# data[].attributes.body
1. Historical events help us develop and learn from mistakes but also grow from what we did right in the past.
2. I think that event should be symbolic to represent bigger ideals to learn from the past
3. I think that there should be changes based on the situation not necessarily consequences.
4. I think it should unify our country because when a mistake happens we know now not to repeat it
5. I do not think it should have global repercussions because it should be specific to where it happened unless it's a larger issue that has been seen in more than one country
6. After 9/11 our country took safety measures to another level which is great but I think that we should learn to deal with these issues in a kind and respectful manner. I also think that we take our security for granted and when traveling you will see the difference not only in airports but just everywhere.

Article Responses:
1.  He knows not to take sides because the wound is still fresh and it would create conflict that is not needed.
2. He thinks it's a great well grounded country but that doesn't match up with the facts.
3. I think that this means that they are scared they will repeat this so there for they get stressed over something that could lead back to history.

# data[].attributes.body
1. a historical event is well worth remembering if it goes down as a life changing effect for people in and outside the country.
2. the event should symbolize larger ideals and bigger pictures in order to incorporate it in our daily lives.
3. no, not particularly. however, i do believe that so far in history events with consequences have had the largest impact on society today, but that does not mean that a good event did not have an effect on society and should be brushed under the rug and ignored.
4. it all depends on what's for the sake of the country. some things happen for a reason, but sometimes countries need to be unified or separated just for the sake of peace. it all depends on the good of the country, unified or divided.
5. it does not, but as mentioned before, these rough events usually result in the most impactful of outcomes. the more repercussions, usually the more thought and learning put into the situation.
6. 9/11 was pretty horrible, and really touched the lives of many knowledgeably and personally.
7. kremin plans hold off on their celebration, due to how divided Russia's views are on the topic. and putin, the president, has certainly has no desire for a revolution due to the divided views.
8. the kremlin believes that Russia has been strongly unified, and they prefer to keep it that way.
9. when a country is paranoid about repeating something in their past and having to revisit awful events. i do agree with this, said that since the russians were already doing very well, they were afraid of losing that.

# data[].attributes.body
1. A historical event is important to remember because, the events that take place teach us as humans both good and bad lessons that we need to remember in order to move forward and progress as a whole.
2. I think it needs to symbolize how we behave and again, teach us. It does symbolize the bigger picture of what's best for the upcoming generations.
3. Not every event needs consequences, but the ones that do should be taken seriously. The consequences that are given will have just as big of an effect if not bigger than the event itself.
4. Yes, I think that we should be able to unify off of our past mistakes and forgive with time.
5. I don't think that global repercussions are necessary, because the more people you include, the harder it is to find a good conclusion that will keep most happy. If you include the whole world a significant amount of people will become unhappy which could cause more outbreak.
6. In 2003, North Korea taking themselves out of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. This has caused a lot of controversy. Also 9/11 being a major event that has also altered our country's safety processions.

1. The country's views are extremely divided and they cannot come to a decision because of this. That is the labelled "official reason". The "more likely explanation" is that Vladimir Putin is restraining it, because he hates the idea of a revolution.
2. They want to stay as one strong unit. If revolution takes place, it will divide the country, and it will ruin the picture of a perfectly unified country.
3. I think it means that they are scared of the past and scared that they could have a repeat. I think that this is a fair fear considering it could be even worse than what has happened in the past due to knew technology. I think that the many countries including the United States lives in a "historical schizophrenia", but not as bad because we have improved.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think the effect of the event is what makes it worthy of being remembered. If there is a big change after the event it should be mentioned decades and decades after it happened.

2. I think it should represent larger ideals because if not there would be no point in remembering it. It should spark curiosity. People should be curious on why it happened negative or positive. If it is negative it should be a way to realize what needs to be talked about and changed in their community and many other communities around them. If it is positive it can be a way for people to see the great impact of the event and continue to progress to a better and healthier place for people around them. It should represent the change in society and people should be able to see this change and discuss.

3. I don't believe that every event should have consequences. I think events like healthy marches that have no consequences are just as impactful as events where people are injured or killed. Yes, when people are hurt this might set off more of a warning for people and get them to do something about the problem, but I don't think hurting people or having consequences are the only way to create a movement or change. I think some effects of events can actually be good and so therefore I think some events should have impactful effects, but I don't believe every event needs some sort of horrible effect or consequence to fully create a movement.

4. For during the event, I think by talking about different groups in society or opinions, as much as it does somewhat divide people, it also helps to bring up problems with things such as racism, sexism, oppression, etc. It isn't that people are dividing each other its more that they are bringing up feelings of minorities outside majorities and sparking a conversation to get a change. Most people who try to create a movement don't create a divide between people. It is usually that the divide is already there and they want to bring attention to it or use it to show the problems in society. I do think people should come together to spark a change, but I also think that since there is already a division between people it is helpful to use what is dividing us to help talk about problems and be able to fix them. For afterwards, I do think it is important that it unifies people. I think it is better that people realize that everyone in the end is a person and deserves just as much as the next person

5. I don't think most events should have repercussions globally. I don't think the whole world must deal with something that is going on with Russia or Japan if say there is a war going on. I do think some countries should know about the events happening in places when it comes to illness or revolutions for example. I don't think they should be punished or have consequences from said events. I do, however, think it is important that people know what is happening around the world. If there was an earthquake in Russia, I think it is important that other countries are aware of it. I don't think they need to be punished from the event, but by being aware it is possible for other countries to help Russia and that is important.

6. The Woman's March on Washington and The Time's Up Movement

1. He plans to because Russia is too divided after the consequences from the event. The "more likely explanation" is because President Vladimir V. Putin doesn't like revolutions and doesn't want to celebrate the idea of overthrowing someone in power.

2. What is the Kremlin’s preferred narrative of Russian history? And, why doesn’t the Russian Revolution fit neatly into that narrative?
His preferred narrative is that it was a pause in Russia's development around Europe and a "'death knell'". It doesn't fit neatly in his narrative because it was actually said that there were two revolutions in 1917.

3. The phrase kind of means that history has made it so that people cannot think clearly about their actions. It has lead to where people have faulty perceptions of the world around them. I do agree with that characterization of Russia because it mentions that people always have to agree with Russia and never disobey the people of power in Russia which I think can lead to people questioning the reality in Russia. I think other countries do. I do believe the United States is one of them. I think the United States, in a weird way, actually feels they have to be patriotic to be a "true American". I think most people see America as this free country where there is free speech and that is somewhat true because we gained freedom in the Revolutionary War. I think most people see America as this place where everyone says what is on their mind and is very patriotic since history, like the Revolutionary War, has shown somewhat of that side. I think most people see America this way and some people might think that if they don't say what they have on their mind they won't fit into the standard of America and this could change their actions and give them this weird perception of America.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  a. What makes a historical event is the effect it had on the society surrounding it. Whether that be good or bad, it is not important if history would be the same without it.
b. An event should be symbolic and represent larger ideals because without that it is purposeless.
c. The event should have noteworthy causes and/or effects because, once again, if it does not, there is no purpose in remembering it.
d. The event can be unifying or divisive. It does not matter as long as there is an impact made.
e. It is not necessary for repercussions to be global. As long as they exist, they can be as small as just in one community.
f. I think the most important and impactful event of the last 20 years is 9/11. It changed the path of American history and effected relations between the US and the Middle East for years to come.
2. a. The Kremlin supposedly believes that the Russian revolution brought too much division to the country, but the article proposes that their opposition may be a result of Vladimir Putin's fear of revolution.
b. The Kremlin prefers to believe that Russia has been and will always be a strong and unified country, but the Russian Revolution clouds that image because it divided the country.
c. "Historical Schizophrenia" means that two historical ideas are prominently coexisting in the same society. In Russia, this applies to a president talking about destroying evidence and forgetting the Russian Revolution while being surrounded by statues of the leaders in that time period. I agree that that seems to be happening in Russia currently. IN the Us, this applies to people fighting for racial equality while praising statues of confederate leaders.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I believe that a historical event is owrth remembering if it affected many people (whether it was good or badly) or if it could affect future generations of people.
2. I think it is important for a historic event to be symbolic and represent larger ideals because it can inspire others to make better decisions.
3. I think that the event should not require consequences when we have positive outcomes, but I do think that if it is negative, people should experience some sort of effect so that people are able to learn from mistakes or other situations so that further generations of people may learn from them.
4. I believe the event can be either unifying or divisive because they both are impactful and contain different circumstances in their own way.
5. No, I don't believe that there is a need for global reprecussions but they usually end up happening because other countries are influenced by other countries.
6. 9/11 is definitely an impactful event in which will always be remembered in our countries as well as surrounding countries because the event was severe and lead to warfare.

1. This is because Vladimir Putin does not want any revolution and because Russia is already divided.
2. The Kremlin's version of Russian history is that of a strong and unified country and the revolution does not line up with their perfect vision of their country.
3. I interpreted it as the Russians are constantly scared that another revolution will begin again and so even small riots frighten them. I believe that many other countries, including the United States can relate to this because people are afriad of repeating past mistakes and events.

# data[].attributes.body
1. A historical event is worth remembering if it permanently changes the lives of the people within the country, and outside of it.
2. The event should be symbolic and represent ideals that people want incorporated in their daily lives (freedom, greater rights, etc.)
3. The event should have consequences, negative or positive, that make an apparent change to those affected.
4. The event can be either unifying or divisive; both are impactful in their own way.
5. The event doesn't have to have global repercussions to be impactful, but this is often a common result, as when a huge change is made in one country it tends to affect the rest of the world in some way or another.
6. 9/11 is a historical event that will go down in history, as it both brought our globe together and tore it apart.
7. The Kremlin plans to sit out this celebration because Russia's views on this topic are greatly divided, but the article suggests that it's because the current president doesn't like the idea of revolting against a leader.
8. The Kremlin chooses to believe that the country has always been strong and unified, as opposed to needing a revolution to make this so.
9. Historical schizophrenia describes a fear of looking deeply at or celebrating the past, as a result of it being extremely ugly or difficult to revisit, or the fear that it will, in some way or another, be repeated.

# data[].attributes.body
1. A historical event is worth remembering if it affected many people's lifestyles.
2. I think any major historical event should represent humanity and how we act.
3. I don't think that an important historical event needs to have an important outcome, other than the change in people's lives. The important part of a historical event is the reason behind it.
4. I think that the event doesn't need to be unifying to all, but an important historical event should bring certain people together.
5. No, I don't think that is necessary because an event's importance isn't only about its repercussions, but about the meaning behind it.
6. This is not necessarily a specific event, but our actions now towards the planet will still be affecting future generations. If we continue to poison our planet, 100 years from now, life on earth will not be good.
7. The Kremlins are going to sit out the 100 year anniversary of the Russian revolution because the Russian people are very conflicted about the event, and it would cause much conflict. More likely, however, Mr. Putin doesn't like revolution, and he doesn't want people celebrating a revolution because it may lead to one of their own.
8. Basically, they say that Russia was always unified and great. The revolution doesn't fit into this because it is rebelling and not picture perfect.
9. This means that Russia is constantly paranoid of another revolution, and even the smallest protesters worry them. I think the US and many other countries are also afraid of revolution because they don't want to be overpowered by the people. This schizophrenia is historical because the paranoia is of a repeat of past events.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes a historical event important and memorable is how much it has impacted the world and shaped how it is today. Events that create positive or negative impacts are worth remembering so that people can either learn from their mistakes or just see how something positive in the world came about.
2. I think the event should be, in some way, symbolic of something or represent larger ideals. If the event is positive, it could symbolize a number of things that will inspire people or show the capabilities of human beings. On the other hand, if the event is negative, it could symbolize the negative effect of that certain event and prompt people to never repeat it again.
3. I think the event should have consequences that lead to important and significant events happening, but those consequences themselves don't necessarily have to be noteworthy.
4. I think the event could be either unifying or dividing, if either one has a major impact (or a future major impact) on the world.
5. I think the event does not necessarily have to have global repercussions as long as it has impacted a large region of the world. Or, if it only affects a smaller region, that event should either be incredibly revolutionary or incredibly awful.
6. I think that 9/11 will still be considered an important event 100 years from now, but I am not sure whether or not many people will know what it was
-------------
1. The official reason there is no national holiday for the Russian revolution is that the country is too divided over the event, but the most likely reason is that Putin does not like the idea of revolution and does not want to see the Russian people celebrating this event.
2. The Kremlin's preferred view of Russian history is that they were always unified and never had any sort of conflict, whereas the Russian revolution brings to light how they weren't always agreeing on everything, and this destroys the Kremlin's version of their history.
3. I think that historical schizophrenia is when a country is paranoid of repeating something from their past, like with Russia, having another revolution. This seems fitting for Russia as they see even street protesters as "potential revolutionaries". I think that many other countries live in historical schizophrenia as well as many countries have historical events they would not want to repeat.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think a historical event is worthy of remembering if it either positively or negatively affects society. The negative impacts could be something to learn from.
2. I think an event should be symbolic and also have a larger ideal, so we can learn from the event and progress.
3. I think the event should be unifying, so people can have a connection with it and the connection will carry on into the future, so it will still be important
4. Not all global events should have repercussions as long, as the event left a good impact
5. 9/11 because of the impact that it  has on people my age now who weren't alive then, so if it still has an impact now, then it most likely will later on

1. The country's views are divided and Putin does not think the revolution is a good idea
2. Kremlin's view of Russia is unified without any conflict.
3. it means that the impact of it's history has made people paranoid in a way, or afraid that small actions might turn into larger and more harmful ones.

# data[].attributes.body
1.
a. A historical event is worth remembering when a change is made to a country and it affects not only the country but the lives of people in the word
b. A major historical event should be symbolic, and show how it affected many peoples lives
c. I think a historical event doesn't need a certain outcome, but it does need to change something, like a populations lives
d. I think an event should bring at least SOME people together, especially a war, but I think it should also tear people a part. (picking sides, etc.)
e.I don't think it is necessary in all cases, but it depends on what happened, and who it affects
f. Any major elections, any wars, the royal weddings, etc

2
a. The Kremlin plans to sit out because the country's views on this topic are divided. It is also suggested the current leader doesn't like the idea of revolting against a leader, especially a Russian leader.
b. The Kremlin's view of Russian history is that they were always unified, and didn't have any conflict at all. This is not true because if they were all unified, then there wouldn't have been any revolutions.
c. Historical schizophrenia is when countries observe other countries and how they are running it. If they are doing well, ideas are taken from the way that country's governing and put into play in another country.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think a historical event is worthy of remembering if it either positively or negatively affects society. The negative impacts could be something to learn from.

# data[].attributes.body
*To me there are two reasons to remember a historical event. One: it was very impactful in a positive way. Or two: it was very impactful in a negative way so now we have to learn from our mistakes. Ex: The holocaust was a very impactful historic event in a negative way and we have learned to not make such a terrible and bad mistake like that again.

*I think it is important for a historic event to be symbolic and represent larger ideals because then it inspires us to make better decisions.

*I don't think it has to have any consequences, as long as we learn from it in a positive way.

*I think it should be unifying, because we don't want anything divisive. If it was divisive, than we should learn and fix that mistake.

*I don't think it needs to, but if it does, I feel that that makes the event much more severe.

*Again, I think the Holocaust was a very significant event. It will be remembered for a LONG TIME and we will know to stop an event such as that way earlier/ never let it happen.
1.  People in Russia are divided on the consequences from that year because they know the idea is bad. Putin doesn't want a revolution and thats why there isn't the holiday.

2. The Kremlin's view is that there has been no conflict because they are unified.

3. “We live in historical schizophrenia,” is where leaders on countries hear or see how other countries are ruling. If they see how they are doing well, they copy them.

# data[].attributes.body
I think a historical event will be remembered later if it affects many people in many countries. The event will be remembered more if it is symbolic because people could have different beliefs on the topic so they will remember how they felt to one side of the debate. I think for it to be remembered probably some people will have to have suffered, so the world can learn from it. The event with different views can bring people together who like or dislike the event, and people will unify in suffering and or success. The event probably will affect the world so most people remember in different countries. I think 9/11 will be remembered forever because not only did it affect USA it affected the countries that helped aid and also the countries that attacked.

The official reason is that there is too much conflict about the topic in Russia. The more likely reason is that Putin doesn't want to give any ideas of rebellion or celebrate any ruler being overthrown. Kremlin's narrative is the march to russias greatness with no decline. The Revolution doesn't follow because it is a slight weakness and Kremlin and Putin do not want to show any weakness. I think yes, Russia is in historical schizophrenia because the people at the time of the Revolution supported it and liked it and it was great for them and got them power from the Czar. It is something that should be applauded but maybe not celebrated fully because the ruler know doesn't want something like that to happen again. It is a question of if something was seen as a victory in the past, but if its not lawful now, how should the world and individual countries deal with educating their people on how to support that event. This relates to the monuments of confederate soldiers in the US. They are famous and should be recognized but not encouraged. This is another example of  historical schizophrenia because it is a conflict of an event in the past that should be learned from and not repeated and maybe not even celebrated.

# data[].attributes.body
1. A historical event is important when it makes a big change in they way people in the time period, think, feel, or believe.
2. I think in should be symbolic but then again if there is a fair amount of people with other believes then it shouldn't represent the the whole event in history.
3. Yes, because if it doesn't effect any thing in anyway than is it really important?
4. It can unify or divide people today and in the future, but it all depends on the event and its own circumstances. And to say that is not important because it didn't bring us , and people, closer would be silly.
5. The event doesn't have to have global repercussions because most of the events that has happened in American history had know effect once so ever to other countries that where involved economically or industrially.
6. 9/11 is an event that will defiantly be in the textbooks (if they are still around) a hundred years from now.
PART 2
1. He plans to sit out because he knows that the idea isn't good because many Russians today are still divided on the consequences of that year.
2. The Russian narrative that he believes is that Russia has been besieged by foreign aggressors and The Russian revolution doesn't fit into that because it was quite the opposite.
3. Historical schizophrenia is when a countries leaders look at or hear how another country is keeping there country afloat and so they do that same thing.

# data[].attributes.body
-  A Historical event becomes important when it has made a really large impact on something and it is remembered because it might have improved something or it was a very important time, place, or thing that impacted a lot of people in a certain way.
- Some historical events may be symbolic if it made a  positive change to a certain thing or to certain people.
- They should be remembered so that people could learn from those consequences and know what would happen if  the consequences are brought back up.
-  Although the event could be divisive, it could also be unifying and help make an impact on the future.
-  Some global repercussions are not necessary, but if it made a huge impact on something then maybe it could.
- Barack Obama becoming President?
1.   He plans to sit out because Russia is too divided over the consequences of that year  and also because Putin does not think a revolution is a good idea.
2.  Their view is that Russia has been besieged by foreign aggressors and the reason why the Russian Revolution does not fit in this is probably because they did not want to attack other countries as they were attacked.
3. I think a historical schizophrenia is when a country is when a country is afraid of something bad happening and that they are worried about what could happen to start the outbreak. Russia is going through a historical schizophrenia because they are worried about revolutionaries starting and I think a lot of other countries have this fear but the U.S. does not really show it that much.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  What makes a historic event important is how it affects people around the world and the impact it has.  There are good and bad impacts and we learn from the bad ones so that history doesn't repeat itself.
2. Important historical events can be symbolic if it makes a positive impact on society, like how certain people gained rights to vote
3. yes they should be recognized since people can learn from these consequences and help generations in the future
4.  if the event has noteworthy consequences then it is unifying in some way and brings the country together
5. I think that the event should have to have global repercussions because if the event was truly important then it would have affected society in some way and changed how people feel and think about certain situations
6.  I think 9/11 is going to be important 100 years from now since it made such a big impact on America and it brought many americans together

article---
1.  Putin wants to sit out because he knows that people are still divided by what happened that year so he thinks it would be better if he didn't interfere
2.  There view is that they don't have any conflict since they are unified
3.  historical schizophrenia probably means that Russia is scared of another revolution and this is historic since many countries, not just russia are scared of revolutions and the repeat of past events that are bad

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes an important historic event is the impact of that it has on the people. It can be a negative impact or a positive impact. An important historic event allows for change and intuition within the world or a nation. For example, 9/11 was the catalyst for many national security enforcements and the death of Osama Bin Laden
2. An important historical event can be symbolic if is a test or the people of a certain nation or a introduction to a new way of society. For example. the allowance of women being able to vote is symbolic because it allowed for a new perception of women.
3. Yes. the consequences and effects should be recognized so future generations can learn and grow from the specific event.
4. Typically, many noteworthy events involve unity, for their is a resolution or unification due to the attack of an outside force (ex. 9/11). There is often a theme of nationalism which marks and event to be important. I personally believe that an event can be important even if their is divide as long as their is pride.
5. Yes, the event should have global reprecussions. They don't have to be major, but if the new of the event sparks action it is obviously important. This means that the event drew emotion and connection with and individual or even an entire nation. This proves the intensity or importance of an event.
6. I think that the meeting of Donald Trump and Kim Jong-Un will be remembered for 100 years. I believe this because their was a theme of intensity and audacity within the act. With the interaction of two heated nations this shows the political capabilties and intensity in todays political

1.It states in the article that Russia will be officialy sitting out on the centary due to the divison of Russia. What the true reason for this is Vladmir Putin's dread of a revolution occurring in Russia. The celebration may evoke ideas of overthrowing Russia's ruler.

2.The Kremlin's preferred version of Russian history is that of a strong and unified country within Russia's "march to greatness". This is not alligned with Russia's actual history, the typical perception of the Russian Revolution was the the czar was overthrown by the soviets, where as the czar was overthrown by revolutionist and formed a liberal state with universal suffararge, forming the first communist state.

3.This statement provides an example for Russian culture and how it is perceived. From the revolutions to the actions of Vladmire Putin.

# data[].attributes.body
What makes a historic event important is how it affects the world at that time and afterwards. I feel that historical events, whether they are good or bad, teach future generations what worked for the world and what did not. This mostly only applies to the government because most of the historic events are government involved. I think the things that historical events teach us make the events worthy to remember decades later. The event should have affected the country/world greatly in either a good or bad way. It should symbolize what the country/world needs to improve on or is doing well at during that current time, but it can also be used for decisions made in the future to not repeat disastrous historical events. The event should have noteworthy consequences or effects. This also shows the future generations of the country/nation how to not make bad decisions and what worked well for them. The event could be unifying or divisive to be historic. I think that the good and bad events can both be unifying and divisive. Going to war with a country is obviously a bad event and divides the opposing countries. But also, when one country goes to war with another country, the countries can develop allies which bring the allied countries together. In conclusion, war can divide, and unite countries together. The event does not have to have global repercussions. There can be a very important historical event that happens mostly within one country that is still very important. I think that the event of 9/11 will still be very important 100 years from now. It was mostly very devastating for the United States but many other countries know about it as well. It also involves terrorists which other countries have been exposed to as well. The Kremlin plans to do this because they do not respect the revolutions that happened. They feel that whoever is ruling deserved to be respected. The Kremlins prefer to explain Russian history as a "long, unified march to greatness, meant to instill a sense of national pride and greatness". I think that historical schizophrenia means that the world and history try to llusionize some parts of history. Most of the time they want to erase some things that have happened like how the Russian rulers want to erase the revolutions that happened.

# data[].attributes.body
HEYYYYYYY

# data[].attributes.body
A historic event becomes historic when it has never happened before and it is the first time or when it is so horrific that it's remembered how tragic the event was so that we can learn from our mistake.
The Russian revolution should be remembered because it's important to take note of how a powerful country so that we can learn what worked for them.
If the event has noteworthy consequences and effects then it should be historically remembered.
The event could be a mixture of both so that if a nation is divided we can learn what led to that division and not do that or if it led to union then we can learn what they did well so we can help our own and other nations to become equally powerful.
It's not necessary to have global repercussions but the rest of the world should know about the event that happened to learn the mistakes others made so they wont make the same ones.
100 years from now 9/11 will still be a relevant accident that will be remembered for what an important and devastating event it was.

1.  The official reason why Russia will be sitting out is because of the division of Russia and Putin knows that people are still split on what happened that year so he thinks it better to sit out.
2. The Kremlin prefers to explain Russia's history as a "unified march to greatness" whereas during the Russian Revolution they were not unified.
3. It means that we don't exactly know what truly happened and I do believe that in certain cases we are mislead to believe one thing when that one thing is completely wrong. With the technology we have today it becomes very possible and easy to deceive a person.