# data[].attributes.body
Good explanations and good supporting ideas

# data[].attributes.body
For can. He can write authors' surname and year of published. Good conclusion
For said. Very good link ideas

# data[].attributes.body
*Text should be more clear with giving evidences.

# data[].attributes.body
He used his own words clearly.

# data[].attributes.body
Using various vocabulary provides to give the main idea better

# data[].attributes.body
In the article,“Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity”, the authors  (Stazyk,Moldovanova,Frederickson (2014) mentions what is the definition, history and three pillars (environmental, economic and social) of sustainability.The authors first include the Athenian's oath which was lead to their cultural heritage (what message do they give to their citizens?).The authors claim that sustainability has long been valued and it can be understood as a form of intergenerational fairness that reflects morality and ethics (briefly explain what do they mean with intergenerational equity?) .Following this they states two opposing views by Bratland and Heal was about two model of economic sustainability (do not mention their names but simply state their ideas about economy).The authors concludes by assuming the problems which can be solved by one setting is suited to another (the idea is not clear because of grammar) then spreading wave of innovation throughout the generations.
Dear Emir,
You have good use of reporting verbs, but make clear what do the writers suggest to what solutions do they offer? and rather than going into details of examples like Heal and Bratland, focus on the ideas presented by using these names?
Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
For Sunay: You should write only the authors’ surnames.
For Said: Good explanation

# data[].attributes.body
For Alperen ; he explain clearly but he improve conclusion because it is weak and unclear.

For Can ; he explain clearly and very detailed but he should write this article’s author, year etc.

# data[].attributes.body
He had written the main pillars of the paragraph clearly but he could mention more about author's personal opinions.

# data[].attributes.body
In the article “Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity”, the writer ( Edmund C. Stazyk, Alisa Moldovanova, and H. George Frederickson )  (2014)discuss the history and explain the forms of sustainability which are economical, environmental and social (what is the writers' main argument? what do they suggest? or what solution do they offer?). First, the authors try to give more information about contemporary sustainability and compare it with Greek’s ancient times opinions (focus on what is in the definitions). Also, the writers point out some evidence about main issue (be specific what are these main ideas). In conclusion, he recommend solutions and concluded with supportive thoughts.
Dear Sunay,

* You have good use of linkers, but you need to make the writers' attitude clear; what do they suggest or what solution do they offer?

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In the article "Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity", (Stazky,Moldovanova,Frederickson,20140) mentions the meaning of sustainability with three different forms (economic, environmental, social) and the history of sustainability.

Dear Ece,
Please complete your summary so that I can give feedback.
Thank you,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In this article, the Author discusses the various sustainability issues in terms of equalityies, rights for current
and future generations. After that, by giving an oath from citizens of the Athenian city who want to transmit the city better for next generations,they states that the term of sustainability actually hasve been existed ing for a long time and it can be considered as equality between generations. Following this, they emphasizes that natural resources and environment which are the common heritage of people should be protected and kept for the next generations to let them access and use. Then, they mentions two different economic systems which can be effective for sustainability (briefly state what are these?). After all, they concludes the article by saying the people are more knowledgeable now about everything so they should support and think their interest in intergenerational fairness (explain this term).

Dear Can,
Good use of linkers and reporting verbs, but you need to state the writers' surnames, the title of the article and the publication year, and be specific with the argument what is the writers' suggestion or solution?
Thank you,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In this article, “Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity”, the authors  Stazyk, Moldovanova, Frederickson, (2014) mention what is the definition, history and three pillars (environmental, economic and social) of sustainability. The writers explain what people have done for sustainability in the past and what can be done for the future with some theories and evidence.

Dear Yaren,

First sentence has clear information, but you need to make the writers' argument clear by stating their suggestions or solutions to the problem.
Thank you,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In the article “Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity”, the authors  (Stazyk,Moldovanova,Frederickson(2014) mention sustainability’s history and clarify three different forms of sustainability which are (environmental,economic and social pillars). They remark that according to Athenian’s oath 2,500 years ago, sustainability was valued for Greek (not necessary). According to the Athenians sustainability is not only environmental but also focuses intergenerational fairness. Sustainability claims that environmental resources must be shared fairly with future generations, because using these is future generation’s right. In addition, Current generation must maintain environmental assets (asset means resource) for the purposes of sustaining income for future generations. They indicate that there are two models of economic sustainability. According to Heal(1998), it is government’s responsibility but Brätland (2006) defends that it is individual’s responsibility (do not mention the names/details, what do these models suggest? briefly mention what are these models?). Authors believe that sustainable social interaction and cooperation in the conditions of resource scarcity appear unrealistic because individuals want short term profit but we must struggle for sustainability, leave a better world for future generations and provide generational fairness.

Dear Alperen,

You were able to select the main argument and main points, but you need to state the main argument at the beginning too. You need to use linkers and reporting verbs so that the readers can understand the order of ideas and the writers' attitude.

Thank you,
MET

# data[].attributes.headline
Analyze this student sample by using the given checklist

# data[].attributes.subject
Analyze this student sample by using the given checklist

# data[].attributes.body
Checklist for summarising:

I have carefully analysed the given text ·
I have taken notes of the main points and key arguments ·       I have written a summary of the major arguments in my own words. ·
I have organised the arguments in a coherent and logical manner ·
I have used the appropriate reporting verbs and phrases that indicate the writer’s attitude towards the topic ·        I have acknowledged the author and the text when necessary |

In the article entitled "Sustainability, Intergenerational Social Equity, and the Socially Responsible Organization" Stazyk, Moldavanova, and Frederickson (2014) claim that governments, organizations and socities must be aware of their responsibilities according to which we should preserve our planet for the coming generation.First the writers define environmental, economic and social sustainability. They stress that protection of the natural resources are important for our survival. Moreover, the writers defend humans should pass the world in a livable way to the next generations. They also mention that economic sustainability is significant and present two different views. The first view stresses that citizens should be responsible for taking action and the other view argues that governments should be protecting our resources and creating jobs for their citizens. They carry on with the social sustainability and claim that people should not be self-centred but they should respect the rights of the future generations to enjoy world resources. The writers conclude by arguing that individuals and states should take the necessary steps to use world resources carefully for the benefit of future generations.

# data[].attributes.body
In the article “Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity”, the authors  (Stazyk, Moldovanova, Frederickson (2014) discuss the history and definition of sustainability and three different forms which includes environmental,economic and social sides. The authors first use modern definition of sustainability and compare with Greek ancient thoughts (briefly state what are the similarities?) . The authors claim that sustainability has historical context and can be understood on the both sides (Ancient or Modern) as a form of intergenerational fairness which means providing better world for future generations by meeting current needs (you can express this in a concise manner, are all words necessary in this sentence?). The authors also mention three different forms. Firstly on the enviromental side there is a thought of sharing naturals resources because nature is a legacy of all people. Secondly on the economic side they compare thoughts about ability of economic production for next generations. Thirdly on the social side they see there should be obligation of society to provide better world for next generations and the authors also discuss the effects of “Tragedy of Commons” which means situation of short-term interests that cause loss of future ability production and consumption. The authors conclude by stating that people are ignorant of future and can only imagine about it. Awareness about current weakness can provide people for policy and practice. People should use logic of social equity as sustainability and people should apply policies that support intergenerational fairness.
Dear Said,
* Good use of linkers, but you can use a variety of reporting verbs. You need to be clear with the main argument what do the writers suggest or offer as a solution?
Best,
MET