# data[].attributes.body
The "x" and "y" numbers on the pattern match the points on the graph. When we added more it was more steep on the graph, but when we added less it was less steep.

# data[].attributes.body
they all start at the same amount except fig 4

# data[].attributes.body
they all go up by 4 except the last one

# data[].attributes.body
2x in the last rule makes the last one deformed

# data[].attributes.body
1, 2, 3, are parallel, 4 starts and the same starting value as 3 but does not grow as fast.

# data[].attributes.body
the first three started with 4x and it made the graph go up at more of a slant and the last one

# data[].attributes.body
patterns 1,2,and3 went up by 4, which made it steeper than going up by 2.

# data[].attributes.body
(a good friend)
they all matched unless you got it wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
In the rule the number in front of x was how much tiles each figure number was going up by

# data[].attributes.body
Rules, 1,2,and 3 all have 4x. That means the tables all go up by 4's. The graph therefore, will have the lines would all be parallel. Just with different starting points. They with stay parallel because of the growth of 4.

# data[].attributes.body
I saw that the added number at the end was what was in figure 0 and the number of x's was how much it went up by each time.

# data[].attributes.body
In the rule the number told us that's what it starts out at and the amount of x is what we add on every time. Some of the graphs have the same amount of starting tiles like tile pattern 3, and 4.

# data[].attributes.body
I saw that the rule, the table, and graph were all alike. The graph and the table showed how it grew by 4 and 2. Using the table, you could figure out how much it went up by. But the rule, was the best resource to use. You could figure out what figure 0 was and how much it went up by. Making it easier to figure out how to make the figure numbers