# data[].attributes.headline
GROUP 5 (Julius, Madeline, Eren, Marcel) 

# data[].attributes.subject
GROUP 5 (Julius, Madeline, Eren, Marcel) 

# data[].attributes.body
Group 2: Carol, Candria, Diva, Jonathan
A: 6
D: 7
Feedback:
The art analysis was quite specific and informative. They included the description of the principles of arts such as the colour composition and comparison to other arts.

Group 3: Marsha, Dyra, Gopas, Johanes
A: 7
D: 8
Feedback:
The analysis fulfilled all the criteria. They included the internal and external informations in detail. Furthermore, they included composition that explains about the possible location in this artwork.

Group 4: Audrey, Shareena,
A:
D:
Feedback:

Group 1: Mutia, Rara, Rafi, Hazael, Rakha
A: 7
D: 7
Feedback:
The analysis contains very beneficial informatios, included with the relation of the painter's life experience with the art piece. Additionally, the placement of the presentation is very structured.

# data[].attributes.body
Group 2:
A:
D:
Feedback:

Group 3:
A:
D:
Feedback:

Group 1:
A:
D:
Feedback:

Group 5:
A:
D:
Feedback:

# data[].attributes.body
Group 1: (Mutia, Rara, Rafi, Hazael, Rakha)
A: 7
D: 7
Feedback:
The critique and the analysis shows the group's understanding towards the concepts that were learned in class. It uses relevant terminologies, and does also explore the artwork in great detail, covering the essence of each explanation, which does fulfills both criterion and its strand.

Group 2: (Diva, Chandria, Carol, Jonathan)
A:  6
D: 7
Feedback:
- Criteria A: We think your group did an excellent job in demonstrating your knowledge and understanding of the artwork. You use terminologies such as elements of art (form, value, colour, line) and principles of design (emphasis, balance, rhythm) and your work is of original context. However, the presentation doesn't answer some of the questions that are already formatted into the presentation.
- Criteria D: We think your group has put a precise description of internal information of the artwork (subject matter, medium, and form) as well as external information, such as the biography of the artist. It also has sufficient interpretation, judgement based from the artwork, and has compared the painting to another artwork.

Group 4: (Audrey and Shareena Anastasya)
A:
D:
Feedback:

Group 5: (Julius, Madeline, Eren, Marcel)
A: 6
D: 6
Feedback:

# data[].attributes.headline
GROUP 1(Mutia, Rara, Rafi, Hazael, Rakha)

# data[].attributes.subject
GROUP 1(Mutia, Rara, Rafi, Hazael, Rakha)

# data[].attributes.body
Group 2: (Diva, Candria, Carol, Jonathan)
A: 6
D: 7
Feedback:
For criteria A, there were some incorrectly used terminologies in the presentation. They were some mistakes that are not that hard to spot because it break the flow of the text. For criteria D, there is detailed information about the art work, they covered topics such as the medium and how the art work is created and laid out.

Group 3: (Marsha, Dyra, Gopas, Johanes)
A: 7
D: 7
Feedback:
For criteria A, they utilize the correct vocabulary regarding the topic and are able to describe the work with the correct terms which creates a good flow. For criteria D, they properly explain the composition of the art work and are able to create their own interpretation of the work.

Group 4:
A:
D:
Feedback:

Group 5: (Julius, Madeline, Eren, Marcel)
A:
D:
Feedback:

# data[].attributes.body
To make sure everyone would get the grade as fair as possible,
Each one of you will write INDIVIDUALLY in google form
Each group member's contribution in percentage.
(for example: Kania 20%, Tania 10%, Zania 30%, Sania 20%, Rania 20%, = total 100%. Note: This is confidential, between each one of you and ibu Kania )

https://goo.gl/forms/c2nizbfQwBG63eOx1

# data[].attributes.body
0 | The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors below.
1 — 2
+incomplete description of internal information of the artwork (subject matter, medium, and form) and external information (contextual understanding)
+simple Interpretation based on some of the information
+no Judgement
3 — 4
+simple description of internal information of the artwork (subject matter, medium, and form) and external information (contextual understanding)
+simple Interpretation based on some of the information
+Judgement (based on personal opinion)
5 — 6
+Description of internal information of the artwork (subject matter, medium, and form) and external information (contextual understanding)
+Interpretation based on the information
+Judgement (based on standard, convention, theory, or comparison with other artwork)
7 — 8
+Detailed description of internal information of the artwork (subject matter, medium, and form) and external information (contextual understanding)
+Comprehensive Interpretation based on the information
+Judgement (based on relevant standard, convention, theory, Or comparison with other artwork)

# data[].attributes.body
0 | The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors below.
1 — 2
The student demonstrates limited knowledge and understanding of the artwork, limited use of subject-specific terminology, demonstrates limited understanding of the role of the artwork in original context.
3 — 4
The student demonstrates adequate knowledge and understanding of the artwork, adequate use of subject-specific terminology, demonstrates adequate understanding of the role of the artwork in original context.
5 — 6
The student demonstrates substantial knowledge and understanding of the artwork, substantial use of subject-specific terminology, demonstrates substantial understanding of the role of the artwork in original context.
7 — 8
The student demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of the artwork, excellent use of subject-specific terminology, demonstrates excellent understanding of the role of the artwork in original context.

# data[].attributes.body
Each group will try to evaluate the other 5 groups using the Task Specific Clarification.
Each group will also give feedbacks.

# data[].attributes.headline
GROUP 2 (Diva, Candria, Carol, Jonathan)

# data[].attributes.subject
GROUP 2 (Diva, Candria, Carol, Jonathan)

# data[].attributes.body
Group 1: (Mutia, Rara, Rafi, Hazael, Rakha)
A: 7
D: 8
Feedback:
For criterion A, We think your group did a great job in elaborating the work of art and your judgement of the work of art is interesting. However, we think that the you can add and elaborate more on the principle of design such as the harmony. For criterion D, we think you guys did a great job. Overall, brilliant work.

Group 3 (Marsha, Dyra, Johanes, and Gopas)
A: 5
D: 8
Feedback:
- Criterion A: We think your group did a good job in elaborating in everything that you mentioned in the critique. However, we are confused with the overall structure of the critique especially in the internal information. There are some parts of the inerpretation, elements of art, and principle of design that are still mixed together and jumbled up. We think it is better if you make a more coherent structure to the critique. Other than that,  the painting itself is not a pure realism because it has the object of a supernatural being, Tuyul. So, we think that the painting is actually surrealist painting because realist painting does not include any imaginary things especially supernatural beings. Other than that, the painting itself is not a symmetrical painting, it is assymetrical, but the composition placement is balance, which is why it looks symmetrical. Your group needs to elaborate more on that. Finally, there are some elements of art and principles of art that are not mentioned in the critique,.
- Criterion D;
We think you guys did a marvelous job on the interpretation and it is very intriguing to read the intrepretation and your judgements. Keep up the good work!
Overall, your group need to work on the structuring, but we give a standing ovation for the interpretation.

Group 4:
A:
D:
Feedback:

Group 5 (Julius, Madeline, Eren, Marcel)
A: 6
D: 5
Feedback:
- Criterion A: Your group did an okay critique, but we feel there is much more to elaborate in this painting such as the principles of art and some elements of art that are missing.  The structure is also very incoherent and confusing to read for the analysis. We believe your group should do a deeper  analysis and elaborate more. However, despite the flaws, we enjoyed reading the biography because your group did a nice job in elaborating the artist and the influence of his work.
- Criterion D:
We read the part where you made comparison with other artworks and artist. However, we did not see the judgement or your opinion on the artwork itself. Your judgement should be explicitly elaborated since this is an art critique not an art analysis only.
Overall, work on the flow and  structure of the analysis and add the judgement at the end of the analysis. Other than that, we also liked the creativity in creating the website. Keep on progressing!