# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The divorce rate is often held up as proof of social breakdown. Asides from the collapse of the nuclear family and bringing misery on former spouses and their children, it represents the triumph of selfish individualism over responsibility and self-sacrifice. Divorce is often painful, especially where children are involved. However, if people are definitively committed to divorce, staying married could be even worse.

Still, the fact that forty percent of marriages now end in divorce can be taken as proof that the process is too easy. But is it? England and Wales do not have 'no faults divorce'. Unless you separate for two years and agree to end the marriage (or five without agreement), some form of proven fault on one side is necessary, whether this is adultery, desertion, or unreasonable behaviour.

In some cases this is easy to establish and it is fair to blame one party. Proving unreasonable behaviour is not especially hard, given the wide and vague definition. As far as the actual divorce goes, it is not difficult, not withstanding the recently increased court fee, presumably intended as a disincentive.

The current rules become problematic when dividing financial assets and reaching agreement about childcare and access. Given the usual need for fault on the part of one party, any acrimony is exacerbated and the person taking the blame is at an automatic disadvantage. Where unreasonable behaviour is emotional or physical abuse, this is fair.

However, as one party can simply concede their 'unreasonable behaviour' to speed up the process, it can create unnecessary unfairness and resentment. In other cases, where both parties have been at fault this can incentivise a race to pin blame first and most squarely.

A positive step would be to allow a marriage to be dissolved unilaterally without the need for justification, so long as there are no children under eighteen. Even in child cases, a less protracted and more harmonious process can only be positive, and it is unlikely that children benefit from having two parents living together who openly despise each other. The separation period could be reduced to one year with agreement and two without, given that by this stage the family has already broken down.

Where there are no underage children, there is no reason for obstacles to divorce. The idea that all committed, meaningful relationships have to last forever is rather odd. For many people, it works, and is wonderful. But, others may find a marriage attractive at one stage of their life, and, without fault, simply not feel this way later.

In general, a high churn rate is a healthy indicator. People change service providers and employer regularly. They are happy with one for a period, but due to their priorities or situation, or the other party's terms, changing they are free to exit and choose something they prefer under new conditions. There is no reason marriages should not work more like this.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The divorce rate is often held up as proof of social breakdown . Asides from the collapse of the nuclear family and bringing misery on former spouses and their children, it represents the triumph of selfish individualism over responsibility and self-sacrifice. Divorce is often painful, e

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
No fault divorce is the norm in every state in the United States. But that doesn't mean that everyone thinks that it is a good idea. Conservatives and religious groups in particular have been pushing divorce reform for years. They answer the question "Should divorce be harder to get?" with a resounding YES!

On the other side of the equation, most people who have actually been through a divorce think that divorce is already hard enough. There are plenty of road blocks to ending your marriage with dignity and respect. Having to prove that your spouse cheated on you, beat you, was a drug addict, or was "at fault" in destroying your marriage (especially when none of those things is true) seems absurd.

So, who is right? Should we turn back the clock and do away with no fault divorce? Or, should irreconcilable differences be enough to end every marriage? Should divorce be harder to get?

Here are the arguments, pro and con.

Top 10 Arguments for Abolishing No Fault Divorce

1.Divorce is bad for kids.

Divorce puts children at risk for many serious problems. It weakens the parents' relationship with their children, and makes it more likely that these children will get divorced themselves. It supposedly increases children's behavioral, emotional, and psychiatric risks, and diminishes their learning capacity.

2. The U.S. divorce rate is too high.

The divorce rate in the U.S. is twice as high now as it was before the advent of no fault divorce in 1969.

3. No fault divorce has not made divorce any less contentious (even though it was supposed to do so).

No fault divorce has been the law for decades and divorce is still as acrimonious as ever. People still fight. Divorce is still ugly. No fault divorce has done nothing other than allow people to end their marriages too easily.

4. Allowing divorce to happen before a significant waiting period means that couples may act in haste.

Making people wait a significant period of time before allowing them to divorce may make them think twice about getting divorced. If, during the waiting period, you educate couples about all of the hazards of divorce, you may be able to dissuade many people from breaking up their families.

5. Divorce causes economic hardship.

Divorce is expensive. According to a study by the Marriage and Religion Research Institute, divorce slows economic growth. 2009 Census figures showed that 27% of women and 17% of men who were divorced in the past 12 months had less than $25,000 in annual income. 22% of women who divorced in the past 12 months lived in poverty, compared to 11% of non-divorced women who live in poverty.

6. If couples had more education about how to maintain a good marriage, less of them would opt for divorce.

According to the Coalition for Divorce Reform, if couples were more educated about the harmful effects of divorce, and were taught how to improve their relationships before they were allowed to divorce, more marriages could be saved.

7. God hates divorce.

Almost every religion discourages divorce. Multiple Bible verses illustrate that God thinks divorce is wrong. The Talmud says that, "Even God sheds tears when a couple divorces." God also discourages divorce in the Quaran.

8. Married people are healthier than divorced people.

Studies show that married people live longer, healthier lives. They also show that married people are less likely to suffer from heart or blood vessel problems than their divorced or single counterparts. Married people are also more likely to rate their health as being better than others.

9. Unilateral divorce (allowing for divorce when only one, but not both, parties wants a divorce) is unfair.

Divorce based upon "irreconcilable differences" allows one person to be able to push through a divorce regardless of whether their spouse wants a divorce or not. Proponents of divorce reform argue that allowing one person to end a marriage, regardless of the other person's wishes, makes getting divorce too easy. It also unfairly decreases the power of the spouse who wants to stay married.

10. Making divorce harder will encourage people to stay married.

Easy divorce laws give people an incentive to end their marriages rather than work on fixing them. Establishing longer waiting periods before divorce and requiring people to go through marriage education classes before divorce will lower the divorce rate.

Answers to the Top 10 Arguments for Abolishing No Fault Divorce

1.Parental conflict is what really hurts kids.

Children suffer from their parents' conflict - regardless of whether their parents are married or divorced. While some studies show that children of divorce do worse in life than children from intact studies, experts point out that it is difficult for any study to definitively isolate divorce as the cause of a child's poor outcomes in life. Most children of divorce recover from the effects of their parents' divorce relatively quickly. In short, it is conflict, not divorce, that hurts children the most.

2. The U.S. divorce rate has been falling for years.

The U.S. divorce rate has fallen from 23 divorces per married couple in 1979 to under 17 divorces per married couple in 2005.

3. No fault divorce has helped, more than hurt, society.

In the 10 years following the adoption of no fault divorce, domestic violence dropped by one third, the number of husbands convicted of murdering their wives dropped by 10%, and the female suicide rate dropped by 11 - 19%. People no longer have to lie about what really happened in their marriage, just to get a divorce.

4. Most people have thought about divorce for years before they pull the trigger.

A recent study of 3,000 people who were representative of the U.S. married population found that 37% of people had been thinking of divorce for over two years, and another 16% of people had been thinking of divorce for more than one year. While not everyone who thinks about divorce gets a divorce, most people who do get divorced are not cavalier about doing so. At this point, everyone in the world knows that getting a divorce sucks. More education is not necessarily the answer.

5. Making divorce harder won't change the economic effect of divorce.

The economic hit that people take when they get divorced is usually temporary. What's more, poverty is as much a cause of divorce as divorce is a cause of poverty. Because of that, it's hard to really know the truth of what the "statistics" show.

6. Couples should get more education about how to maintain a good marriage.

A Google search for the phrase "effects of divorce" yields 41,500,000 results. It's hard to believe that anyone doesn't know that divorce has some negative effects. Educating yourself about how to maintain a good marriage can never hurt. But, if education alone could save a marriage, the divorce rate world wide would be a whole lot lower than it is.

7. Everyone has the right to believe what they want about divorce.

You can believe that God hates divorce if you want. I believe that God is love. My God doesn't hate divorce, or the people who get divorced. The beautiful thing is that we live in America. We each have the right to believe what we want.

8. There is no scientific evidence that married people are healthier than divorced people.

How spouses treat each other directly affects their health. While being happily married may be a boon to your health, being unhappily married may actually hurt your health. Thus, it may be the strength of your marriage, rather than the simple fact that you are married, that matters.

9. Forcing someone who wants to divorce to stay married is unfair.

Even if their reasons for wanting a divorce are stupid, forcing someone to stay married against their will is medieval. While unilateral divorce decreases the power of the spouse who wants to stay married, requiring both parties to agree before they can get divorced eliminates the power of a spouse who is unhappy and wants a divorce. It also forces people (particularly women and children) to stay in violent marriages where they are not safe.

10. Making divorce harder will only make it worse.

If people want to get divorced, they will get divorced. Making divorce harder will only frustrate people who are already frustrated in their marriage. What's more, the government has no business inserting itself into people's personal relationships. The law should not infringe on people's right to marry, or divorce, as they choose.

So, Should Divorce Be Harder to Get?

Statistics are often misleading. "Facts" can be manipulated and studies often "prove" the point of the institution that commissioned the study.

Regardless of what you think about divorce, if you look hard enough, you can probably find some study to support your position.

What the debate seems to come down to is which value you hold more dear: personal freedom and the right to decide your own fate and future, or the total sanctity of marriage and maintaining a traditional family no matter what.

Yet, these two values are not mutually exclusive. Most people value both marriage and freedom in varying degrees. The question is really when, and under what circumstances, one value should trump the other.

Marriage in the New Millennium

Society is changing. Our values are changing. While some people claim that these changes will ultimately destroy life as we know it, nothing stays the same forever. Marriage and divorce today look very different from how they looked 100 years ago.

What you think of marriage and divorce today often depends on the kind of marriage you have. If you are in a marriage with a violent or abusive spouse, you will be glad that getting a divorce is easier now than it was 50 years ago.

On the other hand, if you have been a good and faithful spouse and expected your marriage to last forever, but your spouse decides s/he wants a divorce, you will probably wish that the divorce laws were stricter. You will wish that you could slow or stop the divorce that you don't want.

The truth is that, today, both the divorce rate and the marriage rate, are lower than they have been in years. So, whether you think divorce should be harder to get or not, if fewer and fewer people are getting married, soon it might not matter much how hard it is to get divorced.

_________
Regardless of whether you think divorce is too easy or not, when you are facing divorce, you need help! CLICK THE BUTTON below and get your FREE DIVORCE CHECKLIST to help you navigate through your divorce.
Send me My FREE Divorce Checklist

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
No Fault Divorce: Should Divorce Be Harder to Get?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
No fault divorce is the norm in every state in the United States. But that doesn't mean that everyone thinks that it is a good idea. Conservatives and religious groups in particular have been pushing divorce reform for years. They answer the question "Should divorce be harder to get?"

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
This is a complicated debate. Few people probably want to ban the ability to divorce altogether, but some people definitely think that divorce has gotten too easy or that it might be important to help people think through the consequences of divorce.

So here are some questions to consider in making your argument and some sources to consider in thinking this through.

Why make divorce harder?

Is there is evidence that divorce is harmful to children or adults?

Is "divorce" itself really the cause of this harm?

Is there evidence that people regret getting divorced?

Is there evidence that people take "getting married" too lightly and give up to easily?

If you were going to make it harder to get divorced, how would you do this?

Create a "waiting" period?

Offer counseling?

Provide education about the consequences of divorce?

Is there any evidence that the above approaches work?

Why make divorce easier or at least leave the law alone?

Is there evidence that staying in a "conflict marriage" is harmful to children and adults?

What causes the "harm" we associate with divorce?

Is there evidence that divorce improves the adults and/or children's well-being?

If you make divorce harder, what does this do to marriages in which there is domestic violence?

Here are a variety of sources that provide background evidence about the wisdom of making divorce easy or harder.

NY Times Debate: Making Divorce Harder

Is Making Divorce Easier Bad for Kids?

Do Divorce Laws Make Divorce More Likely?

Research by Bill Doherty & Colleagues:

Doherty, W. (2015).Reflections on the divorce revolution: Assessing our impact. Psychotherapy Networker (July/August), 19-25, 42-44.

Doherty, W. J., Willoughby, B. J., & Peterson, B. (2011).Interest in reconciliation among divorcing parents. Family Court Review , 313-321.

more work by Doherty

Hughes posts on Huffington Post

Hughes, The Effects of Divorce on Children

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Debate: Should divorce be made harder to get?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This is a complicated debate. Few people probably want to ban the ability to divorce altogether, but some people definitely think that divorce has gotten too easy or that it might be important to help people think through the consequences of divorce.