# data[].attributes.body
I like how you guys have a slide explaining how you analyse the topic question! And split the impacts into political/economic/social etc

# data[].attributes.body
i love how you guys were very clear in terms of your analysis of the question, and your approach in answering the question! the perspectives you took were distinct and you compared various sub points (political, social, economic, environmental etc.) with sources which made it your argument very understandable and convincing

# data[].attributes.body
perhaps this does not have to do with your presentation, but since you touched on america failing to keep laos and cambodia from turning communist, i just wondered what were the actual reasons these two countries turned communist?

# data[].attributes.body
i think you did a great job overall, but maybe you could be a teensy bit clearer and mentioned right at the start and end that achieving one’s goal in warfare is the most important of all, because from your slides on the impacts vietnam seems to suffer more than america which may be slightly confusing to the audience

# data[].attributes.body
i like how you use extensive details to support your argument and also split it into political, economic and social aspects which made it very clear

# data[].attributes.body
i like how you guys had a very clear definition of the question! i think defining it well at that start made the presentation a lot easier to follow. good job!

# data[].attributes.body
i was wondering why your "economic" and "environmental" were grouped together... while i do see the correlation between the two, i think it would have been good if you could explore them separately as well! for instance, was there any economic impact for america without considering the environment (since you guys mentioned that it was not as detrimental for the economy as the war had taken place in vietnam)?

# data[].attributes.body
how did vietnam and america accomplish their objectives in the war (to what degree of success were they accomplished) as the impacts aren’t really linked to this

# data[].attributes.body
i think perhaps y'all could have linked the sources to your elaborations a bit more! (rather than having an elaboration and then presenting a source that does not directly link to it; bc if not it defeats the purpose of historical investigation!) but other than that, the presentation was very good!

# data[].attributes.body
Your analysis of the question was thorough and you guys were clear in your stance. It gave the presentation a clear sense of direction  and made the rest of it easy to follow

# data[].attributes.body
you can focus more on the extent to which each country accomplished its objectives in the war, and whether accomplishing such objectives was worth the cost, as this will make your argument stronger

# data[].attributes.body
- While I understand your metrics (and would probably have also used the same one) it's a bit over-simplified. While it is true both countries went to war with a certain objective,  to what extent were they willing to go for to achieve this?  Achieving the objective isn't exactly an inherent "good" and maybe explaining why the objective is more important than anything else would have been good!

# data[].attributes.body
when you weigh out, you can use more relative comparisons.  (Eg percentage of soldiers who died/ time required for economy to recover) You have many stats which is good! But they aren't relative so it's hard for us to understand who suffered "more" for the various aspects.  Overall good job though :)

# data[].attributes.body
I think it was lowkey abit messy like halfway through i wasn’t following that well because I think you guys explored different areas of warfare and kept cross-referring to Vietnam and America all over again, also some of the slides didn’t have headings so i had no idea what the context was sometimes haha

# data[].attributes.body
I think some of your parts could be more supported with sources and evidences, because the significant one I remembered was only agent orange and that was for social impact, the rest were not really quite so clear

# data[].attributes.body
i think your stance was made very clear right from the start and you gave a slight overview of everything, which made your points afterwards easy to pinpoint/ identify. the signposting and how you split your points also made everything very neat.

# data[].attributes.body
your evaluation was quite rushed and i feel like it could have been much more elaborated on, with much more analysis as to how each country managed to fulfil/ not fulfil their goal.

# data[].attributes.body
Achieving the political objectives /political impact were more important in assessing the overall winner in the presentation? Conclusion in presentation that Vietnam won. What about the high cost (more than USA as pointed out in presentation)
-Cost worth it? Hence conclude Vietnam won

# data[].attributes.body
Further explanation Economic impact and environmental impact

# data[].attributes.body
1. Inquiry questions were very clear

2. Discussed global implications (e.g. changed Laotian views of America, hence affected american prestige etc), sources were clear, overall well-organised information, statistics were clear and powerfully brought across their stands, very detailed

# data[].attributes.body
Perhaps you could discuss further about present-day implications?

# data[].attributes.body
It was an awesome presentation overall, you could improve it by perhaps cutting down your info and sources to less but more focused points, because i felt like there was a lot a lot of info + sources :)

# data[].attributes.body
you were very clear on your stance and point of view!

# data[].attributes.body
did other countries (eg. america) have a different view on who won the war?