# data[].attributes.body
There are many benefits of future technology. For example,  " At breakfast, you wonder what your bestie is up to; suddenly her social media feed floats before you. You blink twice to like a video of her dog, Gigabyte." That is a benefit. This proves that

# data[].attributes.body
Future Technology has many benefits to our lives. For example, phones can be implanted in our brains. This would help us because, we could "text back using only our thoughts."

# data[].attributes.body
There are many benefits of future technology. One benefit is you can type in your head with your thoughts  which is much more efficient. In the text the author states "Its a text from your mom Breakfast is ready K then you text back using only your thoughts" .   Another example is if the phone was in your head then there would be no cracks.

# data[].attributes.body
There are many benefits of future technology, such as texting your friends with your thoughts. Some things you can do are, "Think of all the things you can do when you pick up your phone. You can talk to dozens of people, and go shopping." This will allow us to multi-task in the future, like some busy people do, like teachers or parents. Also, you don't have to worry about your phone breaking. This will be a great help in doing many things at once.

# data[].attributes.body
There is many benefits into implanting your phone in your brain.For example,  in the text "Technology Benefits and Costs" , The Author describes"Tap your left temple to stop the alarm." Imagine how convenient it would be to wake up to an alarm in your head.  Another Example would be, "It would be Possible to do [anything] [......]without even looking at a screen."  This is quite helpful because you won't have to ruin your eyes with technology.

# data[].attributes.body
The future of technology has many benefits. In the text "Would you implant your phone in your brain?", an example of one benefit is that you can text other with your thoughts, the author states "You text back only using your thoughts." This shows that instead of taking out your phone and going to an app, just think of something and send it to someone with your thoughts. This is one of the many benefits of future technology.

# data[].attributes.body
On the other hand, there can also be many costs of future technology. In the text "Would You Implant Your Phone in Your Brain?," one of the costs is "Some experts even warn of brain-jacking, a sinister scenario in which a criminal hacks into your implant and gets control of it." This shows that people could hack your brain and phone implant and can even turn you into a human robot and get control of your whole body.

# data[].attributes.body
Implanting a phone into your brain sounds good and all- but there is a dark side. People might hack into a person's phone and control people, or you can become very lonely because you always have technology, based on scientist research. Imagine if your phone went "RING RING RING!!" with notifications all day. "When they're inserting the phone they can also insert a chip [tracking] that hackers or brain-jackers your brain and then you won't be able to have your privacy." another reason is "If phones were in our brains, it would be nearly impossible to turn them off." this shows phones also have a bad side, which can be very dangerous.

# data[].attributes.body
There are many costs into all these benefits into implanting your phone into your brain.One cost is , " [ an] excessive time on on our  devices can make us feel  anxious lonely and fatigued." . Another piece  of text evidence from the text "Technogly Benefits and Costs " is " Some experts even warn of " brainjacking "a serious sinister  scenario in which a criminal hacks into your implant and gets control of it." This is terrible for us humans because imagine if all your memories can be deleted by hackers and taken away.

# data[].attributes.body
As well as benefits, future technology has many costs. One example is, humans can get addicted to technology because "it would be impossible to turn [Phones] off."

# data[].attributes.body
There are some costs of future tecnology. One cost is that hackers can go into your brain, and delete memorys. The author states,  " What if these hackers deleted memorys? Or inserted fake ones? Controlled your movment?" Another example of the costs of  future technology is that we wont be able to turn off our phones and it will be annoying with all the noise. The author states, " If phones were in our brains, it would be nearly impossible to turn them off." In conclusion, there are many costs  to future technology.

# data[].attributes.body
Though there are many benefits, there are also many costs. In the text " Would You Implant You Phone in Your Brain? " there are many costs. One example of a cost is hackers can delete or insert memories. According to the text, the author states " Some experts even warn of brainjacking, a sinister scenario in which a criminal hacks into your implant and gets control of it. " Many people don't want their memories deleted or have new memories inserted.

# data[].attributes.body
Technology is mostly harmful and we should make changes to the development of it. In the text "Cell phone implant". The author describes how you might not have curiosity ."with infinite knowledge would ah-ha moments still happen"   Also in the text "Is Technology Killing Our Friendships " The author describes how people get lonely by technology. "other experts however warn that to much online communication can get in the way of forming deep friendships.The biggest problem is the amount of time kids are spending alone on their devices." This is why we think technology is mostly harmful and we should make some changes to develop it.

# data[].attributes.body
Technology is mostly harmful and because of that we should continue to make changes to it.One thing that is not good about technology (specifically phones) is, "... kids might mistake the "friends" on their social media feeds for true friends".
This is disastrous because imagine if there was a random scammer or bad person for example trying to scam you using your social media feed and you mistake them as your friend imagine what could happen to you because of this.

# data[].attributes.body
Technology is mostly harmful and we should make some changes to the development of it. In the text"Is technology killing our friendship" Many people can feel lonely experts research "The biggest problem is the amount people are spending alone with their devices" this is horrible because that they don't have in real life friendship when they need it most. Also "Studies show that excessive time on our devices can make us feel anxious and fatigued."Showing that this can make us feel locked from the outside world.

# data[].attributes.body
Technology is mostly harmful and we should make some changes to the development of it. One example is, hackers can get into your brain and can control it. " Some experts even warn of brain jacking, a sinister scenario in which a criminal hacks into your implant and gets control of it." This is horrific because, it is in issue of privacy. Another example about how technology can be bad is, teens can get addicted to their devices. "Often, even when kids are together, they are interacting with their phones instead of with each other." This is hurtful because teens can get lonely and fatigued by spending to much time on their devices. Also, this leaves less time for genuine friendships.
It is clear that we should change the way that we develop technology.

# data[].attributes.body
Technology is mostly helpful an we should continue to develop it because it can provide useful resources and safety. For example, in the text "His App Could Save Lives" the reader can learn about how Nikhil Gopal made an app to cure malaria. The author states "The test helps both diagnose and treat the disease." This shows that Nikhil's app could provide a useful resource.

# data[].attributes.body
Technology might be helpful to you, but there is a dark side, or a bad side. Take for instance, if you implant a phone into your brain, hackers may be able to hack it and know all your secrets. Since your phone is implanted into your brain, hackers will also be able to control you. In the text, "Would you Implant your phone into your brain?", "Brainjacking, a sinister scenario in which a criminal hacks into your implant and gets control of it." This is bad, because your privacy could be in danger and hackers can control you. Even though technology seems harmful, it helps us a bit, too. In the future, you could "Talk to dozens of friends at once, go shopping, make videos." Technology can also help us multi-task, if you would "Implant a phone into your brain." All in all, there are positives and negatives of technology, but its mostly harmful.

# data[].attributes.body
Technology is mostly helpful and we should continue developing it. for example, a man made an app  called  Mailisa that helps diagnose and treat malaria. The text says, "The Malisa app uses the photo to interpret the blood test and tell you how much of the malaria parasite is in the blood." Another pice of evidence is, "so, the test helps both diagnose and treat the diseases. This evidence shows that technology is mostly helpfull and we should continue developing it because technology is so advanced, we can use it to diagnose and treat diseases. Another example of why technology is mostly helpfull is that we can always stay in contact with our friends online. The text, "Is Technology Killing Our Friendships?" says, "Kids can stay in constant contact, which means they can share more of their feelings with each other." This evidence shows that technology is mostly helpfull because it helps us stay in touch with our friends so we can talk about more of our feelings with them.
In conclusion, this essay is about how technology is mostly helpfull and how we should continue to develop it.

# data[].attributes.body
My claim has been supported by this article. I believe that technology is mostly harmful. I continue to believe this because the health of hybrid animals is not good. The author wrote that they are too big for their own organs. It is hard to decide where a hybrid animal can stay because for example, a liger is half lion and tiger. A lion stays in a different habitat than a tiger. The scientists are trying to figure out if making hybrid animals in the wild is part of the natural process. The author wrote " ' Natural hybridization is not bad at all. It's part of the evolutionary process. ' said Yoamel Milián-García. " Hybridization does, however, help save species that are on the verge of extinction. The author wrote " For example, the Florida panther population was saved from extinction by crossbreeding them with Texas cougars. " This saved the Florida panthers. But their children could have health problems and no place to stay.

# data[].attributes.body
My claim has MOSTLY been supported after reading this article, "Hybrid Animals". My claim was that technology was mostly harmful. This is because there are many cons but some pros of hybridization. Bad things are that the animals that are hybridized have different animal parents, so the baby doesn't know which habitat to live in. Also, they grow too big- even for "their own organs, in fact." Some benefits are that a species was about to go extinct, until scientists hybridized 2 animals which saved that species in danger. But, there are mostly bad things.

# data[].attributes.body
My  claim has been supported by the article "Hybrid Animals". The hybrid animals are harmful because  "They can also be deadly". If people keep making hybrid animals more people can die. The article "Hybrid Animals" states "at least 19 people have been killed". The hybrid animals do not have there own habitat so they also die quickly "ligers grow big to big for their organs in fact". This is how it supports my claim that it is mostly harmful.

# data[].attributes.body
This text in some ways has CHALLENGED my claim and it has SUPPORTED my claim in some ways too!!! My claim was that, I thought that Technology is mostly Harmful and we should make some changes to the development of it. One way that the text "Hybrid Animals" SUPPORTS my claim and agrees that hybrid animals (the "technology" in this case) can sometimes be harmful or bad for the environment or for people is, these animals can sometimes be harmful for people or deadly as the Author has described.The reader can know after reading this text that these animals can sometimes be unsatisfactory for people because, the author has written "Unfortunately, they can also be deadly." This statement supports my claim because, being deadly means that many people have gotten harmed by these unexplored creatures. This is 100% not a good thing. The statement uses the word "Unfortunately" this makes me feel that this really must not be a good thing.This text also CHALLENGES my claim when the author writes, "These animals are worth lots of money on the black market." This statement can go both ways this is not good for the animals but it is good for humans because MANY or ALL people love to make cash$$$!!!

# data[].attributes.body
My claim has been supported of technology is mostly harmful I know that Technology is mostly harmful because in the text Hybrid Animals Are An Ethical Quandary For scientists the author states "many big cats hybrids suffer birth defects and never make it to adulthood. This is just one example of why hybrid animals are bad. One other reason that hybrid animals are bad because they can be deadly. The author says "At least 19 people have been killed and 85 people have been hurt". This is another reason that hybrid animals are bad. In conclusion hybrid animals are bad.

# data[].attributes.body
After reading " Hybrid Animals " ,  my claim has been challenged. Before reading this text, I thought that technology was mostly helpful. Now I think mostly harmful. I think this because cross breeding is not good for the offspring or the mother. Here are some facts that support this. They are for the Liger and Tigon. Tigers and Lions live in completely different habitats. Sense the Liger and Tigon are a mix, they would not know how to live in the wild. Tigers and Lions also eat different animals. They both have different color coats that blend in with their habitats. If the Tigon lived in the Jungle like the Tiger, it would not blend in as well as the Tiger does. Same with the Savanna. If the Liger lived in the Savanna like the Lion, it would not blend in like the Lion does. Same with the Jungle. That is why I think future technology could be bad.

# data[].attributes.body
After reading the article, "Hybrid Animals", I think my claim has been challenged. My claim is that technology is mostly helpfull and we should continue developing it. I think that my claim has been challenged because, the article states, "Many big cat hybrids suffer birth defects and never make it to adulthood. If they do, they can pass these mutations on to future generations." This evidence shows that my claim is being challenged because hybridising animals can result in birth defects, which is harmful to the enviornment. But, there is also evidence in this article that supports my claim. For example, "Natural Hybridization it is not bad at all. Its part of the evolutionary procces,"  said Yoamel Milian-Garcia, scientist at the Univercity of Havana in Cuba." This evidence shows that the article  also supports my claim because hybridising animals helps with the evolutionary process and is important for the creation of new species.

# data[].attributes.body
My claim gets stronger, the text "Hybrid Animals" shows that future technology can have many costs. One example is, "Big cat hybrids suffer from birth defects". This shows that they will not survive much. So future technology is mostly harmful.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that with hybrid animals that specific technology is mostly harmful. It changed my  opinion about technology being mostly helpful. "Many big cat hybrids suffer birth defects and never make it to adulthood." This shows that even if experimenting is interesting, It is risking the animal's lives.

# data[].attributes.body
My claim has been challenged. Because it tells less about my claim. For example when animals hybridize they usually survive a fewer amount of years than their suppoused to live.It also supports my claim because

# data[].attributes.body
My claim was supported by this article. I believe that  technology is mostly harmful and we should make some changes to the development of it. In the text "Hybrid animals are a ethical quandary for scientists" the author states "This exercise loses its fun when you learn  about heath problems for hybrids. For example ligers grow big ... to big for their own organs in fact." This means most hybrids die once they become old and if they survive sometimes they don't know where they should live. Proving that future technology is mostly harmful and we should make some changes to the development of it.

# data[].attributes.body
Before reading "Hybrid Animals". My claim was technology is mostly harmful. After reading this article my claim has been supported. Even though scientists have endless fun in naming hybrid animals. They lose that fun when they learn about the health problem of hybrids. For example, "many big cat hybrids suffer birth defects and never make it to adulthood". This is bad because even if they do make it to adult hood. They can pass these mutations to future generations. "Since very few lions and tigers share the same habitat", it is hard to decide where hybrid animals should live. Unfortunately, hybrid can be very deadly and dangerous. Since 1982 at least "19 people have been killed and 85 hurt in the U.S. by privately kept wolf-dog hybrids." This proves that hybridization is just not bad for the hybrid animals, but it is also very dangerous for humans.  All in all, after reading the article "Hybrid Animals", my claim has been supported that technology is mostly harmful.

# data[].attributes.body
I still think my claim is the same because I choose Technology is mostly Harmful.Why? Well because Hybrid Animals are bad for us.First of all they cant live that long and even if they do they could pass munitions on to their other generations and they can grow to big for their organs the author says in the text" Many big Cat Hybrids suffer birth defects and never make to adulthood.If they do they can pass these mutations on to other generations" I know sometimes when a species is Low you can hybridize but basically we shouldn't mix animals with technology. And I am saying that because then we are messing with nature maybe we should just leave things as they are .Also the author says " But we can really do is to protect what we have". But if your basically hybridizing to kill animals shorter and make them become dangerous beasts that hurt humans and kill them then dont do it.This is why I think my claim has been supported.

# data[].attributes.body
After reading the article "Hybrid Animals," my claim has been supported. Before I had read this article, my claim was "Future Technology is mostly harmful and that we should make some changes to the development of it." This claim has been supported because hybridization is actually very bad for an animal's health. Even though hybridization can save animal species, it might be for no use. For example, "Many big cat hybrids suffer birth defects and never make it to adulthood." This is horrible because then they might be extinct. Some animals do go through, but it is still a risk to continue the hybridization. Another very bad thing about Hybridization is that they can be VERY deadly. "At least 19 people have been killed and 85 hurt in the USA by privately keeping wolf-dog hybrids." Making hybrid animals are good for the animals, but it is risk taking for the humans because some of them can be deadly.
All in all, after reading the article "Hybrid animals," my claim has been supported that Technology is mostly harmful.

# data[].attributes.body
My claim has been supported. Before I read," Hybrid Animals", I said that technology is mostly helpful because right now in covid-19, if we didn't have devices, we wouldn't be connected. But zoom is the way we stay connected. And in "His App Can Save Lives", Nikhil had an app the cures Malaria. It can be bad to, that is why a chose that technology is mostly helpful. It could be bad because future technology could mean implanting a phone in your mind. That could be bad because if to send a message you need to just blink, another thing can mean that you will have to blink too, like taking a photo. If you want to send a message but don't want to take a picture, that can be a problem.

# data[].attributes.body
My claim has been challenged and supported, it was challenged because in the text, "Hybrid Animals are an Ethical Quandary for Scientists," the author states "Many big cat hybrids suffer birth defects and never make it to adulthood." My claim was supported because in the text, "Hybrid Animals are an Ethical Quandary for Scientists," the author states "The Florida panther population was saved from extinction by cross breeding them with Texas cougars." This shows that after reading "Hybrid Animals are an Ethical Quandary for Scientists" my claim was challenged and supported because my original claim was that technology is mostly helpful and big cat suffering birth defects is bad, so that challenges my original claim and saving panthers from extinction by cross breeding them is a good thing, so that supports my claim.