# data[].attributes.body
Slate, sides with more liberal Americans.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Donald Trump's Tuesday press conference about his infrastructure plans quickly deteriorated into a defense of his initial response to the violent Charlottesville, Virginia, march, as well as of some of the marchers.

When Trump first started taking questions at Trump Tower this afternoon, he argued that his Saturday statement was vague in assigning blame because, "Unlike you, and unlike the media, before I make a statement, I like to know the facts." Once he knew the facts, he said, of course he was willing to condemn the Ku Klux Klan and white supremacists.

When reporters began to ask about whether the alt-right was behind the Charlottesville bloodshed, though, Trump unleashed a torrent of both-sides whataboutism and crankery.

"What about the alt-left that came charging at the-as you say, the alt-right? Do they have any semblance of guilt?" he asked.

And then the president of the United States began to defend some of the marchers, which gave way to a slippery slope argument about what happens if you begin removing statues of Robert E. Lee:

But not all of those people were neo-Nazis, believe me. Not all of those people were white supremacists, by any stretch. Those people were also there because they wanted to protest the taking down of a statue, Robert E. Lee. You look at some of the groups and you see-you know it if you are honest reporters, which in many cases you are not-but many of the people were there to protest the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. This week it's Lee. I noticed that Stonewall Jackson is coming down. Is it George Washington next week, and Jefferson the week after?

Trump added that there were "some very fine people on both sides" at the protest, and that there was a peaceful march the night before.

Oh yeah, those good ol' marchers on Friday night.

So it seems like our president is back in Saturday statement mode. It's almost like he never really left it, despite his clean-up on Monday.

At least some people are happy.

Here's the full press conference:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Trump Says "Some Very Fine People" Participated in Charlottesville White Supremacist Rally

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Donald Trump's Tuesday press conference about his infrastructure plans quickly deteriorated into a defense of his initial response to the violent Charlottesville, Virginia, march, as well as of some of the marchers.

# data[].attributes.body
BBC, is an outsider perspectives on who the situation was handled.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Violent clashes have taken place between two groups of protestors in the American city of Charlottesville.

The trouble started early on Saturday when hundreds of people who belong to white supremacy groups came to the city to protest against the plans to remove a statue.

White supremacists believe that white people are better than other races.

Why has the statue been an issue?

The statue was of Robert E. Lee, a general who fought in the American Civil War over 150 years ago.

General Lee fought for the side that supported slavery, and owned slaves himself.

This year, the city council of Charlottesville voted to remove the statue because they didn't think they should celebrate General Lee anymore.

But white supremacist and Nazi groups, who think that removing General Lee's statue is an attack on the white race, began a protest against that decision.

What happened next?

Anti-racism groups arrived in Charlottesville to protest against the white supremacists, and violence broke out between the two groups.

A man drove a car into the anti-racism protesters - one woman was killed and 19 people were injured.

Emergency services arrived quickly to help, and a man has now been arrested.

Why is President Trump under attack?

US President Donald Trump has spoken out about the violence several times.

In his first comments, he condemned the violence by "many sides". He was criticised by many people - including some politicians from his own party, for not being firmer on the violence.

They said President Trump should have been clear straightaway that it was white supremacists who were in the wrong, and that the car being driven into the crowd was an act of terrorism.

He then spoke for a second time, saying "Racism is evil and those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs." He also said the group's behaviour was going against everything Americans valued.

But in his latest comments, President Trump again, blamed both sides for what happened. Many politicians in his own Republican party disagree with him and lots of people say they are strongly against what Donald Trump is saying.

Why is this such a big issue in the US now?

This was the biggest gathering of white supremacist groups in many years in the USA.

Donald Trump was criticised during last year's election for not being stronger in criticising racist groups which supported his campaign to be President.

He said he "disavowed" groups like these, which meant he didn't agree or want to be linked with them.

But the events in Charlottesville show once again how the US is deeply divided when it comes to race.

For more on how race affects America, watch this Newsround Special from 2015.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What's happening in Charlottesville? - CBBC Newsround

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Violent clashes have taken place between two groups of protestors in the American city of Charlottesville. The trouble started early on Saturday when hundreds of people who belong to white supremacy groups came to the city to protest against the plans to remove a statue.

# data[].attributes.body
The American conservative, Sides with conservative republicans in the country.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The allegation that the mainstream media disseminates "fake news" about the Trump administration often can seem overwrought, even a kind of caricature. Yet the nearly universal media response to President Trump's news conference at which he addressed the Charlottesville violence can only reinforce it. One day this response may make a rich subject for future historians analyzing it as earlier historians probed witch-burnings, pogroms, and other outbreaks of mass hysteria. They likely will focus on the spectacle of sophisticated, experienced, well credentialed people-Chuck Todd, Jake Tapper, Joe Scarborough, to name three of dozens-responding to Trump's comments on the tragic weekend as if they were, say, undergraduate social justice warriors at Middlebury College.

First, the transmission of facts, which might be the essential point of journalism. Trump approached the Trump Tower podium Tuesday afternoon hoping to talk about infrastructure. The media wanted to talk about Charlottesville (ignoring, not surprisingly, Chicago, where nine people were murdered over the weekend).

The meat of Trump's answer can be broken down into parts. First, he praised the young woman who was murdered, called the driver who ran her over a disgrace to his country, wasn't certain of the semantics whether he should be accused of terrorism or murder.

Second, he asked a reporter for a definition of the alt-right, a term probably as imprecise as "socialist"-and perhaps a reasonable way of expressing uncertainty about the actual center of gravity of a seemingly elastic group that includes such disparate ideological figures as Trump's own American nationalist aide Steve Bannon, the white nationalist Richard Spencer, and the neo-Nazis Spencer has invited into his tent. Third, he reaffirmed the statement he made on Saturday, condemning in the strongest possible terms bigotry and violence.

Then he fatefully threw out the red meat, denouncing what he called the "alt left," or "Antifa," which showed up in Charlottesville, without a permit, intending, as was evident to anyone paying attention to the group's past actions, on physically attacking those attending the alt-right demonstration. He reiterated his previous statement that there was "blame on both sides." He repeated his disdain for "neo-Nazis and white nationalists," saying they should be "condemned totally." Then he noted that some people had come simply to protest the taking down of the Robert E. Lee statue, erected over a hundred years ago.

So how did the media report this message, in which he singled out for condemnation white nationalists and neo-Nazis, lamented the violence on both sides, and posited that many people involved were "fine people" demonstrating for relatively normal things-that is, for the maintenance of a statue, or protesting against the alt-right's bigotry?

It was hard to miss. Headline after headline streaming on the news chyrons on CNN and MSNBC asserted that Trump had defended Nazis, while the transcript (and a video) shows plainly and unambiguously he had done nothing of the sort. Commentators on the two major cable channels were hysterical, some guests labeling Trump a white supremacist, wondering why Jared and Ivanka or the minority members of his administration had not abandoned him. A New York Times story records the "chills" experienced by Chuck Todd upon hearing Trump, the shock of Jake Tapper.

Joe Scarborough said on his TV show that congressional Republicans should essentially go on strike, telling the president they will not pass any legislation whatever until Trump convincingly assures them that he regrets his remarks. New York Times reporter Glenn Thrush on Morning Joe accused the president of being an anti-Semite who "besmirches and insults" the faith of Jews. The Times blatantly misrepresented Trump's remarks with a frontpage headline: "Trump Gives White Supremacists an Unequivocal Boost."

Trump had committed the unpardonable sin, in their eyes, of denouncing left wing extremism. Those who watched video of the event could see, quite plainly, that the antifa were intent on instigating violence, far more than the LARPing Nazis or pathetic Klansmen.

In his sometimes clumsy way, Trump was making the same point as New York Times reporter Sheryl Gay Stolberg, who was on the ground in Charlottesville covering the event. She noticed that the far left counter-protesters were intent on instigating violence and tweeted that "the hard left seemed as hate-filled as the alt-right. I saw club-wielding 'antifa' beating white nationalists being led out of the park." Later, perhaps sensing she was in danger of transgressing some sort of unofficial party line, she amended her thought. She added that the leftists were "violent, not hate-filled. They were standing up to hate." Of course, "standing up to hate" (of whites) is exactly what the alt right would say they are doing as well.

Stolberg's original tweet, and her need to amend it, are telling. There has been a huge upsurge i n left wing violence during the past year. At one extreme, a Bernie Sanders volunteer recently tried to murder the GOP congressional leadership, severely wounding Congressman Steve Salise. Murders of police officers are accelerating, in some cases cold blooded assassinations by Black Lives Matter supporters. Right wing speakers such as Ann Coulter, Milo Yiannopoulos, Charles Murray and Ben Shapiro are regularly prevented-by violence-from speaking on college campuses. Pro-Trump rallies have been cancelled under threat of leftist violence in "tolerant" Portland. Those attending a pro-Trump inaugural ball, "the Deploraball," were pelted by batteries and bottles and chants of "Nazi Scum" by the same antifa who were protesting in Charlotte. (My wife and I were among those targeted). The Deploraball organizers had in fact gone to considerable lengths to bar white nationalists from involvement in the planning or speaking; it was a pro-Trump, multicultural, and multiracial celebration. But for the antifa, and the vast swarm of left wing social justice warriors, any kind of Trump supporter is "Nazi Scum" by definition, people whose First Amendment rights to speak and gather should be denied.

It was probably Trump's awareness of this-an extremely important social fact sedulously ignored by vast legions of mainstream media-that prompted Trump to speak out against the violence of both sides. In doing so, he displayed a far more sophisticated understanding of the overall context of political violence in this country than the media mavens who ritually disdain him.

Scott McConnell is a founding editor of The American Conservative.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What Trump Got Right About Charlottesville

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The allegation that the mainstream media disseminates "fake news" about the Trump administration often can seem overwrought, even a kind of caricature. Yet the nearly universal media response to President Trump's news conference at which he addressed the Charlottesville violence can only reinforce it.

# data[].attributes.body
What's happening in Charlottesville? - CBBC Newsround. (2017, August 16). Retrieved February 08, 2018, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/40916141

McConnell • August 17, 2017, S. (2017, August 17). What Trump Got Right About Charlottesville. Retrieved February 08, 2018, from http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/what-trump-got-right-about-charlottesville/

Newell, J. (2017, August 15). Trump Says "Some Very Fine People" Participated in Charlottesville White Supremacist Rally. Retrieved February 08, 2018, from http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/08/15/trump_defends_charlottesville_marchers_in_press_conference.html