incredibly provincial, it may not be necessary for the event to have global repercussions. But they certainly would emphasize how important the matter is.
- After the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the NSA's breach of US citizen's security will continue to be important to our society because of the large scare that it caused across the nation and the madness followed by it. Many other things following the attacks fuel the want for better security and as technology advances, the NSA and our government will always be keeping a close eye on us and the rest of the world for an extended period of time.

Article:
1.) The reason for the Kremlin wanting to skip the 100th anniversary of the Russian Revolution is because Russia is still divided from the impacts of that dark year. Vladimir would also be disgusted by actually celebrating revolution and the Kremlin respects the ideas of the previous leader.
2.) The Kremlin doesn't want his quintessential image of a smooth, strong "march to greatness" to be ruined because of the idea of division. He prefers to show that Russia has had nothing but success and great fortune, when really this revolution revealed the opposite among the Russian society.
3.) The use of "historical schizophrenia" is very interesting because it validly represents a sign of these times in Russia. These experiences that seem out of touch with reality aren't only relevant in Russia, but all over the world. Our world society is disorganized and constantly battling with so many thoughts or possibilities. The fact we can all find a way to communicate with one another about our ideals and wants seems to be a hard concept to grasp. Diversity is very relevant when considering things today in our every day lives even when we aren't directly involved with others.

# data[].attributes.body
A historic event obviously is supposed to be remembered because it could show the world later that this event was game changing for probably anybody. Most historical event can be symbolic but others may not be very symbolic but if they are they could hold a lot of meaning. usually there should be noteworthy consequences or effects because sometimes there could be things that we could learn from. sometimes some historical event can be unifying but others can actually be divisive like is a country broke away from another? Is this how I'm supposed to answer this one?  Maybe it can have global repercussions but they don't have to? I don't have any idea of what event that could be remembered in 100 years.
Second Part Russian Revolution questions
1). maybe there shouldn't be a holiday that celebrates Russia turning into a communist country? Maybe they don't like parties?
2) Kremlin doesn't want domestic discord so maybe that's the reason why?
3) there was also not many heroic figures that participated in the Russian Revolution. the western Revolutions were more colorful and happier and friendlier than the Russian Revolution. I'm not sure if I'm answering this right.

# data[].attributes.body
1. A historical moment is memorable years later, when a mistake is made and we need to learn from it. This may include a war or a treaty.
2. The event could be bad, but for most events to hold importance the country needed to gain something like land, money, power, or rights.
3. The event needs to hold significance and not be notable if the cause of the event was not significant.
4. If the event was bad, I believe it should be unifying for our country, because we should learn from our mistakes.
5. I do not think it is necessary to have global repercussions because if we have learned from the mistake we do not need to extend consequences.
6.   I believe most of the teriost attacks like 9/11 and the Paris shootings will be important 100 years from now because it had an impact on our country as a whole and we had to unify afterward.
_____________________________________
1. The Kremlin plan stays within Russia because the country is divided and they want  avoid the conflict between the two countries.
2. The Kremlin plan's preferred narrative is through a color revolution, I believe. It does not fit because Putin does not want to celebrate an overthrow of a ruler.
3. I believe the phrase, “We live in historical schizophrenia,” means the Russians cannot think because of History and the past mistakes and religion, the country and the people are caught up in war.  The country is always changing and so are our views.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Historical events are important to remember because it allows people to learn from our past mistakes. If we know what not to do, then we we won't have to repeat bad events.
2.  I think that events should be symbolic to represent bigger ideas and hold another meaning.
3. I think the event should have consequences or effects because we need to learn from our mistakes. By receiving consequences, we learn what not to do.
4. I think the event should be unifying to allow everyone to come together and make a decision. It will allow us to come together and learn.
5. I think that event should global consequences if everyone takes part in it and to allows us to learn. I don't think that it should negatively affect everyone though.
6. I think that 9/11 will be remembered 100 years from now.  It really especially be remembered by Americans because it took place in the US. The event was horrible and brought everyone together. Also, I think the world will remember it because it was a traumatic event for everyone and unified the world.

1. The Kremlin plans to sit out the centenary of the Russian Revolution because Russia is divided. The more likely explanation is that Vladimir Putin hates the idea of revolution.
2. The Kremlin narrative of Russian history is due to a color revolution. It doesn't fit into the narrative because Putin doesn't want to encourage the fact that a leader overthrew another ruler.
3.  I believe that "We live in historical schizophrenia," means that we aren't able to think clearly and can't move on from the past. I somewhat agree because living in the past prevents us from moving on, but sometimes, it allows us to not make mistakes again, so we should remember our history.

# data[].attributes.body
1. If the event changed the outcome of our world today or if it was important to how we live our lives today.

2. I think events should be symbolic to express a bigger meaning.

3. Yes if it has important noteworthy concept then it will be more important and more people would know about it

4. The event should be unifying, for society today and into the future because it should have a good effect on the world and be remembered today.

5. I don't think it is that important for the event to have global repercussions because there should be equal rights and freedom and people have the choice to follow what they want.

6. 9/11 will be remembered in 100 years because it was a very devastating and important part of our history.

ARTICLE
1. Russia is still separate and divided from what happened that year. He also wants to avoid a revolution from happening.

2. He doesn't want his reputation to change because of his idea of change and his idea of division. HE wants to show everyone how great Russia is but the revolution would change this.

3. It means that you are afraid of changes and what will come/the past.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think a historic event becomes worthy and important is determined by how many people were effected. I think our past mistakes help us now, so we do not do the same thing now or in the future. Whether the event was a positive or negative part in our society, I think no matter what someone is affected and the amount of people affected determines hoe rememberable it is.
2. I think it depends on the event and It should represent larger ideals. I think if the idea is symbolized or signified it will make a greater change and impact in our society.
3. I think they should have consequences if people are affected negatively. If they do not have consequences they will never know if what they did was wrong to do and won't be able to learn from their mistakes. I think the effects of the event lead on to the consequences. Like I said above if the effects of the event is not a good outcome then there should be consequences or a form of discipline.
4. I think it can be both. Some events can bring people together as a whole or separate us farther apart. I think it's hard for everyone to agree on the same thing because we all have different opinions or someone whom we do not agree with.
5. I think yes it it affected many people in a bad way. I don't think the global repercussions should make people more stressed to worried, it should just be a warning that there are consequences to your actions.
6. An event from the past twenty years that I think people will remember in the next 100 years is 9/11. It is still such a memorable historic event that has happened. I think people will talk about this in the next 100 years because people are still cautious about terrorist and maybe even going on a plane.
____________________________

1. The Kremlin plan is there because Russia is already really divided and separated. I think he  was just trying to avoid being in a war.

2.Kremlin thinks the Russians are not humble against beating Germany. He was also does not want to divide the country farther apart.

3. I think it means that everyone is focused on the past. People are still making mistakes from the past and not learning from them. I also think that they are too worried or stuck on the past that they can't get passed it. I do agree with this because people were very blindsided and didn't think of what was going to happen afterward.

# data[].attributes.body
- Past historical events are important in today's society because past mistakes help us learn so we can move forward into the future with success.
- Events often are symbolic or represent one big idea.  Personally, I think that it should be symbolic because it is important to focus on the main idea and convey the basics of the argument.
- I believe that events should have noteworthy effects because, then, as a community, we can recognize our mistakes and strive not to make them again.
- I think past events should unify us in the future.  It may be difficult, but together we can learn and understand each other and, once again, become closer so we don't repeat past mistakes.
- I don't think the events should have global repercussions because 1) I don't feel anyone one be suitable to give the whole world consequences, and 2) who are we to decide that someone must be punished. I think the best way to move on is to talk about it, and then learn from the mistakes.
- I think the women's march in Washington D.C. will be remembered in 100 years because it is one way of recognizing and remembering people are sometimes mistreated and we need to work to continue to improve ourselves and society.

Article:
1. Kremlin plans to sit out the  centenary of the Russian Revolution because, officially, he thinks Russia is already too divided.  But in reality, it seems that he just wants to avoid a revolution.
2. Kremlin thinks that Russians are "dancing in the street" about their victory over Germany.  He strongly dislikes this idea, however, Russia had a great downfall after the war as well, so his idea is not backed up by evidence.
3. The phrase, “We live in historical schizophrenia,” means that we, as people, have lost touch with reality. I do agree with this idea of Russia because everyone was so caught up in war and war ending that they didn't recognize how they were going to be effected. Additionally, I think many other countries suffer from historical schizophrenia. I feel we frequently imagine and create unrealistic standards for our countries or misinterpret the past which leads to more mistakes in today's society.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Significant events include those that resulted in great change over a long period of time. To make a historical event important, it has to have an impact on people so they can remember the event for decades. If it has a big impact on society, it will be remembered by many people.
2. In my opinion, I think the event should be symbolic. Yes it should represent larger ideas by impacting people in a specific way.
3. In my opinion, I think the event should have noteworthy consequences and effects because you should have some consequences in life at some point. Also, it will be remembered by a greater number of people.
4. I think the event should be unifying for society today because the impact could last for a long time.
5. I don't think the event should have global repercussions but I do think there should be effects on a small group of individuals.
6. I think that 9/11 is a very important event because it has impacted and effected so many people and will never be forgotten.

Article:
1. In my opinion, they plan to sit out the centenary of the Russian revolution because President Putin loathes the idea of revolution. It seems he doesn't want dividing to happen.
2. They don't want division
3. I'm not 100% sure but maybe it means like you are stuck in the past and can't get out. Maybe they are afraid of change things because they are scared that bad things will come.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I believe that a historical event becomes worth of remembering if it affected a large amount of people or showed a big mistake to learn from.

2. I believe that the event does not always have to represent a big idea, but often times I find that is normally the case. I think if the idea is symbolic it will affect more people and can affect people to change what happened/expand on the idea.

3. I think that it would be better to learn from if it has noteworthy consequences because we would want to learn from them and we can see what they did wrong to fix it.

4. I believe that the event should be unifying in the future because in the end, we should all work together to fix all of the mistakes that are already tearing our world apart.

*Should the event have global repercussions? Or, is that not necessary?
5. I do not necessarily think the event should have global repercussions because many different nations take circumstances in many different ways, but I do think small groups of people should learn from it.

*Can you think of an event during the past twenty years that will be considered important 100 years from now?
6. I believe that 9/11 will be remembered because of the affect it had on many people and the devastating time it caused and how people worked to make it better. People also helped each other and felt sympathetic and worked to secure the country in a better manner, which affects the reactions of all people.

Article:
1. The official reason that the Kremlin plans to "sit out of the centenary of the Russian Revolution" is because that year left people with divided thought about the consequences of the year. The "more likely explanation" is that the President Putin is probably scared to let the country celebrate the takedown of a ruler.

2. The Kremlin's preferred narrative is that Russia has done really well, and the ideas of divisions over the revolution could prove the opposite, which he does not want.

3. I believe that the phrase means that they're so broken down over the consequences that they cannot move on because it causes too much pain. I think that this is present in Russia, but also all over the world. A lot of times, we focus so much on the bad things in the past and it divides people into different sides, but what we really need to be doing is moving on and learning, not continuing to argue about what people did hundreds of years ago.