# data[].attributes.body
I believe that hale is the most effective since hale measures heath over the years.

# data[].attributes.body
I think HALE is the most effective indicator, because it not only takes into account the avg lifespan but also the avg health-span of a population. Unlike the other indicators like infant mortality may not be as representative of an entire population's health due its specificity.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Sanitation is the best indicator bec

# data[].attributes.body
I think that access to sanitation is the most effective indicator because it has strong correlations with other indicators like access to clean water and level of healthcare, plus it is one of the easier ones to quantify and set goals for (e.g. raise access to 95% of population). However, it doesn't account for regional disparities or the quality.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that HALE is the most effective as unlike life expectancy which considers all years, HALE weights the year of life by health status. Furthermore, it measures both the quantity and the quality of life.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that HALE is the most effective because it takes into account more than one indicator in order to health. It also uses sex specific data as well as age- specific data.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe HALE is the most effective as it takes into account both quantity and quality of life and weighs in health status and also takes into account of people living with disease. Whereas, other indicators such as maternal mortality rate only focuses on one aspect and doesn't take into consideration of other things.

# data[].attributes.body
Probably hale because it not only shows quantity but also quality of life and may give indicators of specific groups of people in a given population living with disease. also unlike others it takes into account all of the population regardless of age gender like infant mortality or maternal mortality

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, HALE is the most effective indicator. This is because it considers many factors when calculating the overall score. It also considers quantitative and qualitative factors which means it considers the quality and quantity of life. other indicators such as maternal/infant mortality are not composite and are just qualitative.

# data[].attributes.body
HALE is the most effective as it takes into account a variety of factors such as age, gender, data and mortality data.
It not only measures quantity but quality of life as well.

# data[].attributes.body
i think HALE is the best indicator because it considers the diseases that people have, and how much it decreases the lifespan of the population. Other indicators, such as infant mortality rate, is too specific to one demographic, and doesn't give us a holistic impression of a country.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that HALE , health adjusted life expectancy is effective as it is a composite indicator which measures age and sex specific health data as well as age and sex specific mortality data. It includes all ages in the demographic as well as genders. It covers the whole population and measures the health of a population as a whole, and measures it on a regional/national scale

# data[].attributes.body
I belive that HALE is the most effective as it is one of the only composite indicators whereas other indicators only focus on one aspect of health. Eg. an indicator like doctors per 1000 does not take into account the quality of healthcare received.