# data[].attributes.body
I rate it a 44444 becuASE it wasnt toooooo long or ssshhhrt

# data[].attributes.body
I would score this response a 4 because it gives the reader a brief summary of the story and explains the details clearly with no mistake. Although the response is a little bit to long, the reasonings are explained well with supporting details from the text

# data[].attributes.body
I would rate this a 4 because the cited evidence was a bit too long. But rest of it was great which changed my mind that this should be rated  a 4

# data[].attributes.body
4. I would give response a 4 because it explained why the author named the article "The Amazing Powers of Jen Bricker" very clear. And also the response didn't have a lot of grammar mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
I would score this response, a 4 because the prompt is clearly stated. The response gives clear evidence and examples on how Jen was so powerful, determined and amazing. There is only one grammar mistake, but strong vocabulary is also used.

# data[].attributes.body
4.
I would give this response a four because it was written well. The prompt was addressed correctly and gave enough evidence.The response gives the reader a summary with what they need to know. It has little to no mistakes. Strong vocabulary is also used.

# data[].attributes.body
I would score this response a 4 because it was written very well and it uses not to much evidence, but a good amount and explains clearly how her life was and explains her evidence. Also, it had no grammer mistakes and the response clearly said.

# data[].attributes.body
I would score this sample response a 4 because you understand what the writer is trying to say, even if you have never actually read the article. Also, to make it a 4 you would have to have little to no spelling mistakes, which this person did not have. Another reason I gave it a 4 was because it used text evidence, clearly explaining the quotes and why they were chosen. Besides, the writer used more of reasoning and explanation, not more paraphrasing the article. It is interesting because it fully answered the
prompt.

# data[].attributes.body
I would score this response a 4. Not too many spelling mistakes were inside of the response, and grammar mistakes were not present, either. If you had not read the article, you would still realize what it is about as the response also explains what happens, including supporting details. The answer was questioned completely using details and explanation of them, so therefore, this response to the prompt deserves a 4.

# data[].attributes.body
4
I score this response a 4 because it addresses the prompt well and it has good reasoning to back up their answer. Also the writer includes enough text support to give the reader context.

# data[].attributes.body
4.
I would score this response a four because it was very well written. It included the correct pieces of text evidence, not too much but not too little. The author explained the text evidence so that the reader could understand clearly what she meant. The author gave multiple examples of the text to support her reasoning about why the article was named, "The Amazing Powers of Jen Bricker." Also, the prompt is stated clearly and there was not many spelling errors. Another thing that was good was how the reader could have understood what happened in the article without having to read it.

# data[].attributes.body
4. I rated this student a four because it completely answer being asked and adding interesting words. Plus they don't have any spelling or grammer mistakes that affect the response in anyway and to add to this they do it in chronological order to not confuse the reader.

# data[].attributes.body
umencia
I would give this response a 4 the response clearly address the prompt and has good reasoning as well

# data[].attributes.body
I would give this response a 4 because their text evidence nicely backed the exlapations. Also, the explanations were clear and not confusing. The vocabulary is very good and the response is well detailed.

# data[].attributes.body
4
I gave this a four because the writer uses author enough text support and explains their reasonings. Also, the author uses strong grammar choices

# data[].attributes.body
I score this piece a 4 because it gives and proves much of the evidence and even addresses that prompt correctly. Also, there were no grammar mistakes nor spelling. It also nicely explains why the article is called "The Amazing Powers of Jen Bricker."

# data[].attributes.body
4.
I scored this answer a 4 because it utilizes the information given completely and clearly explains their answer and thoughts. There are also no grammar mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
4
I would rate this a 4 since it was perfect. There is enough text evidence and the evidence is clearly explained. Also, the writer explains what a wonderful person Jen is. The writer explains the article like who reads their response has never read it. That is why I scored this response with a 4.

# data[].attributes.body
I would score this response a 4 because this response fully addresses the prompt, the response utilized why the article was given the title "The Amazing Powers of Jen Bricker," the response isn't off topic, the text evidence is just the right amount, and there are no punctuation, grammar,or spelling mistakes. This is why I would score this response a 4.

# data[].attributes.body
I would score this a 4 because is correctly responded to the text. It gives the correct amount of text evidence and there are no spelling or grammar mistakes. This response correctly explains why the author used the title "The Amazing Powers Of Jen Bricker."

# data[].attributes.body
I would rate this a 4 because they addressed the prompt by telling why the author wrote that it was amazing so the author included it in the title and how she had a disability but was allowed to go and do amazing challenges which is why the author added powers in the title and how she was left and then adopted by a family and that caused the title to be "The Amazing Powers of Jen Bricker" This is why I would rate it a 4 and the only thing is that they had 1 or 2 grammar and spelling mistakes in the writing.

# data[].attributes.body
I WOULD

# data[].attributes.body
I would give this response a 4 out of 4 because it clearly explains the answer and gives lot of details to support the answer. Also it doesn't give a lot of text support but enough so that the reader can have a detailed image of what the writer is talking about. Also, it had little to none spelling mistakes or grammar mistakes. Thisis why I gave the response a 4 out of 4. :>

# data[].attributes.body
I think this response deserves a 4. The prompt was addressed and had text support. You can understand what the writer is trying to sat. It has good reasoning to help back up their answer too. Overall the response was very good. This is why I give the response a 4.

# data[].attributes.body
I would give this a 4. The reason why I give this constructed response a 4 is because the person who wrote this response addressed her main reasons clearly. She/He first summarizes what Jen's early life was like to inform the reader and then goes on about her reasoning. The response has wonderful transition words and phrases and quotes the exact piece of evidence and states where it was from, and furthermore explains how the tiniest piece of text from the article is relevant to her reasons. And lastly she ends with a strong conclusion to tie up this constructed response. This is why I gave this constructed response a 4

# data[].attributes.headline
Why did the author most likely title this article "The Amazing Powers of Jen Bricker"? Support your answer with details from the text. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Why did the author most likely title this article "The Amazing Powers of Jen Bricker"? Support your answer with details from the text. 

# data[].attributes.body
There are two main reasons why the author titled the article, "The Amazing Powers of Jen Bricker". Primarily, Jen has lead an amazing life. It all began when she was born...without legs. Luckily, Jen was adopted by a great family, the Brickers. The Brickers were a family that fully supported Jen. She was encouraged to be an athlete despite her disability. In the section 'Agile and Fearless', it states that Jen would spend her time, "scurrying up rocks, swimming, and bouncing on the big trampoline in her family's backyard". Further along in the article it claims that Jen, "could speed around the softball diamond on her hands, snowboarded, fished and rode horses. She even taught herself to roller-skate on her hands". All of these examples clearly demonstrate that Jen was a person who was determined and did not let the fact that she had no legs limit her hopes and dreams.  Furthermore, Jen was able to travel the world and perform her areal act.  This is an act that requires her to use her gymnastic abilities to twirl in the air suspended only by a long ribbon.  Performing for people all around the world is a feat that most performers aspire to do.  The author realized what a wonderful person Jen was and that she led an interesting life despite what some people would consider a debilitating disability. This caused the author to title the article, "The Amazing Powers of Jen Bricker".