# data[].attributes.body
I'm not big on micromanaging, so I think the best way is to share successes with your subject area team and to give explanation and help when asked.

# data[].attributes.body
This can be observed during evaluations and reinforces or given as areas of needed improvement

# data[].attributes.body
I am not sure. Maybe data collection.

Sowell

# data[].attributes.body
The evidence would be the work we are having them do, in the 4 core classes math would be the only one that might have some difficulty doing this, but could always have them write out the explanation to the problems they are solving.

# data[].attributes.headline
Maybe we can find a better word than monitor... encourage maybe? Ultimate evidence is always student success. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Maybe we can find a better word than monitor... encourage maybe? Ultimate evidence is always student success. 

# data[].attributes.body
I mean, will it ever be complete? Adults have saturation levels the same as kids do so maybe resources, tools and ideas dispersed gradually. Focus on one at a time, over a few months maybe, rather that 3-5.

# data[].attributes.headline
Not too sure maybe just talk to them and ask if they are using it.. we cant exactly force them

# data[].attributes.subject
Not too sure maybe just talk to them and ask if they are using it.. we cant exactly force them

# data[].attributes.headline
I am not sure i think they're is always room for growth so i think that this process is ongoing.

# data[].attributes.subject
I am not sure i think they're is always room for growth so i think that this process is ongoing.

# data[].attributes.headline
this could be seen during an observation 

# data[].attributes.subject
this could be seen during an observation 

# data[].attributes.body
Make it an agenda item on the content/ grade level meetings. Have the conversations making it up and present at the surface level a somewhat reoccuring item every other month.

# data[].attributes.body
The evidence they provide the 1st semester and 2nd semester. Then we could take it and look at it as a campus site and then bring all campuses together and look at each others. This would measure us as a district and at each campus the level of AVID we are implementing. This could be completed in a Zoom meeting with us looking at uploads from our campus and the dictrict campuse.

# data[].attributes.body
Great use of SWIVL… upload using WICOR in our classroom, so non AVID teachers could see it in action. Then they upload one.

1st- Who would hold the teacher accountable to implementing WICOR in the classroom during observations? Do the observers have full buy-in to AVID and what is the evaluation… a check-off list?

2nd- Does this change how a teacher will be evaluated formally, or just not inviting the teacher to be part of the site team next year because they are not implementing WICOR?

# data[].attributes.headline
I would suggest Avid observations and student artifacts are the best evidence. This should not be part of the formal observation process but definitely walk through's / class observations by Corie or Dr. Tucker. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I would suggest Avid observations and student artifacts are the best evidence. This should not be part of the formal observation process but definitely walk through's / class observations by Corie or Dr. Tucker. 