# data[].attributes.body
The ideology that the government or the media is trying to influence how the public by interpreting how the media is being portrait to the public.

# data[].attributes.body
For example showing a certain company or political advertisement more prominently compared to others.

# data[].attributes.body
The media and the press do not express actual reality

The media and the press focus on certain topics to influence the public opinion, thinking that the topic shown is more important

The public is not aware of this occurring

# data[].attributes.body
While an interest group is considered a group looking to gain advantages or benefits through political lobbying, there is a difference with relevant special interest groups as they are more popular and more powerful. As long as the interest group stays relative they can continue to grow and work towards their goal. Without relevance the interest group will start to disappear and lose members.

# data[].attributes.body
US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)

Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

Department of State (DOS)

Department of Labor (DOL)

Selective Service

Social Security Administration

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)

Department of Justice (DOJ)

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

# data[].attributes.headline
Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security

# data[].attributes.subject
Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security

# data[].attributes.body
Have jurisdiction over the following subject matters: immigration and naturalization, border security, admission of refugees, treaties, conventions and international agreements, Federal charters of incorporation, private immigration bills, non-border immigration enforcement

# data[].attributes.body
Vance v. Terrazas

Landon v. Plasencia

Kwong_Hai_Chew v. Colding

INS v. Elias-Zacarias

Vartelas v. Holder

Kleindienst v. Mandel

INS v. Lopez-Mendoza

INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

INS v. Delgado

Toll v. Moreno

Plyler v. Doe

Shaughnessy v. US ex rel Mezei

Graham v. Richardson

US v. Wong Kim Ark

# data[].attributes.body
Court reaffirmed that noncitizens are entitled to Due Process protections under the Fifth  and Fourteenth Amendments regardless of immigration status.

# data[].attributes.body
held that it was constitutional for Congress to grant special preference immigration status to legitimate children and their parents, or illegitimate children and their mothers, while excluding illegitimate children and their fathers.

The Court stressed that Congress, not the courts, has the sole power to decide who to admit and exclude for immigration purposes

# data[].attributes.body
Congress and the Supreme Court granted limited room for states to regulate the livelihoods of immigrants residing within their borders, such as issuing business licenses and providing health and welfare services. Issue entrepreneurs took advantage of circumstances, like political polarization after the 2000 presidential election (George W. Bush) and the rise of security issues after 9/11, to weaken the policy through enforcement, or self-deportation, laws throughout the country. Democratic-leaning cities and states are much more likely to pass such legislation than Republican-leaning areas who were much more likely to be in favor of restrictive laws. Municipal identification cards, for example, were passed in Democrat-controlled cities, while driver’s licenses for the unauthorized citizens have also generally been passed in Democratic-leaning states. States with more Latinos part of their electorate and naturalized immigrants are more likely to provide driver’s licenses, in-state tuition, and financial aid for unauthorized residents. Executive action, in the form of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program, has also made a difference and pushed many states to take another look at their policies on driver’s licenses for unauthorized immigrants as they grapple with how to grant licenses to the DACA population.