# data[].attributes.body
I like blending various models to meet various needs, therefore, "what I want/don't want in an instructional model" would depend on all kinds of factors.  It strikes me that the better a teacher deeply understands their content, their students' needs, and the resources available, the more effective a teacher would be at personalizing the learning for students.  There is a lot to think about/consider!

# data[].attributes.body
I like several models. I think some grade levels and content areas are better suited for some models. I think various models allow teachers to choose a framework that meets their teaching style.

# data[].attributes.body
I like all of the models and I believe that they all can play a significant role in a classroom.  I believe that a some of the models are better suited for certain content areas and grade levels.  The best things about all of this is the flexibility and choice that both the teacher and student has.

# data[].attributes.body
Teachers have to be organized and prepared in order to deliver this, but once those items are in place it can be done.  They must be familiar with content, and be flexible in that students have choices over their own learning.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the variety of instructional models presented here and the PPT that shows how they might be blended together to meet the needs of the teacher and students. It's a great visual for teachers. However, teachers need to know each of the models deeply in order for that to be implemented effectively.
Cara Miller

# data[].attributes.body
I like the openness to mix and match components.  I think that promotes a greater success and usage of each component.
With each component, there needs to be a clear purpose and focus. Any component can end up with a less than desirable result if used without thought

# data[].attributes.body
Depending on the teacher and the level of management they have in their classroom they can use the models to ensure that each student is receiving targeted instruction.

# data[].attributes.body
Refleciton here

# data[].attributes.body
I enjoyed reading about the data and reflection piece.  This is so important for our students to be able to articulate why they are learning the information and how they know that they have mastered.     Also, teacher reviewing the data is key to success.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the descriptions and visual models in the PPT to show the different models in action. I can think of speciifc teachers on my can use the various models in their classroom.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the examples for teachers to see how it can work in their classroom. I worry that teachers will get too caught up in having kids doing the different stations and there won't be clear objectives or data driven instruction. It needs to be more explicit in the description of whole group and small group time.

# data[].attributes.body
The Tool helps guide thinking as we observe the teachers and students in action. It provides us with information and

# data[].attributes.body
The tool has helped guide me as I coach teachers and help them plan their PL/BL implementation. It has provided me with a place to start with them and given me a resource to look at as we continue our work with our teachers.

# data[].attributes.body
This tool can easily guide a discussion with teachers about their BL/PL implementation. The look-fors can easily be used to celebrate what teachers are already doing well and ideas for next steps for each teacher.

# data[].attributes.body
The Coaching tool would have worked fairly well. It is a little hard without the context of the whole lesson, but I would have still had good questions to ask the teacher had I just observed this portion of the lesson

# data[].attributes.body
It is evident that we strive to support our administration with their goals however it is also clear that support at the teacher level is critical. I think we need to be clear about what our vision is so that we can provide powerful PD that supports our teachers.

# data[].attributes.body
The survey results indicate that support moving forward is critical. The free response questions offer great ideas for next steps... we need to communicate our vision and allow for meaningful PD so that teachers and administrators feel equipped to move forward.

# data[].attributes.body
I think this tool would also be helpful for teachers to have.

# data[].attributes.body
Station rotation with targeted pull-out and Flex Playlists + Stations are my favorit models for the classroom. Concerns around the Flipped model is accessibility and support outside of the school. The idea of creating and sharing playlists within the district is intriging. Using Master Checklists is a good idea for coaching.

# data[].attributes.body
I think these components are valuable because they "give permission" to change the delivery model to individual-centered rather than w hole group.  Some people need that encouragement to change their teaching style.

# data[].attributes.body
We have a tradition of excellent, but always have room to grow and modernize. Our willingness to grow is what also makes us strong.

# data[].attributes.body
This tool helps coaches focus their observations when visiting classrooms. I agree with Monica that our teachers should have this to reflect on their instruction.

# data[].attributes.body
I really like this tool for teachers and coaches. Teachers can get a better picture of areas that they can implement in their classroom or questions they need to ask themselves or students.

# data[].attributes.body
As we moved forward with blended learning, we need to continue to provide support and training for all teachers. It is necessary for student success.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that the tool helps to provide a focus when visiting classrooms and conferencing with teachers. I

# data[].attributes.body
The Core 4 Document allows for teachers to be flexible, review data and also to add the digital component.  I like how the paper is written with steps on how to do different items in order to be successful.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the flexibility that is built into the models. Teachers are able to select a model that they feel works for them, at this time, and revise it as they move forward with personalized learning.

# data[].attributes.body
It is evident that our teachers need continued support with blended learning.  Students will need this in order to be successful.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the adjustment to flexible tools. Digital content can palsy an important role, but it allows teachers to offer hands-on and/or real-world tasks to the Core 4.

# data[].attributes.body
Love the updates to the CORE 4, especially the change from digital content to flexible content. I like that the flexible content included integrating content areas (i.e. ELA/Social Studies).   I also like the Potential First Steps list. The Student Reflection section can be expanded and elaborated upon. As noted, reflection is a long term endeavor that requires a solid understanding of students and must be modeled...I find that some teachers are perplexed on how to mentor students in this area. I may be unaware of additional help documents available in this area. Due to being listed last and seemingly explained in less detail, some readers may not ever "get to" this vital area.

# data[].attributes.body
Teachers are feeling positive vibes on their campuses. A focus appears to be on how to support sites, administrators, and our teachers with PL and maximize that positive vibe and impact with students.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the adjustment fro digital content to flexible content. It gives teachers more opportunities to incorporate a variety of learning tools in the classroom.

# data[].attributes.body
Looking back on this survey helps me recognize the progress we are making towards PL. More and more teachers are trying to embrace personalized learning even if it doesn't always refelct a specific model.

# data[].attributes.body
The adjustment from digital content to flexible content makes a big difference. Many teachers were stuck on the idea of having to have their students on a computer interacting with their content, this allows teachers to offer the hand-on and real-world experience which builds 21st century skills.

# data[].attributes.body
The updates are definitely inline with our belief system of being flexible and responsive to our students and teachers, their needs, and the available tools and resources to support them.

# data[].attributes.body
The guiding document is a great tool to use in order to assist with coaching teachers.

# data[].attributes.body
This is a great shift and allows for a wider variety of tools to be incorporated. I think the shift will be less overwhelming for teachers overall.

# data[].attributes.body
We need to continue to support our teachers as we move forward with blended and personalized learning.

# data[].attributes.body
It's only what we're listening for, it's also how it's being said/relayed, and those nonverbal cues. The whole picture is going to help us in providing support.

# data[].attributes.body
The labels used to describe three types of content are new to me. I like the idea of looking more deeply at contnet and categorizing it as Foundational (Must do), Flexible, or Highly Customizable

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the flexibility is an important aspect. I think this will encourage teachers to use the most effective content to achieve their goals.