# data[].attributes.body
Based on my opinion, Pie charts are a good  way to represent large data in a simple graphical manner. It stated 91% and its not 100% all Singaporeans therefore Abang didn't interpret the data correctly.

# data[].attributes.body
Abang did not interpret this data correctly.
Based on the data given and what Abang have interpreted is different. The data analyse that 3 in 5 indicates fair amount of trust in traditional media. While Abang interpret that there are 1 out of 5 Singaporeans trust traditional media more. Hence, the data and his interpret is different and is not reliable.

# data[].attributes.body
abang did not interpret the data properly as he mentioned that singaporeans are unable to tell real news from fake and that there is need of worry when it was only a small percentage, there should be a little worry but not as extreme as abang was

# data[].attributes.body
Abang did not interpret the data correctly. the source states that 3 out of 5 indicate a " fair amount of trust" while 1 out of 5 indicates "a great deal of trust" so it does not mean that more people prefer traditional data.

# data[].attributes.body
abang did not interpret the data correctly as there was one that stated a 3 in one have 'fair amount of trust' while another set of data states at 1 in 5 ' great deal of trust', what abang did was combine the two different data sets and interpreted it as one whole.

# data[].attributes.body
Abang interpretation is wrong because 3 of 5 have indicate fair amount of trust which means they are okay with anything / doesnt have specific preference while only 1 of 5 really trust the traditional media.

# data[].attributes.body
abang did not interpret the data properly because even though the data was only a 2 in 5, it is still enough for people to be bias in the way they interpret the news as it would align with their personal opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
Abang interpret the data correctly.
It stated 2 out 5 Singaporeans are not thinking critically as the survey shows that they trust the news based on their own opinions. Therefore its only minority.

# data[].attributes.body
abang did not interpret the data properly as the numbers showed 49% in 2017 while in 2018 it was 46%, and abang said that the numbers were 66% in 2017 and rising to 69% in 2018, where did abang get his interpretation of the figures from.

# data[].attributes.body
Abang did not intrepret the data correctly because the survey based on their own thoughts , it doesnt mean that we shouldnt have strong laws. The survey also not effective.

# data[].attributes.body
abang did not interpret the source correctly. the numbers between 2017 and 2018 does not match so where did abang get his statistics from.

# data[].attributes.body
Abang did not interpret the data correctly because the firgues between 2018 and 2017 facebook has a decrease while others increase. How did abang arrive with the statics 66% and 69%? Where did he got the statics from?

# data[].attributes.body
Abang did not interpret the data presented correctly.  As the percentage for 2017 and 2018 does not match each other.  How did he come to conclusions that the government should regulate social media. He cannot derive this conclusions from reading 2 years percentage that is not the same.
Also different age group use different platforms.

# data[].attributes.body
abang did not interpret the data correctly as he said only 24% said strongly agree to supporting stronger regulations when there was a 56 % that said 'agree' to the same question, this tells me that it is more than a 24% that wants change . abang also followed a bandwagon based on his interpretation as according to him only 24% agreed thus he should not be obliged to agree as it is a minority, thus his interpretation was wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The way Straits Times has chosen to present the data is a bit misleading (go see the detailed findings in the IPSOS survey report!).
2. Is inability to identify fake news header = inability to detect fake news???

# data[].attributes.body
1. The data shows that 1 in 5 respondents greatly trust traditional media. But is fair to say that these 1 in 5 respondents trust traditional media over non-traditional forms of media?
2. Why can't Abang combine the two sets of data?

# data[].attributes.body
Is it wrong to trust news that align with your own beliefs?

# data[].attributes.body
Not every survey must have percentages adding up to 100% - it really depends on how the survey question is crafted. Is social media really the top source for fake news?

# data[].attributes.body
Is the majority view always right????