# data[].attributes.body
The camera is a bit shaky while it is fast forwarding.
89/100

# data[].attributes.body
The information was well displayed but, the camera quality could have been better.

# data[].attributes.headline
you should have show what the people were looking at. Zoie just looked at a computer then BUZZZZZZZ

# data[].attributes.subject
you should have show what the people were looking at. Zoie just looked at a computer then BUZZZZZZZ

# data[].attributes.body
The quality could have been better and the camera should not have shook as much. Also, we were confused by the procedures.
91/100

# data[].attributes.body
94/100 it was awesome

# data[].attributes.body
need more graphs.

ya dig?

# data[].attributes.body
Where are the data tables? That's a zero, you didn't have any data tables. Lacked colors.

# data[].attributes.body
Video lacked description but was intriguing

# data[].attributes.body
There could have been better lighting. Not enough data, you should've added a chart and told your results of the test. Experiment wasn't too good. 82/100

# data[].attributes.body
Forgot to have a graph/chart. You could have been more clear on procedures.

# data[].attributes.body
No colors, no data table, no attractiveness, hypothesis was not stated clearly

# data[].attributes.body
Very good video! You showed the information needed. It was clear that you knew what you all were doing.

# data[].attributes.headline
Don't forget, Malee and Jaylah have permission to go over the time. They are going to give 9-10 points on the length of video.

# data[].attributes.subject
Don't forget, Malee and Jaylah have permission to go over the time. They are going to give 9-10 points on the length of video.

# data[].attributes.body
Your procedure could have been more clear. It was good all around.

# data[].attributes.body
Meh. The procedure was not too strong. the question is very misleading. 86/100

# data[].attributes.body
Procedure was a bit short to read, but good enough and the sound when some of the contestants spoke was very quiet. Loud, really loud celebration.  Graph is good. 91/100

# data[].attributes.body
Music good!

# data[].attributes.body
Well done! Information was well formated.

# data[].attributes.body
All round very good, I liked it a lot.

# data[].attributes.body
Great Job. You could have used shape format to make it better. Great display of info. 90/100

# data[].attributes.body
needed more people ya dig

# data[].attributes.body
I think the video could have been cut more but there should have been more data. Also, there was a lot of background noise, so you should have filmed somewhere else.

# data[].attributes.body
The amount of sound in the background was distracting, but other than that it seems good so far. The background noises could've been muted and maybe you could've found a different room to film. Grammar issue in the conclusion. Good video though. 86/100

# data[].attributes.body
Should've recorded data in quieter space. Can barely hear. Too much background noise. Good Vid but also meh

# data[].attributes.body
There was a lot of background noise and the procedure was flawed. The weight of each slice was different, not making it an equal experiment. Too long, and Lauryn wasn't in the video for long enough.

# data[].attributes.body
the best i have ever seen

# data[].attributes.body
Camera was very very shaky. Voices are quiet. Procedure was so fast.

# data[].attributes.body
Camera quality was the literal definition of garbage
92/100

i thought it was good

# data[].attributes.body
The information was good, but the camera quality could improve.
It was very professional looking.

# data[].attributes.body
camera quality was not good.

# data[].attributes.body
Great job on the video. It was visually pleasing, and I enjoyed watching it. The only major problem was that the procedure went by too fast.

# data[].attributes.body
It was very good, visually pleasing